I was on ripx4nutmeg's twitter and found this abomination. Chalk it up to 'things that never happen' happening.
Male assaults two young girls, identifies as female (his egg 'cracked') and will now be housed with females. California allows any male who IDs as a woman into women's prisons. Libfems and their troon handlers keep insisting this never happens (and, by extension, BreadTube).
There is also a bot on Twitter called WhatIsaWomanBot, who aims to show how asking what a woman is is bad faith and a logical fallacy because males can be women if skirt go spinny spinny. Here is the
website.
When troons say that sex and gender aren't the same, they will go out of their way to conflate it when they think you aren't looking. Here is what they say in regards to how transwomen are women and how misogyny affects males:
What is a woman?
"Woman" is a gender identity, which is the relationship between an individual's understanding of themself within society and the abstraction of patterns of sexed behavior and physical characteristics. Thus, a woman is anyone who genuinely identifies as one.
Male/female and man/woman are often interchangeable because of the nature of language and the evolution of the understanding of gender. But 'woman' and 'women' refer to the identity of a person or group of people respectively, that is not always predicated on their biology.
For example, "Women's studies" will often examine the social and cultural constructs of gender within systems of privilege and oppression. That oppression can be based on typical female biology, but the effects can affect all women based on gender.
For example, misogyny affects trans women. This is just an observable fact.
It's an 'observable fact' that males are women provided they say they are. Sex and gender are totally different, yo.
Here is one Twitter
thread.
Archive.
Troons believe that asking them what a woman means is arguing in
bad faith. They love using this argument in other to get people off their case when they aren't calling you a Nazi-fascist.
No troon, I don't think you're a woman. You're a man in shit clothes and makeup, and I will never see you as a woman.
Link.
Archive.
New Statesman has published an article arguing that GC beliefs aren't widespread and everyone believes men are women if they ID as such. Ignoring the Lia Thomas controversy and the Loudoun rape scandal, New Statesman publishes work from Logically.ai, a 'fact checker' that argues that #KeepPrisonsSingleSex is the result of bot farms.
Of course, all of their trans activism is organic and not funded at all.
This from
New Statesman:
“When a trans person is incarcerated, the prison services individually assess each case to determine whether other prisoners or the transgender prisoner themself would be safe,” the Logically report concluded. “It is not true that a trans prisoner, solely based on self-ID, would be able to be homed in a prison that didn’t match their birth sex. The Times’s reporting, in conjunction with the reach the manipulated hashtag gave it, could very easily mislead an uninformed reader into thinking that it was.”
We know this isn't true, be it in the UK, Canada, or the US. Any male who IDs as a woman has the 'right' to be transferred to a women's prison or women's spaces in general. Karen White already showed this 'truth' as false.
Here is the Logically
article.
The opposition that shot down the amendment not to put males in female prisons said this.
Women in jail, he said, should not have to suffer “rape and violence from big, brute rapists who have decided to identify as women and get sent to a women’s unit.” The amendment was withdrawn as it would have failed on the grounds that excluding trans women from female prisons would be “cruel” and “extraordinarily dangerous,” the Opposition noted, referencing the high levels of abuse and violence transgender people experience in prison.
Half of these males are sex offenders. It's dangerous for them to be around other males, so let's put them in with the women. It'd be cruel not to.
Curiously though, beyond the accounts for Baroness Fox and other groups like NoXYinXXprisons (Keep Prisons Single Sex’s account) who were close to the amendment to the Police Crime and Sentencing Bill (in yellow), the accounts that exercised the highest degree of influence on the network were “name+number” accounts, which often indicates a bot.
These accounts never tweeted original content, instead rapidly retweeting and cross-retweeting content containing the hashtags #KeepPrisonsSingleSex and #MakePrisonsSingleSex. This rapid and high-volume interaction with a hashtag is exactly the kind of signal that Twitter’s algorithm needs to recognize a hashtag as “trending” as it appears as though it is being used by a lot of different people, even when it’s not.
Funny. I've seen plenty of BlueAnon accounts that have never produced an original Tweet yet are never banned or accused of bots.
If you oppose troons in women's spaces, you're a bot. But you can spout #CiswiththeT all you want, because that's organic (and not started by a social media influencer), and everyone supports males in women's spaces.