- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Funny thing about 3D artists is a remarkable number of them can't draw.
AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities
- Thread starter gagabobo1997
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2016
something I don't understand are the people that keep saying "two more weeks and the bubble pops!" like that suddenly means AI will vanish into the night never to be seen again. We can't go back to a pre-AI world, they have to unironically deal with it.
Goodstuff Goose
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2024
It's mostly coming from troon- and troon-worshipping communities, people who are used to denying reality and who don't have a very good track record of predicting the future.
In my experience, the angriest anti-AI seethers happen to be the same people who thought that Twitter was going to collapse back in 2022, who were very cock-sure and arrogant about Kamala winning in 2024, and who thought that the UK would actually significantly improve with the Tories out of government. Unsurprisingly, none of these predictions have come to pass.
What's actually going to happen when the AI bubble pops, is a lot of hardship for everyone as it drags the economy down the gutter with it. A lot of smaller AI startups are going to die off, and people are going to lose a lot of money (and you should expect the anti-AI crowd to cry the hardest about this). But the big players? They'll stick around, and they will adjust their business model accordingly. Not to mention that many tools, including browsers, have integrated AI models that will continue running regardless of which remote services go down. The technology is simply too versatile to give up on.
And even if there was some cultist movement across the entire Western world that banned AI simply due to vibes, then China would advance the tech nonetheless (and gain another big advantage over us).
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
One of the anti AI people that did a hunger strike against Google Deepmind put out a documentary about his shit.
His documentary (it is only 20 minutes long):
"I Went On A Hunger Strike Outside Google To Stop The AI Race"
Description:
Most of it is just rehashing "original thoughts" that other people have written and there's really nothing original in it.
Hunger strike link on k-farms
His documentary (it is only 20 minutes long):
Description:
Archive of video:
Most of it is just rehashing "original thoughts" that other people have written and there's really nothing original in it.
Hunger strike link on k-farms
Reactions:
x 22 x 29 x 17 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 2 x 1
x 22 x 29 x 17 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 2 x 1
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2016
such a good point, we literally can't stop doing AI. We'll just be handing over the next century over to China
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
I can almost guarantee you that if the anti-AI cult got companies to stop working on it the cult themselves would make it.
The most vehement and famous AI faggot (the shlomo guy) is basically responsible for pushing AI as hard as it has been pushed.
It's a 101 lesson in the Streisand effect.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
So like, would a counter-protest to a hunger strike be a bunch of fat niggas standing across from them, looking them directly in the eyes and eating Arby's? I'd give anything to participate in that, counter-protesting retards just by being a fat fuck sounds like a dream come true.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2024
how do you expect anyone old enough to vote to take you seriously if you litteraly make the whole thing into a gay youtube slop video complete with the most algorithem chasing cringe inducing video thumbnail.
They got really cocky after they got self-precieved wins on technology, such as Cryptocurrencies, VR, Metaverses, and NFTs. They think AI will follow suit.
I personally don't think any of those technology is dead in the waters.
- Joined
- May 31, 2021
They are not.
Crypto’s issue is that its value is inherently unstable. If a country or multinational company decided to use bitcoin as its main currency, things would change.
I digress though, VR and metaverses are not as indistinguishable from reality as people want, but they will get there.
NFT, I don’t know much about other than it being used for pyramid schemes, so I won’t really comment.
The difference with AI is that it has made a huge difference in daily life so rapidly.
The only other thing I would say that’s been adopted so quickly and thoroughly recently are mobile phones.
Dumb then smart.
There were people saying that phones and in particular the iPhone were gimmicks and people would soon abandon them.
There were even people who set out to avoid having a phone, but nowadays in the west life without one is increasingly difficult.
To take an Industrial Revolution example, the only lasting contribution Luddites have had was to introduce the word “sabotage” to the English language.
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2022
I think one or two countries have declared certain types of crypto to be legal tender now. Wonder how many more need to do so in order for it to stabilize.
With how much people bitch about people copying and pasting internet images without consent you'd think it never went out of fashion.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
I tried coming up with a word for this and the closest I got to was "Tiger Ride" based off a Chinese expression: "He who rides tigers cannot easily dismount."
The bomb, fractional reserve lending, computers, and AI are tiger rides. There's no going back. Even if the market crashes, the tiger ride continues.
Goodstuff Goose
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2024
Yeah like FinnSven said, LLMs are much more versatile.
Blockchain was intended as an algorithm to achieve distributed consensus. Its monetary value is merely the engine that powers its adoption, but it was never the main purpose. Unfortunately, distributed consensus is mostly an academic problem. It's a solution in search of a practical issue, and that's why the technology is no longer so hyped, outside of its monetary value. NFTs were a vanity project, a scam born out of the idea of blockchain.
VR is mainly a gaming peripheral, and the attempts to expand this to the general public, such as AR or Metaverse, have largely failed. Solutions in search of a problem.
Game streaming again mostly represented a theoretical benefit, but failed to be adopted by consumers.
Unlike all of these, LLMs are actually being used by people. The average joe has adopted it. The technology not making a profit is largely due to mismanagement by Big Tech and lofty ideas about "AGI" that will eventually be corrected.
Hi Null. Can I ask your thoughts about the parallel between AI and Trannies, and how leftists will forever defend one with all their resources they have but they invoke the name of the lord when talking the other?
Goodstuff Goose
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2024
"Be gay, do crime"
"Fuck copyright"
"Piracy is always morally good"
"Lmao NFT bros I can just save-image-as"
vs.
"AI should be illegal, it's trained on stolen intellectual property, it's stealing my art"
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2021
- Joined
- May 31, 2021
Had early bitcoin adopters had the idea of using it like traveler’s cheques, i.e. take a pen drive with a value in bitcoin with you while traveling, visit an exchange kiosk or special atm and get x amount in local currency, rather than carrying cash, then that could have been one way of making it palatable to the public and business.
Nowadays most credit cards and debit cards have totally eliminated the use of bearer bonds and traveler’s cheques, but there could have still been a market for those who don’t like being tracked.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
I don't know what you're talking about. A lot of trannies hate AI.
- Joined
- May 31, 2021
That individual is asking why “leftists” defend trannies and hate AI.
Personally I haven’t seen any specifically left wing focused or based hatred of AI.
Certainly not any serious hatred of it outside of general anti corporate/capitalism pointed objection.
The more vocal opponents of it in that regard though that I have seen are the freedom/libertarian anti big government sort of crowd who are usually a tad more right wing in their opinion and belief.
AI in regard for the traditional left would probably be viewed as a good thing if it made the lives of workers easier and social and health care more efficient.
AI is a tool, like a hammer.
It can be used to build and break, it just depends on who is using it.