🍽️ حلال Michael Robert Thurlow / Angry Canadian / Volkswachter / Lothloran / NorthlandPride / NSCLRP / imageboard user - Canadian Nazi, Wifebeater, Narcissist, C-Tier Shitposter, Loli Enthusiast, Brony, Transphobic Tranny, White Pearls and White Pride, RALM Failtroll

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
An update to my last post, seems Kengle finally figured out how to demod Cancuck:
Demodded.PNG

For anyone who didn't connect the dots yesterday, @wharf rat was actually a Spooky Bones sock that they'd been using since November, shortly after their original account got banned. They'd apparently outed their own sock by bragging about their thread which went up this past Wednesday: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/rache...tayuubarbie-lucyfern13-miranda-sforza.116204/

wharf rat is fucking Spooky Bones.PNG

After @StrawberryDouche called them out in the Spooky Bones inquiry thread (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/can-s...y-bones-situation.105554/page-5#post-11628964), surprisingly no resistance was given alongside a full admission. What followed was an almost-sad reverse cycle as Spooky Rat went on to StrawberryDouche's profile to proclaim their lack of reasoning to further antagonize her. Spooky also stopped dumbrating my posts:
Hmm.PNG

It was as if they knew their time was limited, and rather than go out with an explosively abrasive bang like our buddy Thurlow, they actually tried not to be a raging asshole. Well, Spooks was right. Their time was limited. As of yesterday evening the wharf rat account is banned.

I understand a fair amount of this forum has their hairs split in terms of two things regarding Spooky Bones, and the only reason I bring it up in this thread is because of A. The degree of interaction wharf rat actually had with the thread. And B. That Mike and Spooks' relationship is almost owed for everything that's been found on Thurlow so far. Those two things are Spooks' gender, and the degree of respect they've been able to garner from a good portion of the Farms.

As for the respect value, I can grasp that. Before the crazy shit hit, even I was a fan. I loved their OPs. They were good shit. As per their gender...Look. I'm gonna be respectful and say "they/them/their" in a public capacity but personally I think Spooks is a dude. And for the full sake of honesty, as well as being respectful, I will say this: There is a thread on Onion Farms, on Spooky Bones, that just dropped within the last few hours. I will not link it here as I'm sure this post has derailed the thread enough, however keep in mind Thurlow likely contributed to it so its relevance is not totally lost here.
 
I have a sneaking suspicion that this thread is going to turn into a shitshow complete with discord gayops, trannies, weird double-crossing schizos, and good old fashioned faggotry.

It would be pretty funny if the mods let one of ACs socks through to screech for a few posts before banning him, however.
 
Filler Bitch said:
I have a sneaking suspicion that this thread is going to turn into a shitshow complete with discord gayops, trannies, weird double-crossing schizos, and good old fashioned faggotry.

It would be pretty funny if the mods let one of ACs socks through to screech for a few posts before banning him, however.
Click to expand...
You mean you haven't figured out which socks are ACs yet?
 
DiscoRodeo said:
You mean you haven't figured out which socks are ACs yet?
Click to expand...
To be fair, he does use quite a few. And since he's figured out my posting activity in T&H, he's been more careful not to make them easily identifiable.
 
The Neo Nazi turns out to be a huge degenerate? Good golly, who could have seen that coming? Take as old as time.

But seriously, fuck this guy for neglecting an innocent child. Child abuse makes me MATI
 
I was recently put in touch with Brittany Pamies, the ex-wife of @Angry Canadian. It appears she is aware of the thread and wanted to share more information about him and his degenerate tendencies. I can confirm this is the True&Honest ex-wife. The "interview" took place over two days, so part 1 covers the first day, and so on. The conversation was very free-form so it has been lightly edited to be more reader-friendly and omit sensitive info about minors, etc. You will notice her username is the same as the name she used for her TikTok account listed in the OP.
There are some graphic accounts of abuse


If you're comfortable, would you mind starting anything I might have gotten wrong about your story, or the circumstances of yours and Michael's arrests?
Brit1.png
Brit2.png

(Bottom line cropped on the second image for the child's privacy)
You mentioned him punishing you. Could you give an example?
brit3.png

You mentioned him forcing you to dress more masculine, can you elaborate on that?
brit7.png

Was there a time you felt a connection? What was he like before you married?
brit6.png

It seems like he exercised full control over your life. Did he give you any freedom?
brit8.png

Thank you for your time and bravery to speak to an internet stranger about a difficult period of your life.
brit9.png

(Part 1 concluded)

Clarifying questions were asked a few days later

How did you and Michael meet?
pamies1.png


What were your home/living arrangements like in Florida, and did he have a job at the time?
Pamies2.png
Pamies3.png

Pamies4.png
Pamies5.png

Pamies6.png
Pamies7.png

Pamies8.png


He claimed to have a few different degrees. Do you know if he graduated from anywhere?
pamies9.png

Did he have any friends that you knew of?
pamies10.png

pamies11.png

What were his parents like?
pamies12.png

pamies13.png

Them seeming normal must have been a welcome change at the time
pamies14.png

Did you ever meet his brother?
pamies15.png

Was he into My Chemical Romance or My Little Pony when you two were together?
pamies16.png

pamies17.png

pamies18.png

pamies19.png

So were you all ever part of a scene?
pamies20.png

pamies21.png

pamies22.png

Would you say alcohol was a problem for him?
pamies23.png

How often would he drink?
pamies24.png

pamies25.png

Earlier you mentioned he would wear dresses and lingerie. Did he have gender identity issues?
pamies26.png

pamies27.png



Brittany is now remarried and living a better life than Michael could hope for. She gave us some valuable insights into Thurlow's life, but my favorite piece will be her ending after our first conversation.
pamiesend.png


She said that Michael will, to this day, create fake Facebook accounts and send her messages with her family's addresses, threatening them and herself bodily harm. She made it clear she wanted to speak out so that other women would not be victimized by Mike Thurlow, and recognize the warning signs of abusive tendencies in others.

When asked to give a word of counsel to others who may fall for Mike Thurlow, she says,
britend.png

:semperfidelis:
Based

EDIT:
I forgot to add our bonus Thurlow pic. Here he is in the modern day
bonusmeme.png

Does he resemble anyone?
bonusmeme1.png
 
Last edited:
His parents are obviously aware of his behavior since he was violent towards her in front of them. I would guess it's safe to assume his parents are supporting him in Canada since he's at least marginally a fugitive... on vast land holdings while his new and improved wife -who is a model- travels the country managing their properties. Also: $40,000 bottles of whiskey.

Great parenting, you guys. Top notch.
 
holy shit that interview with the ex wife is fucking milk. he is unironically a fucking troon jfc. sides. i thought that he was bad enough but wewlad
troon mike.png
 
Bonktrash said:
Good job on getting more info on his degenerate backstory @HiramTheGrift, truly an origin befitting a proud Aryan warrior.
Click to expand...
How do you figure; decided to read this thread after seeing the spooky bones post and mentions of this "thurlow", dude, the OP of this thread shows this ginger chick lied in one of her first messages.

1649794611145.png


She says this arrest happened the same time this thurlow guy was arrested for choking her.

1649794755231.png


The two incidents are literally a year apart. This picture was in the OP. Why would she lie about something that's demonstrably false in a discord interview lmao.

The one thing that can be verified is a lie lmao, I'm not saying that a nazi in drag isn't hilarious but what the fuck, come on bro.
 
Last edited:
Grapeful Dead said:
How do you figure; decided to read this thread after seeing the spooky bones post and mentions of this "thurlow", dude, the OP of this thread shows this ginger chick lied in one of her first messages.

View attachment 3172764

She says this arrest happened the same time this thurlow guy was arrested for choking her.

View attachment 3172773

The two incidents are literally a year apart. This picture was in the OP. Why would she lie about something that's demonstrably false in a discord interview lmao.
Click to expand...
It probably could have been worded more properly, but my opening question was broad and poorly worded.

I asked the following in the first question: 1. What I had gotten wrong in the writing and 2. What were the circumstances of the arrest.

In retrospect, I shouldn't have asked two questions with similar answers from the start. Her answer here ought to be read like this (in my interpretation)

(Beginning with question two) We were arrested together for child neglect on a night I called the police due to him attacking me (via strangulation, but not related to his domestic battery charge).

She then mentions the separate strangulation charge on him being dropped, and her returning to his home. In the interview further down she clarifies this by saying during the time of his battery charge she moved in with her mother but was lulled back into returning to him - and was before she was pregnant with his child.

The events of her first answer are in reverse-chronological order. This was so she can answer both what I got wrong and clarify the arrests at the same time. I'm not an expert interviewer

To clarify the timeline
In 2012 Mike Thurlow was arrested for domestic abuse via strangulation. Brittany then moved out for a time and then returned.
In 2013 they were both arrested for child neglect
They were not concurrent arrests
 
Last edited:
HiramTheGrift said:
It probably could have been worded more properly, but my opening question was broad and poorly worded.

I asked the following in the first question: 1. What I had gotten wrong in the writing and 2. What were the circumstances of the arrest.

In retrospect, I shouldn't have asked two questions with similar answers from the start. Her answer here ought to be read like this (in my interpretation)
Click to expand...
That's not what she says. She says that this guy choked her, and she called the police and she says that instead of arresting this guy they decided to arrest both of them because there were balloons in her son's room (lmao???). You're saying that she got confused and forgot an entire year's worth of time and then conflated two totally separate incidents because you asked a confusing question? That's special bro.
HiramTheGrift said:
(Beginning with question two) We were arrested together for child neglect on a night I called the police due to him attacking me (via strangulation, but not related to his domestic battery charge).
Click to expand...
That makes no sense. You're saying that the police thought balloons were more important than the marks that would surely be on her neck, and chose not to charge this guy for a second time with the same offense? Are you retarded?

This thread is dumb and I regret reading it.
 
Grapeful Dead said:
That's not what she says. She says that this guy choked her, and she called the police and she says that instead of arresting this guy they decided to arrest both of them because there were balloons in her son's room (lmao???). You're saying that she got confused and forgot an entire year's worth of time and then conflated two totally separate incidents because you asked a confusing question? That's special bro.

That makes no sense. You're saying that the police thought balloons were more important than the marks that would surely be on her neck, and chose not to charge this guy for a second time with the same offense? Are you retarded?

This thread is dumb and I regret reading it.
Click to expand...

You have misunderstood her statements. She states plainly that she called the police on him when he attacked her, they were both arrested for child neglect. She later covers his strangulation charge that happened prior to this arrest - an event that happened before her pregnancy where she moved in (temporarily) with her mother.
His arrest for both charges and her arrest for child neglect were covered. You can challenge the veracity of the charges (despite considerable evidence) but it sounds like it's not worth your time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom