💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    699
That bill's gonna look like 1 drop of the expensive liquor Nick licks off the bottleneck compared to any incoming perjury charges.

View attachment 6310369

Almost no one gets charges with this in the United States, I am told.

BULL SHIT. Bob is a fucking liar who lies! Didn't Nick go to a charity event with his father several years ago in which Nick claimed to have gotten ass blasted drunk because his medication (I think Modafinil) made him more susceptible to alcohol?

I remember the same story. Bob is just lying to protect Nick. We would all do it to some extent for family, but we can call the spade what it is when we see it.

Are you telling me that for 1 week out of every month, the kids were staying at their grandparents house? This is ludicrous.

Robert Rekieta got the kids out of the house on a regular basis so his son could be a swinging, coke snorting, alcoholic degenerate.

That sounds insane. What kinds of parents off load their huldrne for 25% of the time onto the grandparents?
 
Are you telling me that for 1 week out of every month, the kids were staying at their grandparents house? This is ludicrous.

Robert Rekieta got the kids out of the house on a regular basis so his son could be a swinging, coke snorting, alcoholic degenerate.
When people were tracking the stream calendar ITT, I bet if we went back and took a look from last October until May of this year, we could figure out exactly when the kids were with Bob and Celeste, just from Nick's lack of streaming for a week.
 
Just wanted to point out that the Pharmchek sweat patches pick up on cocaine and most opioids, but not Nick’s drug of choice: Alcohol.

Kinda makes you 🤔
 
Are you telling me that for 1 week out of every month, the kids were staying at their grandparents house? This is ludicrous.

Robert Rekieta got the kids out of the house on a regular basis so his son could be a swinging, coke snorting, alcoholic degenerate.
Very charitable of you to assume that the guy jacking off on stream would go through all that effort to remove the kids from the house before giving in to depravity and drug addiction.
 
Terrible cross examination by the prosecutor. All she got was "they could've been on drugs without you knowing," "you weren't at their house much," and "it would be bad to have drugs in a house with kids." She didn't even try to press that lying sack of shit.

"In your opinion Nick and Kayla are wonderful parents?
You've never seen either of them intoxicated?
You don't believe they would ever put the kids in danger?
You said you have complete confidence in their parenting?

Then surely you don't think the kids should've been removed?

Would you agree that splitting up a family for no reason is one of the worst things the government can do?

And that's exactly what's happening here, in your opinion?

You said your highest priority is reunification?

You would say anything during your testimony to get those kids home, wouldn't you, Bob?"
 
It's very likely that Nick's dad is exactly like him.
Personality-wise? Seems likely, but minor quibble: Bob had to be legit smart-to-borderline genius to work at Cray as an engineer in the 80s and 90s. Nick is nowhere near that level of intelligent. Nick barely got a BA in creative writing from a 5th rate "show up and you graduate" college.
 
Terrible cross examination by the prosecutor. All she got was "they could've been on drugs without you knowing," "you weren't at their house much," and "it would be bad to have drugs in a house with kids." She didn't even try to press that lying sack of shit.

"In your opinion Nick and Kayla are wonderful parents?
You've never seen either of them intoxicated?
You don't believe they would ever put the kids in danger?
You said you have complete confidence in their parenting?

Then surely you don't think the kids should've been removed?

Would you agree that splitting up a family for no reason is one of the worst things the government can do?

And that's exactly what's happening here, in your opinion?

You said your highest priority is reunification?

You would say anything during your testimony to get those kids home, wouldn't you, Bob?"
This was just a hearing in front of the judge, there is no jury to impress and no semantics to challenge.
The judge has seen every kind of depraved parents, mistreated kids and the relatives lying to cover it up to prevent jailtime for their children.
The father was not every credible, but him being present shows there is at least some form of familiar support network that can help them out.

It all resulted in the children not going back right away and are staying with relatives (I think it was implied they are with relatives now).

I expect a lot harsher questions if the father would try to testify to the same things in the criminal proceedings, going as far as confronting him with the swinging, cucking, balldos, and general decline of his son live on stream for the world to see. How credible his statements are also relies on what bodycam footage shows the house actually looked like inside.
 
Responsive Motion - 20240815 - 34-CR-24-341 (Rekieta N.)-images-0.jpg Responsive Motion - 20240815 - 34-CR-24-341 (Rekieta N.)-images-1.jpg Responsive Motion - 20240815 - 34-CR-24-341 (Rekieta N.)-images-2.jpg Responsive Motion - 20240815 - 34-CR-24-341 (Rekieta N.)-images-3.jpg Responsive Motion - 20240815 - 34-CR-24-341 (Rekieta N.)-images-4.jpg Responsive Motion - 20240815 - 34-CR-24-341 (Rekieta N.)-images-5.jpg Responsive Motion - 20240815 - 34-CR-24-341 (Rekieta N.)-images-6.jpg Responsive Motion - 20240815 - 34-CR-24-341 (Rekieta N.)-images-7.jpg Ex. A - DC Sex Offender Registry Extract - Retrieved 20240814 (Rekieta N.).jpg
 

Attachments

Last edited:
What a hypocritical coward. How can we make sure that court isn't engaged in chicanery against Nick if we cannot watch the proceedings?
 
Back
Top Bottom