Official Kiwifarms Edgy Atheist Thread - where we make fun of all sorts of sky daddy believers

[The Tall Man]

Bro, just stop with your cringe articles already.

The articles demonstrate that there are real life consequences to following rotten morals.

https://www.jpost.com/israel/govt-struggles-with-jump-in-teen-prostitution

I TOLD YOU WHAT THE TALMUD IS LIKE 12 TIMES ALREADY
IT'S A FUCKING IMAGINARY COURT CASE BOOK OF EXAMPLES

Yes, and one of your top sages argues that raping a baby girl younger than three is equivalent to poking someone in the eye.
And your barbaric pedophilic cult thought this was such an amazing argument that it needs to be preserved for future generations.

Your unwillingness to condemn this speaks volumes about your morals.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

The articles demonstrate that there are real life consequences to following rotten morals.

https://www.jpost.com/israel/govt-struggles-with-jump-in-teen-prostitution

Yeah, those muslim bastards really should go to jail.

Yes, and one of your top sages argues that raping a baby girl younger than three is equivalent to poking someone in the eye.

This dude man.
So fucking stupid.

And your barbaric pedophilic cult thought this was such an amazing argument that it needs to be preserved for future generations.

Yeah nigger.
They just didn't imagine that a closet pedophile like you would show up, read it and actually believe that the Jews treat a fucking hypothetical as law.

Your unwillingness to condemn this speaks volumes about your morals.

You ignorant stupidity speaks volumes of the supernatural, because someone this fucking dumb, this relentlessly ignorant who keeps asking the same shit over and over and over and over and over again, like I said you would, somehow still remembers how to breathe.

 

[The Tall Man]

Yeah nigger.
They just didn't imagine that a closet pedophile like you would show up, read it and actually believe that the Jews treat a fucking hypothetical as law.

>It is you, child, who is a pedophile for interpreting this innocent justification for raping babies as pedophilic.

Most moral Religion in the world.

You ignorant stupidity speaks volumes of the supernatural, because someone this fucking dumb, this relentlessly ignorant who keeps asking the same shit

Why would I stop asking? You have not given me an explanation why the passage doesn't mean what it says.

I will ask again, explain what this passage actually means.
Ketubot 11b

Rava said that this is what the mishna is saying: An adult man who engaged in intercourse with a minor girl less than three years old has done nothing, as intercourse with a girl less than three years old is tantamount to poking a finger into the eye. In the case of an eye, after a tear falls from it another tear forms to replace it.

What is Rava's argument here? What makes it so great that it had to be recorded in religious books?

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

>It is you, child, who is a pedophile for interpreting this innocent justification for raping babies as pedophilic.

Someone who actually cares about this subject would not spew horseshit and would do the due diligence of basic fucking research before raging out like a clown.
You are definitely a pedo, because you care so much to push your ideological nonsense just for the sake of ideological nonsense. This is what hypocrites do. Do you know what a hypocrite means? Do I need to get some scholar of languages with 99 yellow press article citations for you?

Why would I stop asking?

Because you're a moron lol

You have not given me an explanation why the passage doesn't mean what it says.

Because it's a dialectic. Do you know what that means? Of course you don't.

I will ask again,

And again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again again and again and again and again and again and again again and again and again and again and again and again again and again and again and again and again and again again and again and again and again and again and again, because your raisin brain cannot comprehend what a dialectic is.

What is Rava's argument here? What makes it so great that it had to be recorded in religious books?

It, like all the other insane crazy shit in the Talmud, is a complex summary record of how you cannot argue for a given case within certain confines of the Jewish law.
If you want a more complex answer, find a Rabbi, or a few Rabbis, email them and read what they say, you absolute imbecile.

 

[The Tall Man]

If you want a more complex answer, find a Rabbi or a few Rabbis, email them and read what they say, you absolute imbecile.

So you can't answer it, and it would be too complicated for me to understand anyway.
Got it.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

So you can't answer it

I literally answered you a million times, grifter.
If you want to know greater detail, go find a Rabbi. And I mean it, if you actually care, which you obviously do, find a Rabbi and discuss it before you call them pedos and shit.
And for the love of common sense, stop going to 4chan to get your talking points. You don't get your ammo against pedos from other pedos.

and it would be to complicated for me to understand anyways.

To complicated indeed.

Got it.

No you didn't. I give it 2 seconds before you ask again.

Hey Tall Order Fag, is that you in the green pjs?

 

[The Tall Man]

I literally answered you a million times, grifter.

Please link the answer.
All I have seen is you claim I took it out of context, then you moved to saying I am cherry-picking, and finally, you settled with 'You don't get it because it's dialectic.'

Being the patient man that I am, I will grant you all this goalpost-moving and ask you: What truth did this passage of the Talmud reveal?

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

Please link the answer.

No lol
I intentionally will not, because it takes 2 seconds and I demand you do that yourself.

All I have seen is you claim I took it out of context,

Which is exactly what you do lol
I looked at the other shit you post. You are a literal retard. Retards do not deserve respect.

then you moved to saying I am cherry-picking,

Which is the exact same as the above lol
Man, you really are consistently stooped.

and finally, you settled with 'You don't get it because it's dialectic.'

No. I settled with 'You don't get WHAT IS dialectic.'
I will also follow up with 'You don't get SPEAK ENGLISH even.'

Being the patient man that I am,

lool
Retard, I'm the patient man fucking around with a waste of space like you, but that's just because I like to laugh at stupid retards going in circles.

I will grant you all this goalpost-moving and ask you: What truth did this passage of the Talmud reveal?

THAT YOU CANNOT ARGUE ABOUT CHILD RAPE IN A CERTAIN RANGE OF THE LAW, BECAUSE THERE IS NOT ENOUGH LAW TO CLEARLY SHOW THE RAPE IS EVIL, WHICH IT CLEARLY IS EVIL EVEN TO A BLIND MONKEY

 

[The Tall Man]

Which is the exact same as the above lol
Man, you really are consistently stooped.

cherry-picking is not the same as taking something out of context

Spoiler: explaining simple concepts to Captain MATI

Cherry-picking refers to selectively presenting only evidence that supports your argument while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. It involves being selective about the information presented to create a misleading impression.

Taking something out of context involves quoting or referencing a part of a statement or text in a way that distorts its intended meaning. This can happen by removing it from the surrounding text or circumstances that provide a fuller understanding.

No. I settled with 'You don't get WHAT IS dialectic.'

I keep asking you what the argument is and at what truth has been uncovered.

Spoiler: explaining simple concepts to Captain MATI

Dialectic is a method of argument or discussion involving the exchange of logical reasoning and ideas, typically to explore and resolve contradictions or to uncover the truth.

THAT YOU CANNOT ARGUE ABOUT CHILD RAPE IN A CERTAIN RANGE OF THE LAW, BECAUSE THERE IS NOT ENOUGH LAW TO CLEARLY SHOW THE RAPE IS EVIL, WHICH IT CLEARLY IS EVIL EVEN TO A BLIND MONKEY

No. That has nothing to do with the passages of Ketubot 11b or Sanhedrin 55b.

Retard

I don't claim to be the smartest person in the world, but I can easily run circles around your mind.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

cherry-picking is not the same as taking something out of context

Spoiler: explaining simple concepts to Captain MATI

Cherry-picking

Spoiler: explaining simple concepts to Captain MATI

refers to selectively presenting only evidence that supports your argument while ignoring evidence that contradicts it. It involves being selective about the information presented to create a misleading impression.

Taking something out of context involves quoting or referencing a part of a statement or text in a way that distorts its intended meaning. This can happen by removing it from the surrounding text or circumstances that provide a fuller understanding.

I keep asking you what the argument is and at what truth has been uncovered.

Spoiler: explaining simple concepts to Captain MATI

Dialectic is a method of argument or discussion involving the exchange of logical reasoning and ideas, typically to explore and resolve contradictions or to uncover the truth.

No. That has nothing to do with the passages of Ketubot 11b or Sanhedrin 55b.

I don't claim to be the smartest person in the world, but I can easily run circles around your mind.

What the fuck kind of cryptic post is this shit lol

 

[OneMillionRPM]

It's like every thread on this site eventually leads to the subject of pedophilia.

Noncewin's Law.

 

[The Deep State]

Thread vibes for the last 3 pages.

 

[The Tall Man]

Thread vibes for the last 3 pages.

jvw2.mp4

Why do you never criticize Judaism?

 

[f4t2h7gc]

Dave Farina debated some flat earther with the Quarter Pounder hosting.
Video on Dave's channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCXupXXXncM
https://youtube.com/watch?v=qCXupXXXncMVideo on quarter pounder's channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_vbOXJW2B8

Now as for why this crossover happened, this is what Dave is saying:
View attachment 6103330
This betrayal happened even after QP said all three of them (both debaters and himself) were gigachads who could've been slaying pussy that night, or something to that effect.

The FE subhumans still haven't figured out things like air resistance and conservation of momentum, but something else that's also giving me fedpostal urges is the comments section in QP's channel.
View attachment 6103359
The vast majority of them - despite ostensibly not being flat earthers - are crying about what a meanie Dave is, the actual debate topic be damned. Conservatards will happily become flat earthers if the issue is sufficiently politicized. I'm so fucking MATI at this shit, bros. I'm getting the same genocidal urges as when Tucker confidently denied evolution on JRE. This shit is long past the point of being funny, we need those fucking demonkkkrat re-education camps Q anon was wailing about.

Some people just can't be convinced. Many are just there for the grift. I doubt they actually believe it.

 

[The Deep State]

Why do you never criticize Judaism?

I put Jews on the poll as "foreskin munchers". I find Judaism abhorrent.

It's just that Judaism isn't very relevant in the present cultural/political zeitgeist, while Islam (here we go again) produces a surplus of lolcow/horrorcow shit.

Edit: I can't believe you negrated that soundtrack dude, I made both you and cap look so cool.

 

[The Tall Man]

I put Jews on the poll as "foreskin munchers". I find Judaism abhorrent.

That is nice and all, but when compared to what you have to say about Islam and Christianity, it seems like you are scared to touch the rotten root of the Abrahamic religions.
And Judaism is objectively the worst of all three.
So, those Chabadniks scurrying away with blood-stained mattresses when their tunnels were closed, considering that the exact same area had multiple problems with rampant pedophilia, isn't horrorcow shit?

It's just that Judaism isn't very relevant in the present cultural/political zeitgeist, while Islam produces a surplus of lolcow/horrorcow shit.

This has to be a joke, right?
You do realize the most powerful religious movement in the West is Judeo-Christianity, which is basically Shabbos Goy Christians helping the Jews with their holy wars.
This situation brought us all the wars in the Middle East. I hope you are not one of those braindead leftoids who repeats the meme that it was about the US getting oil, because all you have to do is look up imports from Iraq before and after the war to realize the US only lost oil imports. These wars are done because of Abrahamism.
Chabad has more sway over Russia than the Orthodox Church. And these people have far more disturbing beliefs than Islam.

You post your enlightened centrist video trying to equate my arguments with "Nazism," claiming it had nothing to do with atheism.
I want you to explain this to me.
How is anything I have posted not related to atheism?

 

[FedPostalService]

Why do you never criticize Judaism?

Why can certain posters not bring up Judaism even when no one is talking about it?

 

[The Deep State]

@The Tall Man You're taking this way too seriously if you need me to explain to you why I made a glorified meme.

I don't share your views on Jewish world domination, etc. That's just something we'll have to agree to disagree on, because I'm not interested in fighting other atheists about which skydad faction is worse.

 

[Tablet County]

You post your enlightened centrist video trying to equate my arguments with "Nazism,"

I too am not fond of the disproportionate social and political currency that people of Jewish descent often (((coincidentally))) wield in our society, but you can't espouse ancient Germanic principles, post frequently in the holocaust denial thread, and talk about Jews every other sentence and not expect people to equate your views to Nazism. I realize that's an incredible generalization and I know being a teutonophile who hates kikes and denies the shoah doesn't automatically make you some kind of Hitler 2, but you at least have to consider how you appear.

 

[The Tall Man]

@The Tall Man You're taking this way too seriously if you need me to explain to you why I made a glorified meme.

I don't share your views on Jewish world domination, etc. That's just something we'll have to agree to disagree on, because I'm not interested in fighting other atheists about which skydad faction is worse.

So you don't think Judeo-Christianity has a lot of influence on politics?

This is a problem I see with many "Atheists" they can't comprehend that religious people really believe the abhorrent nonsense they spew.
They are also unable to realize how many powerful people are religiously motivated.
Just because you think it's silly and don't believe it doesn't mean others wont give everything in the pursuit of eternal live.

If you look at the PNAC papers, startegy papers for US startegy for the middle east it's written by a bunch of religious Jews for religious reasons. You look at OSP and it's a bunch of religious Jews working with the religious George Bush to destabilize the middle east.

Yes, I still want you to justify your glorified meme.

Why can certain posters not bring up Judaism even when no one is talking about it?

That doesn't really apply in the Atheist thread does it?
Judaism is the root of Christianity, Christianity was invented by religious Jews.
Judaism is the root of Islam, Islam was invented by religious Jews.
If you don't take Judaism and the made up history that is part of all Abrahamic religions into account then you are only criticizing superficial aspects.

I too am not fond of the disproportionate social and political currency that people of Jewish descent often (((coincidentally))) wield in our society, but you can't espouse ancient Germanic principles, post frequently in the holocaust denial thread, and talk about Jews every other sentence and not expect people to equate your views to Nazism. I realize that's an incredible generalization and I know being a teutonophile who hates kikes and denies the shoah doesn't automatically make you some kind of Hitler 2, but you at least have to consider how you appear.

My "anti-Semitism" doesn't matter.

Deep State felt the need to equate my arguments to Nazism. He does not know my views on Nazism.

There is nothing in my arguments that can be mistaken for Nazism, besides general criticism of Judaism, which leads me to believe that Deep State equates criticism of Judaism with Nazism.
I have checked his posts and he does like to criticize Muslims and Christians, he seems to be pro Israel and he doesn't seem to like criticizing Judaism.
To me he seems like someone who loves to bash on Muslims and Christians and pretend he has principles based on rational Atheism, but he obviously lacks the spine to call out the ROOT of all Abrahamic religions Judaism.

Anyone pretending to be righteous when stating Muhammad is a pedophile but becomes as quiet as a curch mouse when passages of the Talmud about raping babies come up is pathetic.