💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Kosher Dill]

So is that it, Nick's SuperLawyer (TM) strategy is to say "You are obliged to assume I'm 100% clean unless you have a dirty piss test and 8K footage of me snorting coke out of a bag marked 'NICK'S COCAINE' sitting on today's newspaper"? He thinks he's smart but you know this is all just marked down as "Uncooperative" on the CPS spreadsheet, without further comment.

I swear, everything this coke goblin does is optimized for maximum judge and CPS annoyance, when he's entirely dependent on their goodwill.

 

[Maraschino]

And even then, there was a noted failure to "remove any residual exposure" to cocaine by "wiping every surface down with bleach," because when it came down to selecting the appropriate "cleaning protocol," the Rekietas refused to even so much as discuss "what substance was there" and "don't necessarily believe that it was even in their home."

e doesn't see the point for releasing the footage because he doesn't know what it is people want to see. The rumors are just lies and fanfiction.

They brought their coke hoe co-defendant to their children services case. What a fucking idiot.

Since I don't think explicit words explain my point, I'm going to have to use the most classic form of communication (shitty memes) created as a result of 15 quintillion hours in Paint/Photoshop:

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

The bodycam footage that exonerates him of wrong doing is protected? What exactly does protecting it do if it is perfectly ordinary footage of a respectable home?

It's a FUNNY and WEIRD part of Minnesota law that NO ONE can understand. Sorry, Kiwiprude! He cannot release it no matter how much he wants to!

Are they really? I guess that makes sense if he's planning on pleading not guilty no matter what but that is insane if he can go through the entire case saying he's never ever taken coke and retain a straight face.

So is that it, Nick's SuperLawyer (TM) strategy is to say "You are obliged to assume I'm 100% clean unless you have a dirty piss test and 8K footage of me snorting coke out of a bag marked 'NICK'S COCAINE' sitting on today's newspaper"? He thinks he's smart but you know this is all just marked down as "Uncooperative" on the CPS spreadsheet, without further comment.

I swear, everything this coke goblin does is optimized for maximum judge and CPS annoyance, when he's entirely dependent on their goodwill.

This seems to be the strategy. Double-down on the denials for the criminal, and in the civil (where negative inference can be drawn from uncooperativeness or pleading the 5th) to scream 'IT'S NOT FAIR! MUH KONSTITOOSHUN!'

 

[Watching Rekieta]

I don't get where you see this. His entire MO has been to deny any wrongdoing and throw all evidence into question. Even totally obvious shit like him being high as shit on stream. This is going to trial.

Just today, he said things were moving along quickly. If he were going to trial, they wouldn't be moving at all until the omnibus and PC is laid out.

As it stands, his argument in child court is that his drug tests from MMP are all clean and it proves he's sober, but out of the other corner of his mouth he's saying the same testing company is shit and their results are all wrong. He personally objected to their evidence being admitted Re: his daughter and then begged his UA be admitted. Same lab, same hearing. All without his lawyer. He's a moron.

He knows the easiest, quickest way to keep his freedom and his kids is a plea bargain. He's even talked about how innocent men are forced to take plea deals because the state is so powerful. Plea deal coming.

 

[200MB]

No trial. His demeanor is a plea bargain is coming. Probably no jail, deferred adjudication and lots of probation. Lot's of in-home visits by the state. He's about to agree to let the state crawl up his ass with tent and a microscope.

Then he's going to say it's all water under the bridge and he's not discussing it any more. We'll see how many lawyers will then want to associate with a convicted felon. Watch Barnes, etc all scurry away.

We've been watching different lolcows lmao.

 

[Joggin Noggin]

I don't think Rekieta has the humility for a plea deal.

If it was to happen, it would have to be on the literal eve of trial.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Potentially Criminal Sean is either streaming on this in 15 minutes (if he boomered the stream time), or 12 hours and 15 minutes:

Edit: confirmed, time updated, streaming in 8 minutes as I type this.

 

[Strix454]

Are they really? I guess that makes sense if he's planning on pleading not guilty no matter what but that is insane if he can go through the entire case saying he's never ever taken coke and retain a straight face.

It doesn't really matter what he says in the criminal case on that point. He is being charged with possession, not use. In terms of the child neglect, the presence of the coke and the child testing positive for it constitute the neglect even if Nick was not using coke.

In the case involving the children, what he is trying to do is avoid the usual procedure of mental health and chemical assessments. Then an overall plan to deal with the drug issues in the home in a comprehensive way. Which would include going through a rehab program.

What Nick is trying to do here is go through sixty days of clean drug tests and then demand that his children be given back to him based on the idea that just by passing the drug tests and addressing the obvious issues with the condition of the house - that all the problems are addressed and he is a totally fit parent.

Nick is a coward and a total junkie. I would expect he fears any sort of examination of his behavior & any sort of rehab process more than he fears going to prison. I think he would also greatly fear his wife doing any kind of process like that.

I could end up being surprised, but I don't think Nick gets his kids back until either the criminal case is over or he admits to having used coke.

 

[Low IQ Doctor]

Support slut in the peanut gallery. 10/10 move.

There's a nonzero chance he gets away practically scot-free without a plea bargain. This is America, land of the retarded, home of the Whopper. Nick is a WHITE bread nigga and prisons are reserved for the shitty multigrain niggas back in Houston.

 

[Null]

It's a FUNNY and WEIRD part of Minnesota law that NO ONE can understand. Sorry, Kiwiprude! He cannot release it no matter how much he wants to!

I know your are being facetious but allow me to reiterate here:

Even if the footage is protected, Rekieta can sign an affidavit to consent to its release. If the county were to deny the request with his consent, he is proven correct. This costs him nothing. The footage would be censored by the state to redact all non-consenting parties, including the children. There is literally no reason for him not to consent.

I also reiterate here that the second Rekieta starts treating April less than she DESERVES (an angel, princess, dragged though the mud by Rekieta's reckless behavior) there's cash money on the table for her consent.

 

[Hot Dog]

Just today, he said things were moving along quickly. If he were going to trial, they wouldn't be moving at all until the omnibus and PC is laid out.

As it stands, his argument in child court is that his drug tests from MMP are all clean and it proves he's sober, but out of the other corner of his mouth he's saying the same testing company is shit and their results are all wrong. He personally objected to their evidence being admitted Re: his daughter and then begged his UA be admitted. Same lab, same hearing. All without his lawyer. He's a moron.

He knows the easiest, quickest way to keep his freedom and his kids is a plea bargain. He's even talked about how innocent men are forced to take plea deals because the state is so powerful. Plea deal coming.

I wouldn't give his word much weight since he's a proven liar. The amount of statements he's made regarding this case without his lawyer is honestly baffling, if I was dumb enough to sign up as his defense I would have run for the hills after seeing his first post arrest stream.

If he pleas out it's going to be seen as a loss. I don't think his ego can take that.

If the prosecution is even remotely paying attention they've got enough evidence to run circles around him.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

It was 60 days for family supervision, i.e. using grandparents who are present to supervise Nick and Kayla's time with the children rather than the kind of visitation center that Ralph goes to.

I think they said it was 60 days of UA would help establish sobriety andd that would facilitate the children moving to main house w/ grandparents and druggies move out.

Since charges were filed against April, I'm wondering if Nick was trying to argue that live-in fleshlight was not charged with drugs, they can't keep her from being around kids. I wonder if those charges were filed to protect the kids from stupid parenting choices. It gives KCHHS legal reason to keep April away from them.

If they have to kick her out to get their kids back, I hope she takes Nulls offer.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

There is literally no reason for him not to consent.

I mean, we all know why he won't consent to release the footage. His house was in some sort of state approaching maximum entropy, the kind of thing that would inspire physicists (if it didn't also revolt them).

Obviously that's not the narrative Nick is pushing publicly, but of course, he never lies.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Even if the footage is protected, Rekieta can sign an affidavit to consent to its release. If the county were to deny the request with his consent, he is proven correct. This costs him nothing. The footage would be censored by the state to redact all non-consenting parties, including the children. There is literally no reason for him not to consent.

Rekieta agreed to a protective order with respect to discovery in the child custody/CHIPS case. AFAIK the protective order was not posted, only this which said they agreed to one.



The problem with that is that the body cam footage was definitely turned over to Nick/Kayla in the discovery for the SEPARATE criminal case.

Below is from one of Nick or Kayla's criminal cases:


It appears that Nick is going to pretend that the protective order for discovery in the custody case prevents him from signing a release to have the county release evidence provided to him in the separate criminal case against him to the public.

 

[AnOminous]

This time the different judge was having none of it and asked Nick's attorney whether she'd like to make an objection for him.

Good. They shouldn't put up with that bullshit from this idiotic faggot. Tell him to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up unless he wants to fire his lawyer and proceed pro se.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I think they said it was 60 days of UA would help establish sobriety andd that would facilitate the children moving to main house w/ grandparents and druggies move out.

Since charges were filed against April, I'm wondering if Nick was trying to argue that live-in fleshlight was not charged with drugs, they can't keep her from being around kids. I wonder if those charges were filed to protect the kids from stupid parenting choices. It gives KCHHS legal reason to keep April away from them.

If they have to kick her out to get their kids back, I hope she takes Nulls offer.

No, they go over that they cannot license the grandparents (foster parents) to live at the same address that they were removed from. The 60 days would allow them to be rleeasedro Kayla and Nick WITH 24/7 supervision--ostensibly by the grandparents.

 

[MadStan]

I doubt the kids are coming back shortly. The kid nor the parents will explain where her cocaine came from and Nick refuses to tell the judge in the family court that it was his coke, and is denying the drug results from the initial test and is in fact denying it was even his coke. The lawyer can argue jeopardy but its family court not a criminal court and Nick isn’t leveling with the Court. The judge is going to rightly see this as unacceptable regardless of the recent negative tests and I think he will deny custody until he sees good faith from the parents.

From the judges point of view if Nick and Co. state it’s not their drugs then this means someone is in the house warehousing dealer levels and they are oblivious to it, so the denial doesn’t actually work at all.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

I think they said it was 60 days of UA would help establish sobriety andd that would facilitate the children moving to main house w/ grandparents and druggies move out.

No, they go over that they cannot license the grandparents (foster parents) to live at the same address that they were removed from. The 60 days would allow them to be rleeasedro Kayla and Nick WITH 24/7 supervision--ostensibly by the grandparents.

The relevant question in the transcript which was posted refers to "family supervision" which to me in means to refer broadly to any kind of visitation supervised by family as opposed to supervised visitation at a designated facility, and not merely what they were asking for which appeared to be a non-starter based on the licensure issues.

 

[Kosher Dill]

So do any of our doxperts have an idea how often Bob Rekieta is up in Minnesota these days? Attending the hearings, apparently helicopter-hovering over Nick to make him do his taxes, is Bob sweeping for Nick full-time?

 

[AnOminous]

Interesting reading the court docs. The last question the Judge had (and there weren't many) was to clarify that Nick and co. refused to have their initial drug tests released. That was about the extent of the Judge's concern. Take it at face value.

They couldn't hold that against him in the criminal trial, in all likelihood, but they certainly can in the CPS dispute, which isn't criminal. Once they've found cause to remove the kids from an unsafe environment, the burden shifts to the parent(s) to show the environment is now safe. This is a bit of a Kafkaesque situation to be in but hey if you don't want to be charged with crimes, don't have mountains of cocaine and guns just lying around in your degenerate hoarder hovel.

I think it's a good sign the judge is entirely aware what's going on in the case. I'm so sick of useless boomers in these lolcow cases.

I don't get where you see this. His entire MO has been to deny any wrongdoing and throw all evidence into question. Even totally obvious shit like him being high as shit on stream. This is going to trial.

I think it's more likely than not it pleads out, but two confounding factors are Nick is a gargantuan retard and his Barneswalker lawyer appears entirely willing to lead him down the primrose path and try some giddy konstitushamal defense. A normal defendant would be trying to reunite his family and a normal lawyer would be trying to tard-wrangle Nick.

Neither of those things are true in this case.

The GAL is not necessarily an attorney. The GAL is really intended to act as an overall guardian for the children and their interests.

They very often are attorneys, but Kristi Barber (the GAL in this case) is not, although she apparently has enough legal knowledge to act pro se in a case involving herself and win an appeal in a seemingly ugly child custody dispute with her ex.

Even when a GAL is a lawyer, though, they are not acting in an attorney/client relationship although the duties somewhat overlap. Hence, this case has a GAL and a lawyer.