DancingIsraeli
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2022
seriously, though. tankies are more respectable at this point.Lolberts never miss, they're always retards.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
seriously, though. tankies are more respectable at this point.Lolberts never miss, they're always retards.
In Barnes' mind, you can never trust the government that what they put in a police report is accurate so anyone whose guns the government wants to take away they can just frame them.I am a strong defender of 2A and:
If it was just that CPS came over to check things out and there was an unsecured firearm and ammo where one of the multiple children could find it and potentially blow their own fucking head off I might be more likely to support Nick's 2A rights being temporarily stepped on(assuming he is not found guild of a felony because presumption of innocence).
That is not the situation. The situation is an erratic drunk drug addict had a gun under his bed where he could easily reach it when he wakes up hallucinating or Kayla decides enough is enough and tries to leave. Yeah hypothetical blah blah blah.
Nick can have his guns back if he is not found guilty of a felony.
This isn't some edge case of a guy with a couple grams of coke and a pistol in his nightstand, this nigger rackets had a goddamn ounce of coke spread out in different baggies, scales, numerous guns and ammo, other drugs all around 5 fucking kids. I'm about a staunch a second amendment guy as you will find, nick deserves to lose his gun rights until this is settled at the very least.What a fucking retard. This genuinely made me MATI "Duh, he only had cocaine with his guns in the house that his kids were living in. Duh, drugs don't impair your judgement and decision making skills. Duh, this is a second amendment issue!". This isn't a second amendment issue, this is a CPS issue. He had the guns on the cocaine room, not even a room of separation of him being very much capable of making a very bad decision while high on 25g of cocaine.
"For you, the day I brought my Balldo and kilo of cocaine to your town was the most important day of your life. For me, it was Tuesday."Nick's case is like a average Tuesday for him. It's hilarious he's wasting a half of million for a legal & civil case with top lawyers, especially if he's footing kayla's defense.
What seems like forever ago now, I made a post talking about Megan, and I used the quote "use that journalist brain of yours".https://youtube.com/watch?v=sUx09O-Cn10Wait a fucking second this Megan Fox bitch was on Nick's livestream and heard one of his retarded jokes about a victim of child molestation and YET has the gull now to blame Kiwi Farms for the way Nick turned out. Fuck this vile enabling cunt.
yeah, i have seen those updates, i liked those posts. from what i saw, most of the outside entities weighing in are simping nick. i have seen the breadcrumbs. i have followed it all. it’s all repetitive or as yet unproven (though, i will say, the sexual abuse charges are of interest based on nick’s constant “jokes” about child sexual abuse.) but so far in ALL of what’s been revealed since his bonding hearing, there is no “there” there. it’s all speculation. there is no real evidence. i am waiting on bated breath for the evidence. but it’s not there. it’s nothing to get excited about.There's been new developments constantly. I have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. We've had updates that the charge alleging that Kayla Rekieta knowingly permitted physical/sexual abuse wasn't a typo drop in the past hour or so. More outside entities keep weighing in. Culling over Nick's content is revealing more breadcrumbs of what was happening. There's been coverage from Metokur, Nick's friendgroup, and soon Kino Casino.
I sincerely have no clue what you're talking about.
Iirc that's why Rittenhouse's team got rid of him. He was wanting to turn the case into a sensationalized 2A cornerstone. The rest of the team seemed to be more concerned with getting a poor kid out of a horrible situation as quickly as possible.This is why I think Barnes would be a bad idea for Nick. Regardless of the merits of the gun laws Nick's up against (and I agree with @AnOminous over there), there is a 0% chance that Barnes would not use this to grandstand on his '2A lawyer' brand and, given his being a tard about strategy on the Kyle case, he'd maintain that even if the computer was saying PULL UP.
(A phrase just occurred to me while getting ready for the 500: You want a zealous defense not a zealot's defense.)
all of this is utopian idealism on the same level as hardcore commies. a small nation of 130+ IQ white Western Euros MIGHT be able to pull it off, but seeing as that type of organization is effectively illegal everywhere that it matters, it's time for a new plan and you may as well hang the wishful thinking up for the forseeable future.The NAP is supposed to be enforced by private/voluntary militias. Many of the OG libertarians came from the reactionary tradition and saw it as a way to return to a medieval organization of the state, particularly in regards to free and self rulling cities of Medieval Europe. Internet lolbertarians have never actually read any theory or Rothbard.
Also, we have the Chainsaw man, what do you have?
View attachment 6024250
As I recall, during the Depp trial, when the tmz witness clapped back at the Amber's lawyer, one of the lawtube lawyers in the audience (DUI guy) dropped his jaw in shock. Like a cartoon.Can anyone please explain, or link to a post explaining, the legalbytes falling out drama? I remember her in the Rittenhouse and Depp? livestreams but I stopped watching lawtube shortly after that so I missed whatever drama was involved in the breakup.
> [DUI guy's] sin was looking at Elaine's laptop when he was seated right behind them. That's where the 'when we send someone.....' comment came from.,
[DUI guy] also alluded to being able to see Ambers teams laptop and knowing what they had on it, which lead to her counsel talking to the judge about it.
He can work on his comedy. I've heard they love pedophile jokes in prison.If Nick goes to prison he is very likely going to end up getting himself either beaten or killed. Either he's going to say something really stupid or he's going to do something stupid like join the D&D group. If he's smart he might try to get some cred by offering to help prisoners with their cases like that guy who went to prison after trying to take over all of Africa.
At this moment, you are rehashing your points. Shrugs.yeah, i have seen those updates, i liked those posts. from what i saw, most of the outside entities weighing in are simping nick. i have seen the breadcrumbs. i have followed it all. it’s all repetitive or as yet unproven (though, i will say, the sexual abuse charges are of interest based on nick’s constant “jokes” about child sexual abuse.) but so far in ALL of what’s been revealed since his bonding hearing, there is no “there” there. it’s all speculation.
It depends on how flexibly you're using the term "love." Forced "love" is still a form of "love," right Nick?He can work on his comedy. I've heard they love pedophile jokes in prison.
And even more pretentious than that, LegalBytes declared that "when we send people to the courtroom" they should act better than that. It came off like she was the queen of lawtube.As I recall, during the Depp trial, when the tmz witness clapped back at the prosecutor, one of the lawtube lawyers in the audience (DUI guy) dropped his jaw in shock. Like a cartoon.
This photo / video clip became a meme.
Half of the lawtubers, led by legal bytes and law and lumber, said this was completely inappropriate , and dui guy needed to apologize. Since his behavior was "unbecoming of a lawyer" etc.
The other half, which included legal mindset and Nick Rekieta and others, said it was a normal reaction, and wasn't a problem or worth apologizing for.
This split lawtube in two, and I think that's the origin of the legal bytes falling out drama.
my first inkling was way back when he had Drexel on the first few times peddling manosphere bullshit and using terms like "sex economy."This was one of maybe a half-dozen things where I reached peak Nick and realized he was even more subhuman of a piece of shit than I'd previously imagined. I loved the reactions of people there, visibly shocked by his faggotry.
If I knew literally nothing about Rekieta before this happened, I would be much more inclined to skepticism. That isn't the case, though. We knew and could infer a lot about what was going on behind closed doors there, and this simply confirms what we already knew or suspected. I would not be surprised if they exaggerated the squalor and put a thumb on the scale for the weights, in fact, I'd be surprised if they didn't, but I'm pretty convinced the substantive details are correct.In Barnes' mind, you can never trust the government that what they put in a police report is accurate so anyone whose guns the government wants to take away they can just frame them.
Ironically, it somehow has turned out that Drexel may indeed be LESS of a degenerate than Nick. He's never been accused of abusing his OWN child at least.my first inkling was way back when he had Drexel on the first few times peddling manosphere bullshit and using terms like "sex economy."
Don't forget the best part: they gaslit the mother so hard into thinking she ruined her daughter's life by giving her "dangerous and unnecessary drugs for a fake condition" that she killed herself out of shame.For those who missed Nick joking about this girl named Maya
https://youtube.com/watch?v=sUx09O-Cn10
For more context on the girl he's joking about:
"The jury awarded the Kowalski family monies for a range of offenses, including wrongfully placing the child under video surveillance for 48 consecutive hours and making her strip down to shorts and a training bra for a photograph.
A hospital staffer, they found, also committed misconduct by sometimes kissing the then 10-year-old and having her sit on her lap."
Cool story. I'm going to keep dabbing on Nick's grave anywayyeah, i have seen those updates, i liked those posts. from what i saw, most of the outside entities weighing in are simping nick. i have seen the breadcrumbs. i have followed it all. it’s all repetitive or as yet unproven (though, i will say, the sexual abuse charges are of interest based on nick’s constant “jokes” about child sexual abuse.) but so far in ALL of what’s been revealed since his bonding hearing, there is no “there” there. it’s all speculation. there is no real evidence. i am waiting on bated breath for the evidence. but it’s not there. it’s nothing to get excited about.
I stopped watching Nick because I couldn't stand his slimy lawtube buddies.Barnes was a nonstop salt mine during Rittenhouse because he was told he wasn't needed after jury selection started. Hard R Richards and Lawyer 47 couldn't do anything right according to him. I noticed he stopped coming on near the end when it looked like it would take some severe faggotry to convict Kyle like the 4k resolution drone footage bullshit.
I think you just described a lot of the people outside the kf space talking about this.If I knew literally nothing about Rekieta before this happened
I want this to go to trial so I can see the bodycam video(s) and see the state of his fucked up trap house. I want to know just how much of a nigger he really is and listen to the lawtubers so that I can really confirm that they're all niggers themselves.Part of me wants to see this go to trial