No. The ruling is that algorithms are speech. For instance, I am likely liable for the text on the front page feature area, because it's written by staff. The ruling is that content delivery by algorithm is a product or speech directly from the company that they are liable for.
Does that mean that I can sue you for the crippling balldo news addiction, I’ve been exposed to through the front page?
so what changes are you going to have to make to the front page if any?
I hate so much the trend of all these faggot ass movies where they take a song from at least 30 years ago, slather it with reverb, add nostalgia twinkly piano and/or bombastic, wall of sound orchestral hits like it's the smashed and slammed bastard of the 70's and the Inception bwaaaaaaaaaaaa. What makes it worse is that almost every single fucking song is lyrically or thematically inappropriate for the movie they're being used to advertise for but the Hollywood shitbirds don't fucking care because they know people love listening to the jangling keys of shit they recognize.
What Null said was that the ruling didn't affect something that was already true; namely that he would "likely liable for the text on the front page feature area, because it's written by staff."
How the hell can you make a Minecraft movie trailer and not use C418 for the music?
C418 isn't willing to sell his soul to Microsoft so that makes him an evil bigot nazi just like Notch. Thankfully, we have some soulless art hoe and her twangy-ass music to fill in the blank space.
but if say a thread gets featured on the frontpage and in that thread someone says something that could be actionable does that then make null also liable for it because it was featured or would it have to feature the exact post with the actionable content?
Well this only applies at this point in the third circuit court. So for the vast majority of retards in the US, no, they can't use this.
Null is liable for the text of the feature. If someone said something defamatory and Null repeated the defamation he could himself be liable, yes. That's why you won't ever see features like "John literally raped Jessica!!!! WOW!!!" and instead see features like "Jessica accuses Famous Actor John of rape."
Is Null an algorithm?
Listening, I haven't heard anything outrageous, but I have to ask. He seems well spoken and this isn't his first video, so why does he have his screen reflecting off his glasses in such a way that he looks like his eyes are divorced too?
nothing has changed. calm down.
This nigga is trying to get Internet famous from being a deadbeat dad. His daughter hates him and wants nothing to do with him because he left her and her mom for another woman. She doesn't care about him at all but she's got a lot of followers on the Internet and he's trying to make a career out of their family drama for himself. Piece of shit.
That's not just any man in a pink coat. That's ComicCon rape enthusiast/incest dad, Jason Momoa!
see edit to my post:
He literally says at 1:30 that they got divorced in 2005, and yet they still sent her to college and she's still friendly with him at the beginning of her tiktok whore phase, he posts all the screencaps of their light hearted convos back and forth. He's actually more utilitarian and left leaning than his ex wife, who is the one their daughter dislikes because she's part of a pro life organization. You are fucking retarded. Watch literally 5 minutes of something before PMSing and confirming all negative stereotypes about women.
Hey retard incel, if you leave your wife and young daughter in order to find a mailorder bride in east asia, you don't get to complain about how she turned out. Because he wasn't involved in her life. But now he suddenly wants to talk about her because she got Internet clout and he can make "hurr durr my daughter is a dumb whore" videos. Absolutely despicable.