Culture Have More Sex Please

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account


By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
Why do these threads devolve into the 3 Blue haired bitches on Kiwi farms arguing with some Larping Faggot who I have never seen post before this thread was created?
These slapfights are fun. The thots and legbeards come in with “lol small peepee” and “lol incel” and end up being a perfect foil that proves even the most cynical view of modern women and then some. Even a hardcore muh soggy knee shitlord like myself can’t come up with the shit these insane whores come up with. Since modern women refuse to be held accountable or do any kind of introspection for anything they do, they will double down, triple down, etc. There’s always some simps too, a nice cherry on that shit sundae.
 
These slapfights are fun. The thots and legbeards come in with “lol small peepee” and “lol incel” and end up being a perfect foil that proves even the most cynical view of modern women and then some. Even a hardcore muh soggy knee shitlord like myself can’t come up with the shit these insane whores come up with. Since modern women refuse to be held accountable or do any kind of introspection for anything they do, they will double down, triple down, etc. There’s always some simps too, a nice cherry on that shit sundae.
It just confirms my suspicion they intuitively understand actually addressing the concerns and problems of the demographic discussed is very very bad for them. It’s one thing to look down on supposed neckbeard losers, even general feminist misandry isn’t that revealing-but the sheer vicious hostility and animosity whenever the subject of male sexlessness or loneliness comes up reveals A LOT about women-both what they instinctively understand to be their self interest and their true character.

Not just this thread either-whenever the subject is brought up online, feminists react very viciously and defensively. It’s 100% guaranteed way to make them centuple down on the “incel!” “Men aren’t owed shit” “men should die” rhetoric.
 
Last edited:
It just confirms my suspicion they intuitively understand actually addressing the concerns and problems of the demographic discussed is very very bad for them. It’s one thing to look down on supposed neckbeard losers, even general feminist misandry isn’t that revealing-but the sheer vicious hostility and animus whenever the subject of male sexlessness or loneliness comes up reveals A LOT about women-both what they instinctively understand to be their self interest and their true character.

Not just this thread either-whenever the subject is brought up online, feminists react very viciously and defensively. It’s 100% guaranteed way to make them centuple down on the “incel!” “Men aren’t owed shit” “men should die” rhetoric.
Modern western women are conditioned from day one that nothing they say or do is ever their fault and trying to moderate acting on their tingles is the same thing as some Handmaid’s Tale theocratic hellscape where Turbogiganazi incels form rape gangs that target innocent wymyn. These same rape gangs are also known to be triggered when an unattractive man glances at them in the elevator or offers to get them a drink at a bar. Not all women think this way but a huge chunk do and that leads to the insanity/entertainment we see in this thread.

Guys can’t relate because the idea that nothing you ever do or say is wrong is something we can’t comprehend. Even a Patrick Bateman-esque sociopath knows they can’t act on all their impulses without fear of reprisals. Ken McElroy is one of the few men who behaved like a modern woman: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_McElroy
 
It does remind me of the old socialist v capitalist debates. A capitalist insisting workers not join unions and "pull up by the bootstraps" is acting out of self-interest-if workers organize collectively and demand higher pay, etc... the capitalist's profits are curtailed.

The same dynamic is present here-male sexlessness women and their simps demand be treated as an individual failing or pathology, not something that is either addressed with a political solution-either a violent overturning of the current order or changes to social policy. Women don't want to put out-especially for the men who are lonely and/or sexless and they understand that any government or movement that actually addressed the issue would insist they do.

Sex (and companionship by extension) being the resource fought over here.

Do women understand this consciously? Probably not most of them no, but the sheer bile and undiluted hatred whenever this subject is brought up speaks to a subconscious understanding of what they stand to lose if the problem were to be solved.

You see it in full force with the "society doesn't owe you anything" "its your fault you can't get laid" "you are owed nothing" "you're entitled" "want to stop being lonely and miserable, make friends loser!"

Same women will often call themselves socialists or liberals or whatever and they repeat libertarian/ancap talking points almost verbatim. Again because they understand at a visceral primal level the actual stakes.
 
You're just mad because you feel called out
Your relationship with men as a whole is as distorted as any incel's, presumably on account of the poor company you elect to keep, but that's old news-- I ignored that.

What I found gross was how you put down adult virgin women as "autistic", after you've already made clear that you believe men should use women as "warm wet holes" in order to erase the supposed stigma of virginity. That's you wanting company in your misery, and both of those things is downstream from a very developed hatred of women-- and since you're a woman, it's also self-hatred.
 
Last edited:
I already have enough kids, lol. Granted, sex is still pretty good. Sidenote, I love when femcels unironically tell kiwis to have sex. Look in the mirror, bruh.
These slapfights are fun. The thots and legbeards come in with “lol small peepee” and “lol incel.
Bruh, none of them are getting dick anyway, It's seething through projection.
 
Mainstream culture wants everyone to define themselves by sex which is stupid. Sex is actually mundane. It is exciting, yes, but literally every living organism reproduces. Its like defining yourself by your ability to take a shit or to eat food.
 
Last edited:
I went through 34 god damn pages and I did not see this:


You should all be ashamed of yourselves. May God have mercy on your incel souls
 
Your relationship with men as a whole is as distorted as any incel's, presumably on account of the poor company you elect to keep, but that's old news-- I ignored that.

What I found gross was how you put down adult virgin women as "autistic", after you've already made clear that you believe men should use women as "warm wet holes" in order to erase the supposed stigma of virginity. That's you wanting company in your misery, and both of those things is downstream from a very developed hatred of women-- and since you're a woman, it's also self-hatred.
Not true. I never put down them as autistic. I just said the ones I knew personally were all autistic. I also never said men should treat women like that. In fact I wish they wouldn't but they do. But go off anyway, mincing fancy pants pseud.
 
Church girls might actually be sincere. A girl raised Pentecostal is not going to choke on your dick, take it up the ass and give you head in a car. They might insist you believe the religion they do, and that you go to church and behave yourself. Worse, they might insist you meet…their…parents. Horrifying.

A lot of men derive pleasure from seducing or otherwise overcoming a religious or conservative woman’s objections, but men as a rule are not attracted to women that might refuse to indulge their desires or insist on some set of beliefs or standards of conduct if you want to be their bf/husband.
One of the things that I heard a coworker say is that if you want to meet a decent girl, try church. I mean, if you believe in that stuff, that's fine.

A lot of those people believe that God has already chosen your partner for you but it's not the right time or something along those lines. Taken out of a religious context, maybe sometimes the right people do eventually find each other.
Because women can call upon the full might of the entire state apparatus at a whim.

Duh.
And these people have the balls to call ANYONE "fascist."
 
Not true. I never put down them as autistic. I just said the ones I knew personally were all autistic.
As a means to suggest that virgin women past the age of 23 are likely to be autistic, in the same way you were using your supposed experience with virgin men past the age of 23 to suggest that such are likely to be severely angry at women as a category.

I also never said men should treat women like that.
You insult men on account of whether you believe they've had sex-- and only that. You evaluate men based not on whether they've been in an intimate relationship, but on whether they've had sex.

You've made the woman a conceptual device that the man hasn't used (or "can't use") to remove his "virgin" status. If he hasn't, he's worthy of your derision along those lines. If he has, you can't deride him thus.

Take responsibility for the things you choose to say-- if you can.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom