US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png ​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
I can tell this janny is going to be a terror when his inner dictator awakens, he's a bit too competent at his unpaid job right now.

USPG2, our days are numbered. Numbered!
 
X Prime said:
You are misunderstanding what he is saying.

Here's a dirty secret in all polling, surveys, and psychology studies in general: a large proportion of the kind of people who answer them want to make the researcher happy. They subconsciously guess at what the researcher wants and answer in that manner.

Thus, if you ask a question on a survey the right way, you can slant a good chunk of the answers to skew closer to a thing you want to hear. A lot of polling asks questions in this manner because they have an agenda.
Click to expand...
Yeah any "poll" you see published is ONLY to advance a narrative
There's nothing saying you can't do seventy three polls and only publish the one you hit the right results for
 
notorietus said:
cry.mp4
I have received multiple reports of derailment in this thread by @The Projects. Because @The Projects went on a second day to derail the thread with a one-on-one conversation (Agree to Disagree. Our community cannot stand divided. Do not derail threads with one-on-one conversations. Ignore users you can't stand), he has been threadbanned from USPG2 for a month. I have moved all the posts (expect these 2 highlights here & here) in this Mass Debates thread titled: "Debate @The Projects about various political stuff". I also asked about this decision with @Francis York Morgan.
Click to expand...
Lol, how did I fucking know faggots would be reporting him. Not saying I disagree with moving it, he wasn't really basing shit he was saying on actual news, it was pretty much turning into a debate thread on his worldview; but that's just as much the fault of everyone who sees someone "left leaning" come in here and feels the need to prod at them and ask them all these questions and try to unravel their positions.

I'll say it: I support lowering the ban length. Maybe two weeks? He does need to learn not to take bait from you chuds JAQing off. However long it is, I hope he comes back in here, actually talks news from his perspective, and makes retards seethe (I also hope he learns how to stop double posting...)
 
X Prime said:
You are misunderstanding what he is saying.

Here's a dirty secret in all polling, surveys, and psychology studies in general: a large proportion of the kind of people who answer them want to make the researcher happy. They subconsciously guess at what the researcher wants and answer in that manner.

Thus, if you ask a question on a survey the right way, you can slant a good chunk of the answers to skew closer to a thing you want to hear. A lot of polling asks questions in this manner because they have an agenda.
Click to expand...
What benefit is that to anybody?
 
The Last Stand said:
What benefit is that to anybody?
Click to expand...
It helps the person organizing the poll to manipulate public opinion over time by having "data" showing whatever conclusion they want to project, which is very beneficial to them and their funders.
 
Corgis said:
chose to call Trump a fascist dictator BECAUSE THEIR ONLY ALTERNATIVE WAS DESCRIBING HIM AS A STRONG PRESIDENT!
Click to expand...
Literally 90% of leftist propaganda is them deciding what they want the headline to be and then maliciously manipulating factual truths on subjective shit like stats on surveys, social media posts, interviews, etc. and then taking things out of context as hard as they can to reach their desired "truth".

It's like how so many people still think Charlie Kirk was a racist when he was literally one of the least racist people I've seen online. He said he didn't like DEI because it made him doubt the quality of the people in important roles since merit wasn't the only hiring barometer and they took from it "he thinks all blacks are incompetent". He said he sees everyone as equals and there's no racial difference between whites and blacks, just cultural, and people took that and started posting "white supremacist Charlie Kirk hates black people and their culture".

Then these people get called out for their BS and they pretend like they don't know what the issue is, and as the meme (truthfully) goes
images (5).jpeg

Meanwhile "far right" propaganda used to be posting skewed statistics and slurs on 4chan, now it's literally just posting unedited footage of the most unhinged leftists being insane terrorists. I really do think unregulated social media access was a mistake, some people are just way too easily manipulated and simultaneously cannot admit when they are wrong.

That's why I like the Farms cause if someone is trying to spread misinformation they get called a faggot and made fun of, as nature intended
 
The Last Stand said:
What benefit is that to anybody?
Click to expand...
In addition to this:
Oh! said:
It helps the person organizing the poll to manipulate public opinion over time by having "data" showing whatever conclusion they want to project, which is very beneficial to them and their funders.
Click to expand...
People want to look smart to their social peers. If you create enough official/authoritative-looking surveys, it becomes the smart thing to parrot what they seem to be saying.
 
WelfareNiggerQueen said:
Despite how awful Californians are, the State regularly sheds millions of them in rapid bursts at least once a decade that end up shitting up the rest of the country and somehow their population keeps climbing at an insane rate.
Pretty obvious they're padding their numbers with illegal spics. Every spic you see in California once used to be a Huwite man.
Click to expand...

39% of California's population is beaners. 33% is white. It'd be a completely different state without decades of illegal immigration going unchecked.
 
Corgis said:
Lol, how did I fucking know faggots would be reporting him. Not saying I disagree with moving it, he wasn't really basing shit he was saying on actual news, it was pretty much turning into a debate thread on his worldview; but that's just as much the fault of everyone who sees someone "left leaning" come in here and feels the need to prod at them and ask them all these questions and try to unravel their positions.

I'll say it: I support lowering the ban length. Maybe two weeks? He does need to learn not to take bait from you chuds JAQing off. However long it is, I hope he comes back in here, actually talks news from his perspective, and makes retards seethe (I also hope he learns how to stop double posting...)
Click to expand...
I propose a thread ban for being Ree-tarded. No one cares what _you_ want or support. Fuck you Reddit Nigger.
 
Nice Stick said:
It's always the same endgame for those people. (In case you're not familiar with this picture, it's in Cambodia and the girl's parents are in this stack of bones. 2 million people were killed when the commies took over.)
View attachment 8024243
Click to expand...

Nice Stick said:
It's always the same endgame for those people. (In case you're not familiar with this picture, it's in Cambodia and the girl's parents are in this stack of bones. 2 million people were killed when the commies took over.)
View attachment 8024243
Click to expand...
explains the push for disarmament
 
1760192665512.png


Democrats have gone out of their way to facilitate crime, to corrupt children, and to destroy sexual mores, so revelations regarding State Representative Cecil Brockman of North Carolina should come as no surprise:
1760192788735.png
Brockman, who represents Guilford County, is facing two counts of statutory rape of a child between the ages of 13 and 15 and two counts of indecent liberties with a child…

[C]ourt documents indicate that Brockman attempted to contact the alleged victim while they were hospitalized and sought to “use his status to gain information on the whereabouts of the victim.”
Click to expand...

The pronoun “they” is apparently used to hide the gender of the victim. But we can guess: https://xcancel.com/libsoftiktok/status/1976344858043502719
1760192831437.png 1760193177495.jpeg 1760193185184.png 1760193193647.jpeg

Not only LGBT but pigmentally correct. Voters must have been overawed by his historicness.
 
Corgis said:
Lol, how did I fucking know faggots would be reporting him. Not saying I disagree with moving it, he wasn't really basing shit he was saying on actual news, it was pretty much turning into a debate thread on his worldview; but that's just as much the fault of everyone who sees someone "left leaning" come in here and feels the need to prod at them and ask them all these questions and try to unravel their positions.

I'll say it: I support lowering the ban length. Maybe two weeks? He does need to learn not to take bait from you chuds JAQing off. However long it is, I hope he comes back in here, actually talks news from his perspective, and makes retards seethe (I also hope he learns how to stop double posting...)
Click to expand...
Yeah i support lowering the ban length as well.Guys actually reported him? C'mon guys this is supposed to be a chud aligned website, call him a retard then go about your day.
 
Justsomecicada said:
Well we are a little over a year from midterms, what’s everyone’s predictions and why?
Click to expand...
The prediction from normal people is the same as before; Dems will get battered all over the place, because they are narcissistic and entitled toddlers.
Wallace

Thread 'Democrats Still Have No Idea What Went Wrong'

Democrats Still Have No Idea What Went Wrong​

The party’s progressives seem to think the problem is not with their platform but with voters.
By Jonathan Chait

Archive

On a recent panel of progressive activists analyzing what went wrong in the 2024 election, the author, activist, and failed political candidate Qasim Rashid spoke with confidence about the way forward for the Democratic Party. The problem, he insisted, was not that Democrats had strayed too far from public opinion but that the party had grown too solicitous of it. “Saying the right thing timidly,” he...
Reactions:Like x 23 Informative x 3 Feels x 5 Lunacy x 1 Islamic Content x 1 Thunk-Provoking x 9
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom