💪 Tough Guys Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Judge Holden said:
NOOL STOP I SPRAYED MY SCREEN WITH MY BEDTIME OVALTINE AT THIS AUDIO
Click to expand...
It's funny until you realize Nik is also all of these things + a pedophile that got owned by a middle schooler niggeroni child.

I made this awhile ago but this sounds more like Fatrick.
 
Last edited:
AnOminous said:
I wouldn't actually be surprised if they churn out these suits by the dozens just to settle some of them for nuisance value. It's very low effort copypasta type stuff other than Rick's storytelling.
Click to expand...
There are people who just want to sue, even if they are told by a lawyer in good faith that the suit will probably not work out.
They insist, because they feel that they are in the right.
As a lawyer with free resources, why shouldn't you go ahead, phone it in, and make some thousands bucks off stubborn fools?
 
Divine right to rule said:
There are people who just want to sue, even if they are told by a lawyer in good faith that the suit will probably not work out.
They insist, because they feel that they are in the right.
As a lawyer with free resources, why shouldn't you go ahead, phone it in, and make some thousands bucks off stubborn fools?
Click to expand...
Many if not most 1983 clients don't have money to sue or they wouldn't even be in the kind of situation where they are suing the police. Also 1983 actions have fee shifting built in so a winning plaintiff's fees are paid by the defendant. So even nominal damages can add up to a nice paycheck, hence the prevailing practice for 1983 suits is contingency.

I doubt that means they'd actually be above milking a moron like Pat for thousands if they decided the suit was such total dogshit they had no chance of getting even a nuisance value settlement, but if they manage to phone it in well enough just to get past QI, a settlement becomes a real possibility. Then they tard wrangle Fatty into settling, take as much of it as they can get away with, and soothe his tard ego with some nonsense about a moral victory.

ETA: unrelated to post I'm responding to, but as cut and pasty as it is (you will see this case everywhere), they cite Hope v. Pelzer as part of an attempt to end-run around the "clearly established law" requirement to collect on a 1983 action. Amusingly, they cite the case without citing its actual details. It's a Supreme Court case where they found that torturing a prisoner by restraining him in a stress position on a hitching post did indeed violate "clearly established" Eighth Amendment law prohibiting cruel and unusual punishment.

The lower courts had both found qualified immunity, the Circuit Court finding that while such a punishment did indeed violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, this was not "clearly established law" under qualified immunity, so while the plaintiff's rights had been violated, there had never been a specific case of using a hitching post as a torture device, so therefore the guards couldn't have known not to torture him that specific way.

This is how trial courts often treat 1983 actions, getting rid of them by any means possible and finding qualified immunity based on nonsensical arguments like this. SCOTUS essentially said it's clearly established that physical punishments like this that serve no valid penological purpose are a violation of the Eighth Amendment, even if the guards came up with some novel way of torturing someone.

You can see why they didn't elaborate on the specifics of this case, because it is so vastly different than what Pat is arguing is "clearly established law," that is, some right to be immune to reasonable police responses to 911 calls and to be treated as a Very Special Boy.

(Incidentally, the Kafkaesque result of the "clearly established law" doctrine is that, while subsequent cases can cite a finding like this to argue that while it wasn't clearly established law at the time of that case, it is now. So subsequent litigants can take advantage of it, but the litigant whose rights were actually violated, whose lawyers potentially spent millions to establish the new case law? He's shit out of luck. He gets squat.)
 
Last edited:
Rimanah said:
I legitimately wonder what goes on fatrick’s head when he posts this stuff.
Does he simply lack a theory of mind, or whatever the proper term here is?
“Yes, they are looking at a photo of me and saying that it’s fat, but they’re not saying I’m fat, but you are.”
I sincerely wish asylums were still commonplace just so this man pig could be locked up and studied for science.
Click to expand...
Reminds me of some bullshit about how like smart people can handle two or three levels of redirection and idiots can handle like one and Patrick obviously can handle like -2.

No wonder he likes the ”deep symbolism” of marvel movies.
 
Pat is one of the most extreme examples of a phenomenon I've noticed amongst male authors, where they confuse 'having imagined a lot of fight scenes and cool insults' with 'being a real tough guy'. They always talk about 'real fights' they've had exactly like fights go in shitty books, rather than how fights go in real life.

