Missouri executes a man for the 1998 killing of a woman despite her family’s calls to spare his life - Marcellus Williams, 55, was convicted in the 1998 killing of Lisha Gayle, who was stabbed during the burglary of her suburban St. Louis home.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

1727281101072.png 1727281115681.png 1727281167465.png 1727281179531.png 1727281193880.png
Deacon Dave Billips, with the Office of Peace and Justice with the St. Louis Archdiocese, holds a sign as he stands with protesters holding space to halt the execution of Marcellus Williams on Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024, outside the Carnahan Courthouse in St. Louis. (Laurie Skrivan/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP)

FILE - This photo provided by the Missouri Department of Corrections shows Marcellus Williams. (Missouri Department of Corrections via AP, file)

Summer Hishmeh, center, and Sakura Hassan, both from St. Louis, hold hands and cry as they walk with another man away from a protest against the execution of Marcellus Williams outside of the Missouri Department of Corrections prison, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024, in Bonne Terre, Mo. (Zachary Linhares/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP)

FILE - Joseph Amrine, who was exonerated two decades ago after spending years on death row, speaks at a rally to support Missouri death row inmates Marcellus Williams on Aug. 21, 2024, in Clayton, Mo. (AP Photo/Jim Salter, file)

Correctional Officers with the Missouri Department Corrections patrol the area as protesters opposed to the execution of Marcellus Williams pray outside the state prison, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024, in Bonne Terre, Mo. (Zachary Linhares/St. Louis Post-Dispatch via AP)

By DAVID A. LIEB and JIM SALTER
Updated 1:01 AM UTC, September 25, 2024

BONNE TERRE, Mo. (AP) — A Missouri man convicted of breaking into a woman’s home and repeatedly stabbing her was executed Tuesday over the objections of the victim’s family and the prosecutor, who wanted the death sentence commuted to life in prison.

Marcellus Williams, 55, was convicted in the 1998 killing of Lisha Gayle, who was stabbed during the burglary of her suburban St. Louis home.

Williams was put to death despite questions his attorneys raised over jury selection at his trial and the handling of evidence in the case. His clemency petition focused heavily on how Gayle’s relatives wanted Williams’ sentence commuted to life without the possibility of parole.

“The family defines closure as Marcellus being allowed to live,” the petition stated. “Marcellus’ execution is not necessary.”

As Williams lay awaiting execution, he appeared to converse with a spiritual advisor seated next to him. Williams wiggled his feet underneath a white sheet that was pulled up to his neck and moved his head slightly while his spiritual advisor continued to talk. Then Williams’ chest heaved about a half dozen times, and he showed no further movement.

Williams’ son and two attorneys watched from another room. No one was present on behalf of the victim’s family.

The Department of Corrections released a brief statement that Williams had written ahead of time, saying: “All Praise Be to Allah In Every Situation!!!”

Republican Missouri Gov. Mike Parson said he hoped the execution brings finality to a case that “languished for decades, revictimizing Ms. Gayle’s family over and over again.”

“No juror nor judge has ever found Williams’ innocence claim to be credible,” Parson said in a statement.

The NAACP had been among those urging Parson to cancel the execution.

“Tonight, Missouri lynched another innocent Black man,” NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in a statement.

It was the third time Williams faced execution. He got reprieves in 2015 and 2017, but his last-ditch efforts this time were futile. Parson and the state Supreme Court rejected his appeals in quick succession Monday, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to intervene hours before he was put to death.

Last month, Gayle’s relatives gave their blessings to an agreement between the St. Louis County prosecuting attorney’s office and Williams’ attorneys to commute the sentence to life in prison. But acting on an appeal from Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey’s office, the state Supreme Court nullified the agreement.

Williams was among death row inmates in five states who were scheduled to be put to death in the span of a week — an unusually high number that defies a yearslong decline in the use and support of the death penalty in the U.S. The first was carried out Friday in South Carolina. Texas was also slated to execute a prisoner on Tuesday evening.
Gayle, 42, was a social worker and former St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter. Prosecutors at Williams’ trial said he broke into her home on Aug. 11, 1998, heard the shower running and found a large butcher knife. Gayle was stabbed 43 times when she came downstairs. Her purse and her husband’s laptop were stolen.

Authorities said Williams stole a jacket to conceal blood on his shirt. His girlfriend asked him why he would wear a jacket on a hot day. She said she later saw the purse and laptop in his car and that Williams sold the computer a day or two later.

Prosecutors also cited testimony from Henry Cole, who shared a cell with Williams in 1999 while Williams was jailed on unrelated charges. Cole told prosecutors that Williams confessed to the killing and provided details about it.

Williams’ attorneys responded that the girlfriend and Cole were both convicted of felonies and wanted a $10,000 reward. They said that fingerprints, a bloody shoeprint, hair and other evidence at the crime scene didn’t match Williams’.

A crime scene investigator had testified the killer wore gloves.

Questions about DNA evidence also led St. Louis Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell to request a hearing challenging Williams’ guilt. But days before the Aug. 21 hearing, new testing showed that DNA on the knife belonged to members of the prosecutor’s office who handled it without gloves after the original crime lab tests.

Without DNA evidence pointing to any alternative suspect, Midwest Innocence Project attorneys reached a compromise with the prosecutor’s office: Williams would enter a new, no-contest plea to first-degree murder in exchange for a new sentence of life in prison without parole. A no-contest plea isn’t an admission of guilt but is treated as such for the purpose of sentencing.

Judge Bruce Hilton signed off, as did Gayle’s family. But Bailey appealed, and the state Supreme Court blocked the agreement and ordered Hilton to proceed with an evidentiary hearing, which took place last month.

Hilton ruled on Sept. 12 that the first-degree murder conviction and death sentence would stand, noting that Williams’ arguments all had been previously rejected. That decision was upheld Monday by the state Supreme Court.

Attorneys for Williams, who was Black, also challenged the fairness of his trial, particularly the fact that only one of the 12 jurors was Black. Tricia Bushnell of the Midwest Innocence Project said the prosecutor in the case, Keith Larner, removed six of seven Black prospective jurors.

Larner testified at the August hearing that he struck one potential Black juror partly because he looked too much like Williams — a statement that Williams’ attorneys asserted showed improper racial bias.

Larner contended that the jury selection process was fair.

Williams was the third Missouri inmate put to death this year and the 100th since the state resumed use of the death penalty in 1989.

___​

AP writer Mark Sherman contributed from Washington. Salter reported from O’Fallon, Missouri.
 
Some people see the execution of persons as inhumane so they argue for life sentences. I understand their purpose and why they do it. But I’m a person who believes in the death sentence.
 
"God may forgive you, but we wont."
This dude was guilty, and all the other criminals the "Set Nigger Criminals Free" Project are also deserving of the rope. They'll try to bandy about a bunch of numbers, or justification about it, but its all extremely exaggerated and primarily bullshit after-the-fact nitpicking by a Jew-funded group that wants to free as many murderous niggers as possible. These people aren't actually innocent, they just get sprung from jail and their convictions vacated by underhanded social engineering, well funded legal maneuvering, and the willing cooperation of government cucks that share their goals.
This is the best description of the Innocence Project I've ever seen. The Innocent Project helped free a guy and paraded him on Joe Rogan only for the guy to commit another murder and go right back to jail like a month after going on Rogan's podcast.
 
This is the best description of the Innocence Project I've ever seen. The Innocent Project helped free a guy and paraded him on Joe Rogan only for the guy to commit another murder and go right back to jail like a month after going on Rogan's podcast.
Thing is I don't think there's a single person in America right now who genuinely believes there's nothing wrong with the justice system. Everyone knows there are people in jail right now who really aren't bad people at heart that've been dealt a shit hand. But groups like the "Bail Project" and the "Innocence Project" unsurprisingly throw money towards any fuckwad jailbird who cries about being too broke for bail...provided they are of course dirt poor, non-white, and preferably have long criminal histories.

Absolutely zero vetting goes into who gets bail money and how much and half of the time these groups don't even operate through the proper channels. Ideally a "Bail Project" group should operate like a parole board or a scholarship charity but see...that takes time, effort, resources, and their own money and really they'd rather just get as many dindus back out onto the street as they can as quickly as possible.
 
Not only that, it’s like they went out of their way to choose the guiltiest man alive
Someone on the first page spelled it out real well here,

There are organizations that relentlessly pressure the families of victims to denounce the pending execution of the killer. These orgs sometimes campaign with unannounced personal visits to the family's house, etc, for years and years until they break down and give in.

I remember one article where a family had to get restraining orders against many activists, but they weren't allowed to get a restraining order against the whole organization for some sort of 1st amendment reason. The org would just send a new volunteer to knock on the family's door once the prior volunteer got tresspassed off their property.

It's horrifying what these sicko activists do in the name of convicted murderers. They don't give a flying shit about normal, law-abiding people.

It sounds like these political activists groups just browbeat these families into submission by constantly reminding them of dead family. The family members then just agree to some script so they will stop haunting them. That or they cajole or bribe them to say something in front of a mic, and that’s just ghoulish. Not illegal, but should be called out more.
 
Someone on the first page spelled it out real well here,



It sounds like these political activists groups just browbeat these families into submission by constantly reminding them of dead family. The family members then just agree to some script so they will stop haunting them. That or they cajole or bribe them to say something in front of a mic, and that’s just ghoulish. Not illegal, but should be called out more.
im not a big fan of the death penalty, however, I’m starting to believe that these people aren’t doing it for any ethical principles, they just want violent criminals back on the streets
 
Can I be totally real with you guys? Seeing tens of thousands of people on Twitter saying this guy was lynched and crying over a man who stabbed a white woman 47 times killing her was brutally demoralizing to me. I know, I know it's twitter it does not represent the real world 1 to 1 but it still was like "Are we really doing fucking Floyd again? Seriously?" it's so tiring man. I'm so sick of it. And as usual no one on the left who is defending this subhuman cares about the victim.
Women and soyboys are very easily manipulated emotionally.
 
im not a big fan of the death penalty, however, I’m starting to believe that these people aren’t doing it for any ethical principles, they just want violent criminals back on the streets
Perhaps. Another reason is just simple political points. “Those mean old rethuglikkkkhaaaans! just lynched another black man 😩 “ they will say in their blogs and free local news rags. Leaving out the part where he stabbed someone in the belly to death. And that’s on the lighter side of most of these capital punishments.

They don’t care about the victims either. No matter how you slice it, they are defending murderers. And that should make this particular culture war issue a slam dunk for the right. “Hyuk hyuk pro life but pro death” Just shut them up by listing in graphic detail what these killers have done and ask them to defend them still.
 
Perhaps. Another reason is just simple political points. “Those mean old rethuglikkkkhaaaans! just lynched another black man 😩 “ they will say in their blogs and free local news rags. Leaving out the part where he stabbed someone in the belly to death. And that’s on the lighter side of most of these capital punishments.

They don’t care about the victims either. No matter how you slice it, they are defending murderers. And that should make this particular culture war issue a slam dunk for the right. “Hyuk hyuk pro life but pro death” Just shut them up by listing in graphic detail what these killers have done and ask them to defend them still.
The libtards I have known who spout off about this shit NEVER look into the details of the crime. They just copypasta or monotone-recite the "facts" provided by the advocacy group. Most of the time, if you happen to have read up on the case and ask them how they can defend a guy who [did a specific horrific thing documented to the hilt in court] they will claim you are making it up- it sounds so absurd to them, like a clearly fabricated lie a racist would fantasize about.
 
im not a big fan of the death penalty, however, I’m starting to believe that these people aren’t doing it for any ethical principles, they just want violent criminals back on the streets

It's the same reason BLM never shows up when a black cop gets killed or when nigs do some nogging to other nigs
 
It's the same reason BLM never shows up when a black cop gets killed or when nigs do some nogging to other nigs
A much more clear example is when protestors at the CHOP protest in Seattle murdered a black teenager and severely wounded his friend for joy riding.

They even pistol whipped the severely injured teen.

The news media doesn't care about Blacks but only about ratings.
 
The libtards I have known who spout off about this shit NEVER look into the details of the crime. They just copypasta or monotone-recite the "facts" provided by the advocacy group. Most of the time, if you happen to have read up on the case and ask them how they can defend a guy who [did a specific horrific thing documented to the hilt in court] they will claim you are making it up- it sounds so absurd to them, like a clearly fabricated lie a racist would fantasize about.
I remember getting into an argument with a family member when the Mike Brown shooting ten years ago pulling up the police report of what really happened (Him strong arm robbing a corner store then charging a cop reaching for his gun) and the response I got "I don't want to see that you're being racist" or some variant of "You've been reading too many far-right websites". If the truth goes against the accepted leftist narrative they have zero interest in it. It's too uncomfortable for them to even think about.

The way leftists are programmed to think if something about brown people makes them uncomfortable or goes against the "black people are just misunderstood victims of racism!" they default to a variant of "You're a bigot!". Every single time. Why? Because admitting that blacks are on average more prone to violence and have more interactions with the police because of this reason goes against everything they've been programmed to think. Systemic racism, "generational trauma", oppression, redlining etc etc. Once you start admitting "Okay maybe blacks are more violent...." literally everything starts to fall apart. This is why they have to stick to the canned lines.
 
Last edited:
I remember getting into an argument with a family member when the Mike Brown shooting ten years ago pulling up the police report of what really happened (Him strong arm robbing a corner store then charging a cop reaching for his gun) and the response I got "I don't want to see that you're being racist" or some variant of "You've been reading too many far-right websites. If the truth goes against the accepted leftist narrative they have zero interest in it. It's too uncomfortable for them to even think about.
You should have asked them to read the Eric Holder DOJ report on the shooter but removed the first page to show it was a DOJ report. Then if they object to the report you impeach them and question if they find the Black Attorney General Eric Holder to be racist.

It's really fun to watch the wheels fall off.

I have done this on multiple occasions regarding various topics but since we are talking about racism I have two memorable incidents.

One, I was on a date and the guy was kind of a leftist. The guy would talk about racism this or abuse of power that and how his study aboard session in Europe really made the US seem like a racist backwater. Well, I ask if visited Srebrenica on his study aboard trip. The faggot didn't even know about the ugly events that occurred there and thought it was a vacation / party spot.

Another incident was during the BLM protests and some Eurotrash started lecturing Americans about racism. I ask about Srebrenica again but before I could impeach the Eurofag a janny stepped in and removed my comment.

In case people don't know what happened:
 
The REAL crime here was letting the appeals process drag on forever.

Way back when, appeals were handled quickly and the sentences carried out quickly.

Justice delayed is justice denied to the victim, don't give a fuck what her family said.
 
Back
Top Bottom