Post Ratings / Reactions / Sticker Discussion & Sperging

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Null

Null

Ooperator
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
So I'm trying out something that probably wont work well.

You can now rate posts in a multidimensional way. All posts have the "facepunch" bar with different ways of critiquing a message.

You can only rate a post once.
Old likes are now a "Like" rating.
Positive and negative ratings are counted against each user.
If you receive more than 10 negative votes, and that accounts for 60% of all your posts' ratings, it will hide the message.

The system is really flexible so I'll probably be customizing them to each board in the future. As for now I want to see how it plays out.
 
Last edited:
littlebiscuits said:
I really like this, but I fear that people are still going to like the hell out of shitposts and a-logging.
Click to expand...
Good news! They already do and this can't possibly work any less effectively than what exists.

What this may encourage, however, is rating a-loggers as "funny" instead of just liking them. I may be able to filter posts by their rating, so you can maybe sort posts by "Informative" rank. Posts that are interesting and helpful won't get rated funny so you can just string those out.
 
So the clock means "old",
I think we're due for another "CWC documentary" thread

Thumbs down is obviously "dislike", the red x is "disagree", and the brown box is "autistic"
 
It's almost weird seeing the funny rating as something other than a recoloured
WVdA3IT.gif
for me.
 
I've removed the standard user's ability to see who rated their posts, as to avoid reciprocal rage downvoting or autistic gay shit like that.

Mods, Janitors, GMs, and Admins should be able to view and delete ratings.
 
Can we have an A-log rating?

And also this was said in chat -
  1. A moment ago - Stuff and Things:
    Null? if we want to be able to filter them properly, there should be rules or indications
I agree. There should be a vague thing describing what each one means if theyre not self explanatory
 
If there are gonna be filters on the threads based on how the posts were rated, shouldn't there be rules or indications on what the votes mean? i don't want to miss Marvin's or Alec's posts because i am using the "informative" filter and their posts are rated as "funny" or something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom