- Joined
- Dec 11, 2013
Jagoff has said he prefers them with a bit of "bite" in other words underdone.You also don't visibly struggle and have to pull on them to bite the meat off. Personally, I kind of prefer them "overdone" so they're falling apart, but even the more normal way of doing them doesn't sound like you're gnawing on a live animal struggling to get away.
That would imply that Jagoff cared about the end product.Why not salt and pepper each and finish with each "sauce"?
Yeah but that's why it was rigged against him because he had no family / friends there to vote for his version. Had there been actual judges he thought they'd all vote for his chili because he only used "quality ingredients".Yeah, because in his terms, the "game was rigged" as there were no dedicated judges but the visitors themselves voted. I would like to know how many people got the runs from eating Jack's environmental disaster.
Quality of course being a code word for, "what's the cheapest stuff I can get"?
The ingredients themselves aren't the problem although I'd suggest using a chuck or blade roast if you plan on using chunks of meat instead of the ground stuff. Coffee can work in chili. Coffee can also work as part of a marinade for beef. It has some very earthy flavors which can work and if you use a cup of brewed coffee it's not going to taste bitter or anything. The issue is the meat itself was freezer burned, he used cheap ingredients and honestly thought that his chipotle peppers were what were going to get him the prize.Also, who the fuck puts a coffee-crusted brisket in chili? Even if it was fresh and cooked right, that's a horrific combination that'll certainly induce projectile vomiting.