How We Invented Childhood

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
By Callie Stewart | Checked By John Kuroski


Published September 10, 2015

Updated December 17, 2015





Kids Playing Outside

Image Source: www.familybydesign.com
Think of childhood. Not necessarily your childhood, but the idea of being a kid in general. What comes to mind? Playing? Curiosity? Imagination? Innocence?

These are all common, if not cliché, notions of what it means to be a child. You play, you learn, you imagine and you are kept sheltered from the dangers of the world for as long as possible. The adults in your life don’t want to rip you from that childhood naiveté; in fact, they love keeping you there. They want you to remain sweet and to remain untainted—to simply be a child.

That notion of childhood, however, is one we completely and utterly made up. French historian Philippe Ariès wrote perhaps the most widely read book on this very subject, Centuries of Childhood. Though much of the book is now criticized–in part, because some of his evidence was anchored in the adult clothing children wore in medieval portraiture–Ariès was the first to present childhood as a modern social construction, rather than a biological right.

Today, while distancing themselves from Ariès’ logic, many academics agree that the last few centuries of history have seen a major shift in how children are treated and how childhood itself is regarded.
Centuries Of Childhood

Image Source: Amazon
The Routledge History of Childhood in the Western World, a recent compilation of essays from a range of scholars, presents a vast and detailed evolution of what we consider to be childhood–and, as the book is eager to point out, it seeks to finally put Ariès’ text to rest. Editor Paula S. Fass, a historian at UC Berkeley, notes the following in her introduction to the book:

“These essays clearly show that the ‘modern’ perspective on children as sexually innocent, economically dependent, and emotionally fragile whose lives are supposed to be dominated by play, school and family nurture, provides a very limited view of children’s lives in the modern western past. While some children did experience this kind of childhood, for the vast majority, it is quite literally only in the twentieth century that these have been enforced as both preferred and dominant.”
Fass continues to assert that our modern notion of childhood was forged during the Enlightenment. The Enlightenment, or The Age of Reason, spanned from about the 1620s to about the 1780s, and did a good job of shaking up the traditional, and often irrational, ideologies of the Middle Ages. Over the 17th and 18th centuries, the public made a relatively sharp turn toward scientific reason and advanced philosophical thought. As the products of a generation now enamored with reason, children were a big focal point for the many new forms of societal change.
Age Of Innocence

Joshua Reynolds’ popular 18th century painting, “The Age of Innocence,” speaks to the emerging ideals about childhood. Image Source: Tate

English philosopher and father of the Enlightenment John Locke published strong, controversial pieces on politics, religion, education, and liberty. An opponent of England’s entrenched, tyrannical monarchy, Locke quickly became famous among great thinkers with his 1689 publication of An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, in which he urged people to use reason as their guide, to think for themselves, and to understand their world via observation rather than religious dogma.
John Locke

John Locke, Image Source: skepticism.org
By the time he published Some Thoughts Concerning Education in 1693, Locke’s ideas were highly regarded in educated circles. Flipping conventional wisdom about education on its head, Locke states that authoritarian teaching is counterproductive, suggesting, of children, that “all their innocent folly, playing, and childish actions are to be left perfectly free.” The goal was to make moral children, not scholars. Education should be enjoyable and sculpted around the needs of the individual child in order to make a productive, positive member of society.

To understand just how revolutionary Locke’s ideology on education and children was, it needs to be put into context. In Locke’s time, forms of unstructured play or entertainment were considered a waste of time. As a result, throughout Locke’s life, the only “book” and learning tool specifically for children was the hornbook.
With a history that traces back to the 15th century, this “book” was actually a wooden paddle, traditionally inscribed with the alphabet, numbers from zero to nine, and a passage of scripture. And if that wasn’t fun enough, it had the dual purpose of being both a learning tool and a form of punishment if the child did something awful, like recite the alphabet incorrectly.
Hornbook Paddle 1630

A hornbook from approximately 1630. Image Source: Pinterest

Childrens Horn Book

A woman holding a hornbook. Image Source: Wikimedia Commons
Furthermore, in Locke’s time, very little thought was given to a child’s rights. Especially if you didn’t have the money to care for a child, that child was simply a functional object, an extra worker. If the child wasn’t an extra hand, then they were an extra mouth to feed.
Perhaps nowhere is this more acutely evident than in the 200-year-long English tradition of child chimney sweeps, which really took off in the 1660s. Small boys between 4 and 10 years old from families of poverty were sold to master sweeps. Using their elbows, back and knees, the boys would climb up and down narrow chimneys to clean out the soot. These children were severely beaten, starved, disfigured, prone to serious health complications, and even liable to die as a result of getting permanently lodged in chimneys.

However, this “business model” remained popular because most were unsympathetic and no one bothered to create large brushes or rods until they were forced to, in 1875, when it finally became illegal to use children as chimney sweeps.
Children Chimney Sweep

A master and apprentice chimney sweep. Image Source: Wikimedia Commons
Child Chimney Sweep Face

A child chimney sweep, Image Source: Western Civilization

Blake The Chimney Sweeper

William Blake’s 1789 poem, “The Chimney Sweeper,” from his book, Songs of Innocence. Image Source: Answers
Locke died in 1704 (long before the practice of using children as chimney sweeps), but in the following decades, the Enlightenment movement he helped create continued to move forward. Those he influenced continued to popularize his ideas. Literacy was also steadily on the rise (by 1800, 60-70 percent of adult men in England would be able to read, in comparison to 25 percent in 1600), and with literacy came both the ability to spread ideas more quickly and the demand for new publications. In 1620s, about 6,000 titles appeared. By 1710s, that number rose to nearly 21,000 and by the end of the century, it was over 56,000. As a result, religious texts and their medieval philosophies started to lose their monopoly over the written word and public mind.
At this time, the next influential player in the creation of modern childhood stepped up. Greatly inspired by Locke, French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote a number of extremely popular works that had a profound influence on the continuation of the Enlightenment. In particular, Émile confronts the nature of education and man. It is from this writing that most of our modern notions surrounding the innate purity of children emerge. In contrast to the church’s views, Rousseau writes, “nature made me happy and good, and if I am otherwise, it is society’s fault.” Nature is, Rousseau believed, our greatest moral educator and children should focus on their bond with it.

Emile

Image Source: www.heritagebookshop.com
Whether from Locke, Rousseau or elsewhere in the Enlightenment, these notions of childhood largely go unquestioned today. Émile was published in 1762. Just over 250 years later, most of us adamantly believe that children have the right and freedom to be wild (within reason), explore nature, and enjoy a life unaffected by societal corruption. However, a century after Émile, we were still shoving sooty children down chimneys. And it wasn’t even a century ago that the United States fully put a stop to child labor, in 1938.

By that point, the Enlightenment had long come and gone. See, it takes time for these ideas we take for granted to spread through the classes and generations to be made “real.” As a result, today we sit secure in a concrete concept that separates us and our children from those of the Dark Ages, scarcely realizing that that concept is only as old as our grandparents.

 
A French man writing about childhood being a social construct? Someone dig up his basement, because I guarantee you're going to find at least one skeleton of a raped child.

And while you're at it, investigate this journalist for trying to convince everyone that kids are no different from adults, because a redder flag I have never seen.
 
Childhood - Fake
3 billion genders - Reality

I don't understand why whites hate themselves so much they let this shit run amok in their nations...
 
Childhood - Fake
3 billion genders - Reality

I don't understand why whites hate themselves so much they let this shit run amok in their nations...
Good old fashioned guilt, by the end of the 20th century it became clear just how stark the difference between white nations and most non-white nations were, we succeeded to the point that we actually felt guilty about succeeding too much and have been intentionally trying to sabotage that success in order to make the world a little more "fair", so instead of a world of haves and have nots, it's a world where everyone is equally miserable, hooray!
 
Openly questioning why people hate pedophiles isn't enough. Now they must try and turn childhood into a social construct just like race and gender.

I would say the change in economics kickstarted "childhood" more than anything. Your 8 year old could go to school and play instead of helping you work the field or else you all starve and maybe your baby will last through the winter and grow into another farmhand. But these people would rather eat their hats than give capitalism any compliments.
 
I had a horrible feeling opening this, knowing the freaks we share articles from, that this would be an apologetic treatise in favor of pedophillia.

I'm not convinced it isn't.
 
While I agree that we can and should bring apprenticeships back - I think the Renaissance masters were apprenticed to artists and artisans before they were 10 - and non-back-breaking child labor is fine in the context of a family business, this is almost certainly a push for legalized pedophilia.
 
How convenient that childhood is a "social construct". I still think having sex with children is wrong on many different levels and the people who think otherwise should be strung up and beaten like a pinata in roblox
 
Up until a few decades ago, children were treated poorly. For a large part of recorded history, they were used as farming or domestic help. During the industrial revolution, they were seen as good help to keep around dangerous machines, as their small arms and tiny fingers meant they could access parts of the machine to repair it. Of course, this meant that their limbs occasionally got caught and severed in the machines when they inevitably turned on again.

Let children be children. They've earned a time where they only have to worry about school.
 
While I agree that we can and should bring apprenticeships back - I think the Renaissance masters were apprenticed to artists and artisans before they were 10 - and non-back-breaking child labor is fine in the context of a family business, this is almost certainly a push for legalized pedophilia.
Considering how much bullshit is in school curriculums and how useless most college degrees are, apprenticeships might actually be the way to go.

Unfortunately, nowadays most production is mechanized and no one wants to be an Apprentice Gawker Blogger.
 
Up until a few decades ago, children were treated poorly. For a large part of recorded history, they were used as farming or domestic help. During the industrial revolution, they were seen as good help to keep around dangerous machines, as their small arms and tiny fingers meant they could access parts of the machine to repair it. Of course, this meant that their limbs occasionally got caught and severed in the machines when they inevitably turned on again.

Let children be children. They've earned a time where they only have to worry about school.
I would much rather tag along with my parents and help them herd sheep as a child than spend more than 2 days a week in school.

Considering how much bullshit is in school curriculums and how useless most college degrees are, apprenticeships might actually be the way to go.

Unfortunately, nowadays most production is mechanized and no one wants to be an Apprentice Gawker Blogger.
Laws can change and supply chains can fail.
 
Considering how much bullshit is in school curriculums and how useless most college degrees are, apprenticeships might actually be the way to go.

Unfortunately, nowadays most production is mechanized and no one wants to be an Apprentice Gawker Blogger.

I wouldn't mind getting paid to call people rapists and shitlords. I do it on Kiwi Farms most days for free.
 
We invented childhood because we moved forward. We decided that it was better to educate them and prepare them for the world then it was to have them working at age five or married as early teenagers.

Even barring the creepy sexual shit implied by the article...

My grandfather never finished Elementary school because he was needed to labor on the family farm. The way things are going households are going to need more than two incomes- obviously sending your kids out to work is the next step in the plan. Why is everything regression now?
 
I was actually more informed about how much more precious childhood really is, even if it's "fake" or "cultivated" or "new". I remember learning about how children were being treated like absolute shit during the Industrial Revolution, and then we get into shit like warrior cultures where warrior children were indoctrinated to live like adults to face death and how the Goths and Scythians outright killed children who were infirm or disabled.

I honestly came into this thread wanting to learn about what the writer was talking about, and man, is my personal outlook on childhood more reinforced to protect and cherish it away from all of the backwards and obtuse shit that we are forced to notice when we get older. And if everyone on this thread implies, I'll be glad to chop off a child fucker's head off to protect them.
 
Yes, children should be taught like Elizabeth I, who was able to translate works from English into Italian, Latin, and French at the age of 12.
 
We know now that children are not small adults, they need to devolopt and mature their brain and bodies, you fucking pedo.
 
We invented childhood because we moved forward. We decided that it was better to educate them and prepare them for the world then it was to have them working at age five or married as early teenagers.

Even barring the creepy sexual shit implied by the article...

My grandfather never finished Elementary school because he was needed to labor on the family farm. The way things are going households are going to need more than two incomes- obviously sending your kids out to work is the next step in the plan. Why is everything regression now?
Because the peasants aren't yet starving to the point where they'd consider throwing a Revolution.

Childhood happened because we found a way out of the Malthusian Trap where every single living being had to work their asses off (or marry the foreign prince their father told them to marry,) in order to survive. It isn't the Enlightenment that drove this so much as the Industrial Revolution. Eventually machines got so efficient that we could send child workers home. Then we created school so kids could be warehoused while their parents worked at factories and stores. It's economics that has driven most of this shit, not a bunch of effete Europeans writing philosophy books that bloggers and college professors routinely jerk themselves off over.
 
Back
Top Bottom