📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Vi0l3t said:
Hershey chocolate troon from yesterday responds to the enormous backlash he received. After more backlash he muted it. Big cry baby acts like a victim after real women are offended. Notice how he clumps everyone voicing their thoughts all into "far right". He doesnt care what actual women say or think.
View attachment 4680516View attachment 4680518
Click to expand...
Hershey's will never be chocolate
 
Vi0l3t said:
Hershey chocolate troon from yesterday responds to the enormous backlash he received. After more backlash he muted it. Big cry baby acts like a victim after real women are offended. Notice how he clumps everyone voicing their thoughts all into "far right". He doesnt care what actual women say or think.
View attachment 4680516View attachment 4680518
Click to expand...
"I will always stand up for women and girls, cis and trans"
Proceeds to call women far right bigots

riiight
 
Xanax and Wine said:
"I will always stand up for women and girls, cis and trans"
Proceeds to call women far right bigots

riiight
Click to expand...
For Hersheys to choose a fucking man in a dress on a day meant to be about women, especially in the current climate with questions starting to be asked about the damage this gender shit is doing shows a fucking stunning lack of awareness and how deeply the rot has sunk in that this kind of virtue signaling was even considered.
Troons have had things their way for so long unchallenged that their response to even the slightest pushback causes the exact kind of histrionics that have caused people to start looking twice at the troon movement in the first place.
 
Old school sissy ABDL degenerate website Sissykiss (so old SA has a thread on it from 2009) has a saying the quiet bit out loud post from a frequent poster nylontoni (Archive.is):

Nothing compares to being exposed and humiliated shopping for frilly sissy women's clothes. This is even greater with female input and having women's clothes on in the stores under your men's clothes. Trying on dresses and modeling them in public is another gigantic turn on. Wearing the dress out of the store is an absolute dream experience. Transgendered rights assure anyone tempted to be against you will be silenced. Relax, enjoy, be yourself! Try it! You'll like it!
Click to expand...

Transgendered rights assure anyone tempted to be against you will be silenced. AGPs want women shop workers to indulge in their fetish and the law to stop them saying no.

Sissykiss includes an appearance from Sissy Baby Pansy.
 
I meant to post this last week but got distracted. A 'science writer' with a huge honker decided to pull the 'more variation within than between' in regards to sex differences. But first, here is the author in question:
024T_ED5_400x400.jpg
And the thread. Link / https://archive.is/PQFHe
totes similar.PNG totes similar 2.PNG totes similar 3.PNG
But wait, it's different for humans!
totes similar 4.PNG
The nasal cavity is different, the orbital ridge is different, the jaw is wider and sharper. The bumps are different, too; the female skull is smoother. That's just from me, a know nothing.
totes similar 5.PNG totes similar 6.PNG totes similar 7.PNG
"Why are males and females so similar"
I don't know, why do males pay thousands to shave down their jaws to look 'more feminine', if there aren't any noticeable differences?
totes similar 8.PNG
"It's messy and complicated and loud, and we just don't know what sex differences are"
Thankfully, a lot of people were calling her out.
hi science journalist here.PNG hi science journalist here 2.PNG hi science journalist here 3.PNG
That isn't true - well, except for Asians (something Einstein noted). Evolution always serves a purpose; nearly all human traits are heritable. This woman admits she likes 'string beans', probably because no one else wants that fucking nose.

She provides no evidence human sexual dimorphism has gone down, aside from her primate skulls. Someone else pointed out in the comments she wouldn't like touching the racial aspect of it - and how skull differences matter there, too.
 
Inebriated Raccoon said:
A bit long but a young woman on Twitter is managing to pull off an entertaining grift.

Apparently, some TIM porn models are upset at a real woman who is masquerading as a trans woman with an intact penis, successfully.
View attachment 4673078View attachment 4673072View attachment 4673912
They are upset because she gets high engagement despite posting ZERO actual nudes and possibly no videos.
View attachment 4673096View attachment 4673093View attachment 4673066
Some of the responses are hilarious.
View attachment 4673089
Some of the responses to this “transbaiting” situation are incredibly ironic. View attachment 4673101
From this grift, she managed to accumulate nearly 100k followers and has just started posting in January of this year.View attachment 4673065
Most of her posts consist of her showing her “girl-buldge” fully-clothed.View attachment 4673082
She blurs the images that shows the “penis”.
View attachment 4673612
I was curious to find out if these were AI generated images. All I did was Google search her Twitter username and I found her reddit account. She (or someone) actively promotes herself on Reddit by posting on numerous trans-related subs. Curiously, she calls herself “non-binary” in her description.View attachment 4673509
On one of her most popular posts, numerous redditors clocked that she was faking and one user even provided a link to images proving that she is wearing a dildo. She is always fully clothed in her pictures. The only think she “exposes” is a dildo.
View attachment 4673506
Just a truly diabolical plot that she most likely initiated as soon as she turned 18, assuming she is real. She has managed to make money fully-clothed posting only pictures while pissing off some TIM porn stars who are nowhere near as successful despite them being real “tgirls” and her just starting this grift in January.

This tweet pretty much sums up the one of the entertaining aspects of this.
View attachment 4673896
They are upset that this “cis” woman is invading their space.
Click to expand...
Maybe the cis woman read all those Kikomi comics and
decided to put the wisdom from them to very good use. :optimistic:
1677805447085.png
 
Inebriated Raccoon said:
A bit long but a young woman on Twitter is managing to pull off an entertaining grift.

Apparently, some TIM porn models are upset at a real woman who is masquerading as a trans woman with an intact penis, successfully.
View attachment 4673078View attachment 4673072View attachment 4673912
They are upset because she gets high engagement despite posting ZERO actual nudes and possibly no videos.
View attachment 4673096View attachment 4673093View attachment 4673066
Some of the responses are hilarious.
View attachment 4673089
Some of the responses to this “transbaiting” situation are incredibly ironic. View attachment 4673101
From this grift, she managed to accumulate nearly 100k followers and has just started posting in January of this year.View attachment 4673065
Most of her posts consist of her showing her “girl-buldge” fully-clothed.View attachment 4673082
She blurs the images that shows the “penis”.
View attachment 4673612
I was curious to find out if these were AI generated images. All I did was Google search her Twitter username and I found her reddit account. She (or someone) actively promotes herself on Reddit by posting on numerous trans-related subs. Curiously, she calls herself “non-binary” in her description.View attachment 4673509
On one of her most popular posts, numerous redditors clocked that she was faking and one user even provided a link to images proving that she is wearing a dildo. She is always fully clothed in her pictures. The only think she “exposes” is a dildo.
View attachment 4673506
Just a truly diabolical plot that she most likely initiated as soon as she turned 18, assuming she is real. She has managed to make money fully-clothed posting only pictures while pissing off some TIM porn stars who are nowhere near as successful despite them being real “tgirls” and her just starting this grift in January.

This tweet pretty much sums up the one of the entertaining aspects of this.
View attachment 4673896
They are upset that this “cis” woman is invading their space.
Click to expand...
I applaud this girl for her entrepreneurship, but Jesus, is she actually 18? In some of the photos she looks VERY young, like closer to 12 or 13.

If I'm just a prude, feel free to give me trash cans and puzzle pieces.
 
Chandelier said:
I meant to post this last week but got distracted. A 'science writer' with a huge honker decided to pull the 'more variation within than between' in regards to sex differences. But first, here is the author in question:
View attachment 4682249
And the thread. Link / https://archive.is/PQFHe
View attachment 4682256View attachment 4682265View attachment 4682266
But wait, it's different for humans!
View attachment 4682269
The nasal cavity is different, the orbital ridge is different, the jaw is wider and sharper. The bumps are different, too; the female skull is smoother. That's just from me, a know nothing.
View attachment 4682273View attachment 4682274View attachment 4682276
"Why are males and females so similar"
I don't know, why do males pay thousands to shave down their jaws to look 'more feminine', if there aren't any noticeable differences?
View attachment 4682280
"It's messy and complicated and loud, and we just don't know what sex differences are"
Thankfully, a lot of people were calling her out.
View attachment 4682284View attachment 4682286View attachment 4682288
That isn't true - well, except for Asians (something Einstein noted). Evolution always serves a purpose; nearly all human traits are heritable. This woman admits she likes 'string beans', probably because no one else wants that fucking nose.

She provides no evidence human sexual dimorphism has gone down, aside from her primate skulls. Someone else pointed out in the comments she wouldn't like touching the racial aspect of it - and how skull differences matter there, too.
Click to expand...
I could tell instantly. Anyone can, jesus the cope lol.
 
Chandelier said:
I meant to post this last week but got distracted. A 'science writer' with a huge honker decided to pull the 'more variation within than between' in regards to sex differences. But first, here is the author in question:
View attachment 4682249
And the thread. Link / https://archive.is/PQFHe
View attachment 4682256View attachment 4682265View attachment 4682266
But wait, it's different for humans!
View attachment 4682269
The nasal cavity is different, the orbital ridge is different, the jaw is wider and sharper. The bumps are different, too; the female skull is smoother. That's just from me, a know nothing.
View attachment 4682273View attachment 4682274View attachment 4682276
"Why are males and females so similar"
I don't know, why do males pay thousands to shave down their jaws to look 'more feminine', if there aren't any noticeable differences?
View attachment 4682280
"It's messy and complicated and loud, and we just don't know what sex differences are"
Thankfully, a lot of people were calling her out.
View attachment 4682284View attachment 4682286View attachment 4682288
That isn't true - well, except for Asians (something Einstein noted). Evolution always serves a purpose; nearly all human traits are heritable. This woman admits she likes 'string beans', probably because no one else wants that fucking nose.

She provides no evidence human sexual dimorphism has gone down, aside from her primate skulls. Someone else pointed out in the comments she wouldn't like touching the racial aspect of it - and how skull differences matter there, too.
Click to expand...

Eh, the narrow point re evolution seems rightish, although the prevalence of dimorphism on skull shapes is asserted and yet to be proved by the author, hence the “rightish“. But the value of that assertion is questionable, because skull shapes are not determinative of anything apart from how successfully they stop your brains from falling out.

Let’s assume that dimorphism is not that great, and that there is great variety within sexes in brow ridges, other skeletal features etc. We don’t actually assign sex at birth (or subsequently) on any of those things. Sex is assigned based on the superficial appearance of genitals, and buttressed by chromosomes and gametes. So the dimorphism point is at best an interesting observation, and not an argument for or against transgenderism. That won’t stop people from abusing the observation for their own ends, of course.

TL;DR sex is real, and isn’t based on how dismorphic an individual or group is on issues like bone ridges, but on genitals, chromosomes and gametes. And the dimorphism is very real on that level.
 
Last edited:
Chandelier said:
She provides no evidence human sexual dimorphism has gone down, aside from her primate skulls. Someone else pointed out in the comments she wouldn't like touching the racial aspect of it - and how skull differences matter there, too.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's really weird that she uses gorillas, chimps, and orangutans to try make a point about humans. What she should have done is compare proto-humans to humans. Do you want to guess why she didn't use proto-humans? Because sexual dimorphism among our evolutionary ancestors up to us hasn't really changed in the last 250,000 years. Oops.
 
Thomas Eugene Paris said:
I applaud this girl for her entrepreneurship, but Jesus, is she actually 18? In some of the photos she looks VERY young, like closer to 12 or 13.
Click to expand...
I am torn between my hatred of porn and the normalization of pedophilia and my admiration for this woman's masterful troll work. Get that bag, sis? But also someone check the hard drives of the men who gave you that 86k? I guess?
 
Chandelier said:
I meant to post this last week but got distracted. A 'science writer' with a huge honker decided to pull the 'more variation within than between' in regards to sex differences. But first, here is the author in question:
Click to expand...
I don't think this is about the gender cult so much as it's about girls sucking at math due to proto-hominid girls not hunting mammoths. She's making arguments similar to Debra Soh. End of Gender is an interesting book. Available from a libgen.is near you.

Edit: I missed the tweet where she refers to gender essentialists, lol. A "gender essentialist" only believes in sex, which she's acknowledging.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom