Culture A gay, multi-ethnic, chicken-farming family is part of Minnesota’s emerging polyamorous community - The rural household is part of a nonmonogamous movement that some say is going mainstream.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
By Richard Chin
The Minnesota Star Tribune
August 20, 2024 at 1:00PM

JJYRULGMLJA2TFYMLCCXA6JXP4.jpg
Bryan Demeritte, a Unitarian pastor and farmer, center, stands with his husband, Deron Demeritte, right, and Joshua Rodriguez, left, on their Loving More Farmstead in Waseca. (Nicole Neri/For the Minnesota Star Tribune)

Bryan and Deron Demeritte and Joshua Rodriguez don’t exactly make up a stereotypical rural household.

It’s true that they hunt and fish and raise chickens, fruits and vegetables on their 10-acre farmstead in Waseca, surrounded by fertile rolling fields of soybean and corn.

But Bryan, a full-time farmer and a part-time Unitarian pastor and seminary professor, describes Deron and Joshua as his two husbands.

Think of it as Green Acres, nonmonogamy style. Or polyamory among the chickens.

Bryan, 52, is white, a former teacher who grew up Baptist in Missouri. Deron, 38, is Black and originally from the Bahamas. He works as an industrial and commercial HVAC foreman and has been legally married to Bryan for 11 years. Joshua (who plans to change his last name to Demeritte) is a 24-year-old restoration company project manager. He’s mostly Latino and grew up in Boston as the son of immigrant parents from the Dominican Republic and El Salvador.

Joshua has been in a committed relationship with Bryan for five years. He and Deron consider themselves as brother husbands.

In the language of the nonmonogamous community, they’re “nesting partners” in a polyamorous “V” relationship, with Bryan as the “hinge.” That means Bryan has a physical and romantic relationship with Deron and Joshua, but Deron and Joshua don’t have that sort of relationship with each other.

“I love Josh, but I’m not in love with Josh,” Deron said. ”We’re like brothers, almost.”

The three recently moved into their five-bedroom ranch house in the small southern Minnesota town as business and relationship partners in what they’ve called Loving More Farmstead.

Their spread includes three barns, a field of corn, four small vineyards, an apple orchard, a couple of geese and 72 juvenile Heritage chickens that will earn their keep laying eggs for market. They’ll be adding a market vegetable garden and begin raising sheep for lamb meat next.

There are other farmers of color. And other gay farmers. But Bryan said he doesn’t know of any other gay, nesting, polyamorous, multiracial farming households.

So far, the Loving More trio said they haven’t had any problems fitting into their rural community.

“Were the happiest we’ve ever been,” Bryan said. “I think people in this Minnesota sense are very welcoming, but they also just leave you alone.”

“We’re all just people. We’re just trying to love,” Joshua said.

OCYIGCQZYBCRZJAG6VSXWF4N2U.jpg
(Nicole Neri)

Becoming more mainstream​

Their lifestyle isn’t quite as unconventional as it once was regarded.

Recently, mainstream publications such as the New York Times have been writing about nonmonogamy and polyamory in ways that make it seem fashionable.

In an article from last December titled “How Did Polyamory Become So Popular?” the New Yorker noted that references to nonmonogamous relationships have recently been appearing in books, movies, luxury perfume ads and television shows ranging from HBO’s “Succession” to HGTV’s “House Hunters.”

Earlier this year, the Wall Street Journal declared “Open relationships are having a moment.”

Increasingly, you can express a preference for a nonmonogamous relationship on dating websites. There was even a sly depiction of a “ménage à trois” during the opening ceremony of the recently concluded Summer Olympics in Paris.

Closer to home, the local nonmonogamy group called MNPoly reports its membership has grown to more than 4,000 members, up from about 1,000 in early 2020. More than 100 people attended the nonprofit’s fifth annual convention, MNPolyCon, held this summer at a community center in St. Louis Park.

“It has become more accepted,” said Marie LePage, a 42-year-old Minneapolis nonmonogamy and personal growth life coach. LePage said, “I personally feel more comfortable telling a stranger” about her nonmonogamous relationships.

“We’re trying to normalize nonmonogamy,” said Maija Hitt, education committee co-chair for MNPoly. “Our mission is education.”

Hitt, a 43-year-old St. Paul resident, said increasing mainstream acceptance of nonmonogamy is being led by younger people.

“To them, it’s becoming no big deal,” she said. “They’re openly nonmonogamous. They don’t hide it.”

About a third of all American adults say open marriages — where both spouses agree that they can date or have sex with other people — are somewhat or completely acceptable, according to a 2023 Pew Research Center survey. And half of adults under 30 say open marriages are acceptable, according to the survey.

But older adults were also well-represented at the one-day MNPolyCon held July 20 at St. Louis Park’s Lenox Community Center.

Alan Wilson, a 73-year-old Brooklyn Park resident, said he’s been married for 41 years, but he’s also had dozens of additional “play partners” — friends with benefits, long-term partners and infrequent, occasional encounters that he calls “comet relationships.”

Nonmonogamy “makes my life more fulfilling,” he said. “I’ve never hidden it in my life. My children grew up knowing I had girlfriends.”

“I’m a very sexual person,” he said. But he said, “I’m not a playboy. It’s relationships I want. I prefer to find love over sex.”

Wilson said high housing costs may be making nonmonogamy more attractive. Multipartner relationships mean more people available to pay for household finances and help out with child-rearing.

“You just can’t afford a three- or four-bedroom place unless you have more incomes,” he said.

ICSV57ZTQBBUZCZA2QUMU7LUXA.jpg
(Nicole Neri)

Communication required​

But nonmonogamy doesn’t just mean more sex with more people.

It takes work to make nonmonogamous relationships work, according to members of the MNPoly group, which describes itself as supporting “ethical and consensual” nonmonogamous relationships.

“The main thing for us is everything is consensual, it’s open, it’s honest,” said Randy Frehse, who lives near Pine City, Minn., and is a longtime member of the MNPoly group.

“It takes a lot of communication,” Hitt said. “It’s way more communication than sex.”

“It’s not just a free-for-all. You don’t use it as an excuse to be dishonest or deceptive to people,” said Ray Grant, a Minneapolis man in a “very open relationship” with his nesting partner, Richard Lyons.

Scheduling is also a challenge, Wilson said. “It’s the really hard part.”

“Thank god for Google Calendar,” said Lyons of the time management challenges of an open relationship.

Energy management is also a consideration for Lyons, 75, and Grant, 62.

“We take a lot of naps,” Lyons said.

3QXMZMAGTRB5ZOFBS4VX6BFVU4.jpg
(Nicole Neri)

Live and let live​

At MNPolyCon, sessions on nonmonogamy and aging touched on memory issues and consent, changes in libido and sexual performance, colonoscopies, hip replacements, advanced directives and polyamory in senior living facilities.

“I find myself more and more horny as I get older, though maybe the hydraulics don’t work as well,” said Grant.

Bryan Demeritte led a session called “Non-Monogamy 101″ in which he said terms like “ethical nonmonogamy” and “consensual nonmonogamy” are giving way to a simpler, nonjudgmental umbrella term: nonmonogamy.

Polygamy and swinging would be forms of nonmonogamy. So would good old-fashioned cheating, though Hitt said, if you’re cheating, “you’re just not doing it right.”

Instead, many in Hitt’s group prefer polyamory, a subset of nonmonogamy that means “multiple concurrent romantic relationships with the knowledge and consent of all involved.”

Demeritte is writing a book to be published next year called “The More Love the Better,” which he said will describe nonmonogamy in the 21st century from the theological perspective.

“Someone you know is nonmonogamous,” Demeritte said. “It is becoming more and more mainstream. It’s time to let people be who they want to be and live the way they want to live.”