I'd never call myself a tough guy, but I grew up in a bad neighborhood and have been in fights that I won and fights that I lost. The universal theme between all of them was they were ultimately awkward and kind of embarrassing, cause they always start off as stupid bickering and then (unless you're gonna murder the other guy) end in stupid bickering, except now your body and clothes are kinda fucked up and disheveled to a lesser or greater extent. Even if you win there's not really a point where the other guy admits you're actually cool and badass except to get you to stop twisting their arm. Then the second they're out of reach it's back to whatever crap started the fight.

Like you might have stupid 'fights' with your friends where an argument escalates into physicality and you both blow off steam, those can have good outcomes, but I'd not consider them a real fight.

The only reason I mention any of this is to highlight the contrast between how Pat talks about his tough guy life and the shallow peripheries of the world of toughness I have experienced. He's not even a good liar, like if you want to lie about being tough at least read some stuff by actual dangerous people and then copy that. Don't just write out scenes from Road House and say they happened to you when you have the shape and zestiness levels of a fucking tangerine.
 
Gorbus said:
Pat is one of the most extreme examples of a phenomenon I've noticed amongst male authors, where they confuse 'having imagined a lot of fight scenes and cool insults' with 'being a real tough guy'. They always talk about 'real fights' they've had exactly like fights go in shitty books, rather than how fights go in real life.

I'd never call myself a tough guy, but I grew up in a bad neighborhood and have been in fights that I won and fights that I lost. The universal theme between all of them was they were ultimately awkward and kind of embarrassing, cause they always start off as stupid bickering and then (unless you're gonna murder the other guy) end in stupid bickering, except now your body and clothes are kinda fucked up and disheveled to a lesser or greater extent. Even if you win there's not really a point where the other guy admits you're actually cool and badass except to get you to stop twisting their arm. Then the second they're out of reach it's back to whatever crap started the fight.

Like you might have stupid 'fights' with your friends where an argument escalates into physicality and you both blow off steam, those can have good outcomes, but I'd not consider them a real fight.

The only reason I mention any of this is to highlight the contrast between how Pat talks about his tough guy life and the shallow peripheries of the world of toughness I have experienced. He's not even a good liar, like if you want to lie about being tough at least read some stuff by actual dangerous people and then copy that. Don't just write out scenes from Road House and say they happened to you when you have the shape and zestiness levels of a fucking tangerine.
Click to expand...
He's basically what Steven Segal would have been if he was too lazy to go to karate class.
 
1000002050.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gorbus said:
they confuse 'having imagined a lot of fight scenes and cool insults' with 'being a real tough guy’
Click to expand...
Anyone who’s spent a lot of time around UFC fighters or MMA pros will tell you that those dudes spend zero time talking about how tough they are. They have nothing to prove. It’s only the weak Walter Mitty types who run their mouths the way Pat does. He’s a living caricature of an impotent loser.
 
John Andrews Stan said:
Anyone who’s spent a lot of time around UFC fighters or MMA pros will tell you that those dudes spend zero time talking about how tough they are. They have nothing to prove. It’s only the weak Walter Mitty types who run their mouths the way Pat does. He’s a living caricature of an impotent loser.
Click to expand...
Or to quote the Geto Boys: "Real gangsta ass niggas never flex nuts, cause real gangsta ass niggas know they got em."
 
It’s commendable really that a man can take so many L’s on a daily basis and still wake up in the morning to face the world. People with self-reflection would feel a deep shame if their lives turned out anything like Pat’s.
 
Judge Holden said:
DOUBLE EDIT: oh for fuck sake.....he is STILL unable to wrap his head around other people seeing his photo and automatically going "ew fat"
1724356179060.png
Click to expand...

He is incapable of accepting that other normal people find him gross or fat. He at least has the capacity to dismiss all the pests and their heckling as just that (even if it's true), I'll give him credit there. I can't recall if there's ever been a case of a civilian naturally coming upon and calling him fat without any sort of provocation by the pests. I'm sure there has been but this thread is fucking massive. If that's the case I believe he has simply said "And you would be wrong, child." But then if these people are calling him fat couldn't he just say "and they're of course wrong, like you always are, stalker. Enjoy prison." What compels him to essentially inflict his grotesque physique on someone else? By saying they're calling the pest fat and gross he's saying their usage of his persona is indeed that of a fat man. but doing so would be admitting he is fat and disgusting and pat cannot do that. But then why call the stalker fat if he's the one--

I can't do this. If I try to unravel the yarn of Fat I'm gonna spiral right into a meat grinder in a basement.
 
You know what's interesting?

Patty's been faffing around Scotland and Ireland, leaving a path of shattered toilets in his wake.

No one is keeping watch over his Very Important Lawnchairs and other items that have been 'donated.'

You'd think such a golden opportunity to fuck with him would've happened while he could do nothing but seethe (more) impotently thousands of miles away. Clearly, the horrible people doing this would seize such a great opportunity.

Unless...

Immortal Technique Vol.2 said:
Rick can't see the big picture through his jealousy. William Morris Endeavor, a holdings company, paid the $8 million advance and has a $6 billion revenue intake. William Morris Endeavor has also done business with Trump in the past. This is all about greasing the hands of a politician first, with the potential of this making money second.
Plus, it's an investment. A 40 year old Vice President, has a high probability for running for the presidency. If he becomes President, he's going to remember who was nice to him when other book deals are cut.
Rick's 1.2 GPA brain can only react to a chess move, while others are out there planning their next 10 moves in the future.
Click to expand...

It's pretty reasonable that they're going to break even, at the very least, with this.

Being completely generous with estimates, assuming that this book would be sold for $25, they need to sell roughly 320,000 books to simply break even.

It's been a while since I had to even think about retail, but generally things like books, DVDs, etc. are sold to retailers and they're stuck with them. So say Barnes and Noble buys 1,000 copies, it's now the retailer's problem. Vance's last book was successful, so this isn't the wasteful gambit Patty thinks it is.

And that's without even accounting for shit like libraries, non-American buyers, etc.

To the surprise of no one, Patty is an absolute retard.
 
Rimanah said:
Does he simply lack a theory of mind, or whatever the proper term here is?
“Yes, they are looking at a photo of me and saying that it’s fat, but they’re not saying I’m fat, but you are.”
Click to expand...

Q: How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast?

A: No, child. It is you who did not eat breakfast. It is obvious to all that I have never skipped breakfast. These are your delusions again.
Enjoy hunger.
 
Yeah, I just don't understand how Pat's brain works. He knows that the stalker is using Pat as their profile photo. He appears to fail to understand that the other person on twitter is seeing only the profile photo of Pat, and so the other person thinks that the stalker looks like Pat, even though Pat is not actually the stalker. It is a level of stupidity so astonishing, it is just hard to believe. (it has to be a bit, surely?) I think that animals such as elephants, monkeys and crows would be able to understand this. It is almost kind of similar to whether an animal is able to understand the concept of a mirror.

Back to Pat's fatness (he's fat). He really has got very fat very quickly. His appearance on the "so fucking funny" podcast (early spring this year?) was a bit of a surprise as he looked considerably fatter and in worse health than he had done previously. He has got hugely more fat since then. He is not so very far from becoming a deathfat I think. Another year or so at this rate of weight gain and he is there.

He just looks to be in terrible health now, and he is starting to look like he will have trouble walking soon. Just the way that his legs and hips look to me in the Slurm tshirt photo.
 
This Machine Milks Cows said:
Yeah, I just don't understand how Pat's brain works. He knows that the stalker is using Pat as their profile photo. He appears to fail to understand that the other person on twitter is seeing only the profile photo of Pat, and so the other person thinks that the stalker looks like Pat, even though Pat is not actually the stalker. It is a level of stupidity so astonishing, it is just hard to believe. (it has to be a bit, surely?) I think that animals such as elephants, monkeys and crows would be able to understand this. It is almost kind of similar to whether an animal is able to understand the concept of a mirror.

Back to Pat's fatness (he's fat). He really has got very fat very quickly. His appearance on the "so fucking funny" podcast (early spring this year?) was a bit of a surprise as he looked considerably fatter and in worse health than he had done previously. He has got hugely more fat since then. He is not so very far from becoming a deathfat I think. Another year or so at this rate of weight gain and he is there.

He just looks to be in terrible health now, and he is starting to look like he will have trouble walking soon. Just the way that his legs and hips look to me in the Slurm tshirt photo.
Click to expand...
If porklinson dies tommorow I will be sad and so will the rest of kiwifarms or ona after 15 minutes of pretending to celebrate. The sheer fatness and retardation of fatrick has helped me feel joy in the darkest times of my life. Even when I feel pathetic I can still look down on this retard and feel better on myself. A world without the pig is a world I cant live in.
 
Late I know, but is it normal for lawyers to use words like “bogus” and say something was “in front of their noses”, stuff like that, in court documents? Some of the phraseology just sounds off to me. I’m joining Team “Fatrick wrote it and a junior lawyer just deleted the stupidest parts and added some case law”.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom