Official Kiwifarms OTP shipping thread / Official Kiwi Farmer Bingo

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Would you ever meet a user offsite?

  • Yes

    Votes: 292 42.2%

  • No

    Votes: 212 30.6%

  • I have no idea

    Votes: 188 27.2%
  • Total voters
    692
Weland said:
It's a retarded wishlist lol. Just from looking at the moid bingos here I can tell who will get married soon and who will die alone and childless.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, when I die, unfortunately, I'm dying alone man.
 
617 - RXPwilP.png
Here's my bingo, do with it what you will.
Some of you people scare me
1000036603 (1).png
 
Bit of environmental storytelling here where a lot of the men's cards are a whole bunch of .2 or .1 multipliers that puts their odds well into the fractional percentages, you know, blond hair, blue eyes, that sort of stuff. Like yeah I'd love to date Konota with D cups but I'll settle for you,

-- and a lot of the women's are a bunch of .99s that read like a minimum wage online interview like "Take a shower" and "Not a cannibal" and "deodorant with aluminum" with the occasional .0001 chucked on, "Bakes and rides motorcycles". And now I'm having to sit here and wonder like, what don't I know about the intersection of baking and motorcycles?
 
Fields Of Rye said:
Bit of environmental storytelling here where a lot of the men's cards are a whole bunch of .2 or .1 multipliers that puts their odds well into the fractional percentages, you know, blond hair, blue eyes, that sort of stuff. Like yeah I'd love to date Konota with D cups but I'll settle for you,

-- and a lot of the women's are a bunch of .99s that read like a minimum wage online interview like "Take a shower" and "Not a cannibal" and "deodorant with aluminum" with the occasional .0001 chucked on, "Bakes and rides motorcycles". And now I'm having to sit here and wonder like, what don't I know about the intersection of baking and motorcycles?
Click to expand...
I went back and checked mine.
long waters said:
long-waters.webp
Click to expand...
I don't think my .2s are that bad. Overall it could be summed up as:
- is woman
- is relatively near me
- is weird nerd
- is femcelish / low partners
- is possibly a degenerate but not too degenerate, conservatively degenerate? is that a thing?
Maybe the nerdy stuff is .2ish by default. And maybe the swans thing is a .01 thing, but it should synergize with the rest of the nerdy stuff.
Honestly the most outlandish thing there is the weight thing. Doubt single women browsing the KF would be anywhere near meeting that but oh well. Not hating on any chonker groypereses, just want to be able to lift you and I'm not that strong (skill issue).
 
Fields Of Rye said:
Bit of environmental storytelling here where a lot of the men's cards are a whole bunch of .2 or .1 multipliers that puts their odds well into the fractional percentages, you know, blond hair, blue eyes, that sort of stuff. Like yeah I'd love to date Konota with D cups but I'll settle for you.
Click to expand...
Structure of a bingo matters innately more than the actual content. You can throw bad multiplier on separated row/column bingos.
There's 12 ways to win a bingo, the first space you don't qualify for removes 2-3 ways to win at first, then 0-3 ways lost per next disqualification depending on conditions.
First elimination on a diagonal guarantees 3 possible lost bingos, and a good chance of 1-2 lost bingos after, and only 0 on the case of a lost column, row, and diagonal.
This is not the case for anything not on a diagonal, which will only lose 2, or on the case of a lost column or row, 1, or both, zero.

If you have two dqs on the same diagonal at the start, you are at least losing 5 ways to win. You are already nearly halfway to losing.
On the contrary, if you have two dqs on the same row/column, you'd only lose 3.

Theoretically spitballing, you can get up to 20 spaces of leeway for a extremely unlikely bingo, or as little as ~6-7.
TL;DR, put the loose requirements on the diagonals, for a better bingo experience.

Plus, this type of bingo is an innately selective. Let's be generous and say it takes 4 spaces to win (free bingos).
If you put out a trait that 95% of people share for all 4 spaces, there's still a 18% chance failing to find these traits in any given person of that population.
Drop it to 90%, and it's ~35%. Drop it to 80%, and it's ~60%. Drop it to 50%, and it's ~94%.
It's actually better to just have one 20% on a line with various 90%+ than just have coin flips of various traits.
On a line with 3 90% traits with a 20% trait, the chance of failure is ~85%. Which isn't bad. Equivalent to a line bet in roulette.

I'd personally rather see a picky bingo than a loose one. It's more fun that way, and I'd argue that a good portion of these bingos are not serious.
 
mirai gadget 8 said:
>kurisu pfp and post attachment
>d-cup or above
>tall
>non-bio stem degree
?????
Click to expand...
I live in an area where a sizable populace of women are above 5'8, lol. It's what I grew up around. National average is like 5'6 or something, right?
Biology majors consistently pissed me off when I tutored.
The rest is I like what I like.
 
SteinserGate said:
Structure of a bingo matters innately more than the actual content. You can throw bad multiplier on separated row/column bingos.
There's 12 ways to win a bingo, the first space you don't qualify for removes 2-3 ways to win at first, then 0-3 ways lost per next disqualification depending on conditions.
First elimination on a diagonal guarantees 3 possible lost bingos, and a good chance of 1-2 lost bingos after, and only 0 on the case of a lost column, row, and diagonal.
This is not the case for anything not on a diagonal, which will only lose 2, or on the case of a lost column or row, 1, or both, zero.

If you have two dqs on the same diagonal at the start, you are at least losing 5 ways to win. You are already nearly halfway to losing.
On the contrary, if you have two dqs on the same row/column, you'd only lose 3.

Theoretically spitballing, you can get up to 20 spaces of leeway for a extremely unlikely bingo, or as little as ~6-7.
TL;DR, put the loose requirements on the diagonals, for a better bingo experience.

Plus, this type of bingo is an innately selective. Let's be generous and say it takes 4 spaces to win (free bingos).
If you put out a trait that 95% of people share for all 4 spaces, there's still a 18% chance failing to find these traits in any given person of that population.
Drop it to 90%, and it's ~35%. Drop it to 80%, and it's ~60%. Drop it to 50%, and it's ~94%.
It's actually better to just have one 20% on a line with various 90%+ than just have coin flips of various traits.
On a line with 3 90% traits with a 20% trait, the chance of failure is ~85%. Which isn't bad. Equivalent to a line bet in roulette.

I'd personally rather see a picky bingo than a loose one. It's more fun that way, and I'd argue that a good portion of these bingos are not serious.
Click to expand...
 
SteinserGate said:
Structure of a bingo matters innately more than the actual content. You can throw bad multiplier on separated row/column bingos.
There's 12 ways to win a bingo, the first space you don't qualify for removes 2-3 ways to win at first, then 0-3 ways lost per next disqualification depending on conditions.
First elimination on a diagonal guarantees 3 possible lost bingos, and a good chance of 1-2 lost bingos after, and only 0 on the case of a lost column, row, and diagonal.
This is not the case for anything not on a diagonal, which will only lose 2, or on the case of a lost column or row, 1, or both, zero.

If you have two dqs on the same diagonal at the start, you are at least losing 5 ways to win. You are already nearly halfway to losing.
On the contrary, if you have two dqs on the same row/column, you'd only lose 3.

Theoretically spitballing, you can get up to 20 spaces of leeway for a extremely unlikely bingo, or as little as ~6-7.
TL;DR, put the loose requirements on the diagonals, for a better bingo experience.

Plus, this type of bingo is an innately selective. Let's be generous and say it takes 4 spaces to win (free bingos).
If you put out a trait that 95% of people share for all 4 spaces, there's still a 18% chance failing to find these traits in any given person of that population.
Drop it to 90%, and it's ~35%. Drop it to 80%, and it's ~60%. Drop it to 50%, and it's ~94%.
It's actually better to just have one 20% on a line with various 90%+ than just have coin flips of various traits.
On a line with 3 90% traits with a 20% trait, the chance of failure is ~85%. Which isn't bad. Equivalent to a line bet in roulette.

I'd personally rather see a picky bingo than a loose one. It's more fun that way, and I'd argue that a good portion of these bingos are not serious.
Click to expand...
Congratulations on making the most autistic post in the most autistic thread on the most autistic website on the internet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom