Culture Have More Sex Please

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account


By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
It just confirms my suspicion they intuitively understand actually addressing the concerns and problems of the demographic discussed is very very bad for them. It’s one thing to look down on supposed neckbeard losers, even general feminist misandry isn’t that revealing-but the sheer vicious hostility and animosity whenever the subject of male sexlessness or loneliness comes up reveals A LOT about women-both what they instinctively understand to be their self interest and their true character.

Not just this thread either-whenever the subject is brought up online, feminists react very viciously and defensively. It’s 100% guaranteed way to make them centuple down on the “incel!” “Men aren’t owed shit” “men should die” rhetoric.

Your relationship with men as a whole is as distorted as any incel's, presumably on account of the poor company you elect to keep, but that's old news-- I ignored that.

What I found gross was how you put down adult virgin women as "autistic", after you've already made clear that you believe men should use women as "warm wet holes" in order to erase the supposed stigma of virginity. That's you wanting company in your misery, and both of those things is downstream from a very developed hatred of women-- and since you're a woman, it's also self-hatred.
Women simply don't like men, they see them as tools and very few exceptions are made to that rule. It usually takes a single father getting the kids and seeing how badly the mother hurt their dad or a brother face some serious feminist bullshit for them to appreciate men. Unless it's personal during childhood women just don't develop empathy for men (and most men don't either). No amount of autistic screeching by MRAs or any one else is going to change that.

I do enjoy seeing legbeards try to battle with men on forums though. As long as the legbeard hasn't flashed the gash to get mods on their side they always get demolished. Women simply cannot fight men and always try to rely on social shaming terms men shrug off while demolishing the dumb bitches in vicious attacks about everything from being a slut to having saggy tits like a playground swing set. Trannies put up more of a fight then women do because they know to go on the attack and not reply with 1 word.

Has this thread got any one laid yet? Any nice boob pictures? Maybe a cheeky minge jpg being sent? I was hoping my autistic ranting might get me some nudes but I guess the legbeards aren't as turned on by FACTS and LOGIC as incels are. Maybe next thread..
 
Fuck you guys, I'm not reading all 33 pages of autistic sad shit. Anyway, my question is shouldn't it be the pursuit of romance and long-term compatibility that we want rather the the act of sex itself? Sex is great and all by itself, but it's very emotional and what makes it worth it in the end is the stability and comfort that comes before it with your partner.

Finding that person you talk of takes a lot of gaining experience and going through horrible relationships. And due to the current social and cultural climate, at least with Western Women, finding that person is like finding a needle in a haystack. And the relationships with these Western Women can really wear down your resilience.

In fact Sweden I think was considering passing a law to stop Men from marrying Women from Thailand because the marriage rate for that was so high, and Western Women were so bad it's almost impossible to find a good one.
 
Lot of men and women have no idea how to interact now in order to get anywhere romantically. I imagine women getting more into online dating with stuff like Tinder helped damage things, as women can see the 10/10 guys and not realize how unattainable they are for average women. So women now feel more comfortable brushing off guys rather than trying for conversations or anything, meaning progressing to actual flirting would be even more difficult.

2023-02-16.png
 
Lot of men and women have no idea how to interact now in order to get anywhere romantically. I imagine women getting more into online dating with stuff like Tinder helped damage things, as women can see the 10/10 guys and not realize how unattainable they are for average women. So women now feel more comfortable brushing off guys rather than trying for conversations or anything, meaning progressing to actual flirting would be even more difficult.

View attachment 4548193

One of my ex's said she used to bag a 10/10 within 15 minutes on Tinder. But it was only for a bang and then he was gone. And she wasn't a prize chicken. So I think this has warped Womens sense of value in the dating market. If she can bag a 10/10 for a bang in 15 minutes. Then she should be able to get a 10/10 boyfriend? A 10/10 Husband? Right?........... RIGHT?
 
Lot of men and women have no idea how to interact now in order to get anywhere romantically. I imagine women getting more into online dating with stuff like Tinder helped damage things, as women can see the 10/10 guys and not realize how unattainable they are for average women. So women now feel more comfortable brushing off guys rather than trying for conversations or anything, meaning progressing to actual flirting would be even more difficult.

View attachment 4548193
Mixers seem to be the solution to this. Or they would be if everyone wasn't on their phones the whole time.
 
No, there are a few women capable of some level of rational discourse. You've seen a couple on this site. It's a rare quality.
Most women on the site are terfs, and let me tell you, the "r" in terf could stand for every word in the english language starting with "r" except "rational".
 
Most women on the site are terfs, and let me tell you, the "r" in terf could stand for every word in the english language starting with "r" except "rational".
The troon menace seems to have made people forget that 'TERFs' hate men above all else. They only care now that troons are stepping in on their gig.

You'd think having troons treat them the way they treat men would be eye opening but I guess I expected too much from people who claim it's the man's fault when female prison guards have sex with male prisoners for 'lying to them'.
 
Most women on the site are terfs, and let me tell you, the "r" in terf could stand for every word in the english language starting with "r" except "rational".
Other words they most definitely are not include reasonable, realistic, and restrained.

I despise trannies as much as the next Kiwi, but this entire convo has been very enlightening about why their nemesis the TERF is by no means a good thing either. (Then again feminist madness and degeneracy reached near singularity levels before the Troon-apocalypse).

Feminists and especially TERFs are often more vicious, more debased, and have done far more cumulative harm to society then trannies-if only because they have been around for over a century.
 
Feminists and especially TERFs are often more vicious, more debased, and have done far more cumulative harm to society then trannies-if only because they have been around for over a century.
Terfs created trannies. They hate it when you remind them but their "Sexual liberation now, I'll do whatever the fuck I want and you can't stop me you shitlord" ideology is what led to troons being emboldened and taking over their grift.
 
The joke is old, but men really do make better women than women do. (Well except for the sheer filth and degeneracy inherent in troonism itself).

Feminism and sexual liberation though did lead to the triumph of tranny-ism, if gender roles aren't defined, if they are not set in stone, then well why can't a man who "feels" he is a woman authentically be a woman? Who is anyone to say otherwise?

Its classic Saturn devouring his children material, and just the dialectic continuing ever on into the abyss. So yeah my sympathy for feminists is very very minimal.

If women had not dared to oppose the patriarchy, and undermined the power of the father and husband then they wouldn't have trannies in their bathrooms demanding they suck their mutilated dicks. But they spent the last half century corroding a social order that protected them as much as it (rightfully) enchained them. So they get what they deserve.
 
The joke is old, but men really do make better women than women do. (Well except for the sheer filth and degeneracy inherent in troonism itself).

Feminism and sexual liberation though did lead to the triumph of tranny-ism, if gender roles aren't defined, if they are not set in stone, then well why can't a man who "feels" he is a woman authentically be a woman? Who is anyone to say otherwise?

Its classic Saturn devouring his children material, and just the dialectic continuing ever on into the abyss. So yeah my sympathy for feminists is very very minimal.

If women had not dared to oppose the patriarchy, and undermined the power of the father and husband then they wouldn't have trannies in their bathrooms demanding they suck their mutilated dicks. But they spent the last half century corroding a social order that protected them as much as it (rightfully) enchained them. So they get what they deserve.

Buddy you've gone off the deep end.
 
Back
Top Bottom