Culture Have More Sex Please

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account


By Magdalene J. Taylor
Ms. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture.

Sex is good. Sex is healthy. Sex is an essential part of our social fabric. And you — specifically — should probably be having more of it.
Americans, in the midst of a loneliness epidemic, are not having enough sex. Across almost every demographic group, American adults old and young, single and coupled, rich and poor are having less sex than they have had at any point in at least the past three decades.

Sex isn’t the sole form of fulfilling human interaction and certainly isn’t a salve for loneliness in all forms. Still, it should be seen as a critical part of our social well-being, not an indulgence or an afterthought. This is in large part because the rise in loneliness closely parallels a decline in sex. More than a quarter of Americans hadn’t had sex even once in the past year the last time the General Social Survey asked, in 2021. It was the highest such level of sexlessness in the survey’s history.

That figure includes almost 30 percent of men under 30, a figure that has tripled since 2008. In the 1990s, about half of Americans were having sex weekly or more — that figure is now under 40 percent. For many who are having sex, the frequency has dropped precipitously. And it’s not just sex: Partnership and cohabitation are down, too. Less time spent with friends and lovers — these aren’t distinct issues but symptoms of the same cultural malaise, an isolation that is demolishing Americans’ social lives, love lives and happiness.

Estimates vary, but somewhere between a third and two-thirds of Americans report being lonely. Loneliness exists on a feedback loop: Fraying cultural bonds, damaged physical health and reduced social contact both exacerbate loneliness and are exacerbated by it, to the point that loneliness lowers life expectancy. Loneliness is a challenging phenomenon for researchers to quantify, but there are telltale signs — and they point to a society losing its way. The number of Americans who report having no close friends at all has quadrupled since 1990, according to a Survey Center on American Life study. An average American in 2021 spent 58 percent less time with friends than in 2013, the Census Bureau found.

Covid-19 has contributed to the spike in loneliness and the decline in sex, but is only partially responsible. Between 2014 and 2019, the decrease in time people spent with friends was greater than it was during the pandemic. And during the pandemic, many Americans spent more and more time alone, with neither friends nor romantic partners. Younger Americans are, infamously, less likely to have sex than their parents’ generations — and when they do have sex, they’re doing it with fewer partners.

In my work as a writer covering sex and culture, I have spoken to dozens of men for whom a lack of sex is the defining characteristic of their daily life. It shapes their interests, their motivations, their hopes. Some are incels — short for “involuntary celibates,” believers in a toxic, misogynistic ideology — but more are not. Some believe the pursuit of sex will be entirely futile. In turn, they’ve begun to interpret going out, spending time with friends and meeting new people as futile, too. This thinking becomes cyclical — soon, they’re not only afraid of failing to find a sexual partner but they also grow to fear even platonic social interactions. Sex is only one component of their overall isolation but is in many cases the one upon which the overall problem hinges.
It’s easy to brush these men off as anomalies, or to label their state as a result of personal failings or even the consequences of modern masculinity. But while much of the research around the decline in sex focuses upon young men, almost every group of Americans is experiencing the absence of sex — and the consequences are profound. If a lack of sex is affecting the cultural and social participation of these young men, it’s likely to be affecting the rest of us, too. A lack of sex can easily translate into less socialization, fewer families and a sicker population: Sex reduces pain, relieves stress, improves sleep, lowers blood pressure and strengthens heart health.

Writers like myself have made male sexlessness a well-known issue, even as women are in the same bind. Data from the General Social Survey actually suggests they may be having even less sex than men. In 2021, roughly a quarter of women under 35 reported having had no sex in the past year. For men, the figure was 19 percent. And women who are having sex are less likely to be happy with the sex they’re having. Both men and women report feelings of regret and unhappiness following casual sex, but it’s more common among women — probably in part because of cultural perceptions of sexual autonomy. Sex can bring people together, but that only works when it’s good sex.

Not only are women and men marching together into sexlessness; they’re also on the same road to loneliness. Young women were more likely than men to report losing touch with friends during the pandemic, and a British study found that women were more likely than men to report feeling lonely “often” or “always.” Reporting often focuses on young-male sexlessness — and on incel ideology — but the decline in sex and rise in loneliness and social isolation are not male problems. In 21st-century America, loneliness is essentially omnipresent, and the high schooler’s cliché fear that “everyone else is having sex” has never been less true.

There is no one solution. The loneliness epidemic has been brought about by myriad factors that have been exacerbated over decades. Social media is one culprit; the 20th century’s war of attrition against walkable communities is another. But as loneliness has accelerated, it has become self-perpetuating: Our current societal loneliness — and sexlessness — is a result of social and cultural shifts, while its continuation perpetuates those shifts further.

The loneliness epidemic may be a societal issue, but it can be solved, at least partly, at the level of individual bedrooms. Those of us in a position to be having more sex ought to be doing so. Here is the rare opportunity to do something for the betterment of the world around you that involves nothing more than indulging in one of humanity’s most essential pleasures.

Having more sex is both personal guidance — your doctor might well agree — and a political statement. American society is less connected, made up of individuals who seem increasingly willing to isolate themselves. Having more sex can be an act of social solidarity.

Not everyone who wants to have more sex is easily capable of doing so. Disabilities, religious objections, asexuality and any set of day-to-day restrictions and responsibilities curtail or close off sex for many. There may be some who simply do not want to have more sex, or any sex at all. But even those who won’t have more sex should avoid apathy. Sex is intrinsic to a society built on social connection — and right now, our connections and our sex lives are collapsing alongside each other.

Many people — like some of the young men I have spoken to in my work — have resigned themselves to displacing their sexual desires, relying entirely on porn or other online stimuli, mirroring so many types of relationships that have been subsumed into the digital world. As a balm for loneliness, digital sex can be little better than digital friendship — a source of envy, resentfulness and spite, a driver of loneliness rather than a cure for it. It’s no match for the real thing.
So, anyone capable should have sex — as much as they can, as pleasurably as they can, as often as they can.

Magdalene J. Taylor is a writer covering sex and culture. She writes the newsletter “Many Such Cases.”
 
See, if you were smart/an autist you would understand that all relationships need to be subjected to a careful cost/benefit analysis. The fact that women don't do this and try to make the best out of an imperfect relationship proves that they are dumb
False. Women in fact do relationship cost/benefit analyses all the time.

...they may not be good at it, but they do do it.
 
You deflect with every comment you make.
He's what I think. You want me to agree with you that all women are whores unconditionally because you only want women to be on the hook for a return to the trad lifestyle and not commit to becoming more trad yourself.

We have had viable family units for 10,000 years. The small hats invented porn, inceldom, and feminism for the purposes of depopulation.
We can't solve it. The system won't let you. They want this.
This is why we must burn the system to the ground.
 
See, if you were smart/an autist you would understand that all relationships need to be subjected to a careful cost/benefit analysis. The fact that women don't do this and try to make the best out of an imperfect relationship proves that they are dumb, whereas alpha chads and volcels have both come out winners because they have no attachments, swimming through women like sharks in the sea or avoiding a strangling net.
I think I'm getting a contact high from the copium huffing.

"These women aren't morons who make terrible life decisions. They're just sentimental. They're romantics. It's such a beautiful, noble way to go through life! Love like you've never been hurt!"
 
Because they are human and make mistakes also relationships are messy so is pregnancies and hormones. Go read some relationship advice how many men and women were in terrible relationships or where cheating is happening and it didn't click to them until they found out. Also people can't act like paranoid cunts all the time. But i am sure this is also somehow womans fault . And the fact that sex and relationships together with births are in decline shouldn't be already indicator that woman are careful .
They are some really retarded humans, I'll tell you that. I know plenty of women who haven't gotten knocked up by some retarded nigger. Know plenty of men who take care of their children too. Taking accountability in the people you associate with in any manner does wonders for a person's life. Doesn't surprise me so many people are miserable today because they can't take any in their own.

Sexlessness is on the decline for men and relationships are on the decline in general because women are just becoming concubines for the top percentage of men. This isn't women being careful. It's women being undecisive and ruining themselves for healthy relationships. We do not work under the same parameters. It's why women lean more liberal than they do conservative. It's why women are cited as victims of increased suicide when in the same article men are mentioned to have an increase in suicidal ideation. And it's why you are utterly incapable of seeing any responsibility on a woman's side in this entire mess.

We say women are equal to men when we are different. This is the source of the gender wars. Men are told not to be men and women are told not to be women. And women shame men for simply existing at this point. Not making enough money, not being married, not having a certain type of job, and not being attractive. Say a single thing about a woman and you get what's happening in this thread now. One side is not being defensive enough and the other is far too defensive. One's flinging shit and the other side flinging any back is seen as hateful. What the fuck even is this?
 
I thought you were going to give a product of thought.
Nigger, every time I make a point, all I get is a chorus of "nuh-uhs" from totally-not-incels about how literally every conceivable problem is the fault of women and only women, even when men are "mysteriously" disproportionately benefited.

