💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    698
View attachment 5310101

From one of Elissa's latest YT comments

Just a reminder that TiC is still with us and has a new fan favourite.

He copypasta-ed across several clips. At least he attributes his source.

View attachment 5310103

Vito is also now lurking on Elissa's channel.

Elissa Clips YT - Rekieta Law Hates Everybody
I find it extremely weird, if not completely coordinated between Rekieta and Vito, that they try to push so hard that the issue between CG people and them is "you guys and your fans can't handle people not liking ISOM" when from the very beggining the issue is with the retarded Vito and Masterson trying to mess with July's bussiness and even going as far as contacting a charity AND a church (Masterson admited openly about the charity stuff, even if Rekieta dismissed it and just threw it there as a 2 second comment) and the Church stuff that for some reason Rekieta keeps screaming: "SHOW ME EVIDENCE, SHOW ME EVIDENCE, I SEE NO EVIDENCE OF THE MAIL BEING FROM MASTERSON OR VITO", Sure you can hide behind the mail stuff, but what about doing the exact same thing on the open using Twitter like this:

001.png 002.png

isn't this doing exactly the same as the mail did? isn't this creating some kind of copyright or trademark issue artificially when no one was talking about it before? doesn't this look a lot like interference?
 
What an arrogant and condescending thing to say about a supposed friend, and also totally not credible. Nick is clearly frustrated that he is having trouble controlling the narrative around best friend / sex pest Drexel, as well as keeping the lid on Nick's embarrassing swinger behavior which contradicts his carefully cultivated "trad dad" image.
It's hilarious this cocksucking faggot is somehow claiming Jersh is easily manipulated.

While being completely assblasted that his own drunken, demented attempts at manipulating him utterly failed.
 
I think what's bothering me the most is that Nick went hard as fuck on Keffals for troonshine/catboy ranch (Rightfully so); so much so that it got him in trouble for the "Get on the wall" soliloquy which kickstarted his Youtube banishment.

Yet, he's insanely milquetoast on Juju/Vito/Drex for similar predatory tactics and opinions, in certain ways worse since Vito is mask off on "I'm here for your kids lol joking"
 
"This woman puts me in poverty when I shouldn't be"

Reminder: Nick Rekieta had 5 kids and raised them in a rural manor surrounded by fields of acreage while attending law school, all based off a community college creative writing degree. He still considers himself a child of hardship though because his wealthy grandparents didn't buy him fancy sport cars or yachts or whatever growing up.

I find it extremely weird, if not completely coordinated between Rekieta and Vito, that they try to push so hard that the issue between CG people and them is "you guys and your fans can't handle people not liking ISOM" when from the very beggining the issue is with the retarded Vito and Masterson trying to mess with July's bussiness and even going as far as contacting a charity AND a church
Both "Vito & Dick are fucking with Eric July" and "July and everyone dickriding him can't handle criticism of Isom" can be true though. The beginning was over a year ago when Vito started throwing rocks at July before Isom #1 even launched to get attention. Eric July isn't Comicsgate either (he specifically said he was doing his own thing); with the CG community divided on this matter along the lines of people who think they can get something out of supporting him and those that don't.
 
Last edited:
I think what's bothering me the most is that Nick went hard as fuck on Keffals for troonshine/catboy ranch (Rightfully so); so much so that it got him in trouble for the "Get on the wall" soliloquy which kickstarted his Youtube banishment.

Yet, he's insanely milquetoast on Juju/Vito/Drex for similar predatory tactics and opinions, in certain ways worse since Vito is mask off on "I'm here for your kids lol joking"
Because like most cows and grifters, he has no morals, he will agree with whatever his friends and close circle say. I wouldn't be surprised if any of his friends: Vito, Masterson, Coomalor, Drex end up fucking an actual underage kid, and Rekieta will inmediately turn into Nick Fuentes and say "well at that age you know what sex is and what you want, so it isn't the rapist´s fault" like the Ali defense.
 
