The Caroline Farrow, Adrian Harrop, and Anthony George Halliday / Stephanie Hayden Megathread

[Historical Figure]

I'M FINALLY DONE! Not wanting to wade into this with my ass showing, I figured it would be best to read the entire Hayden thread and then this entire thread before partaking. Seemed reasonable.

What a stupid, handsome fool I was. The madness... THE MADNESS!

With that out the way:

"Proliferate member?" I assume the stupid, fat nonce means "prolific" or even "profligate," isn't this the same stupid, fat nonce who keeps bringing up Ma Farrow's alleged lack of education? Tony should stick to communicating in his natural way: like a scouse cartoon snake voiced by Bob Hoskins. His attempts to come across as intelligent or educated tend to be embarrassing exercises in futility.

(Seriously, if you want to figure out which of the socks have been Tony, you don't even need to compare the linguistic idiosyncrasies, just try reading the posts in the voice of Bob Hoskins as a mobster subtly threatening a woman.)

 

[Historical Figure]

I hope the doublepost is forgivable given the circumstances. During the downtime, I've been watching Ma Farrow's Twitter feed and through the insanity, I noticed something we seemingly haven't been paying attention to: what is it with Tony's trips to South Africa? Is he smuggling diamonds to the UK? Why else would he be going on all those trips to ZA?

 

[Stabmaster Arson II]

I hope the doublepost is forgivable given the circumstances. During the downtime, I've been watching Ma Farrow's Twitter feed and through the insanity, I noticed something we seemingly haven't been paying attention to: what is it with Tony's trips to South Africa? Is he smuggling diamonds to the UK? Why else would he be going on all those trips to ZA?

Better than zero chance it's sex tourism.

 

[Historical Figure]

Better than zero chance it's sex tourism.

That's the theory we've been going by but think about it: who, on God's green Earth, would fuck that thing? I'm getting the weirdest feeling he's pretty happy with the 626 rumor because he never counters it and it's a great excuse to travel the world with a handful of diamonds up his ass. I don't know, I may just be a handsome fool looking for a grander explanation than the "he's just a manwhore selling his anus to foreigners" shtick.

 

[AnOminous]

That's the theory we've been going by but think about it: who, on God's green Earth, would fuck that thing?

Presumably trafficked children.

 

[Stabmaster Arson II]

who, on God's green Earth, would fuck that thing?

Someone being paid.

"he's just a manwhore selling his anus to foreigners" shtick.

He's never selling, always buying. If Boogie can manage it, so can he.

 

[Moon Cricket]

Important!
Judgement dated 28th October 2022... so pretty fresh off the press!

Well worth a read

Stephanie Rebecca Hayden v Associated Newspapers Limited & Anor - Find case law

caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Archive

Spoiler: Highlights

5.
The Claimant was misgendered in the KiwiFarms Post. The Claimant is transsexual. The misgendering of her in the post would have been deliberate. She has become a target for hostility, particularly on the KiwiFarms website. Some of that has been directed at her because she is transsexual, but significant interest and commentary has also been provoked by the large number of legal actions that the Claimant has brought in recent years.
6.
The Claimant, I am satisfied, regularly monitors what is said about her on the KiwiFarms website. As a result, she became aware of the KiwiFarms Post shortly after it was posted and took immediate action. For someone who complains about harassment, visiting the website on which this alleged harassment is posted is not altogether easy to understand. The Claimant told me, at the hearing, that she does not post on the KiwiFarms website “in any guise”.

(a) The alleged wrongdoing

"First, even on the assumption that X is “Notso jolly Halliday”, the KiwiFarms Post does not, itself, disclose wrongdoing sufficient to sustain a Norwich Pharmacal order. The wrongdoing alleged by the Claimant is harassment. However, the KiwiFarms Post is, in its terms unremarkable, particularly when compared by the surrounding posts of others. Put simply, it does not arguably disclose a case of harassment with any prospect of success applying the threshold requirements for harassment by speech set out in Hayden -v- Dickenson (see [58] above). I am aware from the evidence filed by the Claimant in this claim, and in others, that “Notso jolly Halliday” has posted other material on the KiwiFarms website that the Claimant considers to be harassing of her. But even if I were to assume in her favour that she could credibly advance a claim that, taking these further posts into account, “Notso jolly Halliday” has been pursuing a course of conduct that amounts to harassment (applying the Hayden -v- Dickenson threshold), a Norwich Pharmacal order against this Respondent would be only for a piece of an evidential jigsaw. This point perhaps has more relevance to whether the Claimant can satisfy the requirement that the Respondent has been ‘caught up in the wrongdoing’ (to use that shorthand for this element of the test).
71.
Finally, on this first issue, I consider I am entitled to consider that, evidentially and as a matter of logic, proof that X obtained the Davison Order does not, itself, thereby prove that X is “Notso jolly Halliday”. I accept that, were this to be an important consideration, fairness might require that X should provide evidence of the circulation of the Davison Order to others (as claimed in X’s letter – see [14] above). That evidence would go to the strength (or weakness) of the inference that X and “Notso jolly Halliday” are the same person. It does not alter the fundamental proposition that proof that X obtained the Davison Order does not, itself, prove that X is “Notso jolly Halliday”. Again, this is a point that will have perhaps more force when it comes to discretionary considerations, particularly whether a Norwich Pharmacal order would lead to innocent people facing proceedings.

 

[ScooterL]

what is it with Tony's trips to South Africa?

 

[Patricia Highsmith]

Fat Tony appealing? Hoping to make some case law as a distraction from his latest loss is, well, sad. When he's not tonguing Tory arse he's tag teaming with a totally random Twitter account RubinRemus who is Ma Farrow's current scourge. Whispers it's @henry_sister behind that account. It's an obsessive bit of stalking for sure.
P.S. Don't ever change, Anthony.

https://twitter.com/flyinglawyer73/status/1585932793900855296

Stephanie Hayden on Twitter: "Some point in 2023 I will be involved i…

archived 1 Nov 2022 04:02:53 UTC

archive.ph

 

[Notso jolly Halliday]

One of the best things about that judgement was the way in which the judge used another of Tony’s failed cases as a precedent to show him that laughing over his legal lunacy is not harassment.

Tony is only allowed to appeal the part of the judgement that determines what constitutes a court record.

As well as being a shit lawyer, he’s way out of his depth and likely to make a poor fist of things but that’s not the point.

He gets to play dress up and inflict his tedium on some other poor judge who has to pretend to take him seriously. Even if he loses he has his name attached to another precedent. It’s all supply.

He almost makes having a Cluster B look attractive. Whereas most litigants would be dying with embarrassment he sees going down in the legal history books as a vindictive obsessive loser with a poor grasp of law, as a win!

Beginning to envy his scrambled neural pathways. He’s incapable of shame.

“It is impossible to determine whether or not NSJH has or is linked to someone with legal training. Their post was unremarkable.”

Sweet.

 

[Timothy Troon]

That's the theory we've been going by but think about it: who, on God's green Earth, would fuck that thing? I'm getting the weirdest feeling he's pretty happy with the 626 rumor because he never counters it and it's a great excuse to travel the world with a handful of diamonds up his ass. I don't know, I may just be a handsome fool looking for a grander explanation than the "he's just a manwhore selling his anus to foreigners" shtick.

Would the “I’m trans” card work well with airport security?

 

[Stabmaster Arson II]

Would the “I’m trans” card work well with airport security?

If I worked there, it would mean no cavity search as I'd want to avoid the smell.

 

[trannyfucker]

Important!
Judgement dated 28th October 2022... so pretty fresh off the press!

Well worth a read

Stephanie Rebecca Hayden v Associated Newspapers Limited & Anor - Find case law

caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Archive

Spoiler: Highlights

5.
The Claimant was misgendered in the KiwiFarms Post. The Claimant is transsexual. The misgendering of her in the post would have been deliberate. She has become a target for hostility, particularly on the KiwiFarms website. Some of that has been directed at her because she is transsexual, but significant interest and commentary has also been provoked by the large number of legal actions that the Claimant has brought in recent years.
6.
The Claimant, I am satisfied, regularly monitors what is said about her on the KiwiFarms website. As a result, she became aware of the KiwiFarms Post shortly after it was posted and took immediate action. For someone who complains about harassment, visiting the website on which this alleged harassment is posted is not altogether easy to understand. The Claimant told me, at the hearing, that she does not post on the KiwiFarms website “in any guise”.

(a) The alleged wrongdoing

"First, even on the assumption that X is “Notso jolly Halliday”, the KiwiFarms Post does not, itself, disclose wrongdoing sufficient to sustain a Norwich Pharmacal order. The wrongdoing alleged by the Claimant is harassment. However, the KiwiFarms Post is, in its terms unremarkable, particularly when compared by the surrounding posts of others. Put simply, it does not arguably disclose a case of harassment with any prospect of success applying the threshold requirements for harassment by speech set out in Hayden -v- Dickenson (see [58] above). I am aware from the evidence filed by the Claimant in this claim, and in others, that “Notso jolly Halliday” has posted other material on the KiwiFarms website that the Claimant considers to be harassing of her. But even if I were to assume in her favour that she could credibly advance a claim that, taking these further posts into account, “Notso jolly Halliday” has been pursuing a course of conduct that amounts to harassment (applying the Hayden -v- Dickenson threshold), a Norwich Pharmacal order against this Respondent would be only for a piece of an evidential jigsaw. This point perhaps has more relevance to whether the Claimant can satisfy the requirement that the Respondent has been ‘caught up in the wrongdoing’ (to use that shorthand for this element of the test).
71.
Finally, on this first issue, I consider I am entitled to consider that, evidentially and as a matter of logic, proof that X obtained the Davison Order does not, itself, thereby prove that X is “Notso jolly Halliday”. I accept that, were this to be an important consideration, fairness might require that X should provide evidence of the circulation of the Davison Order to others (as claimed in X’s letter – see [14] above). That evidence would go to the strength (or weakness) of the inference that X and “Notso jolly Halliday” are the same person. It does not alter the fundamental proposition that proof that X obtained the Davison Order does not, itself, prove that X is “Notso jolly Halliday”. Again, this is a point that will have perhaps more force when it comes to discretionary considerations, particularly whether a Norwich Pharmacal order would lead to innocent people facing proceedings.

You missed very important detail

Non party applying for copy of court order can keep anonymity

Litigant had sought applicant's personal details to support charges of alleged harassment.

www.lawgazette.co.uk

On 15 February 2022, the day of the KiwiFarms Post, the Claimant issued an Application Notice in the claim against the Defendant (but without notice to the Defendant) for an order that the Respondent (“HMCTS”) should disclose the identity of the person who had obtained a copy of the Davison Order from the Court which had then been included in the KiwiFarms Post. I shall refer to this person as X. The grounds on which this order was sought was that the Davison Order had been “posted on a harassment website to intimidate the Claimant”.

In the draft order that accompanied the Application Notice, the Claimant sought an order requiring HMCTS to provide the full name, address, email address and method of payment used by X. The draft order also sought a direction that HMCTS should serve a copy of the Application Notice, evidence in support and the Order upon X. In other words, the Claimant was proposing that the Order that she sought should be made without notice to X. The Claimant asked that her Application be dealt with without a hearing.

The Claimant filed a further witness statement on 4 April 2022. She provided further information about the harassment to which she feels she has been subjected arising from postings on two particular threads on the KiwiFarms website. The Claimant also put forward a theory, based on her analysis of these posts, that the “Notso jolly Halliday” account was operated by someone with connections to the legal profession. It is impossible to reach any conclusion, on the presented evidence, whether this is correct.

The first issue is whether the form completed by X and submitted to the court to obtain a copy of the Davison Order is a “communication between the court and… another person”. In my judgment, it is. It was a request on a standard form for provision of a document from the records of the Court.

However, in my judgment, this document is not part of the “records of the court”. I accept Mr Ustych’s submission that it is properly to be classified as an administrative document that is received by the Court in order to enable the discharge of the obligation to provide third-party access to documents of the Court required to be publicly accessible.

For those reasons, and in my judgment, the Court does not have jurisdiction under CPR 5.4B(2) to make the order sought by the Claimant. The document she seeks is not part of the “records of the court”.

Secondly

First, even on the assumption that X is “Notso jolly Halliday”, the KiwiFarms Post does not, itself, disclose wrongdoing sufficient to sustain a Norwich Pharmacal order. The wrongdoing alleged by the Claimant is harassment. However, the KiwiFarms Post is, in its terms unremarkable, particularly when compared by the surrounding posts of others.

The only activity that might be deterred by my making the order sought by the Claimant would be to discourage people from exercising their right to obtain copies of documents required by law to be publicly available from the records of the Court. It would not be in the public interest to discourage that activity as it would undermine open justice.

I accept that the Claimant will face difficulties in obtaining the information from another source. Although not in evidence in these proceedings, I think I can properly take notice of the fact that the KiwiFarms website, given its domicile and stated policies of protecting freedom of expression, is unlikely itself to respond to a Norwich Pharmacal order, issued by a Court in England & Wales, requiring provision of information capable of identifying the person operating the “Notso jolly Halliday” account.

 

[AnOminous]

This judge knows his shit.

 

[tonytroon]

Tony failed again. He wanted the details of the person who legitimately purchased a court document which appeared on this site in order to bring yet another lolsuit against them . Nicklin slapped Tony down . His option for appeal is very narrow and expressly forbids what he wants

Meanwhile after two years of yet another lolsuit against Joani Walsh fat Tony agrees to drop the case just days before it goes to court. The matter revolved around Joani allegedly taking a picture of the fat nonce in and around court. Nonce would have lost that case too so its effectively a win for Walsh who was representing herself .

On Twitter the fat nonce and his sidekick Katie Jones aka katybops have started posting as RubinRemus again, A troll account whose timeline is almost exclusively anti Farrow and who pals up with another troll account called dropKiwiFarms who is certain KF is not returning

Here is fugly Kate suggesting without a shred of evidence that she may refer to Father Farrow in an outrageous defamatory manner because fugly Kate is married to a burger flipper , a term she objects too

She also claims somewhat ironically she wouldn't want to be married to a kiddy fiddler . Yet her online partner is Anthony George Halliday who now calls himself Stephanie Hayden who IS A CONVICTED KIDDY FIDDLER a fact he initially denied via his proxy for months on end only to have to reveal his conviction on two counts in disclosure in the BD case
We know the kid he buggered was under 16 at the time of the offence and Tony has lost none of his interest in twinks since then. He's a buggerer of boys as his whoring sites and internet postings indicate

 

[Patricia Highsmith]

The unintended consequence of Hayden's attempt to force disclosure is that news items, both legal and more general, are mentioning his recent legal defeat, his reluctance to pay what he owes, his arguably vexatious legal history, and his perverse habit of mining for offense by closely monitoring this hateful site. Humiliation boner? He really is an attention seeking idiot.

The hearing, in May, arose from an unsuccessful libel action brought against the Mail on Sunday by Stephanie Hayden, a campaigner on transgender issues. In costs proceedings following the case, a costs master made an order requiring Hayden to attend court and provide information.

 

[AirdropShitposts]

However, the KiwiFarms Post is, in its terms unremarkable, particularly when compared by the surrounding posts of others.

 

[Historical Figure]

Are we... is The Website of Hate and Harassment slowly but surely fixing the Britfag court system? The number of positive precedents is about to match our beloved kill list.

Granted, I assume it's not quite the legacy Nûll would have expected or even wanted the Farms to leave but, by Jove, it's something.

 

[Caroline Farrow]

Meanwhile @rubinremus who doesn’t like having their name mentioned on here because it puts them at risk of being identified which they call “doxing” is pulling up all my old KiwiFarms posts in the hope of “shaming”.

I stand by every word I’ve ever said. On that terrible day of judgement, I’d rather account for a bit of rough and ready humour on the KiwiFarms than apologise for simping for paedophiles and other abominations.

I might even jump on the live stream with @Null just to give them something to really reeee about!

Rubin has mentioned me almost 800 times now. Real Buffalo Bill territory. It would be nice if the police could seize some of the suspects’ IT but seeing as they support trooning and noncery, it’s unlikely to happen.

If anyone does have any evidence regarding Remus’ identity, message me, or just post it here for us all to laugh at.

 

[Need4Sneed]

Meanwhile @rubinremus who doesn’t like having their name mentioned on here because it puts them at risk of being identified which they call “doxing” is pulling up all my old KiwiFarms posts in the hope of “shaming”.

I stand by every word I’ve ever said. On that terrible day of judgement, I’d rather account for a bit of rough and ready humour on the KiwiFarms than apologise for simping for paedophiles and other abominations.

I might even jump on the live stream with @Null just to give them something to really reeee about!

Rubin has mentioned me almost 800 times now. Real Buffalo Bill territory. It would be nice if the police could seize some of the suspects’
IT but seeing as they support trooning and noncery, it’s unlikely to happen.

If anyone does have any evidence regarding Remus’ identity, message me, or just post it here for us all to laugh at.

This guy Tweeting writhing 20 minutes.