Opinion Do billionaires have a right to exist? - The angry manlet whines again.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Original (Archive)

America has driven more than 650 species to extinction. And it should do the same to billionaires.

Why? Because there are only five ways to become one, and they’re all bad for free-market capitalism:

1. Exploit a Monopoly.

Jamie Dimon is worth $2 billion today… but not because he succeeded in the “free market.” In 2008, the government bailed out his bank JPMorgan and other giant Wall Street banks, keeping them off the endangered species list.

This government “insurance policy” scored these struggling Mom-and-Pop megabanks an estimated $34 billion a year.

But doesn’t entrepreneur Jeff Bezos deserve his billions for building Amazon?

No, because he also built a monopoly that’s been charged by the federal government and 17 states for inflating prices, overcharging sellers, and stifling competition like a predator in the wild.

With better anti-monopoly enforcement, Bezos would be worth closer to his fair-market value.

2. Exploit Inside Information

Steven A. Cohen, worth roughly $20 billion headed a hedge fund charged by the Justice Department with insider trading “on a scale without known precedent.” Another innovator!

Taming insider trading would level the investing field between the C Suite and Main Street.

3. Buy Off Politicians

That’s a great way to become a billionaire! The Koch family and Koch Industries saved roughly $1 billion a year from the Trump tax cut they and allies spent $20 million lobbying for. What a return on investment!

If we had tougher lobbying laws, political corruption would go extinct.

4. Defraud Investors

Adam Neumann conned investors out of hundreds of millions for WeWork, an office-sharing startup. WeWork didn’t make a nickel of profit, but Neumann still funded his extravagant lifestyle, including a $60 million private jet. Not exactly “sharing.”

Elizabeth Holmes was convicted of fraud for her blood-testing company, Theranos. So was Sam Bankman-Fried of crypto-exchange FTX. Remember a supposed billionaire named Donald Trump? He was also found to have committed fraud.

Presumably, if we had tougher anti-fraud laws, more would be caught and there’d be fewer billionaires to preserve.

5. Get Money From Rich Relatives

About 60 percent of all wealth in America today is inherited.

That’s because loopholes in U.S. tax law —lobbied for by the wealthy — allow rich families to avoid taxes on assets they inherit. And the estate tax has been so defanged that fewer than 0.2 percent of estates have paid it in recent years.

Tax reform would disrupt the circle of life for the rich, stopping them from automatically becoming billionaires at their birth, or someone else’s death.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not arguing against big rewards for entrepreneurs and inventors. But do today’s entrepreneurs really need billions of dollars? Couldn’t they survive on a measly hundred million?

Because they’re now using those billions to erode American institutions. They spent fortunes bringing Supreme Court justices with them into the wild.They treated news organizations and social media platforms like prey, and they turned their relationships with politicians into patronage troughs.

This has created an America where fewer than ever can become millionaires (or even thousandaires) through hard work and actual innovation.

If capitalism were working properly, billionaires would have gone the way of the dodo.
 
I love that they have to go straight to billionaires because most of the figureheads in their movement are millionaires, which is totally not the same to the average person at all
 
I do think billionares overall tend to be more of a drag than a benefit to society but then again, janking away their stuff is theft. Honestly speaking I just wished they weren't effectively above the law or even worse, wrote laws.
 
If we had tougher lobbying laws, political corruption would go extinct.

aBrb2XKZ_700w_0.jpg
 
Because the government wouldn't stop at taking Billionaires' money by force.

As soon as they run out of that money, they'll move their gaze down the line.
 
But doesn’t entrepreneur Jeff Bezos deserve his billions for building Amazon?

No, because he also built a monopoly that’s been charged by the federal government and 17 states for inflating prices, overcharging sellers, and stifling competition like a predator in the wild.
Tell me you're jealous without telling me that you're jealous.
With better anti-monopoly enforcement, Bezos would be worth closer to his fair-market value.
Of course he's a fucking socialist. I stopped here and I literally know what the rest of the article is about. :story: :story: :story:
 
If capitalism were working properly, billionaires would have gone the way of the dodo.
Oh so we're doing "that's not real capitalism" now or how "that shouldn't be legal"?

I mean, if we look at his five "ideas" there are several problems with them:
1. Exploit a Monopoly - Notice that he kind of yadda-yaddas over the Federal Reserve, but that would be anti-semitic. He also seems to be confusing what a monopoly is. Amazon isn't the only retailer out there, their attempts at grocery have vastly underperformed expectations, their big "Just Walk Out" technology was hundreds of Indians working overtime.

He also seems to confuse Bezos' wealth and how its tied to Amazon shares, he doesn't have a dragon's hoard of money to roll around in. And how would he propose even breaking up Amazon? Have them spin off Zappos/Abe Books? Yeah that's not going to do a whole lot in the grand scheme of things.

2. Exploit Inside Information - Yeah, but that's illegal. Most billionaires don't make money (at least, most of it) through outright fraud.

3. Buy Off Politicians - Are you kidding me? Politicians make money through insider trading and other benefits. It's not like billionaires are the only ones making campaign donations and/or bribes.

4. Defraud Investors - The whole of the "eat the rich" style whining is how they're harming the "workers". In the case of WeWork or Theranos, that wasn't "normal people" investing, that was investors.

5. Get Money From Rich Relatives - Every once in a while, I hear of some inheritance tax idea that's supposed to limit this sort of behavior. First, it's not going to work because they don't inherit money directly, it's all done through trusts and NGOs. Secondly, an inheritance tax is only going to benefit the super-rich you claim to hate because it means that people will be held to things like apartment landlords and other companies that control wealth instead of having it themselves.
 
The problem with all this stuff is the measures you put in place harm the ordinary people far more. Inheritance tax is hitting ordinary Brits hard, people inherit a house and can’t live in it because they have to pay a huge tax bill, even on a relatively modest place these days. The super rich just put stuff in trusts.
We already have monopoly rules, they’re not enforced. We have sweetheart tax deals the government actively creates. The last thing we need is more money grabbing rules which will be loopholed by the mega rich and hit Joe bloggs.

The most effective way of reducing the cash of the mega rich is probably getting their dissolute offspring into drugs and fast women, and creating a luxury goods economy that fleeces them at every turn.
 
Back
Top Bottom