📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A Nigerian-American doctor made a post about using pronoun badges. She made it all about transphobia because people approached her about it. Lots of enby doctors - mostly white - chime in, saying that they are proud using pronoun badges.

As is typical, she shut off the comments when it didn't go her way.

Link / Archive

pronoun badges.PNG
prounoun badges 2.PNG
Med Twitter has, in recent years, signalled its descent into woke politics. The worst of this is the intersection between race and sex: you will find the worst takes from black or brown doctors. Especially black women. If you remember Hood Biology, she was the intersection of all three: black, female, and trans (she was FTM). Bait them enough and you'll see their true colours.

What I picked up here was that pronouns truly are a cult. They signify that you are 'trustworthy' and part of the in group.
pronoun badges 3.PNG
pronoun badges 4.PNG

Wannabe Chris Farley there admits it's about changing the language to change minds. He uses gender neutral language in his life yet still uses the term 'dad'. Of course, with the push for 'seahorse dads' anything goes.

pronoun Jesus.PNG
Evelyn is generally uninteresting, albeit he's a troon who trooned out while doing his studies. He will be mentioned later in the thread.

pronoun Jesus 2.PNG

A closer look at Michael shows the rapid aging all FTM troons have. It's obscene how fast they age.

-zWoiGl3_400x400.jpg

Slight PL: this woman looks like a friend of mine, who's in his fifties. I don't know how old this female is but in nearly every case I have seen a FTM, they age obscenely.

pronoun Jesus 3.PNG
"Pronouns make me feel safe. They show who I can trust."

Yes, and me reciting a Koran verse makes me trustworthy to Muslims.

pronoun Jesus 4.PNG

pronoun cult.PNG

These people tell us that society puts us in boxes. Here they are gladly separating humanity into 'Us' and 'Them'. It's amazing what these people admit to when they think the cissies aren't looking. They want us to be obedient allies.

pronoun cult 2.PNG
White male thanks a black woman for prioritizing him over her. The jokes write themselves.

pronoun cult 3.PNG
Maybe ask yourselves why masculine = threatening in our society? And you, Emma, don't even remotely pass. You're a dude.

pronoun cult 4.PNG

Here're some tits.

pronoun tits.PNG
TW learning how to do pelvic floor exercises to save their gaping wound:

TW pelvic floor.PNG

The good ole Nigerian doctor continues, again restricting comments to save herself from TERFs:

gender human being.PNG
Ah, but she knows full well what females are. She even knows race AND sex affects the heart!

FOGIYfgWUAER9j8.jpg

We'll take a break from her.


Remember Sandra Newman and how her book on what would happen if all males with a Y chromosome went extinct and the shitshow it caused? Well it brought some delicious cow milk.

Here is a DNA guy on 'women with Ys'.

Link / Archive
Rate me late if most of these screenshots have been posted.

women with Ys.PNG
women with Ys 2.PNG
women with Ys 3.PNG

It gets even juicier.

Y so mad.PNG
Ouch. This didn't go over well with him.


Y murders.PNG

I wonder if these people ever wondered why males, as a rule, tend to be more violent? Nah that's TERFy.

Y murders 2.PNG
Genes do govern behaviour, and the genes you get are determined by the genetic information your chromosomes provide. This is why males tend to have greater psychosis and BPD symptoms than women. Don't forget MAOA, only found in males.

Y murders 3.PNG
My favorite. Short and to the point.

Y extinction.PNG
Y extinction 2.PNG
Too bad her book didn't include the extinction of gender, otherwise these enbies would be wailing into the abyss.

Y extinction 3.PNG
The Thatcher comment piqued my interest, so I looked into the thread:

Y Thatcher.PNG
Y Thatcher 2.PNG
Yeah, male chimps commit higher levels of violence because of patriarchy. I am at least glad radfems ditched this argument. Males are violent because of the genes expressed on that Y chromosome. And testosterone. It's nearly universal in mammals.

Another troon talks about a power vacuum:

Y power vacuum.PNG
Glad our anarchist troon here is willing to pile on some bricks.

Now here is the comment Sarah's fellow author made, and the responses to her that led to her losing her NAMBLA prize. Sleep with the wolves...die by their teeth.

Y terfy.PNG Y terfy 2.PNG Y terfy 3.PNG
Their tone here is fascinating. TERFs threaten literal violence towards trans people as the troons say and a book triggers them into extinction. These people are cry bullies: they threaten violence at any given moment to TERFs and then cry like bitches when someone punches back. Sandra and Lauren should never have apologized; I believe Lauren did not, but that didn't stop the mob from coming after her.

Had to include this little tidbit.

Y terfy 4.PNG
Yeah they just decide what genes you get...totes don't matter.


Now we've got a trans author who so kindly gave his book for free!

Thought about TERFs.PNG
As promised, here they are. In a nice epub format!

Who is Jessie? Well, he tends to hang around some notables, some not. Thinks the black lipstick gives him a good look.

Jessie doesn't like to be reminded of women's rights. British TERFs haunt his mind day in and day out.
He wants 20,000 British pounds to pay for his SRS, despite he and his wife living paycheck to paycheck. Predictably, his wife works and she is disabled, while the physically fine Jessie over here relies on her to foot the bill.
lovely TERF island.PNG
He so desperately wants to be a mom, taking that right away from his own wife:
basic mom.PNG

You're low IQ if you're a GC feminist, says the dude in lipstick:

basic IQ.PNG
Reminder: this guy refuses to work. His wife does all of it despite her physical limitations (or mental limitations). This guy spends all of his time online.

basic IQ 2.PNG
Well if he's going to be like other troons, maybe he will see this thread. Second, how is your wife hitting people if she's that disabled and can't even work the whole week? Who is she threatening? The stair well?

basic IQ 3.PNG
Ick.

Also reblogs David Paisley and our dear friend Katy Montgomerie.

bitchy David.PNG
Sophie's right on all of those, you know. And maybe if you cared about black women you wouldn't call the cops on them, eh?

Troons threatening violence:

rites or I bite.PNG
6k likes.

Not usual cow material, but interesting enough to mention. That book might be 'Manhunt' worthy.


Lastly, here is our gal KM.

KM organ donation.PNG
Dear Katy. Where I come from, you can withdraw consent of organ donation at any time. You cannot take those organs by force unless you want to mimic the Chinese. If you do, that's unethical. You are not entitled to women's wombs, Colin.
 
I'm a free speech extremist but an unconditional death penalty for posting a "dress go spinny" video on the internet seems like a common sense restriction that should fit within First Amendment jurisprudence.
 
I'm probably super slow coming to this conclusion but gender ideology is just the lib version of Q Anon isn't it?

To believe the tenets of both ideologies you need to divorce yourself from reality completely and deny what you can see with your own eyes.
 
Some dude LARPed as Lia Thomas and went to a city council meeting lol

 
Not trying to shit up the thread, but part of the rejection of this book is the rejection of the ideia that men are violent, like that they act that way because of the enviroment and culture and not because they are bunch of murderous psychopaths, didn't this ideia spawned from the mainstream liberal feminism? That says that men can be feminists too and that they are also oppressed by the patriarchy basically a feminism that paths the men's heads by saying that they are good boys and etc... Like its goes against the well accepeted western ideia that everyone is born good and that its the environment that shapes the person, when in reality not everyone is equal, some are born good some evil and etc... I might be talking shit, since i know jackshit about feminism so idk, and the troon talking about the power vacuum that would come with the extiction of men, what power vacuum? In the military and criminals gangs? Since i think that this would still be thing even without men, yeah, it would have a power vacuum in thoses, but not in the rest, at least in the western world, like isn't that some sort of denial of reality? That the world would be in fact better without men? Why its hurt so much to admit that?
 

Attachments

Not trying to shit up the thread, but part of the rejection of this book is the rejection of the ideia that men are violent, like that they act that way because of the enviroment and culture and not because they are bunch of murderous psychopaths, didn't this ideia spawned from the mainstream liberal feminism? That says that men can be feminists too and that they are also oppressed by the patriarchy basically a feminism that paths the men's heads by saying that they are good boys and etc... Like its goes against the well accepeted western ideia that everyone is born good and that its the environment that shapes the person, when in reality not everyone is equal, some are born good some evil and etc... I might be talking shit, since i know jackshit about feminism so idk, and the troon talking about the power vacuum that would come with the extiction of men, what power vacuum? In the military and criminals gangs? Since i think that this would still be thing even without men, yeah, it would have a power vacuum in thoses, but not in the rest, at least in the western world, like isn't that some sort of denial of reality? That the world would be in fact better without men? Why its hurt so much to admit that?

It's more broadly a western idea that humans are "tabula rasa" and that there are no inbuilt difference between the sexes. Feminism has taken that up to argue that masculine traits like propensity to violence is purely a social construct.

Though I have to say that people assume women would cooperate instantly really don't understand how female intrasexual competition works. Males and females across the animal kingdom compete differently and have different interests in sexual selection, but both sexes do compete. As much as it is a stereotype, there's plenty of studies that have looked at women's indirect aggression (cattiness, undermining, etc.) as an evolutionary trait, and it really does seem to be a mechanism for undermining rivals for mates. Men compete directly and aggressively, but are more able to forgive after direct confrontation. Women compete more subtly, but are more likely to hold grudges and view each other as long term competition. Men are more risk prone, women are more likely to be long term strategic thinkers, especially as concerns offspring and making sure they have competitive advantages. Because making sure their offspring have the best genes, and the clearest competitive field, is how females display their genetic fitness. At the same time, women form alliances differently than men, but both sexes are able to put aside competition for broader group needs. People want to pretend that humans have somehow escaped the underlying reason for sexual selection, but we haven't. This is part of the stupidity of troonism, especially MTF troonism, because the way the talk about femininity makes it really clear they don't understand how women actually behave with one another, they just have the sugary sweet illusion that women are all soft and helpful and love each other. No troon is pining after being ostracized for having pissed off the wrong women accidentally.

E: Admitting that male sexuality has an inherent potential risk to it that socialization won't wish away is also poison for troon arguments. It doesn't have to be true for every man. Just that fact that a certain subset of men will tend towards predatory expressions of sexuality should make people question their desire to access women's spaces, because of pure advantages of strength.

Enough evopsych :politisperg:


Clipboard Image (2).jpg
Link


First, this trigger warning shit is another wokist shibboleth that I find fucking exhausting. I have never been raped, but it seems to be me that the inability to even say the word sort of robs you of the ability to address concerns about it or approach the topic constructively. This shit, where people are censoring uses of a word, that isn't even being used in jest or to insult, because of the hypothetical panic attacks it could induce in people they don't know, is crazy.

Second, would a dude who lied about his dick size be able to declare "microphallophobia" if you decided you didn't want to sleep with him when you saw it?

Incidentally, here's what this "dude" looks like:
Clipboard Image (3).jpg

Don't worry about men wanting to pick you up, regardless of dick size.




Clipboard Image (4).jpg

Guys, we don't know the pain of not having "rep" in video games. Though I'm struggling to think of a way that you could even include a MTF trans character into a narrative that wouldn't have them REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEing about choosing to not make them pass perfectly as trans women. All the FTM characters mentioned specifically don't pass. You as a player, and your character in game, are supposed to clock that it's a woman occupying a man's role. I guess because the Joan of Arc narrative is more understood within fantasy/genre fiction.
 
Last edited:
4th grade? Too young to even think about puberty, let alone decide you want to join the alphabet soup for the rest of your life

More like he groomed the kids
When I was in 3rd grade, some other kid told me that during puberty your dick falls off and you grow a new one. I believed it for awhile. Kids do not and cannot understand the consequences of transition or puberty blockers. Anyone who thinks kids can consent to these decisions is someone who will benefit from kids being seen as able to consent.
 
View attachment 3121153
Link


First, this trigger warning shit is another wokist shibboleth that I find fucking exhausting. I have never been raped, but it seems to be me that the inability to even say the word sort of robs you of the ability to address concerns about it or approach the topic constructively. This shit, where people are censoring uses of a word, that isn't even being used in jest or to insult, because of the hypothetical panic attacks it could induce in people they don't know, is crazy.
They censored it in the screenshot but then right away threw out a trigger warning about RAPE in capital letters at the start of the tweet.

Trigger warnings have been researched and have been found to either do nothing or make things worse. As the research did not begin with a trigger warning about its findings, it has been ignored by Woko Haram.
 
RE "trans" Fight Club - Chuck Palahniuk wrote another novel with a trans character (Invisible Monsters), so they can claim that one instead. It's probably not something they'd want though and is considered transphobic by today's standards. It's been a long time since I've read it but I think the guy got sexually abused and tries to become someone else / turn into his sister by getting a sex change and surgery.
Anyway, the portrayal of the struggle with masculinity etc in FC has nothing to do with trannydom. They can fuck off.
 
Dear Katy. Where I come from, you can withdraw consent of organ donation at any time. You cannot take those organs by force unless you want to mimic the Chinese. If you do, that's unethical. You are not entitled to women's wombs, Colin.
To be fair, he is correct that it's insane. Why reject the chance to cause an AGP's kidneys to fail from beyond the grave?

Not trying to shit up the thread, but part of the rejection of this book is the rejection of the ideia that men are violent, like that they act that way because of the enviroment and culture and not because they are bunch of murderous psychopaths, didn't this ideia spawned from the mainstream liberal feminism? That says that men can be feminists too and that they are also oppressed by the patriarchy basically a feminism that paths the men's heads by saying that they are good boys and etc... Like its goes against the well accepeted western ideia that everyone is born good and that its the environment that shapes the person, when in reality not everyone is equal, some are born good some evil and etc... I might be talking shit, since i know jackshit about feminism so idk, and the troon talking about the power vacuum that would come with the extiction of men, what power vacuum? In the military and criminals gangs? Since i think that this would still be thing even without men, yeah, it would have a power vacuum in thoses, but not in the rest, at least in the western world, like isn't that some sort of denial of reality? That the world would be in fact better without men? Why its hurt so much to admit that?

I think it's mostly just reverse-engineered from the primordial untouchable belief that these people must conform to in order to continue to be accepted by their tribe (Trans Women Are Women). If you admit that genes relating to biological sex might influence behavior, then you might have to admit that male genes might cause males to behave differently from women, and that causes cognitive dissonance related to the TWAW idea. Therefore, men are not influenced by their genes.

On the other hand, I doubt this kind of thinking could have taken hold if there was not already fertile ground for it: American society in general (not just liberalism) relies heavily on the idea of individualism and self-reliance and merit, and the idea of people being influenced by their genes (and therefore potentially limited by their genes) does not sit well with that mythos. Fredrik DeBoer talks a lot about this and gets shunned by the left for it, even though he's a leftist. But I think most right-wing Americans think similarly, even if they use it to justify different things. The idea of the infinite-potential blank-slate individual is so pervasive in American culture that most of us don't even notice it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom