A decades-long broken economy screwed over millennials, and their decision to delay having kids is fueling America’s historically low birth rate - Amazingly, they aren't blaming avocado toast this time

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Birth rates are falling in the U.S. After the highs of the baby boom in the mid-20th century and the lows of the baby bust in the 1970s, birth rates were relatively stable for nearly 50 years. But during the Great Recession, from 2007-2009, birth rates declined sharply—and they’ve kept falling. In 2007, average birth rates were right around 2 children per woman. By 2021, levels had dropped more than 20%, close to the lowest level in a century. Why?

Is this decline because, as some suggest, young people aren’t interested in having children? Or are people facing increasing barriers to becoming parents?

We are demographers who study how people make plans for having kids and whether they are able to carry out those intentions.

In a recent study, we analyzed how changes in childbearing goals may have contributed to recent declines in birth rates in the United States. Our analysis found that most young people still plan to become parents but are delaying childbearing.
Digging into the demographic data

We were interested in whether people have changed their plans for childbearing over the past few decades. And we knew from other research that the way people think about having children changes as they get older and their circumstances change. Some people initially think they’ll have children, then gradually change their views over time, perhaps because they don’t meet the right partner or because they work in demanding fields. Others don’t expect to have children at one point but later find themselves desiring to have children or, sometimes, unexpectedly pregnant.

So we needed to analyze both changes over time—comparing young people now to those in the past, and changes across the life course—comparing a group of people at different ages. No single data set contains enough information to make both of those comparisons, so we combined information from multiple surveys.

Since the 1970s, the National Surveys of Family Growth, a federal survey run by the National Centers for Health Statistics, have been asking people about their childbearing goals and behaviors. The survey doesn’t collect data from the same people over time, but it provides a snapshot of the U.S. population about every five years.

Using multiple rounds of the survey, we are able to track what’s happening, on average, among people born around the same time—what demographers call a “cohort”—as they pass through their childbearing years.

For this study, we looked at 13 cohorts of women and 10 cohorts of men born between the 1960s and the 2000s. We followed these cohorts to track whether members intended to have any children and the average number of children they intended, starting at age 15 and going up to the most recent data collected through 2019.

We found remarkable consistency in childbearing goals across cohorts. For example, if we look at teenage girls in the 1980s—the cohort born in 1965-69—they planned to have 2.2 children on average. Among the same age group in the early 21st century—the cohort born in 1995-1999—girls intended to have 2.1 children on average. Slightly more young people plan to have no children now than 30 years ago, but still, the vast majority of U.S. young adults plan to have kids: about 88% of teenage girls and 89% of teenage boys.

We also found that as they themselves get older, people plan to have fewer children, but not by much. This pattern was also pretty consistent across cohorts. Among those born in 1975-79, for instance, men and women when they were age 20-24 planned to have an average of 2.3 and 2.5 children, respectively. These averages fell slightly, to 2.1 children for men and 2.2 children for women, by the time respondents were 35-39. Still, overwhelmingly, most Americans plan to have children, and the average intended number of children is right around 2.

So, if childbearing goals haven’t changed much, why are birth rates declining?
What keeps people from their target family size?

Our study can’t directly address why birth rates are going down, but we can propose some explanations based on other research.

In part, this decline is good news. There are fewer unintended births than there were 30 years ago, a decrease linked to increasing use of effective contraceptive methods like IUDs and implants and improved insurance coverage from the Affordable Care Act.

Compared with earlier eras, people today start having their children later. These delays also contribute to declining birth rates: Because people start later, they have less time to meet their childbearing goals before they reach biological or social age limits for having kids. As people wait longer to start having children, they are also more likely to change their minds about parenting.

But why are people getting a later start on having kids? We hypothesize that Americans see parenthood as harder to manage than they might have in the past.

Although the U.S. economy overall recovered after the Great Recession, many young people, in particular, feel uncertain about their ability to achieve some of the things they see as necessary for having children, including a good job, a stable relationship, and safe, affordable housing.

At the same time, the costs of raising children—from child care and housing to college education—are rising. And parents may feel more pressure to live up to high-intensive parenting standards and prepare their children for an uncertain world.

And while our data doesn’t cover the last three years, the COVID-19 pandemic may have increased feelings of instability by exposing the lack of support for American parents.

For many parents and would-be parents, the “right time” to have a child, or have another child, may feel increasingly out of reach—no matter their ideal family size.

-----

Some real howlers in this 'news' article. It's like they're desperately pretending to be too stupid to notice the causes of birthrates falling off a cliff.
 
Although the U.S. economy overall recovered after the Great Recession
Sure it did. Could not admit that the Obama recovery was like a patient going from a machine to breathing on their own but still unconscious.

I do not see anything in this article about children being brainwashed into believing they are gay, queer, or trans.

Nothing in this article about environmental factors either.

And while our data doesn’t cover the last three years, the COVID-19 pandemic may have increased feelings of instability by exposing the lack of support for American parents.
Support? Tyrannical governors kept people out of work for years. But yeah I am sure it did increase feelings of instability. We went from one of the hottest economies in history to the morgue in just two weeks.
 
Who would have thought that putting a comfortable middle class lifestyle behind a paywall of college/certification, years of moving up a corporate ladder, a bloated housing market, high consumer inflation, the risk of falling prey to a predatory family court system, and the need for both parents in the workforce contributing, would lead to Millennial birthrates rivaling that of Chinese pandas?
 
The truth of the matter is, urbanization slows population growth. People have natural inclinations and evolutionary mechanisms that tell them "no space left, don't have as many kids." The fact that America has been urbanizing is the main reason for the collapse of birth rates, with other secondary reasons making an impact but not as much of one.

If countries really wanted to increase their birth rate, they wouldn't start with more bughive daycares. That doesn't work (and the highly urbanized countries that have tried have watched helplessly as people still won't have bughive babies even when you incentivize them to do so!). You need to incentivize the purchase and settlement of unsettled, rural land. Nothing makes people think having a big batch of kids sounds fun better than a 5 acre plot of land in the country.
 
Maybe all the 1990s and 2000s era non stop fear mongering about overpopulation and how epic the "child free" life would be was a bad idea.
 
No way. You mean the economy went to shit because of bad economic policies and Capitalism run amok and now people can't afford to have kids. Get the fuck outta here. No fucking way.
 
Obligatory.
Iuden.jpg
 
Ahh, so that's the US's method of population control, financially strangle generations driving down birthrates while neutering/spaying the crop that do get birthed. Bravo Global Elites.
 
Why would a non-minority have a child that, if they have any cognizance of the state of society, they know might be discriminated against?
Nobody cares.

Why even have a child in this day and age? That's just me. Perhaps there are factors of why the birth rate in the US is declining.
 
I'm a zoomer, I want to have a bunch of kids even if I can't afford them. The only issue is I can't find a woman. Women fucking suck. Fix women and you fix the birthrate. If they're always spreading their legs and never giving birth then your country is gonna die, nigga.
 
It doesn't help that gender relations have been badly poisoned for ideological purposes.

The amount of both men and women I've met who think a simple "hi my name is x" is creepy and predatory is insane. I've heard people even say bars and clubs are off limits for approaching women.

How is babby supposed to happen if the first fucking date never even happens?

At this point the only babies being conceived are from regretful one night stands and a high percentage of those will probably be aborted.
 
Last edited:
Huh, are people still unaware that the government literally pays you 2k/kid and that you can get half of daycare/babysitting costs refunded as a tax credit?

I love tax season.
A lot of people don't want to warehouse their kid, they want to be there as they grow up.

I don't care if daycare was free, I'd never put my hypothetical kid in one.

So the government can dangle whatever "alternatives" and "options" it wants in front of me, if I can't raise a child/family the way I want to? I'll just opt out of doing it.

I'd rather abstain than do it half-assed.

The government offering to help me half-ass it is not a benefit.

I don't want your bugpods, that includes ones with nurseries already built-in.
 
This is disingenuous bullshit imo. People have had and still have kids regardless of their financial situation, sometimes to tragic results when talking about extreme poverty. If lower economic status stopped people from popping out kids, India wouldn't be outpacing China in population. People aren't having fewer kids because they're not as well off so much as because they've literally fucked with society for so long and introduced no small amount of biological fuckery into the mix too. Birth rates are still booming in places where women haven't been told for decades that peak success is being a childless power bitch or a cum depository for every 6 pack around. Birth rates are still booming in places where men haven't been told for decades they are the scum of the earth for being attracted to women or told that masculinity is evil. Birth rates are still booming in places that dont push body altering hormonal birth control on people from high school age and up or put hormones and other chemical shit in the food supply.
 
Awwww, it's such a bullshit, really. Financial status have nothing to do with common millennial be in doubt how reasonable it be to have a kid these days. Haven't you saw what's going on in public Schools across all America? Haven't you seen the agenda, the virtue signal bullshit, what society we live in and who's ultimately is about to taught our kids? The fact that there's fuckton of sex pests like ryu289 (Jacob S. Blaustein), Sappho (Connor roundy), keffals (lucas roberts) and his Asian faggot husband, and many-many more?

Oh btw, Nicocado Avocado did nothing wrong.

I'm a zoomer
You're also a furrfag, and no wonder why you can't find a woman. Who the fuck in them sane mind will marry a larping imbecile?
 
Lol? Hiring a family member to help out for a day here and there hardly constitutes as "bugpod"

Sorry about your lineage dying off.
I wasn't talking about family, I'm talking about government-provided "help' which will only waste money and end up breeding more broken people.

But while I'm on the topic.

Japan has tried every flavor carrot they can imagine for 20 + years to get their declining birth rate up, and nothing works. If possibly the most obedient mass population on the planet can't be made to fall in line for it? I doubt any schema any other government could cook up

When you break people to the point they lose interest in continuing to propagate, nothing can put them back on track.

That is a one-time switch and when it turns off, it turns off hard and for good.

Lots of little missteps have led to this point where the average person literally can't afford a stable one-income two-parent home. And without that, a lot of people don't want to just "settle", myself included.

I can't say how to fix it, but, most of those bad ideas are government policy directly, or the consequences of people/business trying to follow government policy.

Modern nations are just strangling themselves as-is, more "incentives" will just come round and put more pressure on the throat.

We need massively less government to even begin to claw back what's been taken.
 
Back
Top Bottom