💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    699
"Stupid farmers, just because Nick lost the appeal doesn't mean he'll lose the lawsuit." -CGoody, probably.
That guy is the biggest mark.

"Camera angle and lighting, that's all it is. So what he drinks a lot, doesn't mean he's an alcoholic at all. 2 hours of sleep is plenty after getting drunk to safely drive kids to school. I sexted Mandy so I know it's a woman and not Asalieri."

CGoody.png
 
A good lawyer could have worked that down, I imagine. A formal apology, in public, on Twitter and in video form, plus blaming substance abuse and entering a rehab clinic (even as a PR move) could have worked down the price. I imagine most people would rather take 20k now plus the apology, than going through trial and maybe losing or even not getting the offered settlement.
Nick would not do the apology or if he did he would fuck it up after.

I caught some stream a couple of weeks ago and he spent a few minutes bashing Monty.
 
This will twist into an excuse for the locals streams somehow

Rittenhouse era Nick, assuming the original offending stream had happened then, could have grifted this successfully. By staying the course of “I said it but it is literally comedy, my style is exaggerated, off the cuff, loud and most of all offensive” he could well have navigated audience approval and the victim role all while taking in the money. It would at least be a reasonable defense. It would fit his brand all the way back to the Maddox case to a t. So what if the defendant is an asshole, loud, offensive, fucks twins at cons or shoots pedos in the streets, this is America baby and the law doesn’t care about your feelings, prude!

The Vic case showed his aptitude for fundraising and milking the unfair suit angle. He made shitting on the opposing party, including over the top speculation of sexual deviancy, look like fighting the good fight. Or it was in many ways. Rittenhouse and Depp affirmed (pun intended) the image of the rough and rowdy non politically correct position being the right one.
He seemed anxious for getting Ronica to sue him. I too would have gladly sat through him reading a 3 page filing per 2h stream, he would ave hyped up his (lawyer’s) responses and they would have been full of little inside jokes. This could have helped him become a heroic figure, the artist suffering for his art at the hands of the unfunny and humorless, easy to further move in on that Glenn Beck etc type of media.

It must be so depressing to realize that you finally maneuvered yourself into the position you wanted so badly that you overplayed your hand to get there, only to realize forcing the issue negates all your advantages and you are finally

Felted
Have some of that prestream Jack, Nicky, every hour is prestream as long as you never go live isn’t it, checkmate farmers, cheers
 
Knowing that his appeal has fallen through, how does every single shitty insane thing that Nick has said in the interim about Monty between being sued and now (like the I think 30 minute diatribe against Monty) affect him, assuming he's just going to try to battle the lawsuit and not settle?

I'd assume Schneider being able to bring up his diatribes would just make it so much worse and therefore a lot funnier.
 
Maybe @Useful_Mistake would want it?
I have literally no control over this part of the forum. Make a new OP in the PG, and ask Null (in TtS) to replace the original OP with yours. Alternatively, and this would be faster, just ask a global mod to make some edits of the OP on your behalf.
 
That was what happened to Quasi, and it took how many years to get paid? I could only ever see doing something like that against an in-state defendant who you 100% knew was going to be collectable.
I could see it probably being negotiable to have a hybrid agreement where they get paid up front no matter what, but promise to try to collect fees back later, probably hedged a bit with some kind of "best efforts" language so the lawyer doesn't get roped into an act of futility.
 
I understand that. What I am asking is if you would want to have custody of a new OP. The litigation stuff seems to be your thing.
Sure, though, I suppose if I'm to have control over it, I might as well make have a part in making the OP myself. We could collab on it in DMs
 
it has to be ego, too, that's keeping randazza on the payroll at this point, right? he has completely shit the bed on every single task rekeita seems to have had for him, up to the point where even the thread is (somewhat, slightly, a little) shocked at how far this stupidity has managed to get. the longer he waits to get rid of the money leech, the better, in my view. nick doesn't deserve the money he has, and he pisses it away making his kids watch him kill his marriage and his own liver.
I don't really think any of this is Randazza's fault. Sometimes you get a bad case with bad facts and the only option will be to throw whatever procedural and/or novel shit you can at the walls and hope it confuses the judge or opposing counsel enough to fuck up the case. Randazza seems to have done his best under the circumstances, but honestly with a case this straightforward, there's not much he can do.
 
*edit. Monty asked for in excess of 50k, not a sum of 50k
It may seem unimportant but in some cases jurisdictional thresholds like this are treated very seriously. I recall a case that got dismissed because the plaintiff pled exactly $75,000 instead of in excess of $75,000 in a diversity jurisdiction case. Imagine losing your case over a penny. I'm pretty sure it was without prejudice but still. Embarrassing.
 
Back
Top Bottom