2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Techpriest]

What does a ruling being issued on standing mean?

Basically, they have no ground to sue. This can be for a variety of reasons.

 

[Dr J]

What does a ruling being issued on standing mean?

Basically you don't have the right to bring the case, either because you're not an injured party or it's not your jurisdiction or various reasons

As in, his estimate was conservative and even he would be surprised at this shit.

I understood what you meant and thought that was clear from my response

 

[Garm]

With Biden president. I'm hoping I won't have to here about politics in everyplace I go

AntiFa will be more than glad to show up.at your house to explain why such an attitude is racist.

 

[murdered meat bag]

What does a ruling being issued on standing mean?

means the filer doesn't have the right to sue in that particular court. it doesn't mean anything about the contents, issues of the case.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

I don't think are any normal people left who vote Democrat. You've got blue no matter who, SocJus types and corporate parasites.

lol Trump lost because Biden turned out proportionally more normal white guys who voted for Obama in 2012 and Trump in 2016

Keep coping though, retard

it's Judges going... "laches says you are too late despite being told it was too early before."

What part of 'they've had more than nine years to sue over some of these things they now claim are illegal' do you not understand, retard?

Trump's remedy isn't in the courts.

Yes, he's just going to keep raising money from tards like you by pretending he could win.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

What does a ruling being issued on standing mean?

Basically you don't have the right to bring the case, either because you're not an injured party or it's not your jurisdiction or various reasons

I understood what you meant and thought that was clear from my response

Also having it dismissed on standing means there's no evidentiary hearing. So if people use the fact it was dismissed on standing to claim it was 'baseless' that's disingenuous. Robert Barnes has claimed that standing is fundamentally bogus because it's a doctrine the courts invented themselves as a way to not hear cases that have political implications they don't like and I think he's got a point.

 

[Psychic Espeon]

(Crosspost)
Battleground State of Wisconsin casting its Electoral Votes. -

 

[LeChampion1992]

AntiFa will be more than glad to show up.at your house to explain why such an attitude is racist.

That's assuming antifa isn't arrested or treated like terrorists now because the guy at top and at the local level both are in the same political party.
Only the cringe and fringe is going to push forward and March for dismantle capitalism/black trans lives matter and etc....

 

[Garm]

In response to someone asking me something in a DM, and because I don't like textwalling in DM's:

Because it's not over yet and the entire system is a labyrinthine series of checks and balances that very few people understand in totality. "Safe harbor" and "deadlines" and "November 4th is over just pack it up" are just steps along the way, not definitive end-points. The only end-point is when someone's sworn in and plants their ass in front of the Resolute Desk. The only reason that they're typically end-points in the past is because almost no one has been willing to wrench at the levers to start pulling the checks and balances into the game, or because the election was to clear-cut that there wasn't any point on bothering.

Article 2, Section 1, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution. 3 U.S. Code 2 and 5. The precedent set by the 1876 election. 3 U.S. Code 15. There are always options, the only question is whether or not you have the balls to throw the levers and send the ship veering so violently that people get thrown off the deck, and that's without exploring that the civilian sector SpecOps were ordered to report directly to Cohen-Watnick, SolarWind was ordered to immediately be shut down in the U.S., the audit in Michigan was ordered to be released despite the efforts of the Governor to bury the results of the audit, and the FBI making it painfully obvious that Hunter is and has been under investigation for tax fraud for the past two years.

If you really want to follow me out on the limbs of the crazy tree, you can start to wonder why so many people were so fanatic about Joe Biden and members of his cabinet being allowed access to intelligence briefings way before the ink was even put on the page, and who exactly that $400,000 went to when Hunter failed to claim it on his taxes. I stopped paying attention to the lawsuits because everyone's focus was being pulled towards the lawsuits. If that's where I'm supposed to look because they're the keys that are being jangled the loudest, that's the last place I'm interested in looking, especially with all of the other pieces being thrown on the board.

With EO-13848, what happened on November 18th, the revelation that SolarWind has been compromised so badly that the shareholders and CEOs were dumping stocks as quickly as they can, and the pending report from the DNI on December 18th, I'm not paying attention to the lawsuits anymore, because something significantly more interesting is happening over here.

Also please quit sperging out about gay Jesus or whatever. I'm trying to be a crazy person and you're being very distracting.

Good sir, I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. Or perhaps share a graph of your thunks.

 

[murdered meat bag]

Welcome to law!
You can't call "address" frivolous and then cite the mailing and residential address line, which would be the first and most obvious rebuttal. You either word everything airtight and specific, or you can leave it open to courts to interpret. "Obviously it means residential" would be refuted by "so why doesn't it say residential, and why has no action been take it to specify residential address?" His examples point out statues which specifically invoke residential by contrast to the one being cited as in violation.

The case, lacking the ability to cite specific instances of definitive fraud - or even alleging such - instead hinged as such on the specific interpretation of that statute. You wanted to throw out 200k voters over the specific wording of a statute and how that "might maybe kindof possibly" cause fraud. The court ruled the statute to have been followed, if poorly written. Don't know what you want.

the definition of address, mailing or residential issue are red herrings because the problem was that clerks were filling in addresses instead of sending them back to the voter to have the witness line cured or invalidated altogether as defined in the law. if the incomplete addresses were fine because the law doesn't define address, it doesn't negate the fact that clerks modified the witness address line in violation of the law.

 

[Techpriest]

Also having it dismissed on standing means there's no evidentiary hearing. So if people use the fact it was dismissed on standing to claim it was 'baseless' that's disingenuous. Robert Barnes has claimed that standing is fundamentally bogus because it's a doctrine the courts invented themselves as a way to not hear cases that have political implications they don't like and I think he's got a point.

That you lack standing to sue is pretty much proof of your claims being baseless. You cannot establish that you have in some way were harmed, that the party you sue is responsible, that claims of how you were harmed have merit, that you’re suing in a timely fashion, etc etc. You have no ground to stand on to sue.

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

SmartMatic are threatening to sue several fake news organizations, Fox News, OANN, and NewsMax, for defamation against them.

Smartmatic announced today that it is issuing legal notices and retraction demand letters to Fox News, Newsmax and One America News Network for publishing false and defamatory statements. The demand letters identify dozens of factually inaccurate statements made by each of the organizations as part of a “disinformation campaign” to injure Smartmatic and discredit the 2020 U.S. election.

According to Smartmatic’s demand letters, these organizations could have easily discovered the falsity of the statements and implications made about Smartmatic by investigating their statements before publishing them to millions of viewers and readers. Smartmatic had nothing to do with the “controversies” that certain public and private figures have alleged regarding the 2020 U.S. election. Multiple fact-checkers have consistently debunked these false statements with stunning consistency and regularity...

Smartmatic’s only involvement in the United States in the 2020 election was as the manufacturing partner, system integrator, and software developer for Los Angeles County’s publicly owned voting system.

https://www.smartmatic.com/us/media/article/smartmatic-demands-justice-for-defamation/

Hopefully this goes ahead, it would be great if the internal emails from some of these orgs come out in discovery- I doubt many of them are stupid enough to believe the shit they peddle.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

Styx, America, and now the Netherlands premier political analyst, on that Biden vs BLM video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKTwinuZkwk
https://archive.vn/BYWS1
Beijing Bidens Hilarious Fiasco of a Call with Civil Rights 'Leaders'-aKTwinuZkwk-360p.mp4

He needs to put the leather jacket back on. Either that or put on 50lbs of muscle. Hawaiian-type shirt is too limp for his build.

Trump is pardoning Assange.

I've got a feeling it's today when shit hits the fan.

I think that was always going to happen. I think he was waiting until he could get Assange into the US. The UK was and is never going to release him though, as they are going to torture him to death.

Makes you wonder why out of all candidates the dems choose biden. I thought they like politicians that speak with big words 24/7

I think they got off on picking the worst, most unlikable candidates knowing that it would not matter who they chose because they control the flow of information and they control who counts the votes. Installing Biden and Kamala, people no one likes or has ever liked, is a humiliation ritual par excellance.

With Biden president. I'm hoping I won't have to here about politics in everyplace I go

Rock-a-bye, baby.

https://archive.is/EW5FS

Electoral College member from Jackson hopes for a future popular vote system, he says​

Conner Wood is honored to a member of this year’s Electoral College, which has the Constitutional responsibility to select the next U.S. president based on the people’s vote.

He just hopes it’s a job that doesn’t exist much longer.

“Hopefully this is one of the last times we ever do this,” Wood said Monday morning, prior to Michigan’s Electoral College vote. “It’d be great to tell my grandkids, yeah I was a presidential elector in the Electoral College and for them to say, ‘What is that?’”

Conner Wood, on the left with restof Jackson County Democrat Committee (black, jew, dangerhair, and tranny - how typical)

'Conner'? lol.

https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/michigan-gop-rep-punished-refusing-rule-out-electoral-college-violence

Michigan GOP rep punished for refusing to rule out Electoral College violence​

Republican state House leaders have sanctioned GOP Rep. Gary Eisen for a conspiracy-laden radio interview in which he discussed plans to disrupt Monday’s Electoral College vote and wouldn’t rule out the possibility of violence.
"It is dangerous," Eisen, R-St. Clair Township, said in the Monday morning interview on 1380AM in Port Huron, suggesting he and other legislators would attempt to escort the Michigan Republican Party’s slate of electors into the building for Monday’s vote even though President Donald Trump lost the state to Democrat Joe Biden by 154,188 votes.

The radio host concluded the interview by asking Eisen if he could guarantee there would be no violence and that everyone at the Capitol would be safe.

“No,” said Eisen, who is one of 15 state legislators who last week signed onto a brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to undo Michigan election results, which even Trump-appointed justices refused to do.

“I don’t know, because what we’re doing today is uncharted. It hasn’t been done.”

Officials are bracing for potential violence at or near the Michigan Capitol, where pro-Trump protesters are expected outside as 16 Democratic electors make their way inside to formally case their votes for Biden.

Or perhaps share a graph of your thunks.

You can't handle the graph!

 

[Dr J]

Robert Barnes has claimed that standing is fundamentally bogus because it's a doctrine the courts invented themselves as a way to not hear cases that have political implications they don't like and I think he's got a point.

I disagree with that, but IANAL so...

 

[the fall of man]

Makes you wonder why out of all candidates the dems choose biden. I thought they like politicians that speak with big words 24/7

Obama can’t legally be president again so they’re out of ammo

 

[It's HK-47]

Obama can’t legally be president again so they’re out of ammo

Not that he isn't interested in it, mind you.

 

[JaneThough]

You all doing ok in here?

 

[murdered meat bag]

That you lack standing to sue is pretty much proof of your claims being baseless. You cannot establish that you have in some way were harmed, that the party you sue is responsible, that claims of how you were harmed have merit, that you’re suing in a timely fashion, etc etc. You have no ground to stand on to sue.

you certainly wish it to be true, but as we've seen in the courts, there's no harm to trump before the election and laches right after. which part of that addresses the merits of his case?

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Trump is pardoning Assange.

I've got a feeling it's today when shit hits the fan.

I think that was always going to happen. I think he was waiting until he could get Assange into the US. The UK was and is never going to release him though, as they are going to torture him to death.

lol both of you are literally insane. Trump and his boss Adelson collaborated to illegally spy on Assange and planned to kidnap him because of his exposure of war crimes committed in the Zionist wars in Iraq and elsewhere.

They were stealing diapers from Assange's son to confirm paternity in case they wanted to kidnap his partner and children to hold them ransom to force Assange out.

The idea that Trump would pardon Assange is absurd.

Also having it dismissed on standing means there's no evidentiary hearing. So if people use the fact it was dismissed on standing to claim it was 'baseless' that's disingenuous. Robert Barnes has claimed that standing is fundamentally bogus because it's a doctrine the courts invented themselves as a way to not hear cases that have political implications they don't like and I think he's got a point.

And that's why people with more than a single braincell would not waste our time posting anything Barnes says.

you certainly wish it to be true, but as we've seen in the courts, there's no harm to trump before the election and laches right after. which part of that addresses the merits of his case?

lol, the WI supreme court case involved the GOP bleating about election practices that they now claim to be illegal but to which they have done nothing about in NINE YEARS. Keep coping though!

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

the definition of address, mailing or residential issue are red herrings because the problem was that clerks were filling in addresses instead of sending them back to the voter to have the witness line cured or invalidated altogether as defined in the law. if the incomplete addresses were fine because the law doesn't define address, it doesn't negate the fact that clerks modified the witness address line in violation of the law.

That's all addressed on page 27 of the PDF/opinion.
The assertion was that, if someone filled out their full address but left the state out, it should be tossed if a clerk adds in the state. The court found that completing someone's address, by adding in the state or zip code, did not violate the given statute. It also opined that the clerk could not insert an address themselves, and such an action would indeed render the ballot moot.

you certainly wish it to be true, but as we've seen in the courts, there's no harm to trump before the election and laches right after. which part of that addresses the merits of his case?

Before the election, the Trump team needed to make constitutional arguments. You can't allege "theoretical, hypothetical" damage. They didn't make constitutional arguments.

After the election, the Trump team needed to make damage-via-fraud arguments. They have failed to provide evidence of this, and instead pivoted to trying to make constitutional arguments.