If Drexel could fuck a kid he knew when she was 13, even though she's legal, then you can guarantee that he never saw her as a child at the younger age to begin with. He would have flirted with the girl, and the mother would have found it "adorable".
It's repulsive, and anyone who's been around kids that have then grown up would know that, most men I know would baulk at the idea, because they can see the child in the adult.
Plus, you don't fuck your friends kids, regardless of age, you just don't.
It's dodgy as hell, and it confirms his morals, which are those of an alley cat.
It definitely seems weird that he would tell this story thinking it makes him the BBC alpha Chad and doesn't think it makes him look like a creep. Why he'd tell it in the first place is beyond me (and before you say it, "it's because he's melanated")
 
There's other storylines as well such as this friend of his:
Yeah, they certainly keep good company. Groomers and child rapists stick together. They all dislike KF.

It's hilarious this cocksucking faggot is somehow claiming Jersh is easily manipulated.

While being completely assblasted that his own drunken, demented attempts at manipulating him utterly failed.
It's textbook manipulation, Nick Rekieta is just bad at it. He thought the tricks he pulls on Our Wife would work on his e-fwends. It's just not working. If he thinks anything here is wrong, he can just point it out. If he thinks some users are doing dumb stuff with his business, he can just link posts. He won't because he's a liar. He wants this thread locked or thrown back into multimedia, he's just too much of a dimwit to admit it.

It was the same with CRP who wanted his thread deleted due to some SEO thing and an interview. He just kept pushing without mentioning what he wanted.

They both behave like catty gay men or high school girls.
 
It definitely seems weird that he would tell this story thinking it makes him the BBC alpha Chad and doesn't think it makes him look like a creep. Why he'd tell it in the first place is beyond me (and before you say it, "it's because he's melanated")
I think another poster a while ago said it perfectly: in his mind he was probably trying to boast about the classic porn trope of "I fucked the mom and the daughter", of course porn is always a fantasy and in those you have a 20 year old "daughter" acting with a 30 year old "mom".
In real life it gets creepier and illegal, because most single moms have underage kids, and the only way for the "fantasy" to happen in real life would be if he dated the mom when the daughter was very small.
the fact that he didn't realized how bad the whole situacion was could be because he is retarded... or melanated.
 
Because like most cows and grifters, he has no morals, he will agree with whatever his friends and close circle say. I wouldn't be surprised if any of his friends: Vito, Masterson, Coomalor, Drex end up fucking an actual underage kid, and Rekieta will inmediately turn into Nick Fuentes and say "well at that age you know what sex is and what you want, so it isn't the rapist´s fault" like the Ali defense.
Personally, I think it's more out of gratitude/loyalty for Dick.
Unlike Ralph claiming to be the kingmaker "I made you bish!", Dick is genuinely the reason Nick became a multi millionaire via the Lolsuit videos which started his E-Career
 
So if Drexel does sue Null, whose side will Rekieta take?

Null - the guy being sued for calling someone a groomer online
Drexel - the guy suing someone for calling him a groomer online

Inquiring minds want to know
1693675055666.png
 
Personally, I think it's more out of gratitude/loyalty for Dick.
Unlike Ralph claiming to be the kingmaker "I made you bish!", Dick is genuinely the reason Nick became a multi millionaire via the Lolsuit videos which started his E-Career
so grateful that a father of 5 will defend pedophiles and grooming.
 
"All groomers, pedos, and MAPs on the wall!! Ya know what? Throw furries on there too! Ahahahahaaaaa!! *downs whiskey*

"What about your pals Vito and Drexel?"

Nick:
View attachment 5309146
Somebody else can probably do a more quality job but here's my attempt.




Edit: one more edit
 
Last edited:
Drexel reminds me of Max Karson. I think they did the same thing, tell on themselves in a video they thought was normal and relatable and are now trying to put the genie back in the bottle. So far he's denying it but I wonder if he'll go full Mr Girl and start cracking jokes, to be fair "hide yo kids hide yo wife the black bulls coming for them" is already pretty suspect.

Considering his large family Nick's friendship with Drex is concerning.

probably trying to boast about the classic porn trope
Drex is a terminal coomer, and like many terminal coomers it seems he's started to believe that porn is real life so grooming a girl isn't creepy or immoral, it's sexy.
 
Both "Vito & Dick are fucking with Eric July" and "July and everyone dickriding him can't handle criticism of Isom" can be true though. The beginning was over a year ago when Vito started throwing rocks at July before Isom #1 even launched to get attention. Eric July isn't Comicsgate either (he specifically said he was doing his own thing); with the CG community divided on this matter along the lines of people who think they can get something out of supporting him and those that don't.
They are still seething about not being able to draft off of his success and getting muted like a bitch when that fat greasy pedophile tried to shill his shitty little vaporbook. They have been acting like whiny faggots ever since. They seriously cannot fathom that no one cares about their worthless opinions. Like who the fuck are you and why would I care? You have never accomplished anything, ever.
Vito is a fat leftist faggot, and like most leftists he is a pedophile. He is just an SJW pretending that Anti-Anti-Woke is actually a thing.
IMG_6776.png
 
Last edited:
Drex is a terminal coomer, and like many terminal coomers it seems he's started to believe that porn is real life so grooming a girl isn't creepy or immoral, it's sexy.
It's pretty obvious he's got some innocence ruination/deflowering fetish and is really proud of himself for doing it in real life to someone who trusted him. It's obvious he considers women who have sex "ruined", the racial aspect probably also plays into this which is why he goes after white women predominantly. I highly doubt that Drex is the cherry-popping pussy slayer he portrays himself as. Many have pointed out that most of his stories sound fictional or like the plot to a cheap porn, they probably are. I think he mostly just watches porn and then goes into his discord to brag about all those women he "fucked" to a bunch of incels who fluff his ego and also jerk off to his stories cause they are /pol/cels obsessed with "whuite women are RUINED! Tyrone defiles them all with his BBC!". He is so proud of this particular story because it's probably rare for him to actually smash box and he only managed to do it because he groomed the girl since she was 13.
 
You really don't want to start going down the rabbit hole of the "technical" definition of a pedophile and what prepubescent means because I promise you the stench will get on you and start sticking to you if you continue to engage in this kind of rhetoric. Anyone who wants to bang a 13/14 year old is a pedophile and needs to be handled accordingly. Trying to distinguish between MAP and Pedophile, and even to an extent using their softening term of "MAP", is also ill advised. That's just my take though.
I believe ephebophilia (age 15-18) boils down to "I'm attracted to people who are easily manipulated because they're retarded due incomplete brain development" and hebephilia (undergoing puberty) is pedophilia with a higher cut off age. "MAP" is pedophiles engaging in euphemism treadmill and trying to confuse people about what they are.

Oh, this shit again. Kill yourself, pedo.
Being attracted to pre-pubescent children is something utterly abhorrent and the term for it is pedophilia.
Finding post-pubescent minors physically attractive is something normal.
Pursuing post-pubescent minors is wrong, because while many have the sexual characteristics of adults, their brains are not fully developed, and consequently they are very easily manipulated and prone to making very bad decisions (it also begs the question why someone is targeting a person who is quite literally mentally disabled). This makes adults who specifically pursue them sexual predators.

Real pedophiles are rare compared to people who just can't tell at a glace whether someone is 16 or 18, or even 20, and if enough folks start to call both groups "pedophiles", people will start to be indifferent when someone is labelled that, because they assume it's just peal clutching nonsense, because statistically it usually will be (which I think is the point of folding """"ephebophiles"""" into the label "MAP"). This allows actual pedophiles to escape scrutiny. It also opens the door for a whole sector of predators to wave away criticism with "but they look like adults." You're not going to persuade people around them that these people are despicable by just screeching insults.

tl;dr: I think you should call them what they are instead of whatever word has the strongest negative connotation, whether it is applicable or not, because misusing a term will erode the negative connotation of that term. I believe Geared Chris wasn't misguided in trying to clarify.
 
Back
Top Bottom