📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
About cis women not passing: today I saw a woman wearing a wig. I knew it was a wig because she wore it too far down the forehead just like the trannies.

Guess what? I knew she was a woman when she had her back to me. I hadn't even seen the wig hairline yet I knew she was female. Even when I saw the hairline she looked female because she is female. Edit: I thought about saying something about the wig, but I decide that would just embarrass her. If she's wearing a wig there's probably a good reason and she probably feels super self-conscious about it. See Kiwis can be nice.

Another woman I saw recently, I only saw her out of the corner of my eye while she was sitting and thought she was a older man because of how she was dressed. When I actually looked at her I realized she was a woman. I wasn't even thinking of trannies, even though I think I was reading KF at the time. I just knew. Because we can always tell.
Good call, my grandmother wore a wig like a hat and if anyone ever engaged her about it, she'd happily corner them in a conversation for as long as they were too scared to be impolite.
 
Lol 'half of cis women don't pass' is just a testament to the fact that men are dogshit at clocking, beyond 'wig and dress and boobs= lady'. I thought this was a well known difference between the sexes.
This is such a manly thing to think, for a forum of uwu girls. Incredible.
What they mean is half of cis women aren’t fuckable because fuckable is how they define a woman. The “barest essentials” of “femaleness” are “an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes.” - Andrea Long Chu
 
Lol 'half of cis women don't pass' is just a testament to the fact that men are dogshit at clocking, beyond 'wig and dress and boobs= lady'. I thought this was a well known difference between the sexes.
This is such a manly thing to think, for a forum of uwu girls. Incredible.
This is actually a pretty common defense for troons. You mention someone who doesn't pass and they'll post a pic of an ugly woman and say something like "Oh so she doesn't pass?".

It's such a dumb thing to try and use in an argument because an ugly woman is still a woman, an ugly troon is a man who cannot pass for a woman and thus fails at the passing part and the biology part.
 
Tranny's gotta gun:

FqfIFXmaYAEI0_2.jpeg

Screenshot_20230307-043307_Chrome.jpg
Screenshot_20230307-034420_Chrome.jpg

 
Last edited:
Armchair psychology: I think they fantasize about killing people as a diversion from killing themselves. Trooning is a negation of self, a systematic attempt at the destruction of born reality and replacement with fantasy.
Of course they reach for guns, the ultimate phallic object, because in the core of their dingy, meagre souls, they know what they really are.
 
I'm honestly shocked that Jamie Raines / JammiDodger doesn't have her own thread in this forum. They seem to have a wealth of things you could laugh at. Although her YouTube videos have seemed to devolve to just reading Reddit shitposts.

Her Twitter must be a goldmine if she's posting shit like this:
Screenshot 2023-03-07 at 02-51-00 Jamie Raines 🦖🥔 (@jammi_dodger94) _ Twitter.png
Screenshot 2023-03-07 at 02-58-08 Jamie Raines 🦖🥔 (@jammi_dodger94) _ Twitter.png
Just yesterday, they had a whole video poking fun at "men writing women". Odd coming from a woman pretending to be a man and spreading lies that "men" can get pregnant.
I've always had a theory that troons and their handmaidens are obsessed with calling women and men "cis" because deep down, they know the term "trans-man/woman" is "othering" to them. And their narcissistic minds don't want to be "alienated" like the freakshows they are.

A few days ago, they made a video about "Cis straights" trying not to be troonphobic. At around the 4 minute mark she goes into some word salad about a "she" using "he" pronouns being a "he" and no longer a "she".
Since her wife is from a Muslim family and of South Asian ancestry, I've always wondered if the family eventually "accepted" her relationship, because according to her, she is in a "straight" relationship. IIRC, the Persians or some West Asian shithole encourage their gays to become troons.
Link. Archive.

She has a recurring series on her channel called "Pointlessly Gendered", where she complains about things being "needlessly gendered". Yet again, ironic coming from a troon.
 
Last edited:
When troons are trying to explain gender dysphoria, they always use this example "Imagine if one day you woke up as an opposite sex. What would you feel? What would you identify as?"
View attachment 4713790
The answer is that most people would probably go about with their life and they'd accept that they're opposite sex after they adjusted with it. Because normal people are not so obsessed with gender identity like those loonies. Why is it so hard for them to understand?
In the exact hypothetical scenario laid out I'd just get myself transformed back into what I originally was. Ctrl+Z, problem solved, home in time for tea.

Why are troons so bad at analogies/metaphors?
 
In the exact hypothetical scenario laid out I'd just get myself transformed back into what I originally was. Ctrl+Z, problem solved, home in time for tea.

Why are troons so bad at analogies/metaphors?

My question is why are so many troon arguments entirely based on bullshit hypotheticals that cannot and will not ever happen?

I watched that little Breadtube creep LonerBox debate King Critical the other day and he was acting like he totally fucking owned the TERF chud with facts and logic by presenting the argument, "Well, what if we both switched bodies, so your mind was in my body and my mind was in yours? Would you still be King Critical? Would I still be LonerBox?"


I like King Critical, but he was way too generous to that argument and it was embarrassing to try and watch him attempt to argue it in good faith, when what he should have done is turned around and said: "We don't live in 'Freaky Friday', LonerBox, you monumental bellend."
 
My question is why are so many troon arguments entirely based on bullshit hypotheticals that cannot and will not ever happen?

I watched that little Breadtube creep LonerBox debate King Critical the other day and he was acting like he totally fucking owned the TERF chud with facts and logic by presenting the argument, "Well, what if we both switched bodies, so your mind was in my body and my mind was in yours? Would you still be King Critical? Would I still be LonerBox?"

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z9aqr8GH4i0
I like King Critical, but he was way too generous to that argument and it was embarrassing to try and watch him attempt to argue it in good faith, when what he should have done is turned around and said: "We don't live in 'Freaky Friday', LonerBox, you monumental bellend."
I'm sure there's some pretentious Latin term for this fallacy, (reducto ad absurdum, maybe, or is that a Harry Potter spell?) where you keep proposing more and more ludicrous scenarios until your opponent is too bewildered to go on, but the more I see it it just comes across like a really weird parody of Monty Python's 'what have the Roman's ever done for us' sketch.

"Okay, so if we could 3D print a female skeleton and replace each bone in my body, rebuild the flesh and organs like Terminator so I had all the physical components, functions and proportions of a woman, if we could recode my DNA to be female, retune my vocal chords to have a woman's voice, wipe my memory and replace it with X years lived experience as a woman...then would you call me a woman?"
 
I'm sure there's some pretentious Latin term for this fallacy, (reducto ad absurdum, maybe, or is that a Harry Potter spell?) where you keep proposing more and more ludicrous scenarios until your opponent is too bewildered to go on, but the more I see it it just comes across like a really weird parody of Monty Python's 'what have the Roman's ever done for us' sketch.

"Okay, so if we could 3D print a female skeleton and replace each bone in my body, rebuild the flesh and organs like Terminator so I had all the physical components, functions and proportions of a woman, if we could recode my DNA to be female, retune my vocal chords to have a woman's voice, wipe my memory and replace it with X years lived experience as a woman...then would you call me a woman?"
The Tranny of Theseus?
 
OK, for real, how is this shit right here...



...Any different to when, back in the day, nerdy beta male geeks on the Internet would do this shit right here?

View attachment 4720785

This is the same behaviour.
Never thought I would miss these kinds of losers but here we are. We need them to come back into consciousness to defend m’ladies honor and cut up the trannies with their thousand-folded katana or something.
 
Easily solved with... survey says; Anarcho-Communism! Shocker! :Wow:
But who decides how vital it is to produce? And how much we can spare/need? And how said other people get it first? And so on, and so on, and tard on...

, so first, we assume a can opener an endless cost-free supply of HRT. Now, onto the simple cost-free global distribution network
My guess? Cis white slaves. They had their time in the sun, now it's time to become the backbone slaves of the troon empire.



@Larry Trainor
She'd look really good if she stopped LARPing as a man.
That's it. You accidentally pointed out why she doesn't want to be a woman or teen girl: even small complements like this that allude to womanhood or looks or being valued visually that isn't in her control likely set her off. She doesn't want to be anyone visually appealing except to those who she likes or trust, and even then it's likely hard for her.

It's so innocuous but I remember TiFs breaking down at this because they are terrified their value will always be with their looks and their looks are what attracted the abuse in the first place (in their head) so it's a cascade of negative thinking and horrible feelings. It's hard to climb out of and I hope she becomes more at peace with herself one day.

What if I woke up tomorrow 50 feet tall? What if I woke up tomorrow as a turnip? What if I woke up tomorrow and I was on the Starship Enterprise? FFS.
They watch and read too much isekai media and are so used to fantastical scenarios that they don't think of real ones is my guess. Go outside reason #3048.
What they mean is half of cis women aren’t fuckable because fuckable is how they define a woman.
Sometimes anti trans and TERFs give narrow definitions of visually passing as a woman ("no woman has a shoe size over 10, no gorl is over 5'8", no woman has a harsh jawline") and instead of thinking with the broad brainset of "this is a rule of thumb", they take that shit literally and run with it as far as they can to make those types look stupid.

But truthfully, if a troon says that he passes better than a woman, it means he's saying he's prettier than her which even if on the 1 in a million chance her face is FUBAR, notes nothing more than they have a more aesthetically pleasing visage. Of course, this doesn't indicate moral purity, intelligence, reason, or anything else, they just want an easy win ( :story: ) because what they say goes, not you stupid fucking roastie.

Armchair psychology: I think they fantasize about killing people as a diversion from killing themselves.
While Latenightmuffin pointed to the obvious answer, I think they also fantasize about killing people because they want power and are too stupid/emotionally stunted to acquire it through a skill or something. It boost their ego to think about it since it shows they're physically superior. Or they just like hurting people because of the power high and they think it's funny.

My question is why are so many troon arguments entirely based on bullshit hypotheticals that cannot and will not ever happen?
Because they can't think of things that actually will happen and can't talk the science without seeing how limited it is, if they can even find good ones to support their arguments. If they can even understand the science of transgenderism (what little there is) too.

wipe my memory and replace it with X years lived experience as a woman...then would you call me a woman?"
They want to know which scientific discoveries they need to invest in to FINALLY become the woman/man/enby of their dreams. WHEN WILL YOU ACCEPT ME??? They're trying to break down sex so that it's mutable and play-dough like, and want you to see that. They also want all the hoops they go through and all the things that they do to validate themselves to be justified, so that if you spend all your exp & skill points into SRS, hormone therapy, and mimicking a gender, you become it like you would a profession. This is obviously not how it works but damn, don't say that.


Honestly for some of the most complex scenarios I'd still call them their birth gender out of spite because it would be hilarious.
 
Back
Top Bottom