make peace with their body (and if you have back pain causing boobs get a reduction rather than removal for your own health)
For Pooner No. 2 (the blocky, heavy ones, as compared to Pooner No. 1, the fragile waif-like ones), 95% of the time basic weightloss to a near-normal/healthy weight would change their lives - not just for any back pain from heavy* boobs, but for all manner of self esteem, of sense of physical composure and strength, peace, and physical and psychological comfort.
*high weight tends to mean relatively larger breasts, comparing one person at a healthy weight vs the same person obese, especially after they bind them to pendulous oblivion.
I reluctantly get that it's a thing for some women to want to hide their breasts, but I think some of these bigger pooners (esp hetero ones) want to hide their whole bodies - not so much from lechery, but from judgment and rejection. Because even today it's not that fashionable or deemed that attractive (esp for middle-class white girls in suburbs) to be overweight - even moreso if their natural base shape isn't ideally proportioned or classically "feminine." They get their tits lopped off and lean into a beer-gutted stocky guy look and think ah, that's what was wrong, and now I'm the man I always was (and can eat and not exercise and be fat bc I'm a man and it's okay for men to be chunky).
I can't even begin to imagine the level of self resentment that will come along with the surgeries and drugs these fuckers are on.
This was a great analysis, and something I hadn't thought about. They're spending their youth in total, homebound (in large part) self-absorption and inanity. And though self-absorption is a hallmark of youth, it's devolved so far that these folks just discord and vidya and buy clothes and coom. No interests, no richness in their lives, no
real experiences. Everything is a step (or 12) removed from the world. And they just keep doubling down, which is always a spiral down,
bouncing sludging like low-energy atoms into Van der Waals interactions.** ...and because those bonds to others, both specifically and generally, are so weak, it's no wonder they are so fragile personally and so drama-prone - everything is constantly breaking apart, and they have no inherent strength, energy, or stability. Nature is a series of repeating patterns.
**Van der Waals interactions occur when adjacent atoms come close enough that their outer electron clouds just barely touch. It is the weakest of all molecular bonds. Absent some other force, the connection moves to repulsion rather than attraction, lol. From wiki:
In molecular physics and chemistry, the van der Waals force (sometimes van de Waals' force) is a distance-dependent interaction between atoms or molecules. Unlike ionic or covalent bonds, these attractions do not result from a chemical electronic bond;[2] they are comparatively weak and therefore more susceptible to disturbance. The van der Waals force quickly vanishes at longer distances between interacting molecules.
If no other force is present, the distance between atoms at which the force becomes repulsive rather than attractive as the atoms approach one another is called the van der Waals contact distance; this phenomenon results from the mutual repulsion between the atoms' electron clouds.[3]
