Pre-K teacher attacks idea of 'childhood innocence,' claims toddlers not too young for 'sexuality' discussion - William 'Willy' Villalpando called the idea of 'childhood innocence' a 'mythology'

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
(Article, archive)
A pre-kindergarten teacher and early childhood professor repeatedly attacked the idea of "childhood innocence" and claimed that early childhood teachers should introduce children to gender ideology at the youngest ages, Fox News Digital found.

William "Willy" Villalpando works at Santa Ana College in California where he teaches early child development. He also indicated on his Instagram that he is a pre-kindergarten educator.

Fox News found documentation that Villalpando worked in the Rialto Unified School District pre-k division from 2016 through at least June 2021, the latest date California updated teacher's records. It was unclear whether Villalpando continued to work at the district for the 2022-23 academic year, and they refused to respond. When Fox News reached out to Villalpando's Rialto district email address it was not returned to sender.

In 2020, Villalpando called the idea of "childhood innocence" an example of "mythology."

Childhood-innocence-.jpg


"There is a common mythology that children live in this world of pure innocence, and that by introducing or exposing them to the real-world adults are somehow shattering this illusion for them. Therefore, there is a banning of topics and issues that children should not be exposed to, as if they are not experiencing them already."

On another occasion, he said, "I'm tired of the ‘Childhood Innocence’ argument… Stop blaming a phenomenon that doesn't exist."

He went on to attack the idea that children shouldn't be exposed to "sexuality," claiming that "such a view is a very white, Christian, upper-class, cis-gendered, and hetero-centric."
Willy-V.jpg

"Not talking about Queerness in the Classroom, is NOT Letting Children be Children. It's Telling Those people They Do Not Deserve to Exist," he said in September 2021. "Kids are never too young."

"Let's work to deconstruct some of our own biases. (Adults incorrectly link discussions on sexuality and gender as equating to discussions about sex.)," the early childhood educator said.

The district Santa Ana College where the teacher works told Fox News that they do "not condone any form of attack on 'childhood innocence.'

"Our RSCCD community college courses in Child Development and Education Studies do not address nor teach gender studies," the district said.

He said in a November 2022 podcast of "Rainbow Parenting" that "we have so many people who tell us that this is inappropriate stuff we can talk about. And so I'm like, hey, no, we can't talk about this."

The teacher went on to say that if parents didn't have the conversations with kids, it was up to teachers to foster classroom environments that "may make others uncomfortable."

"Children who are exposed to environments with more fluid understandings of gender, are more likely to understand that gender is fluid."

He added that educators should talk to little kids about queerness even if parents have avoided the topic.
Willy-V-prof.jpg
"Parents haven't already had conversations about these things with their kids, that kids don't know, that they might be intersex, that they might be agender... non-binary. And really, children have a right to see themselves in our classrooms. It's not okay to just forget about them or push them out just because it might make us uncomfortable or may make others uncomfortable."
queerness-in-classroom.jpg
According to Villalpando, "talking to children about gender" includes telling them that it is a "social construct."

"This goes alongside teaching children to ask others for their pronouns. Trust me when I say children get this so much faster than adults give them credit for. Let kids practice with you," he said.

Villalpando's social media accounts went dark after Fox News Digital reached out for comment.

"[C]hildren are exploring and understanding gendered association before they say their first words," he said.

"Around 3 to 4 months old, infants [sic] show a sex and gender preference in who they look at."

"At 3 years old, a child can label their perceived gender identity," he said. "By 4 years old, children have a stable sense of their gender identity and have assumptions and beliefs of what they can and cannot do based on their gender (i.e. dolls are for girls, cars are for boys)."

Other teachers in California have raised the topic of gender ideology in their classrooms.

A California teacher named Olivia Garrison bragged about helping students hide their social transitions from parents. Fox News Digital found that Garrison, a 9th grade history teacher, worked at Del Oro High School located in the Kern High School District.

TikTok-teacher-NYT.jpg
Social transitioning is a first step for transgender children. It entails adopting new names, pronouns, changing their clothing and getting haircuts to match a preferred gender expression.

The New York Times reported, "Olivia Garrison, a history teacher in Bakersfield, Calif., who is nonbinary… has helped students socially transition at school without their parents' knowledge."

"My job, which is a public service, is to protect kids… Sometimes, they need protection from their own parents," Garrison told The Times. She did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Another teacher in the Sacramento City Unified District, Danita McCray recommended using a "gender unicorn" with toddlers to introduce gender theory.
Danita-McCray-Featured-Image.jpg

"Now, early childhood is 0 to 8 years old, so that's kind of like from preschool to third grade… And the focus… of this workshop is to provide you with positive strategies to support transgender and gender non-conforming children," McCray said in a video exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital.

"I've done research. I have got my doctorate degree. Children are not too young at five years old. Children understand gender as early as three years old," she said.

Skye Tooley, a teacher at Saturn Street Elementary, located in the Los Angeles Unified School District, discussed on TikTok using a "gender-fluid" stuffed animal to teach children on pronouns and being non-binary. Gender fluidity refers to change over time in a person's gender expression or gender identity, or both.

Stuffed-animals-teacher.jpg

"This is a llama unicorn... I thought it was so cute to let my kids name the llama unicorn. It was a mistake. So this little llama is gender-fluid; we will be practicing pronouns with this little llama," Tooley said.

"[Children] are very much ready for these topics, and are way more accepting than adults when it comes to... gender, gender assumptions, pronouns, all the things. And it is child-development appropriate and age appropriate," the teacher said.

Tooley provided another example of a stuffed animal that had they/them pronouns.

"I started talking [to students] about Norbert the Narwhal … who uses they/them pronouns, and we practice making mistakes with their pronouns as well as correcting them."
 
Believing children shouldn't engage in sexual activity, ESPECIALLY with adults, is a uniquely white belief? Tell me your racist without telling me you're racist.

Funny the way they always have smoke for the Catholic Church for the priest scandals, yet they are operating the same way.

Don't forget Chris Chan. * shudders *
Apparently, since these things never leave the house, they haven't heard of the Asian/Latina mama bear stereotypes.
 
I as an adult can barely understand modern gender and sexuality theories; how can someone who barely understands the concept of shitting in toilets comprehend it?
 
I have children.

I keep an exceptional eye on the news for all the cases within the city in which I live. I also know the Federal prosecutor in my city who is responsible for prosecuting these monsters. They are the sneakiest fucks to have ever walked the Earth and if you are a father or mother and you think your Pedo problem is waiting for you down the road at the local Tranny or gay nightclub, you're a fool.

They hide in plain sight and will most likely be in positions of great trust and be considered beyond reproach - because that's the cover they need to have in life in order to avoid detection.
So... what's the deal? Did one of your kids troon out? Is this some kind of cope denialism, where you redefine what sexual abuse is so you don't have to deal with what you see going on right in front of you? Right now, on Discord, there is many a kid who is being told how to hide this stuff away from their parents, how to brew their own bathtub troonshine, all the while being lovebombed (so long as they continue on with it, at least). If there was some sick fuck telling kids to mutilate themselves in order to get his rocks off, he'd rightfully be called a sick, pedophilic fuck. How the fuck does it suddenly become "protecting trans kids" when he downs some titty Skittles and wears a dress?
Just because these fuckers redefine the words referring to their abuse, doesn't suddenly make it not abuse. If you are making determinations based on who is actually being prosecuted, you are a fucking moron. Epstein got away with what he did for years, and it's funny we still haven't seen a single other prosecution aside from Maxwell. When I report a troon discord that pulls their shit with kids to the authorities, nothing comes from it.
Bringing up Catholic priests works against you here, the reason they got the pedo stigma in the first place is because the Catholic Church was actively shielding them from prosecution. By that logic, I guess priests were absolutely not pedos when the Church actively suppressed their activities and didn't report it to authorities?
 
So... what's the deal? Did one of your kids troon out? Is this some kind of cope denialism, where you redefine what sexual abuse is so you don't have to deal with what you see going on right in front of you? Right now, on Discord, there is many a kid who is being told how to hide this stuff away from their parents, how to brew their own bathtub troonshine, all the while being lovebombed (so long as they continue on with it, at least). If there was some sick fuck telling kids to mutilate themselves in order to get his rocks off, he'd rightfully be called a sick, pedophilic fuck. How the fuck does it suddenly become "protecting trans kids" when he downs some titty Skittles and wears a dress?
Just because these fuckers redefine the words referring to their abuse, doesn't suddenly make it not abuse. If you are making determinations based on who is actually being prosecuted, you are a fucking moron. Epstein got away with what he did for years, and it's funny we still haven't seen a single other prosecution aside from Maxwell. When I report a troon discord that pulls their shit with kids to the authorities, nothing comes from it.
Bringing up Catholic priests works against you here, the reason they got the pedo stigma in the first place is because the Catholic Church was actively shielding them from prosecution. By that logic, I guess priests were absolutely not pedos when the Church actively suppressed their activities and didn't report it to authorities?
Based on trying to have a nuanced discussion with this guy in another thread, he's just going to ignore everything or wave it away then ramble more about how all republicans secretly want to marry children or some shit.
 
Based on trying to have a nuanced discussion with this guy in another thread, he's just going to ignore everything or wave it away then ramble more about how all republicans secretly want to marry children or some shit.
Still, absolute retard mode trying to tell people on the Farms that troons aren't a risk for pedophilia. If he wants to try and own right wingers, probably best not to do it with absolute bullshit that can be disproven in a few clicks within the same site.
 
Still, absolute retard mode trying to tell people on the Farms that troons aren't a risk for pedophilia. If he wants to try and own right wingers, probably best not to do it with absolute bullshit that can be disproven in a few clicks within the same site.
Let's set the troon issue aside in this particular case: these people work with toddlers and deride the concept of childhood innocence as racist, patriarchal and whatever other stupid bullshit they can pile on. These are people, however they identify, who clearly want to fuck kids and this fag wants to Kool-aid Man into the discussion to talk about anything but the topic.

It really makes ya think.
 
"Kids are never too young."

This sentence, regardless of context, sounds very wrong, much worse when you consider this is a topic on sexuality.

Jfc, you guys really need to push back and stop staying quiet. You have let the tumor fester for too long.
 
This sentence, regardless of context, sounds very wrong, much worse when you consider this is a topic on sexuality.

Jfc, you guys really need to push back and stop staying quiet. You have let the tumor fester for too long.
Yeah no the secret to all of this is the tumor is fucking terminal. Not only will there be no push back but attempts to "fix" this will have push back instead.

Cuz why give a shit about children, when you can grift more money from the oppression grift pipeline.
This is honestly why there should be a CLEAR FUCKING line between children and anything sexual. Remove ANY chance of these faggots having any capacity to groom children. I don't give a shit if it harms their "sexual maturity" or whatever this retarded walking dick-joke (seriously his twitter is all "my name will so willy cock joke im comin after ur kids hahahahah kidding unless" bullshit) has as an excuse. The possibility - and actual reality right fucking now, of creating mentally ill children is too high.

Let kids be kids, and let retarded sexually frustrated incels, stay incels.
 
If these people could get laid normally they wouldn't need a lolita express and a pipeline of bribing retarded parents for sex slaves.

Uh.... they're, pedos though I thought that was the point.

We aren't talking about the incel so isolated, so socially stunted and afraid of women, so lonely, and so brainwashed by the internet they think their only hope for a real relationship is from a naive 13 year old on some Minecraft forum. Because they think a kid won't knock them back.

I'm talking about actual pedos.
 
"Parents haven't already had conversations about these things with their kids, that kids don't know, that they might be intersex, that they might be agender... non-binary"

Imagine sitting down little Tommy to tell him there is a chance he might be intersex.

One thing I don't understand is why there seems to be so many questionable things being taught in public schools in N.America.
Isn't elementary school curriculum regulated on federal level?

In my country we have Ministry of Education that approves and regulates public elementary and high school program and it's the same in every school.
 
Glad to see these fucks have eyes on them now.

"Children are not innocent" is actual psychopath talk. They do not deserve to feel safe ever again.

If opposing pedophilia makes me a Nahzee, then Sieg fucking Heil.
Weren't you just defending child marriage in that thread? Lmao

The only thing sex-related little kids need to be taught is proper names for body parts and the good touch/bad touch talk. Learning gay people exist is fine and not inherently sex related.
This shit is why my kids go to a private Christian school. It is less indoctrination than the public schools.
Thats just a different type of indoctrination and less chance pedos there will be reported to law enforcement.
 
Weren't you just defending child marriage in that thread? Lmao
No, I was not. I condemned child marriage like everyone else in that thread.

Never mind the fact that the "child" bride cited in that thread was 22.

The fact that you and your ilk need to put words in other people's mouths shows how full of shit you are.

Say, aren't you the psycho bitch with daddy issues who flicks her bean to post-birth infanticide? There's a difference between being zealously pro-abortion and an odious rusalka like you.
 
Last edited:
No, I was not. I condemned child marriage like everyone else in that thread.

Never mind the fact that the "child" bride cited in that thread was 22.

The fact that you and your ilk need to put words in other people's mouths shows how full of shit you are.

Say, aren't you the psycho bitch with daddy issues who flicks her bean to post-birth infanticide?
We're not defending anything, shitdick. We're pushing back against what is an obvious red herring meant to distract from the Rainbow Mafia demanding to mutilate and brainwash kids into sex slavery.
In a thread about Republicans being butthurt about efforts to ban child marriage.

Child abuse/grooming is OK when conservatives do it in the Thunderdome.
 
Child abuse/grooming is OK when conservatives do it in the Thunderdome.
Not once do I say anything of the sort.

Au contraire, I say the opposite:
It's wrong, whether it's a priest or a man in drag, and you're a dishonest faggot for putting words in my mouth.
Anyone who fucks kids, regardless of party or religion, should have a millstone tied around their neck and thown into the sea.
so you're either illiterate, or you're lying.

You have a right to your opinions. I don't care if you wish death upon every conservative Christian in the world. But you do NOT have a right to go around spreading bullshit strawman claims.
 
Back
Top Bottom