💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Admiral Nelson]

Future plans prediction,

His kids are long gone from either of these regards (lord willing), and thrive in the care of their grandparents who actually care and give a fuck about them

Nick and K (the worse one who obviously doesn't cook) only have each other and have to band together to keep sober to save the 50k and/or prison debts (though obviously they still slip throughout)

After 5+ years living through the criminal watch and punishment process, they realize stability in normality is actually a bless to most people on earth and having a steady family, a consistent income, and with children who you can love is the most anyone could ever wish for in this existence.

Realizing this, they reconnect with their own children who they've thus far abandoned, having to try to make amends day-by-day. Eventually, they somehow establish (though a small mimicry of what it could have been) a relationship with their own flesh and blood a long way down the line, and experience any connection with them as both of them age into their final years (with someone at least remembering them day-to-day, which they don't deserve but is a great blessing in old age). Thankful for this unearned chance, they have in their final memory their own children and the lucky moments they are given in their final life's moments to experience with them...

There is no chance that happens. He's going to stream tonight, God willing, and get pissed drunk and tell off the judge again.

God please let him stream

 

[Armitage]

Huh? What? How does calling someone violate bail conditions?

It's the fact that he could not remember that he was the one who had originally called EvS, meaning that he probably either had brain damage or was on something.

 

[Not A Bug]

We do not and as a result I assume no

Not a law fag, just an irrelevancy but I'd suspect that will come next week, maybe Monday. It takes a hot minute, when an order is made to calendar the probationary check-ins and testing.

Obviously they'll pee hot but what they'll be watching for is a declining count over time. If it stays the same over time, or they get a spike; it's game over. When they order "random" testing, more often than not they'll be called that day and given x amount of time to come in. BUT, since he agreed to the conditions, a tech can show up at the house and test them on the spot.

I knew a guy that had to go through that. He did succeed and got himself clean and sober. Turns out, he was just an asshole all along.

 

[break these cuffs]

It’s a concern but remember nicks streaming schedule used to be way way different. He used to have daytime streams and evening streams. The idea was the daytime stream was meant for following trials. Formal legal discussions and interviews. Basically normie tier shit where he watches his language. His evening streams were usually meant for his core audience and its there he typically would drink. He’d go from like 11 to 2 . Then sometimes do a late late stream where he would watch a movie or just talk to chat. Which eventually moved into locals.

He wouldn't even curse on stream when he first started. That's how far the Christian trad dad larp when he first started.

 

[UCantCCPMe]

Well it doesn’t exactly work that way. From my understanding plea deals can be made through most of the trial. It’s very common to plead not guilty and then eventually accept a negotiated plea later on in the legal process . I’m pretty sure up until even the jury verdict

Its rare for a plea deal to be offered once the trial starts, especially with the amount of evidence they have and usually it's the feds that will offer a late trial plea deal, typically in exchange for valuable information or cooperation in a bigger case.

 

[Procrastinhater]

I don't get why Nick is such a sacred cow to these people, Nick was never not above kicking anyone when they were down bad. Nick gets what he fucking deserves and more because he has 5 fucking kids that are suffering because of it. I think public shaming works great for addiction, not this coddle them be nice shit. Shame this man.

Look if it was just Nick and Our Wife I'd say whatever, do what you want, I'd still laugh at him because he's a drunken mess and that swinger shit is degenerate as fuck, and he's also a giant hypocrite after he used to shit on people like Jack Murphy, but if it's just Mr and Mrs Balldo then who gives a fuck, if he wants to fuck his life up its on him.
But when you become a parent a decent human being makes that kid/kids their primary responsibility untill they are 18.
That's your fucking job and your duty as a parent.
The fact this selfish fuck made a conscious choice to "choose my midlife crisis" and deliberately go off of the fucking rails at 40 when he still had kids relying on him, and after they had already seen and gotten used to a normal family life, is fucking disgusting, despicable, and he deserves every fucking gram of shit that's getting dumped on him.
Whatever was up for the Pastor to notice and report him (and after they obviously tried to stage an intervention, the one Nick threw back in their face and proceeded to seeth about child touching priest and whatever for a month) it must have been bad.
The cops said the house was filthy, dusty, dirty clothes and unwashed pots, it's not fair to his kids that both their parents decided to be hedonistic junkies.
Fuck Nick, he's a piece of shit, people have tried to warn him for over a year that it was going to end up like this, but Nick knew better.
He's a cunt.

Guaranteed he's gonna fuck up his bail conditions by getting wasted and deciding to stream his "real thoughts" despite all advice, because why should he, it's his Freeze Peach.

 

[Lancelot]

Lawtubers commenting made an emphasis that possession cases are both hard to beat and they're first time drug offenders. Nick and Kayla are likely to be offered some type of deferred sentencing or probation alongside drug treatment. Taking steps themselves could only help them unless they're convinced they can beat the charges. The state has them both unless there is some procedural issue. Nick even admitted the drugs were his and implicated Kayla when speaking to police. The other thing they have going for them is that they will likely fall out of 2nd degree possession after weighing the coke without packaging because they were so close to the 25g threshold.

You can correct me if I’m wrong but as I recall all Nick said to the police was that the side chick wasn’t living at their house and was just a visitor. He then explicitly refused to talk about cocaine or anything else

 

[Mourning_Cloak]

In my mind, coping by saying "I've found spent shell casings on the floor after I went to the range" ignores the greater issue.

People seem to really want to downplay the shell casing. I think it's because people are so desperate for at least something to "not be a big deal."

 

[Tiggie_Tiger]

Heck, I’m cheering that he’s had consequences because I would like to see Nick and his family fixed and this is probably the only way that will happen

He doesn’t comprehend people cheering are doing so for various reasons not all because they hate Nick and want to see him suffer

For the sake of his kids, I hope Nick can turn things around and actually get his shit together. But I think that's unlikely.

 

[Swole McPole]

Interested to hear a law fag weigh in. Can them going to rehab be used against them at trial in any way or is it likely to be excluded as too prejudicial?

It's have no bearing on the trial if he was pleading not guilty. Wouldn't normally be admissable because it has no bearing on the issue of whether or not he was in possession on the day concerned.

Generally, people use it in their plea of mitigation. (The attempt to get as light a sentence as possible after you plead or have been found guilty.)

"Yes, you have found my client guilty of possessing an ounce of low quality nigger-supplied yayo. But at the time when he is accused of possessing said product, my client was deep in the depths of a cocaine addiction. Since then, he has signed himself into Drugz-be-gon -- a notable seven day combined detox and rehabilitation facility aimed specifically at the recipients of trust funders, so there are no poors to tempt my client into relapse. Drugz-be-gon have treated and cured his cocaine addiction he has turned in clean urine samples for the last two days, so we can safely say he is completely cured and will never be a bad boy again. Therefore, I ask that you give my client a $100 fine and a complete discharge if he stays free of all drug use for the next two weeks. "

In the absence of a guilty plea though, a plea of mitigation like this is unlikely to cut much ice. Courts want to see some evidence that you're seriously engaged in the process of recovery. That would involve admitting your previous flaws and errors. It would depend on the circumstances, but in most cases -- certainly in a case as cut and dried as Nick's -- they'd probably see a not guilty plea as a refusal to take responsibility and so would probably be very sceptical of the recovery narrative.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

If Nick is going to plead not guilty and is convinced he did nothing wrong, it will not. Because they want to see you feel remorse for your actions, and Nick has none.

Also. It would work against. If he did nothing wrong, why is he going to rehab?

so what would he do if strangers tried the same thing?

The strangers in question at rehab are professionaly trained to deal with this shit. Random friends are not. I think he’d be forced to react better.

I heard somebody say something (idk where) about judging your current situation not based on people who know you, but based on what somebody with no context would think. Well, imagine not ever having heard of Nick and then seeing THIS shit happen. I doubt anyone on earth would have any sympathy.

People I find are willing to be sympathetic just not try and say this wasn’t a situation of their own making.

 

[break these cuffs]

You can correct me if I’m wrong but as I recall all Nick said to the police was that the side chick wasn’t living at their house and was just a visitor. He then explicitly refused to talk about cocaine or anything else

He said he slept in the master bedroom with his wife. Drugs were found in the master bedroom. That's constructive possession and as good as saying "Those drugs are my wife's and mine".

 

[Gas Station Nachos]

This guy pointed out that the "over 25g" includes the packaging.

So it might be if you get rid of the packaging Rekieta (or the demon now possessing him) will be under 25g. Does that help much? Not as much as you'd think. 3 to 25g is still 10 years and a $20K fine. In fact even under 3g is a still 5 years and $10K.

https://arechigo-stokka.com/blog/is-possession-of-cocaine-a-felony-minnesota/

https://archive.is/3xoHg

AR15.com is researching the Sonichu curse. As well they should, given that eldritch abominations aren't known to be vulnerable to 5.56×45mm NATO.

https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Proof-of-the-SONICHU-Chris-Chan-Curse-Nick-Rekieta/5-2726910/

 

[datura_binge]

It's have no bearing on the trial if he was pleading not guilty. Wouldn't normally be admissable because it has no bearing on the issue of whether or not he was in possession on the day concerned.

Generally, people use it in their plea of mitigation.

"Yes, you have found my client guilty of possessing an ounce of low quality nigger-supplied yayo. But at the time when he is accused of possessing said product, my client was deep in the depths of a cocaine addiction. Since then, he has signed himself into Drugz-be-gon -- a notable seven day combined detox and rehabilitation facility aimed specifically at the recipients of trust funders, so there are no poors to tempt my client into relapse. Drugz-be-gon have treated and cured his cocaine addiction he has turned in clean urine samples for the last two days, so we can safely say he is completely cured and will never be a bad boy again. Therefore, I ask that you give my client a $100 fine and a complete discharge if he stays free of all drug use for the next two weeks. "

In the absence of a guilty plea though, a plea of mitigation like this is unlikely to cut much ice. Courts want to see some evidence of recovery. That would involve admitting your previous flaws and errors. They'd see a not guilty plea as a refusal to do that and so would probably be very sceptical of the recovery narrative.

That was my precise thinking. If he doesn't plead guilty, it won't matter at all. He would be an idiot not to plead guilty though, considering his only way out of this is hinged on finding some technicality where the search wasn't legal or something.

 

[Divine right to rule]

For the sake of his kids, I hope Nick can turn things around and actually get his shit together. But I think that's unlikely.

Not only for the sake of his kids.
Nick was really fucking funny before the downfall and was deservedly the king of LawTube.
His trial streams were great and are still worth to be rewatched.
I know a lot of people here are spiteful towards him, but I want old Nick back, if his brain isn't too shot to ever come back.

 

[Truly Rural]

Bruh looking at your profile you've been around long enough to know the golden rule.

People get swatted all the time unfortunately. What almost NEVER happens is that they get arrested on swatting. You have to be degenerate as Pat or genuinely set up like Lucas to provoke an arrest, OR be found with illegal shit like Rekieta. If he was just a normal dude who was swatted they never would have arrested him and charged him. Locals know this but they paid to sweep for this degenerate. Some souls cost only 5 bucks I guess.

Unless the teenagers do everything, it’s likely the children had no clean clothes to wear.

This is true and this situation can not be underestimated. Siblings parenting each other is terrible terrible situation, their childhood literally ripped out of their hands. On top of parenting each other, kid often end up caring for their own parents. I bet kids were gradually being turned into caregivers for Kayla, to mind mommy, to help her, bring her food or drink, turn lights on for mommy, close doors and let her sleep, do something instead of her for younger kids and many little things like that.

These things in a normal family are normal because care is reciprocated, and parents mind for children's needs just as much and more. So it's no big deal bringing mommy dinner in bed when mommy made breakfast and served lunch for all of them. But when it's just kids serving parents it's totally different situation.

 

[TJBirish]

Unlikely. It will show they actually want to change. Going without being asked is a good. Not going. And then not going when being asked however is bad.

If he wants to keep his law license he will almost certainly go into treatment. Most state bars have their own monitoring program. You go to (usually inpatient) treatment and afterward spend a few years being monitored with random testing. Your license is on probation throughout that time and if you screw up you lose it. I went though the medical version of that and it is a HUGE pain in the ass. I don't think he could do it.

That will be a very high hill to climb for him.

 

[Kit Marz]

The thing about Nick that I've been thinking about for over a year now, is how he allowed just a few people's criticism of the balldo spiral into full blown alcoholism and drug use. Instead of laughing it off he decided to double down and kept doubling down until he got arrested. It's really amazing the ego and stupidity this guy has. There really wasn't that many people against him at first, mostly people questioning his judgment. He truly has no one to blame but himself and I don't think there will be a redemption arc. He's too prideful and arrogant to correct course.

 

[Procrastinhater]

It's the fact that he could not remember that he was the one who had originally called EvS, meaning that he probably either had brain damage or was on something.

Maybe his dealer is called Ethan and he called the wrong guy by accident.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

Also. It would work against. If he did nothing wrong, why is he going to rehab?

That was basically why I asked but I doubt they would allow that fact in before the jury, though if they were on the stand and said "I'm not an addict". Maybe they would let that in?

It's have no bearing on the trial if he was pleading not guilty. Wouldn't normally be admissable because it has no bearing on the issue of whether or not he was in possession on the day concerned.

Generally, people use it in their plea of mitigation. (The attempt to get as light a sentence as possible after you plead or have been found guilty.)

"Yes, you have found my client guilty of possessing an ounce of low quality nigger-supplied yayo. But at the time when he is accused of possessing said product, my client was deep in the depths of a cocaine addiction. Since then, he has signed himself into Drugz-be-gon -- a notable seven day combined detox and rehabilitation facility aimed specifically at the recipients of trust funders, so there are no poors to tempt my client into relapse. Drugz-be-gon have treated and cured his cocaine addiction he has turned in clean urine samples for the last two days, so we can safely say he is completely cured and will never be a bad boy again. Therefore, I ask that you give my client a $100 fine and a complete discharge if he stays free of all drug use for the next two weeks. "

In the absence of a guilty plea though, a plea of mitigation like this is unlikely to cut much ice. Courts want to see some evidence of recovery. That would involve admitting your previous flaws and errors. They'd see a not guilty plea as a refusal to do that and so would probably be very sceptical of the recovery narrative.

Thanks, this was an entertaining and very informative write up. I guess following on from the above comment I made to coofs are there any things coke racketeer could say on the stand that would open the door to this info being put before the jury?