💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.5%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.7%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 171 24.4%
  • Total voters
    701
Sharpeteer said:
This is the closest we're going to get to an admission isn't it?
Click to expand...
Earlier in the thread and earlier in the tweeting session he already directly confirmed (by replying "He was") to a question asking if he was on coke when writing his pinned NYE tweet. The fact that he directly confirmed drug use, something he was explicitly not willing to do before, is the strongest sign yet that he intends to or already has accepted a plea deal.
 
Third World Aristocrat said:
He talked about a previous Franks case that he claimed he won (spoiler: he didn't).
Click to expand...
You can actually argue he won the case (by getting a dismissal), but it wasn't because of Franks. He got a probable cause dismissal in that case for his client, but he lost the motion for a Franks hearing.

He was doing some slight of hand bullshit where he wanted people to believe that because he made a Franks motion in a case, and that case was later dismissed, he won thanks to Franks, and is now a Franks expert.

Worth noting that's not armchair lawyer Kiwi analysis either. @Potentially Criminal (actual practicing lawyer) found the case, or had somebody find it, and pointed out what happened there.

Nick lied. Again. His only experience with Franks hearings is not getting one. First for a client of his, and then for himself.
 
Balldo's Gate said:
Rekieta implies that @Potentially Criminal and other LawTubers knew that he "was a crackhead" when he was still popular:
Click to expand...
Wrong again, kiwifag stalker child!
He's just posing a completely fictional hypothetical saying that it would be bad if they knew!

This isn't an admission of anything!

Enjoy prison!
 
Balldo's Gate said:
More Rekieta comments on Melton's behavior towards Aaron's kids:

View attachment 6547045
(Archive)
Click to expand...
Nick doesn't care if Melton lusts over Aaron's kids: (X/A)
rekietalaw-tweet4.png
 
Last edited:
Balldo's Gate said:
More Rekieta comments on Melton's behavior towards Aaron's kids:

View attachment 6547045
(Archive)
Click to expand...
Don't pass go, don't collect 200 superchats. Straight to the fucking wall with you nick. I'm assuming you're doing this to make him tempted enough to beat your fucking ass so you have one less witness at the trial (because admitting to being a cuck bitch didn't work). Aaron, if you're reading this try not to bury him IRL even though it's tempting, save it for court.
 
I'm guessing he's accepted a plea and he views this as (relative) freedom to behave however he wants again.

I know nothing about the law and how or if a plea can get rescinded, but I'd bet Nick will do everything he can to thinly skirt that line, until his confidence overflows again and he crosses some other boundaries. And I bet what he wants to do most is taunt Aaron both personally, and get Aaron to slip legally.

He has learned nothing but more ideas to game the system. His poor, poor children. He will use them as pawns as long as he can; this is a man that deliberately financed a paedophile because he's bitter about his ex-boyfriend and others he views as "less than" exposing him (in his mind, "having it out for him").

Imagine being such pathetic an excuse for a "man". And this is all his legacy will be. Failed lawyer, failed man, failed parent, failed human. And he'll just keep pretending it's exactly the way he wanted it.
 
Last edited:
Drama Trauma said:
Nick doesn't care if Melton lusts over Aaron's kids:
View attachment 6547200
Click to expand...
It's Ralph all over again. Old me from 5 years ago would contact him and beseech him to pull his head out of ass.

Now I just sit back and laugh. Nick consistently picks the worst allies. It's uncanny. I don't think he has a single one left that has any redeeming value whatsoever.
 
Balldo's Gate said:
Earlier in the thread and earlier in the tweeting session he already directly confirmed (by replying "He was") to a question asking if he was on coke when writing his pinned NYE tweet. The fact that he directly confirmed drug use, something he was explicitly not willing to do before, is the strongest sign yet that he intends to or already has accepted a plea deal.
Click to expand...
While I wouldn't be surprised by a plea acceptance at this point, as he could still keep the lie going saying that he "HAD to do it" as others have said already, but I'm a little surprised by the actual admission that the coke did in fact go up his large nose.
 
Hellion said:
I'm guessing he's accepted a plea and he views this as (relative) freedom to behave however he wants again.

I know nothing about the law and how or if a plea can get rescinded, but I'd bet Nick will do everything he can to thinly skirt that line, until his confidence overflows again and he crosses some other boundaries. And I bet what he wants to do most is taunt Aaron, and get Aaron to slip legally.

He has learned nothing but more ideas to game the system. What a disgusting piece of shit; his poor, poor children. He will use them as pawns as long as he can; this is a man that deliberately financed paedophile because he's bitter about his ex-boyfriend.
Click to expand...
Nick getting out of this thinking he's somehow "WON" will only lead to a worse crash (into a tree on the way back from a drunken bender at the grand reopening and rebranding of the Gay20s) further down the line.
 
Third World Aristocrat said:
But he did say that the practicing lawyers who thought the Franks challenge wouldn't be granted had BAD LEGAL ANALYSIS.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't have been surprised if he had gotten the hearing as a sop, but he would have lost it. The Barneswalker didn't have much to do anything with as far as meeting the actual standard for granting it, and on top of that the filing was garbage. That doesn't really mean you necesesarily lose though. Judges are not supposed to say "well your argument is right but your filing is dogshit so you lose anyway."

And they're often reluctant to deny some procedural thing for a defendant when it won't change the outcome anyway, because they want the case to be over when it's done, not to linger around in appeals for another year or two. This leads to some "wrong" decisions that are pragmatically correct in the long run.

That said I was thrilled when the response was not just "no" but "HELL NAW MUTHAFUCKA!"
Captain Manning said:
Nick lied. Again. His only experience with Franks hearings is not getting one. First for a client of his, and then for himself.
Click to expand...
Another of those TechNickality lies. Yes, he filed such a motion. Yes, he won the case. The lie he wanted you to believe was that he won it because of that specific argument. Then when you look it up, since someone inevitably would have, "I NEVER SAID THAT YOU DUMB KIWIFAGS!"
 
1000017456.jpg
Woah Nick, be careful what you say, the cops are watching and might take you seriously. Also I'm stunned that Graf has a nitter instance that works, that must be the only thing he's done right. Nitter Archive

Also yes this is a joke, but would be HILARIOUS if it came up for real.
 
Catgirl Tyranid said:
Nick getting out of this thinking he's somehow "WON" will only lead to a worse crash (into a tree on the way back from a drunken bender at the grand reopening and rebranding of the Gay20s) further down the line.
Click to expand...

If he "wins", it means he has to look after all 5 of his children again (who he hates), with the government, relatives, and community still breathing down his neck.

He'll keep gloating with increasing hysteria, he'll spend more and more time on twitter and in troglodytes' livestreams trying to get a rise out of people - just to scratch that psychological itch of believing he IS getting wins - but the monotony and chafing of his actual, humdrum rural life will inevitably build.

It'll creep up. And it will be excruciating.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom