💊 Manosphere manhood101.com - The Cuck Academy

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
This is a vid on his other channel. I watched it a while ago, but whatever. I assume it's used as a teaching aid to show how much women are horrid moneygrubbers... And pretty sure that his students don't pick up that the women were soured on men and said "fuck it".
The girl with a son and her Mom approving of the rinsing is the worst, IMO. It's very apparent that the daughter has taken on her Mom's burden of thinking all men are scum... Especially how she mentions fairytales.
 
Didn't you leave?
clearly not, and that's also clearly not him

I would find this whole thread funnier if you actually had some convincing evidence you have the right guy. One forum post of someone saying he is charles gellman is not convincing since the photo doesn't look anything like him, nor do I think he is married with kids or loves healthcare and sounds really dull talking about it. I could be wrong but it just doesn't seem likely.
 
Spoiler: Prolly why he got cucked.
Huh, so this is the sort of person that watches the 'self introductions' of pornos.
Like we are supposed to believe real live women are interacting with him and telling him their favorite things... Eh, I guess he's probably paying for cam shows too so maybe that counts to him.
 
@Reeheee2 why are you so hung up about the professor not being charles gellman. Why does it matter to you at all?

Cause he's either Ninjamaster or some sycophant/Academy student here to try and derail the thread. The fact that he keeps referring to the Nicolai Hajrondan photo - that we've already debunked as being him - and not to the very detailed dox on the first page that multiple people have pointed him to confirms that.
 
Last edited:
Cause he's either Gellman or some sycophant/Academy student here to try and derail the thread. The fact that he keeps referring to the Nicolai Hajrondan photo - that we've already debunked as being him - and not to the very detailed dox on the first page that multiple people have pointed him to confirms that.

He could also be exceptional and disinterested.
 
clearly not, and that's also clearly not him

I would find this whole thread funnier if you actually had some convincing evidence you have the right guy. One forum post of someone saying he is charles gellman is not convincing since the photo doesn't look anything like him, nor do I think he is married with kids or loves healthcare and sounds really dull talking about it. I could be wrong but it just doesn't seem likely.
>evidence
Lurk more. It's in here. Even dull people do stupid shit. If it wasn't him, he would be so triggered.
 
@Reeheee2 why are you so hung up about the professor not being charles gellman. Why does it matter to you at all?

cause at least get your facts right before you start attacking someone for laughs, I care cause I'm interested in finding out more about the guy behind the e book, plus if you saw his videos before youtube started the censorship you would see he is legit and gets real results. If his claims weren't backed up by results it would not interest me in the slightest. I think he has hit on something about attraction and female psychology if you will.

>evidence
Lurk more. It's in here. Even dull people do stupid shit. If it wasn't him, he would be so triggered.
he sounds like that all the time, you think you are getting a massive reaction but that is his typical reaction, the photo of "Nicolai Hajrondan" is a real photo of him since it was taken by john the other in his webcam debate, your photo is of a guy on a pua forum who someone else on the pua forum called the guy from MHA.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
cause at least get your facts right before you start attacking someone for laughs, I care cause I'm interested in finding out more about the guy behind the e book, plus if you saw his videos before youtube started the censorship you would see he is legit and gets real results. If his claims weren't backed up by results it would not interest me in the slightest. I think he has hit on something about attraction and female psychology if you will.
Look Charles your not fooling anyone.
 
Sycophants under our 'debate' youtube video

sycophants.png
 
That's what I was thinking. He must have a million socks.
Well we know he loves socks; he's got what...five here? Not to mention the literal hundreds that filled his own forum before mysteriously disappearing. He has to respond to his own posts with sockpuppet accounts just to draw attention to half the threads he starts. I wouldn't doubt that most of those youtube accounts are just alts of his; they talk and act the same, as if his ideal students already knew the best way to start is via e-dick sucking. There's a safe bet a few of those accounts are less than a couple of days old with just one post, no video views save for his stuff.
...Enjoy it while it lasts, Chuckie.
EDIT: Actually looked them up and much to my surprise they're legitimate accounts save for one. I guess he can attract people; insane, desperate thirsty losers but people none the less. Good job. Who know relentless posting in places until you're banned could yield results in the near double digits?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom