US Trump’s New Racist Insult - The former president’s recent attack on Senator Chuck Schumer is like an Everlasting Gobstopper of offense, with new layers emerging one after another.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Weird things happen on the debate stage—just ask Joe Biden. So when Donald Trump used Palestinian as a slur against the president during last week’s debate, it was hard to know whether the insult was planned or just an ad-lib.

“As far as Israel and Hamas, Israel’s the one that wants to go—he said the only one who wants to keep going is Hamas. Actually, Israel is the one. And you should let them go and let them finish the job,” Trump said. “He doesn’t want to do it. He’s become like a Palestinian. But they don’t like him, because he’s a very bad Palestinian. He’s a weak one.”

Whether premeditated or improvised, it was one of the low points of the debate for Trump, whose performance was obscured by Biden’s disaster but was full of misleading and appalling statements. And the next day, he did it again.

“Look at a guy like Senator [Chuck] Schumer,” Trump said the day after the debate, referring to the Senate majority leader. “I’ve always known him, known him a long time. I come from New York; I knew Schumer. He’s become a Palestinian. He’s a Palestinian now. Congratulations. He was very loyal to Israel and to Jewish people. He’s Jewish. But he’s become a Palestinian because they have a couple of more votes or something; nobody’s quite figured it out.”

This is an Everlasting Gobstopper of offense, with new layers emerging one after another. (Trump, like Willy Wonka, favors oversize ties.) First, there is the idea that calling someone Palestinian is inherently pejorative. Then there is the implication that Schumer is a traitor to his own people. Next is the suggestion that Schumer’s opposition to the current Israeli government is a result of his having been bought off—an implication of scheming, an anti-Semitic trope—even though Schumer’s criticism of the current government aligns with large portions of Israeli society and military leadership.

Trump has sought to develop a moderate position on the war in Gaza. He doesn’t like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a former ally, because of perceived personal slights. Trump has suggested at times that the war needs to end quickly, almost shading toward support for a cease-fire. But many in the Republican Party (including Trump’s donor base) are extremely hard-line and want to see Hamas flattened no matter the cost in blood. Trump has been more than happy to sit back and watch Democrats feud over the right course in the war.
From the June 2019 issue: An oral history of Trump’s bigotry

But sometimes Trump reveals more than he intends. In using Palestinian this way, he’s not differentiating between Hamas and civilians, or between Hamas and Fatah, or between Gaza and the West Bank. All Palestinians are the same to him, and they are all contemptible.
The emergence of the insult is reminiscent of another notable Trump remark from the debate. The former president has sought to increase his support among Black voters, especially Black men, but he still doesn’t seem to know how to talk about Black people as anything besides an Other. During the debate, he warned that immigrants were “taking Black jobs now,” an argument premised on the idea that Black people do low-skill jobs and only low-skill jobs. This should come as little surprise—on The Apprentice, for example, Trump was resistant to Black contestants becoming executives.

These moments are useful for remembering who Trump is. His intense focus on the criminal cases against him and the retribution he hopes to deal out for them has become the center of his campaign, somewhat overshadowing the offensive rhetoric that anchored his 2016 effort. But sometimes the mask slips, and the old Trump is still behind it.


source: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/07/trump-racist-insult-palestinian-schumer/678902/
archive: https://archive.md/sQ8LQ
 
Their endless cope and seethe because their guy had a demented episode on stage and they can't cover it up any more will never not be entertaining
 
This is an Everlasting Gobstopper of offense, with new layers emerging one after another. (Trump, like Willy Wonka, favors oversize ties.)

1720134649675.png

Trump is a jawbreaker? Tough to crack?
 
But sometimes Trump reveals more than he intends. In using Palestinian this way, he’s not differentiating between Hamas and civilians, or between Hamas and Fatah, or between Gaza and the West Bank. All Palestinians are the same to him, and they are all contemptible.
That's okay, because Netanyahu doesn't differentiate between Palestinians and Hamas supporters, either! On top of that, the IDF doesn't differentiate terrorists with the kidnapped Israeli citizens, so let's not pretend anyone in a position of power actually gave a shit about "the good ones" to start with.
 
Can't really see how it's racist but it is pretty odd sounding.

I don't think the Democrats have to worry about the Jewish vote in 2024 in any case so it's kind of pointless. It's like Trump trying to win black votes, you're just wasting your time.
 
First, there is the idea that calling someone Palestinian is inherently pejorative. Then there is the implication that Schumer is a traitor to his own people. Next is the suggestion that Schumer’s opposition to the current Israeli government is a result of his having been bought off
Yeah, but what if all these things are true?
 
I'm a little disappointed, Trump's come up with better racial slurs in the past. Still bretty good imo
His intense focus on the criminal cases against him and the retribution he hopes to deal out for them has become the center of his campaign
"Why is BLONALD BLUMPFFFF so upset that he's about to enjoy peepeepoopooprison FOREVER?"

TJD nao
 
Can't really see how it's racist but it is pretty odd sounding.

I don't think the Democrats have to worry about the Jewish vote in 2024 in any case so it's kind of pointless. It's like Trump trying to win black votes, you're just wasting your time.
Actually, part of their problem is that he's made decent inroads with black people. Not massive amounts but, if it holds, enough to devastate the Democrats. Democrats need something like 90% black support to win/be competitive

The Jews, on the other hand, are almost uniformly Democrat. Which is fucking stupid because key Democrat politicians actually do support the people who want them dead
 
This is an Everlasting Gobstopper of offense, with new layers emerging one after another.
If someone fucked a goat on main street I wouldn't need a 600 word article to explain why it was offensive.

If you have to explain the jokeoffense, it wasn't funnyoffensive.
 
New slur just dropped, sweet.

Wait, it's just "Palestinian?" The Jews took their land, so now they're taking the Jew trick of their own name being a slur?
 
Trump has been more than happy to sit back and watch Democrats feud over the right course in the war.
Perhaps he recognizes that both sides of this war (the eternal desert feud itself, and the proxy battle between Establishment Shitlibs and Third-World Progs) hate him and all of red America, so just like sending the National Guard to Ivy League campuses, getting involved will just give the two sides a common enemy to unite against instead of forcing one group to deal with its Golems.

Who the fuck is standing up for Chuck Schumer??
Author David A. Graham, ladies and gentlemen:
1720136322922.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom