- Joined
- Mar 10, 2013
Everything lines up that Labelle is a predator who has spent his whole adult life trying to get close to kids via his various careers, he admits how he dresses on as daily basis is inspired by his obsession with being ‘little’, in his spare time likes to act like a 5 year old and he likes to draw furry fetish art using actual toddlers as inspiration, that’s got to be enough red flags for any sane person, there’s no way Labelle doesn’t know what he’s doing.The insistent denial that it’s a fetish makes it ten times worse for me. It’s not a good look, and tracing a reference from an actual child crosses a huge line, but I’m extremely forgiving about people’s kinks and fetishes as long as they do them in private. If Billy said “yes, I’m into this weird thing in private and that is no one else’s business” I would see much less of a problem. Pretending it isn’t a fetish crosses so many lines because it means either that you know it’s your fetish and you are actively deceiving people into participation or you genuinely aren’t introspective enough to know. Either way, it makes you a predator with the only difference being whether or not you know it
How much of a deviant does Labelle need to be to feel the desire to dress up every day in clothes that remind him of his kink?
I think he’s lying by omission, Billy isn’t denying he likes to role play as a child, he just happens to be leaving that part out entirely and is only focusing on the kind of man he likes and the comic makes it look like he’s trying to gaslight the strawman.Wait, he’s pretending he doesn’tlike to roleplay as a child now? After making several comics about how he does exactly that as a form of therapy or whatever? He’s churning out these strawman rebuttal comics so fast they’re already starting to contradict each other.