Look, I get it - your grievances are legitimate, but you refuse to acknowledge even the most basic grievances women also have. A return to tradition is a two-way street.
 
Stick little you in the hole between the female 's legs, keep thrusting until you reach happy.
I have never found happy between a woman's leg. This sounds gay as fuck but you should feel happy holding hands with someone you love far more than fucking her. Intimacy brings happiness not fucking it's self. Orgasms release a lot of hormones to make intimacy happen but that's more post-sex than sex.
They are some really retarded humans, I'll tell you that. I know plenty of women who haven't gotten knocked up by some retarded nigger. Know plenty of men who take care of their children too. Taking accountability in the people you associate with in any manner does wonders for a person's life. Doesn't surprise me so many people are miserable today because they can't take any in their own.

Sexlessness is on the decline for men and relationships are on the decline in general because women are just becoming concubines for the top percentage of men. This isn't women being careful. It's women being undecisive and ruining themselves for healthy relationships. We do not work under the same parameters. It's why women lean more liberal than they do conservative. It's why women are cited as victims of increased suicide when in the same article men are mentioned to have an increase in suicidal ideation. And it's why you are utterly incapable of seeing any responsibility on a woman's side in this entire mess.

We say women are equal to men when we are different. This is the source of the gender wars. Men are told not to be men and women are told not to be women. And women shame men for simply existing at this point. Not making enough money, not being married, not having a certain type of job, and not being attractive. Say a single thing about a woman and you get what's happening in this thread now. One side is not being defensive enough and the other is far too defensive. One's flinging shit and the other side flinging any back is seen as hateful. What the fuck even is this?
Women are choosing to have the kids of alphas rather than the kids of betas. It's a conscious choice to have the best off spring possible and the government will foot the bill. Birth control cock blocks that mostly but it is a decision being made not indecision.

Men are told not to be men while women are told to be men. Neither are told to be parents. You have castrated men unable to act while women larp as men and kids have no parent to always be there for them. It's no wonder there's so many kids confused today, even the adults don't know what the fuck is going on with themselves.
 
Nigger, every time I make a point, all I get is a chorus of "nuh-uhs" from totally-not-incels about how literally every conceivable problem is the fault of women and only women, even when men are "mysteriously" disproportionately benefited.

Look, I get it - your grievances are legitimate, but you refuse to acknowledge even the most basic grievances women also have. A return to tradition is a two-way street.
you are in complete denial of women having any control over spreading their legs
 
I have never found happy between a woman's leg. This sounds gay as fuck but you should feel happy holding hands with someone you love far more than fucking her. Intimacy brings happiness not fucking it's self. Orgasms release a lot of hormones to make intimacy happen but that's more post-sex than sex.

Women are choosing to have the kids of alphas rather than the kids of betas. It's a conscious choice to have the best off spring possible and the government will foot the bill. Birth control cock blocks that mostly but it is a decision being made not indecision.

Men are told not to be men while women are told to be men. Neither are told to be parents. You have castrated men unable to act while women larp as men and kids have no parent to always be there for them. It's no wonder there's so many kids confused today, even the adults don't know what the fuck is going on with themselves.
Slight but important correction, women don’t do these things consciously. They aren’t waking up and thinking “I should make sure a strong man reproduces through me”-it’s innate subconscious behavior. Instinct that has to be rationalized post hoc.
 
Last edited:
Nigger, every time I make a point, all I get is a chorus of "nuh-uhs" from totally-not-incels about how literally every conceivable problem is the fault of women and only women, even when men are "mysteriously" disproportionately benefited.
I couldn't care less. Talk to me if you're going to quote the things I say for response, not the chorus of incels that totally exists.
 
Men that can get pussy are going to do so. You could i suppose make it punishable to sleep around as a man, but I know of no society where that was actually implemented. A man was punished insofar as he defiled another man’s property. Now that women are free, there’s no real mechanism for restraining cads.

The best thing is to make it legally actionable for men to remain as fathers. The player lifestyle can be disincentivized through onerous and punitive taxation.
 
A women can spread her legs all she wants but she cannot summon a dick without the assistance of a willing man.
Am I really the delusional one for blaming both for committing adultery?
Every response you've given towards women having accountability is but the men though.
We know. All of us know. When you say that, we call it deflection because it doesn't justify anything.
 
So many examples here of failed parenting, or just retarded offspring. Maybe Alex Jones was right, there is something in water turning men gay. Why else are so many men, ( I struggle to apply that word to those present in this thread) terrified of woman.
 
Back
Top Bottom