💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.4%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.8%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.3%
  • Total voters
    696
Joggin Noggin said:
I probably missed it due to not reading all the prior filings, but why are three of Nick's kids represented by counsel other than the GAL? Obviously the GAL is involved given the charges, but with them presumably representing the best interests of the children I'm not seeing a reason for Mr. Greiner to be needed
Click to expand...

The GAL is not necessarily an attorney. The GAL is really intended to act as an overall guardian for the children and their interests. A substitute parent. The GAL would arrange legal representation for the children and coordinate that legal representation. But not necessarily be that legal representative.

The GAL is needed because often attorneys are not good as guardians. In particular they are too narrowly focused on legal issues rather than the overall issues involved.
 
Joggin Noggin said:
I probably missed it due to not reading all the prior filings, but why are three of Nick's kids represented by counsel other than the GAL? Obviously the GAL is involved given the charges, but with them presumably representing the best interests of the children I'm not seeing a reason for Mr. Greiner to be needed
Click to expand...
I think it's a MN thing. Children over 10 have a right to attend hearings and to have their wishes heard. The GAL looks after the childrens interest while their lawyer represents their wishes. Rekieta's children may wish to return to their parents with their siblings and that may not align with their interest but they have a right to be heard in MN.
 
Peace Through Power said:
Some clips from the stream

Kids are coming back (Nick never lies obviously)
Rekieta Kids Coming Back.mp4

State of his case and the thing that people are asking him to release is under protective order (Nick never lies obviously)
Rekieta Protective Order.mp4

Nicks view on abortion (2024 edition)
Rekieta Abortion 2024.mp4
Click to expand...

So Nick's abortion take is 'The government can't stop it because that would mean them stepping too far into people's lives, so "oh well" (I guess no one can naysay them)'

It reads as a way to make a lolbert fantasy of the NAP a cardinal virtue.

Joggin Noggin said:
I probably missed it due to not reading all the prior filings, but why are three of Nick's kids represented by counsel other than the GAL? Obviously the GAL is involved given the charges, but with them presumably representing the best interests of the children I'm not seeing a reason for Mr. Greiner to be needed
Click to expand...

MN has 'McKenna's Law' that entitles any juvenile in a family case over the age of 10 the right to a state-paid attorney and presence at all hearings.

Peace Through Power said:
View attachment 6269094
Maybe this "60 days of negative drug tests" is why Nick believes the kids will be coming back in under two weeks? I wouldn't be so confident considering that their strategy is to deny that they ever took drugs.
Click to expand...

This timeline is about right if we count from the week of Memorial Day on May 27th.
 
Peace Through Power said:
Maybe this "60 days of negative drug tests" is why Nick believes the kids will be coming back in under two weeks? I wouldn't be so confident considering that their strategy is to deny that they ever took drugs.
Click to expand...

Or under the condition that his parents, who are unable to suggest what being under the influence even looks like, despite being glued to television all their lives like most boomers, move in and are there to supervise?

Can you imagine the shame? Meemaw, Pawpaw, the newly divorced coke fiend sidepiece, Kayla, the kids, and the Balldos all under one roof.
 
Last edited:
10) As reiterated in later case plans, Sweep elaborates on KCHHS' safety meeting's attempt to "plan around drug use" having been hampered by the parents having "stated they do not want to answer any questions regarding that" and KCHHS having been "unable to do any safety planning around returning the children" because they had "not been able to establish sobriety" or "establish how these substances were found and got into the home" in the first place.
Click to expand...
He's has never lied.
This is probably the most glaring thing. Enjoy being child free i guess
 
Peace Through Power said:
State of his case and the thing that people are asking him to release is under protective order (Nick never lies obviously)
Your browser is not able to display this video.
Click to expand...
Sorry @Null. Nick would REALLY love to release the body cam footage himself, but unfortunately it's under a protective order which was agreed to by the parties with respect to the evidence in the CHIPS case.

Now, the body cam footage was turned over as discovery material for the criminal case (maybe also in the CHIPS, I have no idea). But, ignore that fact. The bottom line is that Nick would really love to be 100% transparent and publicly release the evidence which would show he is telling the truth about EVERYTHING.

Sadly, he can't do that. His hands are tied.

Peace Through Power said:
Maybe this "60 days of negative drug tests" is why Nick believes the kids will be coming back in under two weeks? I wouldn't be so confident considering that their strategy is to deny that they ever took drugs.
Click to expand...
Note that it wasn't 60 days of negative drug tests before Nick & Kayla "get the kids back" in terms of full custody without supervision.

It was 60 days for family supervision, i.e. using grandparents who are present to supervise Nick and Kayla's time with the children rather than the kind of visitation center that Ralph goes to.

It appears to me he is going to try to pretend on his streams that family-supervised visitation is full custody. It clearly is not.
 
The bodycam footage that exonerates him of wrong doing is protected? What exactly does protecting it do if it is perfectly ordinary footage of a respectable home?
 
Null said:
The bodycam footage that exonerates him of wrong doing is protected? What exactly does protecting it do if it is perfectly ordinary footage of a respectable home?
Click to expand...
The state clearly doctored the footage, man. Nick's doing his best to save us from the big government conspiracy designed to keep him from speaking his TRUTH.
 
200MB said:
His trial is going to be a riot. I can't wait. :story:
Click to expand...
No trial. His demeanor is a plea bargain is coming. Probably no jail, deferred adjudication and lots of probation. Lot's of in-home visits by the state. He's about to agree to let the state crawl up his ass with tent and a microscope.

Then he's going to say it's all water under the bridge and he's not discussing it any more. We'll see how many lawyers will then want to associate with a convicted felon. Watch Barnes, etc all scurry away.
 
Watching Rekieta said:
No trial. His demeanor is a plea bargain is coming. Probably no jail, deferred adjudication and lots of probation. Lot's of in-home visits by the state. He's about to agree to let the state crawl up his ass with tent and a microscope.

Then he's going to say it's all water under the bridge and he's not discussing it any more. We'll see how many lawyers will then want to associate with a convicted felon. Watch Barnes, etc all scurry away.
Click to expand...
I don't get where you see this. His entire MO has been to deny any wrongdoing and throw all evidence into question. Even totally obvious shit like him being high as shit on stream. This is going to trial.
 
Some (humourous) highlights from the transcript:

1722735439513.png

Probably due to his effeminate manner and shoulders


1722736206212.png

1722736265799.png


1722736460866.png


Nick made his parents and in-laws help clean the house:

1722736902615.png



I think this meant that the children were RIGHT THEN with other family, given the grandparents were in court.

1722737001080.png


The end of the transcript is cut off... No idea if there is anything missing or if the final pages were just the clerk signature. Confirmation @MNPublicRecords ?


The CPS sounds competent about making sure someone other than Nick and Kayla is there to supervise at all times before letting the children back. Addressed issue of virtual unrestricted access if the grandparents left the house or were sleeping.

Also, they want follicle test to prove a history of drug use or sobriety. Nick doesn't seem keen on that, and insists on a track record of urine tests, it would seem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom