How is it Holocaust evidence? Lampshades were mentioned a few times during Nuremberg, never in direct connection with Jews, nor in connection with any systematic murder of Jews (which is the the definition of the Holocaust)
exhibits.stanford.edu
These items were literally presented as evidence of German inhumanity at Nuremberg, this is intended to color the public's perceptions of the Germans. The lampshade and other items are blatantly false, and one can tell at a glance, because human skin is not nearly as thick or opaque as cow skin, and would be translucent in sunlight. So this is clearly forged evidence which was used to hang innocent people. Even pro-holocaust, jewish sites now attest that the lampshades are an embarrassing myth.
So the western allies just couldn't resist throwing in more corpse factory myths into a legitimate genocide? Honestly, if you have a legitimate genocide on your hand, I don't see why one would destroy their own credibility by adding additional, planted evidence; but I can see how early, clumsy attempts at frame-ups would fail and become inconvenient later on.
The whole history of the holocaust seems to be this, with grand sweeping claims ("all camps are death camps", "4 million died at Auschwitz") which slowly get beaten back and abandoned one by one as they are revealed to be indefensible, and the holocaust proponents realize that they are only losing credibility trying to defend the more blatantly false ideas.
Nah bro. He never said they were "easily disproven" just that that there was no good evidence at the moment. From the same file:
View attachment 2747564
The fact Allen and Cavendish were skeptical here (perhaps 'judeo-skeptical' lol) throws the following statement into stronger relief. BTW right before he's not talking about Jews, but crimes committed against Poles
They are discussing both Poles and Jews in this, and VCB specifically said that the jews exaggerated German crimes even far more than the Poles did. If the Poles are talking about gassings, and VCB says that's ridiculous, then this implies the jewish claims are even MORE untrustworthy. He's one of the chiefs of the British war cabinet, he would be the person with the best perspective on any of these claims, because the best evidence of anything with propaganda value would all be filtered to him.
View attachment 2747570
"The Germans are out to destroy Jews of any age unless they are fit for manual labour"
Please explain how this is not Holocaust to me.
He doesn't talk about the Germans killing the jews in a systematic manner, and in fact compares that to a grotesque lie and implies it to be a jewish exaggeration.
He basically says in that letter "don't take at face value what the Poles and jews say, it is mostly made up, and it'll hurt our psyops efforts to publicly support them. There's no reason to believe in any genocide against Poles. The Germans do have it out for the jews, but jews are not being mass executed. If we support that claim, then when it is debunked, it will make it harder to prosecute Germans for legitimate massacres."
In this line you keep quoting, he is not saying here anything other than that the Germans had a hostile outlook towards the jews, but not that it was being acted on systematically. "out to destroy" is juxtaposed in this letter to "mass executions in gas chambers".
Are you saying the "artists" put this over the Belzec site?
rather than this?
They put both blast furnace slag and furnace cinders over the graves, along with other types of foreign soils.
The fact that this is a site where all the evidence is from ovens, and they introduced elements from a different type of oven, is completely irresponsible and contaminating. There are chemicals found in industrial waste that were added to the site, which wouldn't be found in corpse cremation. This complicates further research, and can only be assumed to have been done deliberately because of how badly it muddies future examinations (which are clearly never intended to be allowed).
What are wildcat diggers? I've heard mention of this before
View attachment 2747578
Wildcat dig = illegal/unauthorized diggers
Ever since the Germans abandoned the site, it has been tampered with by random people digging at it. After Belzec was occupied by the Soviets, the soviets also quickly dug up the site, allegedly because they heard it was a mass grave and were searching for treasure, though they could have had ulterior motives. After that, for many years, treasure hunters would come, having heard it was a mass grave, to also dig it up.
So the site has been heavily compromised before any archaeologists ever examined it. There are even pro-holocaust sites which attest to this. This means that (even without malicious intent by the soviets) ash layers would be mixed with soil and further diluted (expanding their apparent volume), the boundaries of pits would be expanded, giving them the impression of being much larger than they actually are, or outright linking distinct pits together (thus greatly expanding their apparent volume and confusing their contents), foreign materials could be added, the contents of the pits could be cross-contaminated when the pits are filled back in, etc.
So there are numerous complicating factors already in any archaeology on the site, even before it was turned into a shrine and had even more complicating factors thrown in with the introduction of more foreign mass.
