StannisTheMannis
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2024
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And then is immediately asked by the judge "Are you firing your lawyer? Do you now wish to represent yourself?" And either he sits the fuck down and shuts the fuck up or he gets immediately ass-raped.
And if his response is this:
View attachment 6372570
Then the ass-rape commences immediately.
"Shortcoming" is one word. Glad I took the time to point it out and share my eagle-eyed catch with the rest of the site. Not annoying at all.There’s nothing wrong with pointing out a short coming.
Fairly sure Keanu and Geno didn't know Kayla. Sure, know of.Oh, I agree with your take, but I can see a grey area that could be used - showing it to a couple of her friends who she (presumably) hasn't peeled down in front of ain't a lot different from showing it to her stepfather. It's more a who Aaron showed the pic to than that he showed the pic at all situation.
Either way, Aaron should just cop to it for being a general shitbag.
A gentleman never tells is a good rule to follow.
Didn't Kayla claim she never came from Nick fucking her? I bet she didn't even if she didn't say it, probably because one of his shortcomings was short comings. As in, he was a minute man. In both senses. He took only a minute to coom and on top of that his dick was minute, in the other pronunciation."Shortcoming" is one word. Glad I took the time to point it out and share my eagle-eyed catch with the rest of the site. Not annoying at all.
Typical kike bullshit. How can anyone possibly tell which twin within a womb is agitating? The story is bullshit you might as well be referencing Harry Potter rather than argue whether the legacy was sold for beans under duress or not when the whole thing is an obvious fabrication.You might enjoy this piece that focuses on the opposing natures of Yakov and Eisav, starting in the womb, and how their mother Rivkah tried to make sense of what it was all about and what God wanted from her.
In the last 24 hours Nick has admitted:
-It was cocaine in his bedroom
-He reads Kiwi Farms regularly
-The polycule rumors are true
-He snitched on Aaron to the cops
-Kayla was sending nudes to other men (Nick is a cuck)
Anything else?
Fun fact: Nick is calling it a WIN that he's admitted to being a CUCK. His ex, his gay lover, Aaron, is now facing charges for NICK BEING A CUCK. Aaron cucked Nick. He's now charged with CUCKING NICK.
And NICK is the one who snitched him out for CUCKING him. Nick has literally ADMITTED to being a CUCK!
Some other dude literally had naked pics of his whore wife. That makes him a CUCK!
LMAO! CUCK CUCK CUCK!
NICK IS A CUCK!
NICK IS A CUCK!
He's pled to being a CUCK. He is now a proven CUCK!
Id rather be fat than a cuck
Nick might end up becoming both
Goddammit please STOP DOING THIS. Not just you, EVERYONE. There is no FUCKING H IN "CUCKOLD." WHY DO YOU PEOPLE DO THIS?
Chuckold's Cuck and Suck
Imagine being so absolutely brain-charred from cocaine that you think admitting to being a cuck is a win somehow.Nope. Nothing new here. Just Aaron's cuck slowing becoming Our Cuck.![]()
Nick is claiming admitting to the pics isn't admitting to the relationship. Yup...Imagine being so absolutely brain-charred from cocaine that you think admitting to being a cuck is a win somehow.
I haven't really commented on the felony charge directly (not sure I even read the charges; if I did it was a skim); I don't know which subsection they're relying on for the felony charge. But if it's the harassment subsection,Reading the statute, the harassment part makes no sense.
"the actor disseminates the image with intent to harass the person depicted in the image;" Aaron was boasting.
Hmm? In what way can Aaron sharing that photo with Geno be said to be with the intention to harass Kayla?
Reading the charges it looks to me like the investigating officer is trying to say it is a symptom of an harassment campaign, but harassment like that is a separate crime anyway and using that logic Aaron discussing Nick and April is harassment also. He was certainly saying worse stuff about them.
So I'll go out in the limb and predict that harassment aspect is dropped at some point and the Nick cope will be epic.
(c) "Harass" means an act that would cause a substantial adverse effect on the safety, security, or privacy of a reasonable person.
Cuck logic. Coke logic.Nick is claiming admitting to the pics isn't admitting to the relationship. Yup...
Nick has taken such pains to avoid revealing why Aaron has a problem with him that he must be foolish enough to believe he can keep the truth about his swinging a secret. Would he cop a plea to avoid having to make it public record in Kandiyohi County (it’s now on the record in Stearns County) that he and his wife were in a sexual relationship with April and Aaron?Imagine being so absolutely brain-charred from cocaine that you think admitting to being a cuck is a win somehow.
I paid attention. My point was it wasn't a shortcoming.I think neither of you paid attention to what I actually said.
I praised them and said I was grateful, and in no way did I say they shouldn’t have been there. Just that they left out a key aspect. There’s nothing wrong with pointing out a short coming.
I think they are aiming for a gag order.I haven't really commented on the felony charge directly (not sure I even read the charges; if I did it was a skim); I don't know which subsection they're relying on for the felony charge. But if it's the harassment subsection,
(617.261, subd. 7).
So that's a fight about whether sending the pic to Geno was sent with intent to cause that kind of harm to Kayla. Not seeing it. My read is he was just being a twirp, bragging and being disrespectful and spiteful, but idr anything suggesting an intent to cause her pain or fear. But query what an intent to "cause a substantial adverse effect on the[...]privacy of a reasonable person" even means.
But fwiw since you mentioned the separate crime of harassment, harassment for purposes of a restraining order (609.74is defined to include a single instance of dissemination of an intimate image.
Nick is claiming admitting to the pics isn't admitting to the relationship. Yup...
No, for getting an RO, an instance of sharing an intimate image nonconsensually is considered "harassment"; "harass" is defined differently in the dissemination statute. Not defending it, just reporting.I think they are aiming for a gag order.
However if you define misdemeanor as essentially sending an imagine one time to a person and then say sharing an imaging is automatically harassment, why then spell it out as harassment as an upgrade to felony in the statute? Has to be a standard for it.
I hope Aaron gets this unconstitutional statute thrown out but it would be hilarious if it were financially ruinous for him to do so.No, for getting an RO, an instance of sharing an intimate image nonconsensually is considered "harassment"; "harass" is defined differently in the dissemination statute. Not defending it, just reporting.
I go by the language in the charges around making him stop and the fact a condition for his bail on the charges hints at it as well.No, for getting an RO, an instance of sharing an intimate image nonconsensually is considered "harassment"; "harass" is defined differently in the dissemination statute. Not defending it, just reporting.