US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
60 minutes showing footage of German police arresting people for memes as a good thing and having some bitch on saying we need guard rails on free speech in America. This is of course after that dumb cunt said free speech caused the holocaust to Rubio earlier. Also a segment of a couple crying about USAID going away so they don't get free gibs.

Remember you don't hate the media enough.
I hope she looks forward to the Trump DOJ arresting her then. These people have no ability to consider the laws they beg for being wielded by people they disagree with.
 
Thats the thing, even at its most fascist, the Federation is necessary when the Bugs mind hacked the Sky Marshall into worshipping the Bug God into killing a bunch of soldiers killed. Under the situations every movie presents, diplomacy is not an option.

Even the protestor in the wheelchair you're supposed to feel sympathy for, I feel disgust at his inability to die with dignity. He's an annoying hippie that doesn't really know what he's talking about because the war is real, necessary, and by Traitor of Mars, one the Feds are losing.
What's funny is none of the movies really do track with the Book, even if they can't help but absorb the ethos in their efforts to parody it.

For one thing, in the book the Bugs aren't even the first alien species introduced. There were also the "Skinnies" who were essentially "Ayy LMAOs" that the Federation was also at war with, and they were allied with the Bugs. The reasons for why the war was being fought wasn't important to Heinlein, so he didn't really discuss it much. He was more interested in talking about the internal structure of the federation. The War was just incidental.

Though I think he sort of showed his hand a bit in the discussion about the vacation world. How it was "stunted" due to its lack of radiation exposure compared to earth. None of the life on it had to struggle, and as consequence it was all boring and placid grasses with small insect looking things. That was rapidly being replaced by Earth based life. One of Johnnies paramours on the planet was on Federal service to study the local biome (Because again, Federal Service didn't just mean military service) to figure out a way to preserve parts of it from the aggressive Earth origin plants and animals.

The planet itself was a metaphor for Heinlein's philosophy that if you let yourself get weak, you will be invaded and replaced. Possibly by something entirely alien. Life, Liberty and Prosperity are not something you have a RIGHT too. Its something that needs be fought for actively, and preserved actively. So of course Liberals in the 1990's read this and said, CLEARLY FASCISM. But it's not. Its much older traditionalism. Heinlein was trying to square the circle between the Liberal ideals of the modern State that upholds freedom, with the need for their being a Charles "The Hammer" Martel to ruthlessly slaughter invading Muslims at Poitiers and scatter them before his power in order to preserve his nation and way of life.

Liberalism has a very hard time conceptualizing the traditional duty of the State, and its one I have bitched about at length in other threads. Too often Liberal nations become so obssessed with why they shouldn't kill the mouse in their kitchen, that they despoil the future of their children in favor of the mouse.
 
For my money Tucker Carlson has the best conservative interviews right now. I didn’t care for him when I was younger or even on Fox News. But his recent stuff I’ve found both entertaining and informative. Is there anything about him or his past (other than the bow tie incident) that I should know about?
 
Last edited:
The correct solution here is to periodically send yourself invite codes and then abandon your accounts every time you hit an arbitrary number of messages.
That or sock it up like the good old days.
I don't have to worry about that, though. I'm a 57 year old multi-millionaire with five houses I can escape to and a thriving houseplants-and-gold business.
Advanced AI can begin to figure out your identity with as little as a couple thousand words of typed text. The more information they have the better. Most of this information is catalogued and saved for later retervial and comparisons against leaks that contain geolocation information.

The best way to understand the capabilities out there is understanding equivalent abilities in real life. The military has the ability to identify any human on earth using "gait detection". A 3 second video of you walking is all they need to place you at a location. If you try to fake your gait it still detects who you are but makes a note you attempted to conceal your normal gait.

They likely have similar abilities for every single individual identifying heuristic.
 
Always the best way to figure out who your enemies are. Anyone who says the Bugs in Starship troopers were actually the good guys is an enemy.
Like, no shit fascism is bad, but guess what its still better than being eaten by giant bugs.
A retarded authoritarian government that incompetently fights the bugs is definitely better than getting eaten by the bugs. There is even the outside possibility that an existential threat would make such a government less retarded. Imagine how fucking bleak it would be if instead of generic authoritarian world order fighting the bugs it was globohomo authoritarian world order responding to interstellar bugs eating people. There would be more effort put into bug outreach and how to put more black trannies in command than figuring out better ways to defend our worlds and root out their hives all while sneering at the poor fucking infantry getting their guts torn out by shredding claws.
 
The correct solution here is to periodically send yourself invite codes and then abandon your accounts every time you hit an arbitrary number of messages.
That or sock it up like the good old days.
I don't have to worry about that, though. I'm a 57 year old multi-millionaire with five houses I can escape to and a thriving houseplants-and-gold business.
The ideal age range to be suspected of being online is 18 to 80. If anything The Last Stand might be accidentally doing some sorta opsec genius with their particular fixation in retrospect.
These people side with the bugs in Starship Troopers and preen about muh media literacy

I'll do you one better. Their collective favorite series for over 20 years while poo pooing everything else as problematic and toxic had a magical societal caste system that heavily influenced your entire life's trajectory assigned on your first day of a private school for the genetically superior. A protagonist who despite a tough early childhood inherited a lot of wealth and thrives due to nepotistic influence and family name recognition, sanctioned chattel slavery with only one vocal opposer and only briefly.
And all the money is handled and controlled by big nosed greedy demi-humans.

There's also an irish wizard adept at explosive magic and a black man literally named shacklebolt. (I am not at all offended I think it's funny as shit and pointing it out :story: )

And exactly none of this was a problem or enough to sour their enjoyment and consumption until their idpol firmware updates hit when enough celebs and authorities told them it was a problem and the author was retconned IRL to be a bad person(tm) because the author disagreed with them openly and publicly once. And lost their pass.

Never ever forget that these self-proclaimed pillars of intellect and perception are the people who tell you you're not heckin' "Media Literate".
 
She missed her chance at being in the Stasi so bad. Talking about 'online violence'. What a disaster.
Screenshot 2025-02-16 195747.png
I love how she says basically that people are afraid to speak their mind because of 'online violence' so it's the state's job to make people afraid to speak, not just normies.
 
Hasn't the rates of exclusive homosexuals stayed about the same over time since we started tracking it?
I'm not including bisexuals or trannies here, only exclusively gay or lesbian individuals.
I know I had looked it up once to see if changed or had spikes like trannies do, or was predominantly young girls (an indicator of social contagion) or even a steady rise over time (which may indicate a developmental disorder like autism etc) but it looked to be steadily something like 1% lesbians and 2% gays as far as I could tell (these weren't the exact rates but I remember male gays being double that of female gays which I found surprising).

You are correct. I am too lazy to look it up right now, but if you look at any survey where people are asked to report past sexual contact with a person of the same sex, the number basically hasn't budged in decades. But if you look at surveys of people calling themselves "queer" or "LGBTQ+" the number has exploded.

All the increase comes from non-practicing bisexuals and unhappy fat girls calling themselves queer or nonbinary. The concept has become completely divorced from any actual sexual preference or behavior (and perhaps this was done deliberately, to inflate the numbers of an interest group that can be used to serve the establishment).
 
Democrats, influencers huddle for a new new media strategy
Semafor (archive.ph)
By Max Tani
2025-02-17 01:10:06GMT
The Scoop
After months of licking their wounds and reflecting on how they lost the internet, Democratic strategists and politically-aligned digital creators are privately planning their next steps.

Last week, Democratic operatives gathered at the Wharf in Washington, DC, at the offices of Laurene Powell Jobs’ investment company, Emerson Collective. According to three people with knowledge of the event, the activists and left-leaning media members were in town for a private meeting to discuss how the left’s well-funded digital media ecosystem failed in the 2024 election. The conference featured hourlong seminars on how to improve short and long form video, which included briefings from Courier Newsroom’s Tara McGowan and executives at Crooked Media, and how to better collaborate with influencers to push progressive messages out.

The summit was also an opportunity to connect several of the party’s prominent financial supporters with some of the liberal media organizations that are positioning themselves as vessels to help liberals regain digital ground they’ve lost to the right in recent years.

In the room were Ben Wessel, the director of State and Local Political Affairs for Emerson Collective and Laura Quinn, an executive with the liberal firm Catalist who often advises liberal donors on how to spend their money in progressive media. Michael Del Nin, Soros Fund Management’s leading investor, was also in attendance to talk about strategies around acquiring media companies. Peter Murray also spoke to the group about strategic media opportunities; his organization, Accelerate Change, bought Now This from Vox in 2023, and pivoted it into a more explicitly partisan influencer-driven short-form video company.

Know More
In the wake of their second loss to Donald Trump and the more explicit alignment between the president and the most popular podcasts in the country, Democrats have been on a monthslong party-wide effort to figure out how to regain credibility in digital, or at least develop their own network of friendly pundits and creators outside legacy media who can effectively deliver their message.

The private event at the Wharf was one of several efforts in recent days to shore up Democrats’ digital strategies post-inauguration. Earlier this week, dozens of lawmakers from the House and Senate Democratic caucuses participated in private briefings with Brian Tyler Cohen, a political influencer and the co-founder of Chorus, a Democratic digital group. The briefings laid out what Cohen described to Semafor as tips to help Democratic members better get their messages out on new media platforms. He presented the members with do’s and don’ts for short-form video and text, encouraging them to vastly increase the frequency of their posts and not overly workshop their online content. To make his point, Cohen noted that Elon Musk had posted or retweeted hundreds of posts that week alone. Cohen pointed to positive examples of congressional Democratic content that had performed well and resonated, such as a recent post in which Sen. Tim Kaine pushed back on Trump’s claims about how diversity efforts impacted air traffic safety. He also recommended a particular type of small microphone popular with online content creators that members and their staff should have for whenever they decide to post.

In the months since the election, Cohen’s group, Chorus, has repositioned itself and set up a digital quasi-assignment desk, where lawmakers on Capitol Hill and prominent Democrats elsewhere can connect directly on the backend with creators to facilitate one-on-one interviews or otherwise get their message out. Cohen told Semafor that after his briefing with Senate Democrats, several members, including Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, created new accounts on Threads and Bluesky and began connecting directly with nontraditional digital creators for livestreams and interviews intended to be cut into short-form video.

“A lot of these members of Congress understand the moment that we’re in,” Cohen told Semafor. “They’re recognizing where we are and are very quick to embrace the fact that you have a solution to fixing it. We’ve had a number of electeds meet with creators. That’s to their credit — they’re kind of learning the lessons that this election cycle taught us.”

Max's View
In the months since the election, Democrats have been beating themselves up over how they went from online dominance in the Obama era to playing catch-up; the online right is resurgent, especially in the podcast space, where many Americans now get their information and news.

The initial shock of the presidential loss has been heightened by other frustrations among Democrats at their party’s superficially slow and unsatisfying response to Trump and Musk’s shock-and awe-changes to the federal government. Embarrassing visuals of older lawmakers who seem unable to effectively take the fight to the new administration online have gone viral and prompted dismay from prominent members of the party.

Rising cable television ratings on MSNBC — and increasing online web traffic and subscriber numbers among explicitly anti-Trump outlets — show there is clearly a growing interest in oppositional media. But it remains to be seen whether efforts by Democratic online partisans will be able to alter the playing field in a meaningful way. As Red Seat Ventures co-founder Chris Balfe told me in an interview this week, the online conservative media ecosystem is strong because it spent years developing an anti-establishment model sustained by strong audience interest, not propped up by one party as its political messaging arm.

Some of the Democratic political operatives gathered at the Wharf are the same players who operated with large budgets to spend on digital newsrooms and creators during recent election cycles — without much clear return on their donors’ big dollar investments. And the concepts the meeting addressed aren’t necessarily new: Democrats explicitly reached out to influencers and creators as part of their 2024 strategy, at times to the frustration of legacy media. But if these efforts moved the needle, it clearly was not at the presidential level.

Room for Disagreement
Still, some national Democrats clearly understand that even if helping to prop up a media ecosystem like the one on the right will take time, they need to update their own communication styles in the meantime. In recent weeks, Democratic senators and prominent members of Congress have begun appearing on random niche Twitch gaming streams to criticize Musk and have been churning out multiple TikTok-friendly front-facing vertical videos a week about the new administration. The Democratic National Committee chair race included pledges from the various candidates about supporting explicitly Democratic partisan media, and included a candidate forum moderated by influencers at Chorus.

Notable
Kamala Harris’ former digital chief argued to Semafor last year
that online messaging issues were symptomatic of a deeper cultural deficit that Democrats accrued in recent years.
 
Back
Top Bottom