Balldo threw april under the buss?
I suspect KCHHS said the kids can't be around people facing felony drug possession charges and either April goes or the kids go.
If KCHHS scrutiny about the "live-in nanny" was the impetus then that's all the more reason to expect that the xeetstorms' portrayal of a falling out is fake and gay, and a bit of an effortpost below adds some new evidence from this week in support of that theory. The rabbithole began with a glance at another of Aaron's various a-logs' replies to April's fugueposting:
Owing to the intrepid pioneering of
@AltisticRight's
NLO OP,
@Third World Aristocrat's
nightmare fuel, and
@Balldo's Gate's several forays into that world for the odd Balldo sighting, I shuddered at the thought of setting foot in the wretched hive of scum and villainy that is Aaron's a-log community, but the temptation of this Balldo-milk harvest proved irresistable, assuming proper precautions:
Even with proper precautions, I can't be arsed to suffer through making video clips as the very sight or sound of this creature on the screen became too nauseating to bear, lest it lead one to imagine the smell. However, searching youtube transcripts for the several ways they misspell references to Balldo sufficed to identify timestamps to quickly screenshot and get the hell out of there. The risk of contagion just may have been worth it, as there is now some added documentation of the throuple's continued cavorting well after xeeted portrayals of the fake falling out began, of the aggressive monogamist's professed love for April, of the non-practicing streamer's whereabouts during the time when an election stream could have been profitable, of the lawtuber's contempt for his former colleagues, etc. For simplicity's sake it may as well go in chronological order:
Monday, November 5th (Stroganoff Day)
1. In response to Fattymelt's overlong coverage of "April's" xeetstorms and speculation that Nick is behind it all, he could not let that stand:
2. Upon Fattymelt's dab-addled rambling about "April's" new username alluding to educational courses' suffixes or somesuch nonsense, Nick dignified that with response for some reason:
3. Nick is totally not being performative in reminding everyone that he's a swell guy who reached out with heartfelt condolences to the terminal cancer patient he had just as easily called a
gabbling woman with his nuts tucked up into his asshole for having had the
audacity to suggest that Nick ever apologize for his choices:
4. Nick may be
technically correct that he and April are "not together" when she happens to be in another room at a given moment, such that if you ask whether he means they're "never together," he can still say "I
never said that!":
5. No idea what this is responding to, but I like to think it's seething at the superchat about Aaron saying he and April have spoken recently:
6. Nick may be
technically correct that that he totally wouldn't have looked at any messages on his phone for an entire weekend or have otherwise looked at any of the coverage of his situation on his phone for an entire weekend, such that if you ask whether he means he never looked on any non-phone device like an iPad, he can still say "I
never said that!":
7. Even if it were
technically correct that Nick and April were "not together" in the same room at the moment asked on Monday, they were absolutely "together" hanging out watching football just the night before on Sunday, which was days after the fake-breakup xeets began:
8. Nick may be
technically correct that he didn't "type" any of "April's" tweets, such that if you ask whether he means he never gave her pointers on what she ought to type, he can still say "I
never said that!":
9. Nick and April's totally "not together" get-together on Sunday was joined by Kayla in one big happy throuple reunion, so don't you Scandinavian incel prudes forget that he's
technically still monogamous:
10. Nick may have been
technically correct about how he "
hadn't seen her in forever," because that was in past tense leading up to the point when he had seen her the prior night, so
checkmate, incel prudes:
What a mindfuck - how can anyone go through life thinking this way, always crafting the "technically" accurate statement that obviously implies something different to everyone else in the room, just to have the inevitable "I never said that!" retort in your back pocket? How can one even keep track of such a complicated web of deceit without dropping dead from sheer exhaustion?
But I digress...
Tuesday, November 6th (Election Day)
1. Nick Rekieta, a very busy man, somehow found the time in between drives to theremin lessons to cook biscuits and gravy for his meager hugbox audience, fail to scoop up thousands in easy money covering the momentous occasion of his favored candidate's re-election, and, as per usual, hang out in a Vito clone's chat full of dregs for whatever dopamine fix could come from what few table-scraps of Aaron-a-logging could be squeezed into that otherwise eventful day. Sadly the total amount of time spent there can never be known because Fattymelt either nuked the chat on purpose because someone said something regrettable in there, or made minor edits to the video that inadvertently glitched the synced chat into oblivion, as the case may be:
Fortunately some of the chat can still be derived from screenshots of the show itself, and we don't need to see Nick's verified checkmark or user ID from the missing chat as he was verified in the transcript:
[1:07:49] Whoa, I just got back, look at that! Whoa! Look at this, I just saw this, this is from real Rekieta confirmed. ... So head on over to Rekieta Law, that's real, that's a legit Rekieta Law. [1:08:15]
2. Nick began by seeming to turn on Fattymelt and challenge him to a viewership-duel, which may not go well for him if he sticks to the few dozen bozos on Locals forever:
3. This would appear to have been a whole other fake falling-out, though, as Nick stuck around in his new e-daddy's chat to remind everyone that SP is uggo and he does not relish the task of stealing her next like he stole April:
4. Just in case that last one didn't get the point across, this fucking guy, who streamed just one day prior flexing his rehabilitated aggressively monogamous trad-dad image over a bowl of overpriced hamburger helper, had to reiterate that he indeed did steal, and presently still loves, the "live-in nanny" that he platonically watched football with this Sunday and has totally not been fucking to this very day:
5. He also is totally NOT MAD at those lawtube colleagues that he stiffed, who should have been grateful to ride such huge coattails:
6. I repeat, NOT MAD:
I'm sure there are more little morsels tucked away in there that keyword searches of garbled transcripts didn't pull up easily, so more digging is welcome if anyone dares to enter such hell. I for one will be off to a Wormwood shower to clear every last contaminant from that shithole where Nick sees fit to willingly spend his days over and over again, and even pay for the privilege,
for some reason.
