What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Meriasek said:
It's an alleged tape of Hilary Clinton and another woman raping and torturing and murdering a young woman, drinking her blood and wearing her face skin and so on.
Click to expand...
It was Huma Abedin, the other woman.

Not sure if the video is real or not, but I guess thats the point of the AI conspiracy thing the other poster mentioned. Its hard to come by, but I am sure if you look hard enough you could find it.
 
whogoesthere said:
It was Huma Abedin, the other woman.

Not sure if the video is real or not, but I guess thats the point of the AI conspiracy thing the other poster mentioned. Its hard to come by, but I am sure if you look hard enough you could find it.
Click to expand...
For any blackmail scheme to be successful, access to the blackmail itself has to be heavily guarded. The moment the blackmail of anybody is leaked, all leverage over the blackmail victims is lost. So anybody who goes anywhere close to it has to be either extremely well-trusted or blackmailed themselves as well. And if there is any chance that any outsiders get access to it, they get killed.

A good example of this in action is the death of Gary Caradori. This man was involved in the investigation of the Franklin child abuse scandal, in which an elite pedophile ring was blackmailing US politicians and other high-profile people during the late 1980s and likely earlier. As explained in this book here, before his death, he gave hints that he had gained physical access to the blackmail material itself. This would prove to be a fatal mistake. As he was flying back home, his plane spontaneously broke up during flight and crashed, killing both him and his son that he had brought with him.

Suffice to say, don't go looking for it. You may end up dead, or wake up the next morning with the police raiding your house because the CIA used a backdoor to put 5 terabytes of child porn on your computer.
 
Squishie PP said:
For any blackmail scheme to be successful, access to the blackmail itself has to be heavily guarded. The moment the blackmail of anybody is leaked, all leverage over the blackmail victims is lost. So anybody who goes anywhere close to it has to be either extremely well-trusted or blackmailed themselves as well. And if there is any chance that any outsiders get access to it, they get killed.

A good example of this in action is the death of Gary Caradori. This man was involved in the investigation of the Franklin child abuse scandal, in which an elite pedophile ring was blackmailing US politicians and other high-profile people during the late 1980s and likely earlier. As explained in this book here, before his death, he gave hints that he had gained physical access to the blackmail material itself. This would prove to be a fatal mistake. As he was flying back home, his plane spontaneously broke up during flight and crashed, killing both him and his son that he had brought with him.

Suffice to say, don't go looking for it. You may end up dead, or wake up the next morning with the police raiding your house because the CIA used a backdoor to put 5 terabytes of child porn on your computer.
Click to expand...
Would blackmail even work anymore?
I know I'm terminally mega-jaded at this point, but I feel like when I see things like those girls getting stabbed or the rape cases out of Europe, nothing happens. I don't even feel like pollical scandals are a thing anymore.
 
NoReturn said:
Would blackmail even work anymore?
I know I'm terminally mega-jaded at this point, but I feel like when I see things like those girls getting stabbed or the rape cases out of Europe, nothing happens. I don't even feel like pollical scandals are a thing anymore.
Click to expand...
Hearing news about children being murdered and abused is one thing, but actually seeing the visceral footage of somebody in a position of power committing such atrocities is another. It isn't the rumors that give blackmailers the leverage, but the evidence itself.

You do have a point though: normalization of taboos will result in devaluation of blackmail. This is why blackmailing people for being gay or atheist doesn't work anymore. Pedophilia is the ultimate backstop as far as this goes; if it gets normalized, then blackmail is over. So it is actually in the interest of the elite to prevent the normalization of pedophilia while still being sadistic pedophiles themselves.
 
Squishie PP said:
Hearing news about children being murdered and abused is one thing, but actually seeing the visceral footage of somebody in a position of power committing such atrocities is another. It isn't the rumors that give blackmailers the leverage, but the evidence itself.
Click to expand...
Yeah but would anyone even watch it? To this day there are people who think Kyle Rittenhouse shot three black people.
 
NoReturn said:
Yeah but would anyone even watch it? To this day there are people who think Kyle Rittenhouse shot three black people.
Click to expand...
Depends on the channels of distribution, really. If the blackmail was leaked over the dark web like the hilary tapes were, then nothing becomes of it, since nobody uses the dark web.

But we aren't talking about that here. Those who use blackmail for their power have access to an extremely large amount of resources that would allow them to display the footage in as many places as possible. Imagine for instance that Intel Management Engine/AMD PSP/ARM TrustZone backdoor of every computer, phone, electronic billboard, etc. connected to the internet gets used to download the blackmail and just shove it in as many peoples faces as possible. This is the kind of thing that is held over the heads of those who are blackmailed. In a way it is sort of like nuclear weapons; they don't need to be fired at all to be seen as threatening.
 
VeteranOfTheRetardWars said:
All I'm saying is that Epstein had a whole lot of cameras at his place...
Click to expand...
There was an interview with Maria Farmer, an artist who was employed by Epstein and others in the same network. She had to stay at the mansion of Leslie Wexner, who funded the majority of Epstein's operations.
From what I remember, she claims that there were cameras around the entire property, including in all the bedrooms and bathrooms.
The full interview is available here: https://soundcloud.com/user-4143922...art-1-the-last-american-vagabond-whitney-webb
And here is a mirror that is easier to download locally: https://files.catbox.moe/qajvzy.opus
 
Social movements are organised by companies to cover up the consequences of their actions:

  • LGBTQ+Woke pushed to cover up that microplastics cause homosexuality and increased eostrogen
  • Fat acceptance to cover up the obesity crisis caused by sugar and slop loaded into cheap food
  • Abortion and reproductive rights to cover up that women can't, not that they don't want, to have kids.
  • Infinityniggers and immigration to cover up that the system is dying.
  • JustStopOil and green activists to cover up the dying and disastrous consequence of shipping manufacturing abroad.
 
Bog-standard Poster said:
LGBTQ+Woke pushed to cover up that microplastics cause homosexuality and increased eostrogen
Click to expand...
The circle of "acceptance of LGBTQ+ not matter what" is entirely within the circle of '' Environmentally conscious - hormones disruptors are pretty much everywhere'' crowd.
Yet they never seem to make the connection when you present that Venn diagram to them.
 
Farsided said:
The circle of "acceptance of LGBTQ+ not matter what" is entirely within the circle of '' Environmentally conscious - hormones disruptors are pretty much everywhere'' crowd.
Yet they never seem to make the connection when you present that Venn diagram to them.
Click to expand...
Because despite their rejection of religion, gender to them is more akin to a soul than it is a manifestation of physical phenomena, namely genetics, environment, hormones etc

They can't acknowledge that the uptick in lgbtqiamap+ is anything other than a manifestation of people's true metaphysical nature because the implication that you can "create" a fag gives rise to the idea that you could prevent one from coming into existence
 
Brahma said:
Because despite their rejection of religion, gender to them is more akin to a soul than it is a manifestation of physical phenomena, namely genetics, environment, hormones etc

They can't acknowledge that the uptick in lgbtqiamap+ is anything other than a manifestation of people's true metaphysical nature because the implication that you can "create" a fag gives rise to the idea that you could prevent one from coming into existence
Click to expand...
Just add it to the pile of “things a lot of people don’t want to know the answer to.”
 
Bog-standard Poster said:
Social movements are organised by companies to cover up the consequences of their actions:

  • LGBTQ+Woke pushed to cover up that microplastics cause homosexuality and increased eostrogen
  • Fat acceptance to cover up the obesity crisis caused by sugar and slop loaded into cheap food
  • Abortion and reproductive rights to cover up that women can't, not that they don't want, to have kids.
  • Infinityniggers and immigration to cover up that the system is dying.
  • JustStopOil and green activists to cover up the dying and disastrous consequence of shipping manufacturing abroad.
Click to expand...
Definitely agree on #2 and #4, but the others seem a bit off the mark to me due to the tremendous amount of other incentives pushing us in such directions.
1) LGBTQIAP+ is favored by many different parties, so much that it deserves its own thread to explain all the incentives, but here are a few:
- Depopulation of the middle class (see abortion too)
- Creation of new markets for the medical industry (STD treatment + all the troon shit)
- Normalization of body experimentation, which will eventually result in genetic experimentation on humans being normalized (trannies will be the first to sign up for their gender-affirming gene therapy.)
-
- Keeping the population of niggercattle on the hedonic treadmill for longer so that they can continue denying that their lives are empty and devoid of meaning.
- Nudging people towards pedophilia creates more people to rope into the globalist blackmail network as well as children to be used as fodder for said network (though this will be deprecated eventually, as I have explained before.)
2) Agree, but I will add that it will also (if succesful) make being fat a desirable trait and thus create even more landwhale pharmacattle.
3) Abortion is a multifaceted phenomenon that benefits multiple parties:
- Cull the population of the middle class so that the living standard can be decreased.
- Create a huge population of childless retard women whose maternal instinct can be exploited for other purposes.
- Stem cell and other fetal tissue harvesting/sales
- Fetuses have a social security number in some states; what is this used for?
4) No disagreement here.
5) The environmentalist movement is a loaded gun pointed at the energy supply of the west. Once the dead petrodollar runs out of momentum and all the countries keeping reserves of the US dollar finally see their losses realized, the trigger will be pulled. Shit will get ugly very fast when this happens.
 
Some thoughts of the pushing of fat acceptance. People have gotten fat and it's out of control.

Another push factor may be marketing and advertising. There's a concept in advertising of association. You show a bunch of attractive people using your product and people association the product with it. It's aspirational and a connection in your mind links the product with attractive people.

Which is why in the 90's there'd be ads for Coca-Cola with a bunch of fit dudes and bikini chicks jumping around on a floating bouncy castle off a tropical beach drinking Coke. Who wouldn't want to be doing that and being like them?

Back then most people weren't obese. So while they'll never be that fit or attractive it still seemed obtainable. What happens when the shit in size of people means that they can no longer associate and those fit and attractive people are too far removed from how they see themselves?

Push fat acceptance to try and redefine what is attractive. Maybe there is a reversal? You start putting fat and gross people in your ads. It's not about them being aspirational. It's about making people feel better about themselves.

Nike puts out a billboard with some gross obese black women. Is that an aspirational association or is it a warning? It'll be working on multiple fronts. For some it will make them feel better about themselves being gross. For many others it's about making them feel better about themselves. That is where the positive link with the product comes from.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom