💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.5%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 171 24.4%

  • Total voters
    701
I'm hoping they appeal it. Watching Andrew Branca, I agree with his take - the evidence that was not disclosed, was not relevant. For Alec's charge, in New Mexico law, it does not matter where the bullets came from at all.

The only way it could possibly have mattered, and it's a long shot, is if they were trying to argue Alec was framed or set up by someone else who put the bullets there. But no one was arguing that at all, and it still doesn't even address the involuntary manslaughter elements. Alec COULD have been set up, and ALSO still would have committed involuntary manslaughter.
rich men don't go to prison fella, he was never in danger
 
I think the general public is forgiving enough and ignorant about the facts of the case where they'll start telling themselves "oh, so he beat the charges and he's innocent!"

It's a good thing Nick Rekieta made the wise decision to talk about the teenager raping movie instead of covering the trial.
Nick thinks that the moral of the story was that Lester should have fucked the child and then the Nazi wouldn't have killed him, the real moral of the story is that that even a Faggot is better than a Paedophile (Something that Doug TenNapel doesn't agree with, so Nick is in good company) and that all Pedos should face the woodchipper, twice to the back of the head.
 
Nick thinks that the moral of the story was that Lester should have fucked the child and then the Nazi wouldn't have killed him
That makes no sense. Why would the neighbor decline to murder Kevin Spacey if he rapes the teenager? Is the thought process that the neighbor wouldn't have found Kevin Spacey? The neighbor came back over for the specific purpose of finding and killing Kevin Spacey.

"Oh damn, Kevin Spacey wasn't in the first place I looked, time to give up and go be gay at home!" What? That's nonsense. The neighbor would've probably killed both Kevin Spacey and the raped teenager instead of only Kevin Spacey. Also, wasn't the wife getting ready to kill Kevin Spacey anyways? She definitely would have killed him if he raped the teenager.

This isn't the sweaty superhero standing over two buttons meme where one button is "rape the teenager" and the other is "get shot by the neighbor." Nick is such a dumbfuck.
 
While I generally agree, Nick's great win in Rittenhouse and Depp (to a lesser extent, other trials) was bringing in insightful and well-practiced lawyers who could comment on the happenings. Nick on his own wasn't that insightful, and only entertaining in cases when there were obvious jokes or charismatic witnesses (as in Depp). Trials are long, often are boring, and a panel is a good way to cut through the dead air. That most of them were only clout-chasing demons was irrelevant, the super berries went to Nick.

As you say, even by Murdaugh (or was it Brooks?), that Nick, who could wrestle up and manage some amigos, was gone, and swiss cheese brain now prevents him from ever returning.
Nick has always been a mediocre "lawyer" with shit tier legal takes, he was lucky to hit success at the right time and his skill was getting good guests and being a decent host who knew what questions and things the layman watching would want to be asking. Hes was the first to nail that formula and was lucky that he had a pair of big trials right at the right time.
If he had any kind of work ethic he would have been set.
But Nicks ego meant he thought the big numbers was because of him alone, so when he didnt get Rittenhouse and Depp numbers for every trial he got discouraged, plus he thought he was set, hes never had to stick at anything so he let his worst impulses get the better of him and he fucked it all up

This has all been said before. Its not new.
Theres no way back now though, he's not the Law Pope anymore, hes a fucking drunken cuck who neglected his kids.
His reputation is fucked.
Even if he tried to go back to Rittenhouse era Nick the audience wont want to know.
All he'll get now are ALogs and people watching the trash fire.
He has no one to blame but himself.
Dumbass Balldo Cuck.
I think the general public is forgiving enough and ignorant about the facts of the case where they'll start telling themselves "oh, so he beat the charges and he's innocent!"

It's a good thing Nick Rekieta made the wise decision to talk about the teenager raping movie instead of covering the trial.
To be totally fair it wasn't just Baldwin to blame for that bullshit. The armorer herself, whoever thought it was a good idea to use the guns they were using for the movie to plink with during dinner break, the dumb motherfucker that left it loaded afterwards, the dumb motherfucker that passed Baldwin a loaded gun without checking, Baldwin himself for not checking it was safe, and so on, and so on.
The whole thing was a fucking shit show.
The irony is if it had been guys who actually liked and respected firearms on set and not a whole bunch of anti gun Hollywood cucks it probably wouldn't have happened because they would have known about safety rules and double checked.
It was a complete shit show from all sides.
Baldwin is still the main one to blame though. Anytime you handle a firearm its on you to make sure its safe.
 
Last edited:
That makes no sense. Why would the neighbor decline to murder Kevin Spacey if he rapes the teenager? Is the thought process that the neighbor wouldn't have found Kevin Spacey? The neighbor came back over for the specific purpose of finding and killing Kevin Spacey.

"Oh damn, Kevin Spacey wasn't in the first place I looked, time to give up and go be gay at home!" What? That's nonsense. The neighbor would've probably killed both Kevin Spacey and the raped teenager instead of only Kevin Spacey. Also, wasn't the wife getting ready to kill Kevin Spacey anyways? She definitely would have killed him if he raped the teenager.

This isn't the sweaty superhero standing over two buttons meme where one button is "rape the teenager" and the other is "get shot by the neighbor." Nick is such a dumbfuck.
You guys are overthinking this. He likes the film because Mena Suvari is hot and you get to see her tits.

Anything else is him trying to make excuses for it, but he just likes Mena Suvari‘s tits.

He could just google a picture of them but he’s too much of a boomer to understand that, so he watches an entire film.
 
That makes no sense. Why would the neighbor decline to murder Kevin Spacey if he rapes the teenager? Is the thought process that the neighbor wouldn't have found Kevin Spacey? The neighbor came back over for the specific purpose of finding and killing Kevin Spacey.

"Oh damn, Kevin Spacey wasn't in the first place I looked, time to give up and go be gay at home!" What? That's nonsense. The neighbor would've probably killed both Kevin Spacey and the raped teenager instead of only Kevin Spacey. Also, wasn't the wife getting ready to kill Kevin Spacey anyways? She definitely would have killed him if he raped the teenager.

This isn't the sweaty superhero standing over two buttons meme where one button is "rape the teenager" and the other is "get shot by the neighbor." Nick is such a dumbfuck.
Nick has talked at great length about this movie and pointed out that the irony of Lester arresting his spiral is what ultimately leads to him walking out of the room to his death (Nick's words not mine), the subtle implication here, being reflected in Nick's own life, is to not "PULL UP" because PULLING UP means death, or at least an ego version of it. He regards American Beauty as an allegory for his own life, Nick is a fucking weirdo.
 
The latest document from @MNPublicRecords confirms something that was obvious but flew under the radar. Dawn Weber and John Mueller, the Balldos attorneys in the Emergency Protective Care (EPC) proceeding were court appointed.
View attachment 6183918
View attachment 6183919
What does this matter?

Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 260C.163, subd. 3(b), "In all child protection proceedings where a child risks removal from the care of the child's parent . . . if the parent, guardian, or custodian desires counsel and is eligible for counsel under section 611.17, the court shall appoint counsel to represent each parent, guardian, or custodian prior to the first hearing on the petition . . . ."

In other words, broke niggas get a free lawyer if the gubbermint finna take they kids away, just like they do when they're charged with a jailable offense. Thus the Balldos had to have met the Minnesota broke nigga guidelines found here:

"Are you poor, or are you just pretending to be poor, Mr Balldo?"
to be fair, why would he spend money on trying to get his children back when he can spend it on things he actually cares about like coke and hookers?

I'll play Devil's Advocate:

Could it have been that the County appointed the representation as a precautionary courtesy because they wanted to be DAMN sure there was no appealable issue to toss the evidence from the sting? They they told Balldo to get his own lawyers becuase he can afford it and bond.

This seems in line with the current speculations as to the process and motivation of Kandiyohi County. I suppose we might never know if this is a smoking gun for Nick's devastated financial state, because the family money is always a factor, but it seems to fit the zeitgeist of this thread nicely.

I will defer to local barristers with different experience--or any attorney at all.

Hes was the first to nail that formula and was lucky that he had a pair of big trials right at the right time.
If he had any kind of work ethic he would have been set.

See Emily D. Baker; Viva and Barnes; and CourtTV.

Like them or not, they are making money.

All hell get now are ALogs and people watching the trash fire.
He has no one to blame but himself.

And any new audience will see a million cuck, CPS, or Balldo jokes. Nick is toxic.

He is not on the Anime Matsuri guest list--indeed, there are NO YTbers on it. I wouls speculate that the grand experiment to incorporate them failed spectacularly due to trusting Nick with it. It COULD have worked, but it needed someone savvy enough to run it.

You guys are overthinking this. He likes the film because Mena Suvari is hot and you get to see her tits.

Anything else is him trying to make excuses for it, but he just likes Mena Suvari‘s tits.

He could just google a picture of them but he’s too much of a boomer to understand that, so he watches an entire film.

Is this the straight version of 2M-1F 'not gay if the balls don't touch' cope logic for porn?

Not porn if it is in an artsy media setting.

Nick has talked at great length about this movie and pointed out that the irony of Lester arresting his spiral is what ultimately leads to him walking out of the room to his death (Nick's words not mine), the subtle implication here, being reflected in Nick's own life, is to not "PULL UP" because PULLING UP means death, or at least an ego version of it. He regards American Beauty as an allegory for his own life, Nick is a fucking weirdo.

He just knew that what everyone meant by 'Pull Up' was 'get shot in the head!' Eric July was the first one to say it, after all! Conspiracy confirmed! He can't keep getting away with it!
 
Is this the straight version of 2M-1F 'not gay if the balls don't touch' cope logic for porn?

Not porn if it is in an artsy media setting.
I’m not sure what you’re on about.

Let me explain this to you.

Attractive women are attractive.

You may even want to beat one off of if you look at an attractive woman naked.

The above is actual normal for a guy.

You wanting to do it to men is gay and not “trad cath” or “Russian/Greek orthodox”.

TL;DR you are gay
 
Last edited:
I’m not sure what you’re on about.

Let me explain this to you.

Attractive women are attractive.

You may even want to beat one off of if you look at an attractive woman naked.

The above is actual normal for a guy.

You wanting to it to men is gay and not “trad cath” or “Russian/Greek orthodox”.

TL;DR you are gay
Himedall forever doomed to being misgendered and called a man when she (allegedly) is a (cis)woman.
 
American Beauty was written by a very gay guy who hates hetrosexuality, hetrosexual relationships, hetrosexual families and has a death obsession. If you want to really understand the motivations and the ideas behind the film, replace Mena Suvari's character with a young boy. Probably the "Ricky" character because the Ricky character is a self-insert for young Alan Ball (the writer) and his relationship with his own closeted gay father.

The film really wanted to be about a middle-age guy discovering he is gay, losing any interest in his wife & family & suburban hetro life and then pedo creeping on a young boy only to be murdered by the boy's closeted father. But nobody would have funded a big-budget film like that (at least at that time).
 
They're clearly still alive right? So it's fine.
Nick never pulls up, he accelerates downwards.
If one was seriously hurt, or dead, we'd get told that it's not true, and if it was true it's not a big deal, and if it is a big deal it's not his fault. And Nick would attempt to milk pity points and attention from it.
I don't think he has a bottom.
 
Could it have been that the County appointed the representation as a precautionary courtesy because they wanted to be DAMN sure there was no appealable issue to toss the evidence from the sting? They they told Balldo to get his own lawyers becuase he can afford it and bond.
Many places will have a few lawyers who the police call when you say "give me a lawyer." Sometimes they hang around at courthouses or police stations. They aren't free. You get them from the police or the court and then you pay them afterwards when you drop them for your own attorney. It just allows them to hold hearings without delay.
 
Could it have been that the County appointed the representation as a precautionary courtesy because they wanted to be DAMN sure there was no appealable issue to toss the evidence from the sting? They they told Balldo to get his own lawyers becuase he can afford it and bond.

The Emergency Protective Care hearing on the children is as its name implies something that happens without any notice or generally time to prepare. Since its a family court hearing, they have to provide the parents with some reasonable opportunity to have legal representation. There is generally in the US system a constitutional right to attorney in a court proceeding. That right gets balanced in this situation against the fact that its an emergency hearing.

So generally in the case of people like Nick & Kayla the county will have set of attorneys that can come in and represent them in family court for the emergency hearing. After the emergency hearing, they have the option to choose any legal representation they wish including the people who represented them at the emergency hearing.

In Nick's case, none of these attorneys would be free. He would have to pay them.
 
Trials are long, often are boring, and a panel is a good way to cut through the dead air. That most of them were only clout-chasing demons was irrelevant, the super berries went to Nick.
You're just saying that because you're a hater. After all, look how fantastically Nick is doing now with no guests. It was ALL Nick.
 
The Emergency Protective Care hearing on the children is as its name implies something that happens without any notice or generally time to prepare. Since its a family court hearing, they have to provide the parents with some reasonable opportunity to have legal representation. There is generally in the US system a constitutional right to attorney in a court proceeding. That right gets balanced in this situation against the fact that its an emergency hearing.
In this case the kids were removed on May 24. The hearing was originally set for May 28 but Balldos continued it. The hearing finally took place on June 7. That's more than enough time to hire someone.

The right to appointed counsel in child removal proceedings was only created by statute in Minnesota in 2021, before that poor parents were shit out of luck.
Screenshot_2024-07-13-13-15-35-68_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg
In Nick's case, none of these attorneys would be free. He would have to pay them.
These were appointed panel attorneys. They put their name on a list and get appointed by the court in cases where the public defender doesn't handle that type of case, has a conflict, etc. They bill the state at some set hourly or case rate.

It's possible that the judge appointed them counsel and made the state pay for it regardless of their financial situation because judges can do whatever they want. But the code is black and white: the Balldos had no right to appointed counsel unless they qualified under the financial guidelines.
 
That makes no sense. Why would the neighbor decline to murder Kevin Spacey if he rapes the teenager?

Possible explanation: self-hating gay neighbor interprets not sleeping with the girl as confirmation that Lester is gay and had a relationship with his son (which upsets him for multiple reasons) and so pulls the trigger.

The thought process is likely that the neighbor who killed Lester was initially upset because he thought his son was in a gay relationship with Lester. Testing the waters for his own reasons, the neighbor tries to make a move on Lester and Lester declines. This would muddy the waters as to Lester's sexuality to the neighbor.

Lester not sleeping with the girl signals to the neighbor that Lester is gay, confirming the gay relationship with his son, angering the self-hating gay neighbor, leading him to pull the trigger.

Not saying the interpretation is correct or that it even makes sense. Just the most likely explanation if having sex with the girl would prevent his murder at the hands of the self-hating gay neighbor.

Wouldn't save him from other characters who wanted him dead though.

You guys are overthinking this. He likes the film because Mena Suvari is hot and you get to see her tits.

Anything else is him trying to make excuses for it, but he just likes Mena Suvari‘s tits.

He could just google a picture of them but he’s too much of a boomer to understand that, so he watches an entire film.

Nick certainly has a type.

In the clip below from November 2022, Nick and Kayla are discussing actor filmographies they want to see.

Kayla mentions Kevin Costner because he likes playing the good guy. Nick laughs and chooses Emma Stone (amateur, professional, and leaked stuff) and talks about watching a scene in the movie Easy A on repeat. The scene has Emma, playing a high schooler, walking at the pool and wearing a school uniform that is "3 sizes too small" and Nick thinks it is the hottest she has ever looked.



For reference, here is a picture of Emma in that scene where her character says that her outfit is "2 sizes too small" where her short shorts are trying to imply she has hips. The support for her chest is such that it looks like a shelf in the silliest way, tenting out from her body as her chest appears to be more bra than anything.

Smaller clothes are emphasizing her weaker aesthetic points thereby making her come across as a tryhard developing female (which the character is). Apparently, this is to Nick's tastes (so is the school uniform).

Easy A Pool.pngEasy A Pool shelf.png

Been learning more about Nick's ideal female: "slender white-girl body type". Given April's proportions (or lack thereof) it is becoming more understandable why Nick is attracted to her.

TL/DR: Nick's fixations seem to be telegraphing sexual frustration during his high school years in addition to something much worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom