Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
Then I was right. What the fuck bro, nothing has happened yet!
Oh, I respectfully disagree. We got some prime (if not concentrated) whiny slobbering today:
1715643994764.png
 
Walk with me here, why would he need more time? Are there any deadlines he has missed, maybe? Actually, maybe you reckon he'll explain it in his motion?
Ok I get it, I'll read. Apparently... he was confused. And he's bitching about money because he wants to use their ECF system. You gotta be shitting me.
 
Oh, I respectfully disagree. We got some prime (if not concentrated) whiny slobbering today:
So this dumb bastard's "life hung in the balance" (lmao what a dramaclown) but he couldn't be bothered to respond to anything until it was all over but the crying.
 
Greer really has made an excellent first impression. Too bad Josh... is the nigger,,, of the world! But we all knew SCOTUS was lofty, but was still very cool to try!
 
Greer really has made an excellent first impression. Too bad Josh... is the nigger,,, of the world! But we all knew SCOTUS was lofty, but was still very cool to try!
Also not an entirely wasted effort now that this case is in the 11th circuit. The Defendant has already shown a full willingness to escalate this retard case to the Supreme Court. The 10th circuit dodged the bullet. But there is no guarantee is Greer v. Moon does not appear AGAIN in a request for Writ for Certiorari, this time from a completely different Federal Circuit. Hand waving it away from the 10th is meaningless. Hand Waving it away from the 11th is precedent, because the Supreme Court would be affirming the facts of the case in two different Federal Circuits and thus establishing De Facto precedent by failure to address the issues.

Another fun reason why its a bad idea to let cases escape a circuit court once its been escalated to the appellate level.

The Supreme Court petition was not a wasted effort. The 11th Circuit must now address this issue, because the 10th circuit position is affirmed by the Supreme Court. They must affirm the 10th circuit opinion that defendants must state affirmative defenses at the 12b(6) stage, that receipt of a DMCA imparts strict liability on contributory infringement, and reposting a DMCA is not protected by the 1st amendment. or create circuit split. Or, they must get rid of the case as expeditiously as possible and in a manner that does not even hint at creating hard circuit split that will require yet another another appeal in the Case of Greer v. Moon, this time on appeal for Writ of Certiorari to the 11th Circuit of the United States.

The SCOTUS will have a very hard time ignoring that, because as stated. They would be asked to affirm by not addressing the same fact pattern again in an entirely separate federal district. Ignoring it once can be hand waved away. Ignoring it twice means Copyright trumps the 1st amendment by law.

Lets also not forget the Acerthrone case, which introduced the 10th circuit decision right out the gate in the complaint to the 4th Circuit for the Southern District of West Virginia by requiring the 4th circuit take judicial notice of the 10ths decision, that because Null reposted the DMCA he incurred strict liability and also did so outside the boundaries of constitutional speech protections.

I suppose the law clerks didn't do enough research. This is not over. The SCOTUS is going to see this case again. Either from the 11th or 4th. I suppose they can spend the next few years thinking about it, because mark my words. It's going to come back. Either in totality or as reference.
 
Last edited:
1715647265436.png

"It's not FAIR your Honor! Somebody finally said I wasn't completely full of crap, but he refused to give up!"

Hardin is going to have to spend half of his response straightening out the claims in this garbage document. The 10th didn't agree with Greer, they tossed 2 out of 3 claims. Utah didn't "immediately order the case transferred", there was a week in between the denial of stay and ruling on the motion to transfer (during which Greer filed nothing). The court didn't "violate long-established 10th Circuit precedent", it noted Greer's argument didn't apply to the situation.

Russ has mischaracterized every aspect of the case during his recap, to a degree I don't think I've ever seen in even his dumbest filings.

1715647851815.png
1715648320667.png

It's been exactly two months since that motion to stay was denied (March 14th). Greer should have replied to the motions by now. Even if he was retarded and confused as to where to file them, he should have a response typed up and ready to go.
 
Motion for more time... how long has it been since the stay was officially denied? Almost a month now? Maybe he should have started on these replies a while ago.

Also, Russ, you see this ":" you're supposed to put the Judge's name here, or if you don't know then just leave the whole bit out.
2024-05-13_18-05.png

He does realize that even if Null totally loses the case and has to sell everything we're still just going to form Cassowary Farms to continue making fun of him.
 
It's been exactly two months since that motion to stay was denied (March 14th). Greer should have replied to the motions by now. Even if he was retarded and confused as to where to file them, he should have a response typed up and ready to go.
This is the most bewildering part of this plights-ridden motion. He's not just asking for leave to respond NOW, belatedly. He wants a whole additional month!

Russ, what the fuck have you been doing since the last time you said you needed an extension because you couldn't get representation? That's rhetorical. If the court were to take a month to respond to this, Greer will ask for another extension because he evidently refuses to start working on his case until given a specific date (and even then it's a crapshoot).
 
Last edited:
Gloves need to come off. Hardin should demand an order of the court to address the pending compliance

Greer must comply with the Motion to Join under Rule 19. He must enter Google LLC as a defendant or in the alternative explain why this is not in the interests of the case.

Greer must comply with the Motion to submit a more definitive statement, or in the alternative affirm his complaint as published.

Greer must comply with the Motion to compel scheduling conference or in the alternative withdraw his case.

The 4th one was the motion to change venue, which is what the Utah court grasped at to get rid of this mess. But the other three are still in play.

His motion to stay was DENIED.

He was ordered to COMPLY.

At this point, I suppose the next course of action would be to file under rule 41. Greer has STILL not addressed the motions he is under binding orders to comply with, and months later is asking instead for more time. No. No more time. Either file your answers to the pending motions or drop the case Greer.
 
1715649961910.png

He is still complaining about Utah lmao. Also funny for him to point out that this case has been going on for three entire years. That's Null's and Hardin's Line.


I am particularly a fan of this line though. I AM FUCKING RETARDED AND MY RETARDATION CAUSED THINGS I DIDN"T LIKE. THERE IS NO JUSTICE IN THIS CRUEL WORLD.
1715649985740.png



"Plaintiff's life hangs in the balance" is perfect Random.txt fodder, like most things Russ puts in his docs.
The silver lining to this case going on so long is how much funny shit we get from Russ.

I am particularly fond of the stuff he writes that talks about how confuwuzed pouwur Ruwuseel Gweer is.
 
Motion for more time... how long has it been since the stay was officially denied? Almost a month now? Maybe he should have started on these replies a while ago.

Also, Russ, you see this ":" you're supposed to put the Judge's name here, or if you don't know then just leave the whole bit out.
View attachment 5987018

He does realize that even if Null totally loses the case and has to sell everything we're still just going to form Cassowary Farms to continue making fun of him.
I vote on Emu Farms, that way Australia can't fuck with us.
 
Oh, I respectfully disagree. We got some prime (if not concentrated) whiny slobbering today:
Pretty bold of Russ to expose his actual grievance with the site. Does he really think winning this case means his thread gets removed? I'm guessing that was his "settlement" offer. Man's got it worse than I thought.

Edit: I just noticed that he put the return address on the mail as "south twain", the street that he insists exists in spite of his own documents (and reality) proving otherwise, and answered my own question.
what.jpg.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom