💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 170 24.3%

  • Total voters
    700
Aaron is already out of trouble. Settled via e-mail with the probation officer. He talks about it 12 minutes into his current show.
This would not be the first time Aaron gloated about victory only to end up behind bars the very next day.
 
Aaron is already out of trouble. Settled via e-mail with the probation officer. He talks about it 12 minutes into his current show.
Another win for the Toe!
Edit to add: Here's the clip:



He repeats a portion of the spiel a minute or two later- I didn't continue on to edit that in.

The short of it is, there's a process for Aaron, if he feels there's been a violation on the show, and Aaron followed it. The PO supposedly said fine, how do you prevent it happening again? Given how he repeats it, I wouldn't be surprised if the explanation is part of his talk with his PO.

Here's an AI summary, if you can't stand The Toe:
This segment of the Steel Toe Morning Show is basically Aaron doing damage control and clarifying why he panicked during Friday’s stream.

The core issue was that something inappropriate or prohibited was apparently sent into the show during “Rumble Friday.” Aaron says the content briefly appeared on-screen, triggering what he describes as a mandatory probation procedure: “stop, delete, report.” He claims he immediately:
  • stopped the stream,
  • deleted the stream,
  • and reported the incident.
According to him, he was never actually worried about getting charged or punished because he believed he followed procedure correctly. What really upset him was:
  • the extra work created by the incident,
  • losing parts of the show he thought were genuinely funny or usable as clips,
  • and having to completely nuke the stream archive.
A recurring theme is him trying to reassure viewers that there is no looming legal catastrophe. He repeatedly apologizes for making people think there was some massive crisis hanging over him. He frames the follow-up with probation authorities as routine and rehabilitative rather than punitive.

He also mentions:
  • authorities/probation staff told him they’d simply instruct complainants to contact police if they believed a crime occurred,
  • they discussed preventative measures,
  • and he proposed “three ideas” to stop similar incidents from happening again.
He refuses to explain the exact changes, saying viewers won’t notice them, but implies there will be tighter editorial controls during future Rumble Friday segments.

Tone-wise, the whole thing comes off as:
  • defensive,
  • irritated,
  • anxious about procedure,
  • but also trying hard to project that everything is under control.
The emotional center of the rant is less “I’m terrified of punishment” and more:
“I’m pissed somebody injected this garbage into my show and forced me to burn an episode I actually liked.”

The final takeaway is essentially:
  • no new catastrophe,
  • no apparent probation violation action,
  • tighter moderation going forward,
  • and Aaron trying to calm down an audience that thought something much worse had happened.
 
Last edited:
This would not be the first time Aaron gloated about victory only to end up behind bars the very next day.
I do believe him, it makes sense that he had an agreed procedure for what to do if he got trolled, and that it wouldn’t count against him if he mitigated and reported it. The PO sounds reasonable.

But still, this is Minnesota.
 
I do believe him, it makes sense that he had an agreed procedure for what to do if he got trolled, and that it wouldn’t count against him if he mitigated and reported it. The PO sounds reasonable.

But still, this is Minnesota.
It wouldn't surprise me if the PO was much more reasonable than the ADA or the judge.
 
Sean did cover it on his weekly show (timestamped):
https://youtube.com/watch?v=a5fudS7YT8Q:8943He didn't make a separate video on it, but dude's output is down since he's moving.

Nice of Legal Dicksucker to lowkey call a fat Ohio Florida man of being racist, though.

Anyway, I can only assume Balldoman hasn't done much on it either, other than cry about Aaron Imholté.

Edit:typo
All the gay stuff happens when I go radio slient for the day.
 
All the gay stuff happens when I go radio slient for the day.
nick 39.png I know that's because you are privately giving legal advice to Aaron behind the scenes, SEAAAAN! You are sharing sandwiches with him, SEEEEAAAAN! You are a legal couch, SEEEEAAAAAN!!! SEAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!
 
And Nick says he is afraid of a nice lady.

Nick, people are not afraid of you because you are some badass. They are disturbed because you act psychotic and obsess over another man's semen.
Who is more reasonable to fear?

A deranged drug addict who has personally said his life goal is to end your life, knows where you live, and has gotten volent with his wife in front of you

Or

A middle aged woman that photographs you and attends your trials?

For Nick the reasonable is ridiculous and the ridiculous is reasonable
 
Last edited:
Nick, people are not afraid of you because you are some badass. They are disturbed because you act psychotic and obsess over another man's semen.
Nick seems to be a graduate of the shit-lib school of argumentation, so it is always difficult to parse what he genuinely doesn't understand versus when he's just pretending, especially with all the brain holes now a days. However, with the "ROFL people can't even be consistent about if they're afraid of me" shit he seems genuinely incapable of understanding that Aaron saying that he could beat nick in a fair fight is in no way incompatible with him also saying that he's afraid that Nick may show up with a weapon or do something to his kids.

I still think Aaron might get an HRO based primarily on the data breach and Nick's threats that he's going to release additional confidential information. I think we've basically seen proof to the the civil standard (setting aside foundation/admissibility issues which Aaron's lawyer should be able to overcome.) that the unauthorized access happened.
 
"Backroom Legal Couch" is what Aaron should call a daily STMS segment updating people about developments in important legal cases.

Legal coverage! By retards - for retards.
Honestly that’s not a bad idea. I could stand to listen to a 5 minute update and “retard take” on things like the Karen Read case without having to sit through entire trial streams.
Get Sean on, make it snappy and funny.
 
Back
Top Bottom