- Joined
- Apr 27, 2023
FUCK CANADA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Canada was good without Crosby. It doesn't matter what Cunacks say on Reddit, of course they'd dishonor their players. This shit was fair good game. Cry bitches.How much of a difference would've it been if Crosby was there? I think it would've definitely kept USA on their toes a lot more after the first period. Probably there would be more scoring on both sides as they stayed fired up. I don't know if USA would've pulled it off.
Connor Hellebuyck deserves all of their medals after the performance he gave today. Kinda disappointed the Bash Bros weren't more aggressive past the first period but I'm spoiled and they got the win either way. The leafs made USA earn this win. Those are my disjointed thoughts. See you at the next one.
Sid's getting older, and while I don't think he could have scored 10 goals by himself to win the game, I do think he would have had a tangible effect on team morale. It's an interesting "what-if", at leastHow much of a difference would've it been if Crosby was there? I think it would've definitely kept USA on their toes a lot more after the first period. Probably there would be more scoring on both sides as they stayed fired up. I don't know if USA would've pulled it off.
Sid probably would've provided Canada with that know how to win edge. 40 minutes of tilting the ice and only getting one goal, Sid wouldn't have allowed that. I didn't see many deflected shots, this game was kind of a throwback on that front. Sid's still top 3 in the world on deflecting pucks into the net, maybe still number one. Also not a whole lot of below the end line play by either team, again Sid is still very elite at that. If he had been available Canada would have played differently offensively to some degreeSid's getting older, and while I don't think he could have scored 10 goals by himself to win the game, I do think he would have had a tangible effect on team morale. It's an interesting "what-if", at least
3 on 3 hockey is about a lot of fresh skaters and changes. He was probably the guy to win the faceoff then get a shooter on the iceCan anyone explain why Canada put a center out to win the face-off off in USA's zone, for him to immediately skate off for a line change forcing Canada back to neutral Ice.
What was the plan there?
That's what interests me the most. Crosby's been there before and personally made us eat shit. That experience, wisdom, and confidence is impossible to quantify.Sid's getting older, and while I don't think he could have scored 10 goals by himself to win the game, I do think he would have had a tangible effect on team morale. It's an interesting "what-if", at least
On stacked Olympic level teams how do you have someone who can win the face-off off and generate offense? Why not have Horvat out there?3 on 3 hockey is about a lot of fresh skaters and changes. He was probably the guy to win the faceoff then get a shooter on the ice
Fighting being an automatic game misconduct and ejection was bullshit too. We didn't get to see the true hatred come out because no one wanted to get ejected. DisappointingEdit: Also 3-on-3 overtime is bullshit and I will stand on that hill
you mean black guys?I do feel bad for the wives of Canada, gonna be a lot of black eyes tonight.