💤 Inactive Ethan Ralph's Wikipedia Page - Ethan Ralph officially not notable enough for Wikipedia. He declares Frederick "Hotwheels" Brennan his blood enemy.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Gina Gillotti

antiflamenquista
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Update July 30th: The article is gone and Ethan has declared Hotwheels his enemy after Hotwheels started smugposting about it.

As many of you will no doubt know Ethan has a rather lackluster Wikipedia article which is, as are many other alt-right-adjacent pages, heavily policed by notorious Wikipedo jannie and political commissar Molly "Gorilla Warfare" White. What I didn't know is that apparently Frederick "HotwheelsCripplekike" Brennan was the original author and primary maintainer of the page who apparently got into a tiff with some other Wikipedia faggot (but I repeat myself) about the notability of the revenge porn conviction. As a result, the goblin nominated his own page for deletion:

1658623666535.png

Now, as I am not a tranny, pedophile, or autist, I do not edit Wikipedia and don't know what half of that shit means, but this bit of news cracked me up because I bet that while Gunt's Wikipedia article is unflattering, he nonetheless covets it like he does his Blue Checkmark, and I look forward to the seethe it's loss will cause, as it seems that the nomination for the article to be deleted is winning. (*For the record he is way more notable than a bunch of other losers who have articles and Wiki is gay and FredBren is particularly gay for trying to have it taken down, but still.)
 
Last edited:
"Ethan Ralph is a non-notable alt right pseudo-celebrity"

Oh Ronnie boy,
The Gunt, The Gunt is Hollerin'....
 
Ralph's article contains none of the things that makes Ralph an interesting figure. Nothing about the pillstream, the portugal trips, the texas bowling tournament, or the revenge porn conviction. It doesn't even talk about his connections to America First, or any of the other cowish people Ralph interacts with in the right-wing grift-o-sphere. All it talks about is gamergate, the healstream, and some bitcoin donation ralph received before j6. Ralph's article is a terrible introduction to an otherwise spectacular man(pig), and the tranny jannies over at Wikipedia should go overdose on their bootleg bathtub HRT for not allowing the farms as a source (pretty much the only reason why Ralph's article is such a bore to read.)
 
Gorilla Warfare is so insufferable. She kept deleting edits saying that "Court documents do not qualify as primary sources" or some other such nonsense but it comes as no surprise that small amounts of power go to these people's heads.

Why is Hotwheels wanting to delete this now all of a sudden?
 
Why is Hotwheels wanting to delete this now all of a sudden?
From what I can gather he got (kinda justifiably) pissy that people deleted his edits about the revenge porn and then like a total faggot figured that if the article can't be the way he likes it, then it shouldn't be there at all. Which is very in-character.
Gorilla Warfare is so insufferable. She kept deleting edits saying that "Court documents do not qualify as primary sources" or some other such nonsense
What the fuck is their justification for this though? I don't try to understand the inner workings of Wikipedia I just assume that in the past decade or so it's only good for basic factual information about non-controverisal things, if that.
 
What the fuck is their justification for this though? I don't try to understand the inner workings of Wikipedia I just assume that in the past decade or so it's only good for basic factual information about non-controverisal things, if that.
It's the dumbest thing in the world if the Byuu saga is any indication: court documents are "original research".

Wikipedia requires a "trusted source" to write about court documents before you can cite them without getting jannied.

At least when it's a page with a narrative they wish to keep preserved anyway, which is the only places these rules apply in the first place.
 
I don't try to understand the inner workings of Wikipedia
It's convoluted and boils down to the whims of highly political, eternally online jannies pushing their unhinged beliefs.
"trusted source"
Which had changed in definition since trump appeared and changes in it's enforcement depending on if the admin supports the source's political slant and the article as a whole.
 
Not even CWC is notable enough for Wikipedia so why should Ralph be?
Ethan has been, at a minimum
- notable for GamerGate esp. vs. JW Flynt/Bryanna Wu
- notable for Seattle4Truth
- notable for being the first man convicted under the Revenge Porn statute
and that's just stuff that made the news so as strictly according to Wikipedophile guidelines it should be good to go, and as an Internet culture figure he's closing in on as being 'mainstream' as Chris in that regard
 
Ethan has been, at a minimum
- notable for GamerGate esp. vs. JW Flynt/Bryanna Wu
- notable for Seattle4Truth
- notable for being the first man convicted under the Revenge Porn statute
and that's just stuff that made the news so as strictly according to Wikipedophile guidelines it should be good to go, and as an Internet culture figure he's closing in on as being 'mainstream' as Chris in that regard
And yet they said the WaPo/Healstream stuff wasn't noteworthy?
 
So here but with more troons and moralfags
Welcome to KiwiFarms. The site where thread rules are made up and the stickers don't matter.

Here are the policies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies_and_guidelines
Here is the rule about reliable sources. Enjoy the madness and realization the admins only rules lawyer when they don't like whats being written.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
There is something called WP:NPOV(neutral point of view) that was thrown to the wayside in a spectacular fashion during the gamergate drama and hasn't been followed since.
 
On the one hand, the midget in a wheelchair is an absolute disingenuous faggot who betrayed everything he stood for because he lost his website.

On the other hand, I imagine Ralph would be seething at being called 'not notable'.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom