California parents blast school for giving fifth graders transgender book 'My Shadow is Pink' then forcing them to explain it to kindergartners - The book, in which the main character’s father teaches him “everyone has a shadow that they sometimes feel they need to hide,” is “inspired by the author’s own little boy.”

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article / Archive


A California dad has blasted his son's school for giving the child a book about a transgender boy - then allegedly forcing him to explain it to kindergartners.

Carlos Encinas' 11-year-old son was assigned to read a book called 'My Shadow is Pink' in his fifth-grade class on May 1 at La Costa Heights Elementary School in Carlsbad north of San Diego.

The book centers around a boy who describes his father's shadow as 'big' and 'blue' and his dilemma with his own shadow, which he feels is pink.

'My heart skips a beat as I put on a dress,' the main character says in the book, while wearing a gown while his shade is a feminine color.

'My shadow loves ponies and books and pink toys. Princesses and fairies and things not for boys.'

The book talks about other people's shadows.

'Her shadow, she hides it. Her shadow likes girls.'

After Encina's 11-year-old read the book in his own class, the fifth graders were told they would be sharing the story with their buddy class, a class of kindergartners the fifth graders read to and mentor.

'That's actually where he felt the most uncomfortable,' Encinas said of his son.

'These little kids look up to them. They are with them twice a month.'

Encinas and his wife reached out to the school asking why parents were not notified that their kids would be reading the book and sharing it with even younger kids.

The couple decided to share their son's experience on their own social media to let parents know what was happening.

The parents said they just wanted future notification of sensitive topics and an option for their kids not to participate.

Carlos' video has been shared by many people, including liberal and conservative activists.

The principal of the school called the couple yesterday, they told DailyMail.com.

'I was hoping that they call would be conciliatory or have some sort of a, "Maybe we could do better, you should have been notified." Zero. It was more about her trying to understand how my video was making their teachers feel unsafe.'

Carlos says the principal denied the book was about being transgender and instead said it was about 'identity' and being inclusive.

Additionally, he claims the school told them they would not received future notification on books on the same topics and that their child could not opt out.

While they've gotten plenty of support from many circles, at their elementary school. the Encinas feel that they have been retaliated against for speaking out.

Jenny, Carlos' wife, says she's being attacked by other moms at the school.

'The PTA president organized a 'Pink out the Hate,' as in "We are hateful" and in the support of the book,' she explained.

'It has made my physically sick. My younger son wouldn't go to school. My older son was brave enough to go but he came home feeling like, "Everyone wearing pink is against me.'"

The school district did not immediately respond to a request for comment from DailyMail.com.

'We've been called racists. I'm Hispanic,' Carlos said.

'We've been told we're anti-LGBT. We don't hate anyone, we don't want them to feel excluded. We just want to know parents to know what their child is reading in school.'

With the school doubling down on its position not to notify parents about controversial or sensitive topics, the Encinas are considering moving their sons to a private school.




Additional article / Archive

A California father has taken to social media to speak out against La Costa Heights Elementary School, where his 5th grade class had to discuss a book about transgenderism to kindergarteners.

Carlos Encina explains in a widely-circulated video how his 11-year-old son’s teacher read a book to the class called My Shadow is Pink.

The book, in which the main character’s father teaches him “everyone has a shadow that they sometimes feel they need to hide,” is “inspired by the author’s own little boy.” The young main character “likes princesses, fairies and things ‘not for boys.’”

According to Encina, his son’s class not only read the book but was tasked with discussing it with the kindergarten “buddies” with whom they are paired throughout the school year.

“And that’s really what made him uncomfortable, is he’s got this buddy,” Encina says, referring to his son’s discomfort with the assignment. “These older brothers, older sisters are buddies with them throughout the entire school year. They spend between a half hour and an hour each week together. What’s most concerning is the school is using a child to disseminate this information to someone that is clearly looking up to them, a 5-year-old.”

Encina’s 11-year-old son also made an appearance in the viral video to verbalize his own thoughts about the experience.

“I hoped that my buddy wouldn’t understand what any of it meant,” Encina’s son says, adding his concern that, “it’s not okay that they’re showing this to kindergarteners.

“And after we had to do an activity where they drew a shadow with their favorite color. I never asked if I could opt out. But, I mean, because I didn’t want to get in trouble or anything.”

Encina also shares in the video that when he and his wife reached out to the school district to voice their concern about the topic and activities, the principal denied that the book discussed gender issues and accused Encina of “making their teachers feel unsafe.”

“The response was, ‘Well, this is just an exercise in colors. The buddies are just playing with their shadows and asking what color their shadows are, and, you know, it’s not gender identification, it has nothing to do with that.’”

Scott Stuart, the author of the book in question, has authored several other books for children, including My Shadow is Purple; the description for that book calls it a “heartwarming and inspiring book about being true to yourself and moving beyond the gender binary.”
 
It's one thing to read the book or have it available - I don't like it either, but at least I too can tell my five year old, oh son, they just have different colored shadows and are playing with them.

But can I just say, I'm a little tired of children's books being so allegorical. I know this has been a thing since Aesop's Fables, but the number of times I've tried and failed to explain an allegory to a kindergartner is way too high. They're such literalists at that age.

Anyway, I hate the creeping crawling of utilizing the buddy program to not only get kids reading this book, but forcing the book to be considered and interpreted such that it wouldn't just be forgotten. Insidious.

And of course, shame on the Harper Valley PTA.
 
Encouraging the other children to wear pink in response to this is an act of hostility against that child. It’s absolutely disgraceful.
Imagine you’ve had to do something you weren’t comfortable with at school, and expressed that to a trusted adult and then everyone in school is turned against you by the school admin visibly, wearing clothes that say they’re against you?
That’s really fucked up. I would be absolutely bloody furious. It’s the kind of thing that forms core memories for a child. The next hitler is going to be some poor Hispanic kid who just wanted to play football with his pals at school and do maths and was humiliated by the entire staff and student body for opposing the rainbow mafia. He will never forget this.
 
trannies would give this man the mussolini treatment if they could.. these people need to be barred from holding any influence over children, sick fucking degenerates
 
As someone working in Commiefornia's school system, I highly recommend you keep your kids out of school. It is nothing but a nigger filled mess, slut-culture brained girls, useless classes and lots of indoctrination to boot. Both in terms of pozzed history books as well as globohomo books. Speaking of which.

SJW books. Expect this in your local schools/libraries!

The next hitler is going to be some poor Hispanic kid who just wanted to play football with his pals at school and do maths and was humiliated by the entire staff and student body for opposing the rainbow mafia. He will never forget this.
Unironically. Considering /pol/ and much of the people opposing globohomo are brown themselves with whitey in the mix. It will be an interesting day to see a Spic make his own version of Mein Kampf and names the Jew.

This also means quick cartel-styled executions unlike the Holohoax.
 
Princesses and fairies and things not for boys.
Me as a child explaining how Princess is the best Mario 2 character because she can fly

Me as a child explaining how fairies are the best thing in Link to the Past because they bring you back to life

Good thing I wasn't born 30 years later or I'd have my dick cut off by now because those things are not for boys
 
Me as a child explaining how Princess is the best Mario 2 character because she can fly

Me as a child explaining how fairies are the best thing in Link to the Past because they bring you back to life

Good thing I wasn't born 30 years later or I'd have my dick cut off by now because those things are not for boys
I feel like no one really cared what color clothes you wore or what game characters you liked in the 80's.
I can clearly remember friends of mine having pink cloths and I know I had some pink surf company shirt.
It seems like it was never an issue until the 2010's.
 
It's one thing to read the book or have it available - I don't like it either, but at least I too can tell my five year old, oh son, they just have different colored shadows and are playing with them.

But can I just say, I'm a little tired of children's books being so allegorical. I know this has been a thing since Aesop's Fables, but the number of times I've tried and failed to explain an allegory to a kindergartner is way too high. They're such literalists at that age.

Anyway, I hate the creeping crawling of utilizing the buddy program to not only get kids reading this book, but forcing the book to be considered and interpreted such that it wouldn't just be forgotten. Insidious.

And of course, shame on the Harper Valley PTA.

But the book is obviously not just about colored shadows. It talks about how pink shadows mean you like fairies and wearing dresses, and other shadows "like girls." It's obvious and repeatedly shown in the book that the shadow is 100% about sex stereotypes and sexuality.

It's not like it said "some people have pink shadows and some people have blue shadows, we should all play together no matter what color shadow we have."
 
feel like no one really cared what color clothes you wore or what game characters you liked in the 80's.
I can clearly remember friends of mine having pink cloths and I know I had some pink surf company shirt.
We all wore hand me downs, and everyone was poor. When that happens you tend to have the majority of clothes able to do both sexes. I remember my brothers having pink neon surf shorts in the eighties and then being very very cool and wanting to inherit them when they were outgrown
 
'My shadow loves ponies and books and pink toys. Princesses and fairies and things not for boys.'

It is so crazy to me that parents don’t revolt against this. Even if you’re on the genderblob express, this is an extremely insane concept and you’d think that shitlib parents would some some remaining “hey, books are not just for girls, what the fuck??”

Feel bad for this family, man. I hope they find a nice affordable parochial school and that kid grows up to be extremely based.
 
Misc fun fact, this book has an alternative version.

My Shadow is Purple

Same Tumblr artstyle, same story, different color.
A whole generation is going to be mentally fucked.
...Already is. And it began with the screeching Tumblrites, made worse when the Elites let them in since OWS.

It is so crazy to me that parents don’t revolt against this. Even if you’re on the genderblob express, this is an extremely insane concept and you’d think that shitlib parents would some some remaining “hey, books are not just for girls, what the fuck??”

Feel bad for this family, man. I hope they find a nice affordable parochial school and that kid grows up to be extremely based.
Some already have. There was a protest in Sacramento, where the pozzed school system rulers sit at. The parents showed up to protest and the school invites... Antifa.

Video should be at the California Insider website. Its only the interviews about the aftermath however.
 
Encouraging the other children to wear pink in response to this is an act of hostility against that child. It’s absolutely disgraceful.
Imagine you’ve had to do something you weren’t comfortable with at school, and expressed that to a trusted adult and then everyone in school is turned against you by the school admin visibly, wearing clothes that say they’re against you?
That’s really fucked up. I would be absolutely bloody furious. It’s the kind of thing that forms core memories for a child. The next hitler is going to be some poor Hispanic kid who just wanted to play football with his pals at school and do maths and was humiliated by the entire staff and student body for opposing the rainbow mafia. He will never forget this.
Hey... WAIT A MINUTE!!

I thought schools were all aGaInSt bUllYiNg??
 
Me as a child explaining how Princess is the best Mario 2 character because she can fly

Me as a child explaining how fairies are the best thing in Link to the Past because they bring you back to life

Good thing I wasn't born 30 years later or I'd have my dick cut off by now because those things are not for boys

Feel bad for the soft boys who are males but not interested in traditional masculine things like sports because this shit is going to fuck them up.

The "toxic masculinity" that they think this social engineering is tackling isn't working because the stereotypical lads aren't going to start wearing pink and dresses. No, its the boy who might have became an architect or landscaper designer that got his start by messing around with models will get the message that they must be a girl and wanna suck dick because they are playing with "dolls" rather then football.
 
Pink and blue weren't gendered colors until the 1950s.

For a long period in western history, blue was seen as a demure color good for girls. Mary is traditionally shown wearing blue. Pink, on the other hand, was an outgoing and masculine color. Jesus used to wear a lot of pink.
 
'My shadow loves ponies and books and pink toys. Princesses and fairies and things not for boys.'

There are lots of reasons why this book is shitty and so is the school's response to criticism of it, but what sticks out here is the author implying that books, of all things, are girly. Hey you, little boy reading this book, have you considered that liking books means you might actually be a girl? Books are for girls just like pink toys are.

Creepy groomers.
 
Back
Top Bottom