🪦 Deceased Audrey E. Hale / Aiden E. Hale - Troon Terrorist

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Im reminded of the greentext from a CIAnon talking about how the only thing the feds have succeeded in doing to screw with internet autists is to make them worried that everyone is a glowie and everything is a gay op.
The arguing itself is exactly the kind of niggery they want.
Iirc wasn’t one of the major goals of COINTELPRO or related glowie shenanigans to make the targets so paranoid of fed infiltration that the infiltrated organizations get filled with mistrust and constant internal accusations of members being feds?
 
Im reminded of the greentext from a CIAnon talking about how the only thing the feds have succeeded in doing to screw with internet autists is to make them worried that everyone is a glowie and everything is a gay op.
The arguing itself is exactly the kind of niggery they want.
Chaos is the prerogative of the shabbos goys and their Bankerberg owners, it allows them to run off with all the shekels every single time... well, the Bankerbergs at least, the shabbos goys get the unbacked fiat currency debt. Retards.
 
Is it wrong he's profiting off this? Yes but I'm interested. I wonder how he got it from the Gliggers' hands
I think there are two schools of thought:

1) Troons will copycat and kill more kids.
2) It will help turn public opinion against troons.

My worry is because it was Crowder, it will primarily be the former.
 
I would definitely believe a third-hand story involving a CIA agent.
They're just a goofy rag-tag happy-go-lucky group of Barney Fifes.

All investigators need to first question the material, then the source.
People who oppose critical analysis of the material and source, desire to stop investigation.
Did you misclick and quote my post by accident? I feel like nothing here has anything to do with what I said except that it involves the letters "CIA".

Iirc wasn’t one of the major goals of COINTELPRO or related glowie shenanigans to make the targets so paranoid of fed infiltration that the infiltrated organizations get filled with mistrust and constant internal accusations of members being feds?
Chaos is the prerogative of the shabbos goys and their Bankerberg owners
Yeah that's basically what the complete rando who wrote the greentext was saying. Trying to "de-radicalize" people into disinterest or censor people from discussion wasn't working, and if anything it was starting to mentally fuck with the agents. So they went with sewing chaos and making people mistrust each other, which succeeded in both preventing people from organizing and preventing people from discussing things as openly as they had
 
Reminder:

1680225971552740.jpg
 
...
Yeah that's basically what the complete rando who wrote the greentext was saying. Trying to "de-radicalize" people into disinterest or censor people from discussion wasn't working, and if anything it was starting to mentally fuck with the agents. So they went with sewing chaos and making people mistrust each other, which succeeded in both preventing people from organizing and preventing people from discussing things as openly as they had

So would degrading people investigating evidence offered by an unknown LEO or alphabet through a normie-right talk show host count as 'sewing chaos' and 'mistrust' ?
 
The feds didn't lie to their faces. You all have been screeching about the feds and troons and anti-white hate for dozens of pages now, but this is just three pages from two journals, with only one page that talks about "crackers" and "white privilege." But that's not all she says, is it? She also talks about wanting to get a high "death count," which motivated other mass shooters like Adam Lanza. The feds' summary of her writings, that she just wanted to inflict as much pain as possible, still holds true, for the most part.

Is it really so hard to believe that parents would just want to mourn their loved ones in peace and privacy, rather than have the words of their kid's murderer immortalized and, in some dark corners of the Internet, even idolized? Does everything have to be a conspiracy.
This situation became really weird. It wasn't the FBI blocking at this point, or at least not all of it. Audrey's parents turned over possession of all her dairies to the parents of the victims (not sure if that's just the murder victims families or the groups representing all the families of children attending the school). So you had some journals that were on the scene of the shooting in her car, which were taken as evidence, and then you have like another 18 journals and a bunch of other stuff that was found in Audrey's room.

In most crimes you expect an indictment and public prosecution of the crime which reveals the state's evidence to the public. This will not happen in Audrey's case since she's dead. The actual legal ownership of all "evidence" fell to Audrey's parents, even if some of it is currently in the hands of the state. They decided they wanted nothing to do with it and turned over all legal ownership to a group representing the victims to do as they saw fit. The victim's group did not want it released publicly and were vigorously challenging its release in court. I find it odd that some reports state that not even the victims family's had read these journals. They had come up with some carte blanche reason they wanted it all censored from the public. It could have been as simple as silencing this deranged bitch and not giving her any more notoriety than she already has.

It all set up a strange set of legal arguments for the court. Audrey's crimes weren't just against her victims, but against the laws of our nation and state. The state will prosecute major crimes regardless of how victims feel about the matter, it's out of their hands because they broke the laws of the land. But when there will be no public prosecution of a crime do victims have a right to keep information out of the hands of the public? I actually wondered if these cases surrounding the release were so bogged down due to some relevant precedent being decided. It was an unusual confluence of circumstances, esp the victim's families having ownership of the murderer's writings. Given the amount killers seeking infamy or notoriety, and the media they produce to document their crimes, it's going to be reoccurring question the courts needs to decide. Does the public have a right to evidence and information about a crime outside of criminal prosecution? Usually cops can keep shit out of the public's hands by keeping an investigation "open" indefinitely, but that choice was off the table here.
 
Last edited:
Some of you niggers are seriously retarded. I don't like Crowder either, but making the feds out to be hyper-competent nigh omniscient demigods who are playing 1488D chess by psyopping you with fake copies of a manifesto normies forgot existed at this point because the shooting happened in March is just meltbrained shit. If they were going to do something like that it wouldn't be half a year later after the story was buried as far as most people were concerned. Stop sucking J Edgar Hoover's rotten tranny dick.
Conspiracy retards like to think they're "above it all" and are smarter than everyone else in the room. That's why they go this idiotic route where everything's a big master plan that only they are wise enough to see through. "they wouldn't say faggot cuz they're a tranny!" has to be one of the most retarded things that has been said about this situation. She has a personal code where she won't call people faggots, but she will shoot children. It's idiotic and mind blowing that people actually said this.
 
The YouTube shooter being a MTF is pretty much confirmed by this, being effective active shooters is not a female capability
 
Iirc wasn’t one of the major goals of COINTELPRO or related glowie shenanigans to make the targets so paranoid of fed infiltration that the infiltrated organizations get filled with mistrust and constant internal accusations of members being feds?
I've said something to that effect for years, and as someone who has fucked with people on imageboards for years I can tell you that simply giving the illusion that they've been compromised/infiltrated without offering proof is much more effective than you might think. More often than not it leads to users turning on one another, if not immediately then it fuels the flames later on as statements like this are not forgotten unless they're immediately disproven(which most 4chan users don't really have the capacity to anyways)
Feds are not nearly as omnipotent as you might think and are more often than not just as incompetent as any other government organization due to large amount of low IQ tranny and non-white diversity hires, unless you're on their shit list already you likely have nothing to worry about. If you do basic gatekeeping and have good opsec, once again you and your group will also likely be fine. It's the politisperg shitters who, for some reason, think that everyone who suggests that the right wing do anything but sit on their ass makes them a "fed" for some reason, even as their historical statues are melted down and trannies target and kill their kids. Strange bunch, but what can you do? I guess they have to take it or the feds will get them!
I think there are two schools of thought:

1) Troons will copycat and kill more kids.
2) It will help turn public opinion against troons.

My worry is because it was Crowder, it will primarily be the former.
Considering how many of these trannies literally cry at the thought of them being misgendered, I somehow doubt there will be too many of them planning out a shooting like this and prepping guns+ammo and training with them. If they are too weak to be proper men/women and too stupid to pretend to be the other gender, I don't see them having the discipline to carry out a mass shooting. What I CAN see is a MKULTRA tier discord grooming where guns and ammo are thoughtfully provided by inconspicuous individuals on discord who will gas them on and tell them how brave they are for not taking shit from the misgendering nazis over at the mostly white preschool next door! No fed involvement in that, totally organic. We've seen something like this but in reverse from the shart mart shooter the other year, the one who got infamous for looking up Martha Says porn on his phone.
 
Last edited:
The YouTube shooter being a MTF is pretty much confirmed by this, being effective active shooters is not a female capability
I wouldn't exactly make it a male one either, for every competent mass shooter there's a couch cuck or Randy Stair who think guns work the way they do in Commando.
 
So would degrading people investigating evidence offered by an unknown LEO or alphabet through a normie-right talk show host count as 'sewing chaos' and 'mistrust' ?
Again, literally has nothing to do with what I'm saying. You're just quoting my posts out of context to continue some weird autistic conversation you seem to be publicly having with yourself. Have fun with that.
 
I'm taking this with a huge grain of salt. Why would anyone leak it to Steven Crowder of all people, and after the wife video, Crowder has needed something to get his views/rep back up, won't say he faked it for sure but could see him not verifying it.

Because he's the only one they would take it? Or the only person willing that they trusted not to rat them out?


Does the public have a right to evidence and information about a crime outside of criminal prosecution?

Yes! In this kind of case it does. Or at the very least it should be decided by clear well defined rules/laws. It should apply to all cases the same way, whether there is someone to prosecute or not. If the choice is to restrict then leaking needs to be treated as a major felony in all cases. No discretion! Being a nazi or a troon, a leftist or rightist shouldn't matter.

Personally I think this is a dangerous road to be going down. If it's information the police and authorities want to know then so should the public at some timely and still relevant point. (a point we are WELL past here) This really convenient "gave it back to the family" situation is an unacceptable outcome as well. The families, friends and related organizations don't and shouldn't even factor in. Crimes aren't policed because of their effects on family members of victims. I know it sounds harsh but it is what it is.

The fact that the government is now actively trying to find and punish adds another layer of fucked up to all this.
 
Last edited:
All evidences point to the manifesto being real and not a 4d chess move by the feds. Someone here compared the handwriting and it matches with Aubrey's, another compared the location and it matches perfectly, and lastly, the Nashville Mayor and MNPD response further points to it being legitimate, I could make another post summarizing all the evidences provided in this thread if I have the time. So, for the people that thinks this reeks bullshit, what's your evidence that this is illegitimate? Because everything is pointing to it being legitimate.
 
What are those?
I think the implication is that her shoes changed style/color while she was in the school. Head scratcher if true - but I think they are the same shoe.

I know that CCTV cameras tend to lose color signal in low light or other conditions (fast FPS, bad signal, etc). Take out the color, and they look almost identical.
 
Back
Top Bottom