Source (Archive)
 
Strange of it so often portyaed as good when it's either gays or one woman and several guys as polyamorous. I bet if it's the other way around (one man with several wifes) it's toxic and patriarchy. Unless it's Muslims of course
 
In the language of the nonmonogamous community, they’re “nesting partners” in a polyamorous “V” relationship, with Bryan as the “hinge.” That means Bryan has a physical and romantic relationship with Deron and Joshua, but Deron and Joshua don’t have that sort of relationship with each other.
Not even gay niggers want other gay niggers, apparently.

Bryan, 52, is white, a former teacher who grew up Baptist in Missouri. Deron, 38, is Black and originally from the Bahamas. He works as an industrial and commercial HVAC foreman and has been legally married to Bryan for 11 years. Joshua (who plans to change his last name to Demeritte) is a 24-year-old restoration company project manager. He’s mostly Latino and grew up in Boston as the son of immigrant parents from the Dominican Republic and El Salvador.
If this was a 52 year old man hooking up with two women you could go onto twitter and find all kind of stuff from cat ladies about an age/power imbalance, and how the 24 year old was basically a child. Apparently with homos it is different, somehow? Where they can do the Leonardo DiCaprio thing without a murmur?

Also, why would a 24 year old homo male want a 52 year old as anything other than a sugar daddy?

In any event, this dynamic strikes me as so unstable I predict some sort of chimp out at some point. I'm not necessarily saying the melanin blessed are genetically predisposed to such behavior, but I'm not not saying it, either.
 

Becoming more mainstream​

These people really do live in an alternate reality if they think this is anywhere near mainstream.

In a way even gays at less than 10% of the population aren't mainstream, just their acceptance is, and only because of a massive lobbying and propaganda apparatus.
 
Daily reminder that Minnesota is the California of the Midwest.
If this was a 52 year old man hooking up with two women you could go onto twitter and find all kind of stuff from cat ladies about an age/power imbalance, and how the 24 year old was basically a child. Apparently with homos it is different, somehow? Where they can do the Leonardo DiCaprio thing without a murmur?
Because the cat ladies in question have no functional grasp of male sexuality in general, which they find toxic, or gay male sexuality in particular, which they can't criticize for political reasons even if they don't fetishize it.

As a practical matter, though, I've never seen these sorts of avant-garde relationships function for any length of time. In practical terms this is probably the older couple using their farmhand as a sex toy with a pulse, and the farmhand being too naive to see the warning signs.
 
10 acres isn’t a farm unless you’re a medieval peasant, its a hobby smallholding.
Also, I’m sick to death of poly fuckbuddy gangs with an ick vibe smugly trying to convince the world that it’s normal, superior even, while inadvertently letting slip that it always has wierd balance issues, is emotionally draining, and too much like hard work.
 
Also, I’m sick to death of poly fuckbuddy gangs with an ick vibe smugly trying to convince the world that it’s normal, superior even, while inadvertently letting slip that it always has wierd balance issues, is emotionally draining, and too much like hard work.
The polyfag insistence that people need to learn to move past or accept their natural feelings of revulsion and jealousy reminds me a lot of commies and their bizarre belief that human beings should be remade to accommodate their dead and gay ideology.
 
Please… this will horribly implode in under 5 years. Likely within 3.
 
Well when the inevitable happens at least I won't feel as bad about chickens as I did about alpacas
 
half of adults under 30 say open marriages are acceptable

Yeah, the half with vaginas since that's who is getting laid in an open relationship. Any guy that signs up for that shit has only himself to blame.

And here we have it, the core of why this is the next social push from the corporate liberals.

Look what it did to Americans to need two normal incomes to live in a decent neighborhood where your kids don't have to worry about encampments while walking to school. Now picture needing three, four. They can push housing prices even higher and more out of reach of anyone choosing to be a couple with a stay-at-home parent (ensuring as many kids as possible are culturally enriched by the public schools), and ensure that the only people who can live in nice neighborhoods are polyamorous groups and multigenerational immigrant families where grandma and grandpa bring the money and everyone lives under one roof

That's a Bingo. Anything to break up the nuclear family.
 
Back
Top Bottom