It's always interesting seeing the toy collectors from pre-nostalgia retro price boom. Their collections are usually massive with unique items in it because of how much more affordable they were at the time. A lot of collectors now seem to have the same visual setup and items, it oddly feels sanitized and corporate despite being purely individuals. It really adds to the feeling they're all doing it for show and social clout rather than actually enjoying the things they're hoarding.
Yep, and I think that that’s the result of marketing hijacking nostalgia. I remember watching as the market pivoted from “here’s yesterday’s classics you can get for cheap if you can’t afford the new stuff” & buying specific niche things from one’s own childhood to what’s essentially a “who wasted the most money on 30yo plastic?” challenge.
It’s now about how many “grails” one has in their collection, condition, and other silly nitpicky things like that. And these consumers shell out big bucks for the “nice” examples of things, buy multiple copies of the same thing, and also vacuum up any new product or merchandise corporations make to cash in on the sentiment. (Who actually buys the remanufactured speak-n-spells to give to their kids?)
I’ve always bought to have, and to use. Condition aside from functionality rarely matters in that sense (and often if something is beat up, it’s an even better deal!) and as such it seems I’ve been resistant to that pull that seems to have sucked many others into dropping thousands on shit that is, functionally, worthless.
Also, yeah, baseball cards were an early example of this. They’re also a sign of the future, since no one young cares about them and their value has subsequently tanked.
Oh, and let’s not forget: corporations ARE profiting off of the private sale of vintage items, and a lot, if those sales are happening on sites like eBay where they take a cut of the profit.