US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
I try to leave you guys alone but sometimes I gotta reply if some retard tags me. It amuses me how upset some rapefugees get that this site isn't a bible thumping Republican loving hugbox. At least people aren't trying to get me banned for not loving Trump anymore (at least to my knowledge)
I don't get why they tag you over inane shit. If we had the real Hulk Hogan taking over on the democratic ticket that would be different because the shit would be funny no matter how you cut it.
 
You think that is Republican lead?
That is colusion, that is against democracy you lying sacks of shite. That is treason.
Biden has not been mentally fit to serve since before his election in 2020.
You can reply to multiple posts in the same post. You can pick one or two thoughts and combine them in one post and leave simple "I agree" type comments to the sticker feature to keep the thread cleaner(even in this shithole). No offense, you're new. I'll demonstrate by engaging with HHH in this post:
I know you're a newfag, which is why you got threadbanned for throwing a tantrum in the Trump thread, but if you're trying to reply to me, you should quote my post so I can at least see it if you want me to reply.
You really keep tabs of everybody who invades the hugbox? Or do you just read off your presumably enormous report list.
Sending soldiers to die in pointless wars has been the Republican's MO for decades. Certainly not a RINO thing to do
It is very much a RINO thing to do, when do you think the term originated? Theres a certain Republican who refrained from starting pointless wars, but I can't quite remember his name.
 
One sentiment I feel is the burning anger of the independent and casual democrat supporter.

You're lied to by staffers and the party for bringing up legitimate concerns about age in 2022 but then told to shut up about it because Trump bad and the midterms went blue.
The talking heads and commentators are discussing what-if involving Warnock, Whitmer, and Kamala but they never bothered to ask you what your thoughts are.
Now the party has lined up behind Joe and expects you to get excited about him because somehow Joe is a savior of Our Democracy™ and offers no apology or explanation for lying to you.

Its extremely hard to expect people to 1) buy the argument that democracy is in danger IF 2) Joe Biden is your party's nominee. The crazy thing is the party needs him to run because the alternatives are somehow even worse.
To add to this, it's why if they replace Biden, they won't be doing much better. In recent polling, every other possible replacement other than Mike was losing at the same level as Biden, and given that Mike is not running, it paints a bleak picture for the Democrats.
 
It is very much a RINO thing to do, when do you think the term originated? Theres a certain Republican who refrained from starting pointless wars, but I can't quite remember his name.
No, it's very much not a RINO thing to do. The term "RINO" and "DINO" have been around for decades, too (I know you just started voting recently because you adore Trump so much thanks to /pol/). It's been the Republican MO since WWII. Trump even sent our troops overseas to get involved in the Yemen war (he just made sure it wasn't reported like the previous administrations had done). You're only saying it's a RINO thing to do because you think anyone who isn't your messiah is a RINO, when that isn't reality. If he decided to send troops overseas to fight for Israel, you MAGA cultists would be praising him for it, too.

If you're gonna say something is RINO you should at least know what RINO is :story:

EDIT: Apparently the terms "RINO" and "DINO" have been around for 100 years. It didn't originate with your messiah
 
Sending soldiers to die in pointless wars has been the Republican's MO for decades. Certainly not a RINO thing to do
Don't let the letters next to the name distract you, Senator Holden Bloodfeast knows no true loyalty to any party and appears in many forms. Quite a few of the people who are power players among the Dems today, I remember signing off on the GWOT based on false pretenses. It is not "republican vs Democrat" it is "establishment vs everyone else who they view as expendable meat puppets."
 
No, it's very much not a RINO thing to do. The term "RINO" and "DINO" have been around for decades, too (I know you just started voting recently because you adore Trump so much thanks to /pol/). It's been the Republican MO since WWII. Trump even sent our troops overseas to get involved in the Yemen war (he just made sure it wasn't reported like the previous administrations had done). You're only saying it's a RINO thing to do because you think anyone who isn't your messiah is a RINO, when that isn't reality. If he decided to send troops overseas to fight for Israel, you MAGA cultists would be praising him for it, too.

If you're gonna say something is RINO you should at least know what RINO is :story:
Decades as in the 90s. Mentions of people prior to the Clinton years being "RINOs" come from political commentators retroactively labelling historical figures as RINOs. I checked a few of your favorite MSM sources to confirm this. Believe it or not the 1990s were a few decades ago. Your favorite candidate's mind might be stuck there, but that doesn't mean we're living in it.
 
Don't let the letters next to the name distract you, Senator Holden Bloodfeast knows no true loyalty to any party and appears in many forms. Quite a few of the people who are power players among the Dems today, I remember signing off on the GWOT based on false pretenses. It is not "republican vs Democrat" it is "establishment vs everyone else who they view as expendable meat puppets."
I never said that it wasn't, but it's adorable when a MAGA simpleton who only started being interested in politics because retards on /pol/ told him that Trump was "based" is acting like Republicans weren't the pro-war party for decades

Democrats aren't much better but it was Republicans who started the Iraq war (with a lot of Democrat support)

Decades as in the 90s. Mentions of people prior to the Clinton years being "RINOs" come from political commentators retroactively labelling historical figures as RINOs. I checked a few of your favorite MSM sources to confirm this. Believe it or not the 1990s were a few decades ago. Your favorite candidate's mind might be stuck there, but that doesn't mean we're living in it.
You said the term "RINO" originated under Trump in your previous post. It didn't. It's been around for literally decades (30 years = 3 decades; I know math is difficult for you). Same goes for "DINO". Just admit you were wrong here and we can move on
 
Sending soldiers to die in pointless wars has been the Republican's MO for decades. Certainly not a RINO thing to do
Really? Which wars were those other than the Bush f*ckery in Iraq and Afghanistan?

WW2 - Roosevelt, a democrat
Korean War - Harry Truman, democrat
Vietnam War - Kennedy & Lyndon Johnson, democrats
 
You can reply to multiple posts in the same post. You can pick one or two thoughts and combine them in one post and leave simple "I agree" type comments to the sticker feature to keep the thread cleaner(even in this shithole). No offense, you're new. I'll demonstrate by engaging with HHH in this post:

You really keep tabs of everybody who invades the hugbox? Or do you just read off your presumably enormous report list.

It is very much a RINO thing to do, when do you think the term originated? Theres a certain Republican who refrained from starting pointless wars, but I can't quite remember his name.
Can't be arsed.
 
Really? Which wars were those other than the Bush f*ckery in Iraq and Afghanistan?

WW2 - Roosevelt, a democrat
Korean War - Harry Truman, democrat
Vietnam War - Kennedy & Lyndon Johnson, democrats
Gulf War I. Contra wars under Reagan. Republicans were still defending the Bush fuckery even in 2016. Ted Cruz, who has his mouth stuck to Trump's ass, even loved the war. Or is Ted Cruz a RINO now? I know you MAGA tards think anyone who isn't Trump is a RINO, but that's not the case. If you had not just started voting in 2020 because /pol/tards told you Trump was based you'd know this.

As I said, Democrats weren't much better, but saying every other previous republican since WW II is a "RINO" is completely fucking retarded and you know it.

Anyway, I am heading out for the evening so you guys can have your bible thumping, Republican-loving hugbox back. I won't bother you guys anymore unless you tards tag me again and I am bored
 
I never said that it wasn't, but it's adorable when a MAGA simpleton who only started being interested in politics because retards on /pol/ told him that Trump was "based" is acting like Republicans weren't the pro-war party for decades

Democrats aren't much better but it was Republicans who started the Iraq war (with a lot of Democrat support)


You said the term "RINO" originated under Trump in your previous post. It didn't. It's been around for literally decades (30 years = 3 decades; I know math is difficult for you). Same goes for "DINO". Just admit you were wrong here and we can move on
Trump literally broke this man. All he can do is try and use semantics to argue facts. It doesnt ever work though.
 
vitamin water has HFCS.
I understood that and am unsurprised because I know how bad businesses get. I recall them trying to pitch Sunny Delight as "healthy."
But anyone who looks at Trump as their saviour and think his body and blood will be good for them would also chug Sunny D as part of their five a day.
 
Biden is far from my ideal guy, but I am voting for him because I don't want to live in a theocracy. I even said back in 2020 that he was the 2nd last candidate I'd vote for but he happened to be running against the 1st. Same applies this year. I'd much rather see Buttigieg or some random governor but what ya gonna do
See, folks? That is a classic case of TDR and it absolutely PERVADES the loons that constitute most of the democrat electorate. None of them are going to vote FOR Paedo Joe. All of them will vote AGAINST Donald J. Trump.

The TDR is so extreme that it shares many features with cults. These are not stable people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom